Blockchains Quietly Prepare for Quantum Threat Amid Bitcoin’s Debate Over Timeline
Key Takeaways
- Many blockchains are preparing for potential threats from quantum computing by integrating post-quantum technologies.
- Ethereum views quantum computing as an engineering challenge, emphasizing early preparation given high stakes and long transition times.
- Bitcoin’s community remains divided on the urgency of addressing quantum risks, with concerns about how it’s perceived impacting Bitcoin’s market value.
- Altcoin networks like Aptos and Solana are proactively testing quantum-resistant measures, while Bitcoin’s discourse reflects tensions and trust issues.
- The broader debate emphasizes the importance of clarity and confidence in addressing long-term, ambiguous threats like quantum computing.
WEEX Crypto News, 2025-12-22 16:15:39
As we look into the ever-evolving landscape of blockchain technology, it’s becoming increasingly clear that conversations about quantum computing are taking center stage. Quantum computers remain unable to breach the security of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, yet the ripple of anxiety is already visible among the community. Recently, actions from blockchains such as Aptos and Solana have underscored a forward-thinking approach, as they both engage in testing and preparing for the eventuality of quantum advancements. Meanwhile, within the Bitcoin community, there’s a palpable dispute about whether they should adopt a more rapid approach to incorporate quantum-resistant measures.
Addressing Quantum Threats Without Raising Alarm
Ethereum has taken a particularly strategic perspective on quantum computing. The other major blockchain protocols seem to be following its lead by treating quantum-enhanced cryptography as an instrumental factor needing immediate focus. This methodology isn’t just a knee-jerk reaction to popular fears but rather a well-reasoned approach to future-proof against potential vulnerabilities. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin’s insights shed light on this, emphasizing the low-current probability of quantum breakthroughs capable of outsmarting current cryptography doesn’t excuse the lack of preparedness. He highlights that even a slight risk, owing to the high costs and complex global infrastructures reliant on secure blockchain technologies, demands proactive measures.
This sentiment has resonated across various altcoin blockchains. For instance, Aptos is proposing an opt-in post-quantum signature support system. This effort is designed to be future-ready, offering a hash-based signature scheme that circumvents the operational upheaval to existing accounts. By doing so, it balances readiness with operational continuity, allowing users who wish to adopt this new scheme the latitude to do so without enforcing a global reset.
Solana’s approach is similarly cautious yet innovative. Engaging with Project Eleven, a security firm focused on post-quantum technologies, Solana conducted extensive tests through a dedicated testnet. These tests explored the integration of quantum-resistant signatures, ensuring that potential shifts wouldn’t impair the blockchain’s performance or functionality. This form of testing shows a blend of foresight and pragmatism, signaling robustness without sending disruptive signals to users or investors.
Bitcoin’s Trust Dilemma Amid Quantum Concerns
Bitcoin, however, stands at a crossroads of ideological trust issues. The debate hinges on the blockchain’s foundational reliance on elliptic curve cryptography. Theoretically, a quantum computer adeptly using Shor’s algorithm could unravel this cryptography by deducing private keys from public ones, leading to unauthorized transactions that go unnoticed within the network. Despite this, many believe we are years away from having such quantum capabilities that can be labeled as “cryptographically relevant.”
The Bitcoin community is grappling with how best to present the quantum threat without invoking unnecessary turmoil. On one side of the spectrum, veteran Bitcoin developers and cryptographers like Adam Back dismiss immediate quantum threats, suggesting that these possibilities remain too futuristic to warrant immediate panic. Back argues that overemphasizing quantum risks may inadvertently lead to more damaging outcomes by inciting fear that subsequently affects Bitcoin’s perceived stability.
Conversely, investors and some researchers argue for the importance of tackling even a speculative threat head-on. They stress that Bitcoin’s value, immensely tied to investor confidence in its long-term security, demands visible contingency measures. Figures like Nic Carter criticize prominent dismissals of this threat as “bearish,” suggesting that such attitudes might lead to a diversification of assets away from Bitcoin.
This divide is especially pronounced with Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 360, which introduces potential quantum-resistant signature options. Although still in early stages, discussions around this proposal highlight the broader interplay of trust and skepticism pervasive in the community.
Bitcoin’s Unique Quantum Challenges
In the larger crypto ecosystem, the way quantum computing vulnerabilities are communicated and perceived radically affects investor sentiment and market dynamics. For many altcoins and emerging blockchains, work on post-quantum measures is perceived as standard infrastructure development, a strategic move rather than a signal of present vulnerabilities. By using optional upgrades, these projects can demonstrate preparedness and technological adaptability without compelling onlookers to doubt their current security protocols.
Bitcoin faces a challenging path partly because of its intrinsic value proposition. With its reputation for being a ‘store of value,’ discussions about fortifying Bitcoin’s cryptography implicate more than just technical deliberations—they potentially shake the core assurance investors hold about its longevity. Talking openly about future-proofing Bitcoin can involuntarily create a narrative of vulnerability, something Bitcoin has historically tried to avoid.
However, the underlying discussions about quantum computing for Bitcoin might extend beyond cryptographic fortifications. They must navigate the tightrope between inspiring confidence through preparation and fostering apprehensiveness by emphasizing remote threats. It emphasizes a rare situation where managing the discourse surrounding the threat may be as critical as managing the technical challenges posed by the threat itself.
FAQ
What is the current state of quantum computing in relation to cryptocurrencies?
As of today, quantum computers have not reached the capability needed to break the cryptography underpinning major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Ethereum. However, the potential future capabilities are a reason for current caution and preparation steps among blockchain developers.
How do blockchains prepare for possible quantum computing threats?
Many blockchains are preparing by experimenting with opt-in post-quantum cryptographic solutions, conducting thorough testing on testnets with quantum-resistant technologies, and proposing future-proofing solutions that accommodate eventual quantum breakthroughs without inducing panic or operational disruptions.
Why is there a debate within the Bitcoin community about addressing quantum threats?
The debate stems from different perspectives on urgency and impact. Some see the need for immediate action to bolster long-term trust, while others are wary of inciting undue panic over a technology that is still largely theoretical and years away from being a real threat.
How do investors view Bitcoin’s handling of quantum computing threats?
Investor perspectives vary; some believe addressing such risks upfront enhances confidence, while others worry that premature discussions of quantum threats could undermine current perceptions of Bitcoin’s resilience, prompting diversification and affecting market behavior.
What distinguishes Bitcoin’s handling of quantum threats compared to other blockchains?
Bitcoin is distinct in that it operates under a heightened scrutiny due to its foundational role as a decentralized store of value. Addressing quantum threats means balancing proactive defense measures with maintaining confidence in its present security promises, unlike altcoins that might treat these as mere exploratory infrastructure improvements.
You may also like

December 24th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

Base's 2025 Report Card: Revenue Grows 30X, Solidifies L2 Leadership

Venture Capital Post-Mortem 2025: Hashrate is King, Narrative is Dead

Are Those High-Raised 2021 Projects Still Alive?

Aave Community Governance Drama Escalates, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?

Key Market Information Discrepancy on December 24th - A Must-See! | Alpha Morning Report

Polymarket Announces In-House L2, Is Polygon's Ace Up?

2025 Whale Saga: Mansion Kidnapping, Supply Chain Poisoning, and Billions Liquidated

Believing in the Capital Market - The Essence and Core Value of Cryptocurrency

Absorb Polymarket Old Guard, Coinbase Plunges Into Prediction Market Abyss

Ether pumps to outsiders, dumps in-house. Can Tom Lee's team still be trusted?

Coinbase Joins Prediction Market, AAVE Governance Dispute - What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?
Over the past 24 hours, the crypto market has shown strong momentum across multiple dimensions. The mainstream discussion has focused on Coinbase's official entry into the prediction market through the acquisition of The Clearing Company, as well as the intense controversy within the AAVE community regarding token incentives and governance rights.
In terms of ecosystem development, Solana has introduced the innovative Kora fee layer aimed at reducing user transaction costs; meanwhile, the Perp DEX competition has intensified, with the showdown between Hyperliquid and Lighter sparking widespread community discussion on the future of decentralized derivatives.
This week, Coinbase announced the acquisition of The Clearing Company, marking another significant move to deepen its presence in this field after last week's announcement of launching a prediction market on its platform.
The Clearing Company's founder, Toni Gemayel, and the team will join Coinbase to jointly drive the development of the prediction market business.
Coinbase's Product Lead, Shan Aggarwal, stated that the growth of the prediction market is still in its early stages and predicts that 2026 will be the breakout year for this field.
The community has reacted positively to this, generally believing that Coinbase's entry will bring significant traffic and compliance advantages to the prediction market. However, this has also sparked discussions about the industry's competitive landscape.
Jai Bhavnani, Founder of Rivalry, commented that for startups, if their product model proves to be successful, industry giants like Coinbase have ample reason to replicate it.
This serves as a reminder to all entrepreneurs in the crypto space that they must build significant moats to withstand competition pressure from these giants.
Regulated prediction market platform Kalshi launched its research arm, Kalshi Research, this week, aimed at opening its internal data to the academic community and researchers to facilitate exploration of prediction market-related topics.
Its inaugural research report highlights Kalshi's outperformance in predicting inflation compared to Wall Street's traditional models. Kalshi co-founder Luana Lopes Lara commented that the power of prediction markets lies in the valuable data they generate, and it is now time to better utilize this data.
Meanwhile, Kalshi announced its support for the BNB Chain (BSC), allowing users to deposit and withdraw BNB and USDT via the BSC network.
This move is seen as a significant step for Kalshi to open its platform to a broader crypto user base, aiming to unlock access to the world's largest prediction market. Furthermore, Kalshi also revealed plans to host the first Prediction Market Summit in 2026 to further drive industry engagement and development.
The AAVE community recently engaged in heated debates around an Aave Improvement Proposal (AIP) titled "AAVE Tokenomics Alignment Phase One - Ownership Governance," aiming to transfer ownership and control of the Aave brand from Aave Labs to Aave DAO.
Aave founder Stani Kulechov publicly stated his intention to vote against the proposal, believing it oversimplifies the complex legal and operational structure, potentially slowing down the development process of core products like Aave V4.
The community's reaction was polarized. Some criticized Stani for adopting a "double standard" in governance and questioned whether his team had siphoned off protocol revenue, while others supported his cautious stance, arguing that significant governance changes require more thorough discussion.
This controversy highlights the tension between the ideal of DAO governance in DeFi projects and the actual power held by core development teams.
Despite governance disputes putting pressure on the AAVE token price, on-chain data shows that Stani Kulechov himself has purchased millions of dollars' worth of AAVE in the past few hours.
Simultaneously, a whale address, 0xDDC4, which had been quiet for 6 months, once again spent 500 ETH (approximately $1.53 million) to purchase 9,629 AAVE tokens. Data indicates that this whale has accumulated nearly 40,000 AAVE over the past year but is currently in an unrealized loss position.
The founder and whale's increased holdings during market volatility were interpreted by some investors as a confidence signal in AAVE's long-term value.
In this week's top article, Morpho Labs' "Curator Explained" detailed the role of "curators" in DeFi.
The article likened curators to asset managers in traditional finance, who design, deploy, and manage on-chain vaults, providing users with a one-click diversified investment portfolio.
Unlike traditional fund managers, DeFi curators execute strategies automatically through non-custodial smart contracts, allowing users to maintain full control of their assets. The article offered a new perspective on the specialization and risk management in the DeFi space.
Another widely circulated article, "Ethereum 2025: From Experiment to Global Infrastructure," provided a comprehensive summary of Ethereum's development over the past year. The article noted that 2025 is a crucial year for Ethereum's transition from an experimental project to global financial infrastructure. Through the Pectra and Fusaka hard forks, Ethereum achieved significant reductions in account abstraction and transaction costs.
Furthermore, the SEC's clarification of Ethereum's "non-securities" nature and the launch of tokenized funds on the Ethereum mainnet by traditional financial giants like JPMorgan marked Ethereum's gaining recognition from mainstream institutions. The article suggested that whether it is the continued growth of DeFi, the thriving L2 ecosystem, or the integration with the AI field, Ethereum's vision as the "world computer" is gradually becoming a reality.
The Solana Foundation engineering team released a fee layer solution called Kora this week.
Kora is a fee relayer and signatory node designed to provide the Solana ecosystem with a more flexible transaction fee payment method. Through Kora, users will be able to achieve gas-free transactions or choose to pay network fees using any stablecoin or SPL token. This innovation is seen as an important step in lowering the barrier of entry for new users and improving Solana network's availability.
Additionally, a deep research report on propAMM (proactive market maker) sparked community interest. The report's data analysis of propAMMs on Solana like HumidiFi indicated that Solana has achieved, or even surpassed, the level of transaction execution quality in traditional finance (TradFi) markets.
For example, on the SOL-USDC trading pair, HumidiFi is able to provide a highly competitive spread for large trades (0.4-1.6 bps), which is already better than the trading slippage of some mid-cap stocks in traditional markets.
Research suggests that propAMM is making the vision of the "Internet Capital Market" a reality, with Solana emerging as the prime venue for all of this to happen.
The competition in the perpetual contract DEX (Perp DEX) space is becoming increasingly heated.
In its latest official article, Hyperliquid has positioned its emerging competitor, Lighter, alongside centralized exchanges like Binance, referring to it as a platform utilizing a centralized sequencer. Hyperliquid emphasizes its transparency advantage of being "fully on-chain, operated by a validator network, and with no hidden state."
The community widely interprets this as Hyperliquid declaring "war" on Lighter. The technical differences between the two platforms have also become a focal point of discussion: Hyperliquid focuses on ultimate on-chain transparency, while Lighter emphasizes achieving "verifiable execution" through zero-knowledge proofs to provide users with a Central Limit Order Book (CLOB)-like trading experience.
This battle over the future direction of decentralized derivatives exchanges is expected to peak in 2026.
Meanwhile, discussions about Lighter's trading fees have surfaced. Some users have pointed out that Lighter charged as much as 81 basis points (0.81%) for a $2 million USD/JPY forex trade, far exceeding the near-zero spreads of traditional forex brokers.
Some argue that Lighter does not follow a B-book model that bets against market makers, instead anchoring its prices to the TradFi market, and the high fees may be related to the current liquidity or market maker balance incentives. Providing a more competitive spread for real-world assets (RWA) in the highly volatile crypto market is a key issue Lighter will need to address in the future.

The Secret Centralization Landscape of Stablecoin Payments: 85% of Transaction Volume Controlled by Top 1000 Wallets

2025 Asset Review: Why Did Bitcoin Significantly Underperform Gold and US Stocks?

Why Did Market Sentiment Completely Collapse in 2025? Decoding Messari's Ten-Thousand-Word Annual Report

Twitter 上的「虚假流量」是指通过操纵关注者数量、喜欢和转发等指标来人为增加一条推文的影响力和可信度。下面是一些常见的制造虚假流量的方法: 1. <b>购买关注者:</b> 一些用户会通过购买关注者来迅速增加他们的关注者数量,从而让他们的账号看起来更受欢迎。 2. <b>使用机器人账号:</b> 制造虚假流量的另一种常见方法是使用机器人账号自动执行喜欢、转发和评论等互动操作,从而提高一条推文的互动量。 3. <b>推文交换:</b> 一些用户之间会进行推文交换,即互相喜欢、转发对方的推文...

Audiera Sees Massive Price Surge – Key Cryptocurrency Updates
Key Takeaways Audiera (BEAT) has witnessed significant growth, experiencing a 70.10% increase in the past week. Despite the…

In Vietnam, USDT’s Use and the Reality of Web3 Adoption
Key Takeaways Vietnam has emerged as a leading nation in the adoption of cryptocurrencies, despite cultural and regulatory…
December 24th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?
Base's 2025 Report Card: Revenue Grows 30X, Solidifies L2 Leadership
Venture Capital Post-Mortem 2025: Hashrate is King, Narrative is Dead
Are Those High-Raised 2021 Projects Still Alive?
Aave Community Governance Drama Escalates, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?
Key Market Information Discrepancy on December 24th - A Must-See! | Alpha Morning Report
Popular coins
Latest Crypto News
Customer Support:@weikecs
Business Cooperation:@weikecs
Quant Trading & MM:bd@weex.com
VIP Services:support@weex.com