Header Fund 2025 Postmortem: What were the successful and unsuccessful trades made?

By: blockbeats|2026/01/04 03:30:01
Share
copy
Original Title: Fisher8 Capital 2025-In-Review
Original Source: fisher8 capital
Original Compilation: Azuma, Odaily Planet Daily

Editor's Note: 2025 is now in the past. At the beginning of the new year, many VCs are rushing to publish a retrospective of 2025 and forecasts for 2026. However, due to their own business model orientation, VCs often tend to focus more on a primary market perspective, with limited guidance for retail investors focusing on the secondary market. This retrospective and readiness content from top-tier liquidity fund Fisher8 Capital is different. It fully documents the institution's successful and failed secondary operations in 2025 and also offers some more secondary-market-oriented reflections on the market direction for 2026.

The following is the original content from Fisher8 Capital, translated by Odaily Planet Daily.

Header Fund 2025 Postmortem: What were the successful and unsuccessful trades made?

Abstract

2025 was an exceptionally challenging year for most liquidity funds, characterized by extremely aggressive capital rotation and overall underperformance of crypto assets compared to traditional assets. While Fisher8 Capital achieved some results in mainstream and on-chain assets, due to our high conviction in certain long-term themes (such as AI, DeFi, etc.), we chose to maintain relevant positions through significant drawdowns in some emerging tracks.

Ultimately, Fisher8 Capital closed the year with a 16.7% annual return. We are confident that the discipline and foresight accumulated during this highly volatile year will help us continue to outperform the market in the future. However, from a risk-adjusted perspective, we might have been better off investing our money in a daycare center.

Trade Records

Our best trade operations in 2025 were as follows.

The worst trade operations were these.

2025 Market Retrospective

Trump's Definitive Connection to the Crypto Market

Leading up to the 2024 presidential election, the market widely anticipated that a Trump victory would mark a significant turning point in the cryptocurrency regulatory environment and valuation scale. Key expectations included:

· Ending the regulatory approach of "regulation by enforcement";

· Explicit support for stablecoins;

· Exploring the establishment of a "Strategic Bitcoin Reserve";

· And launching Trump-related projects in September 2024, such as World Liberty Financial (WLFI);

These factors collectively made cryptocurrency one of the highest Beta expressions within the broader "Trump Trade," and significant policy optimism was priced in before the election results were revealed.

However, as this optimism began to wane post-election, the overall "Trump Trade" experienced a reversal. This phenomenon was evident not only in cryptocurrency assets but also in Trump-associated stocks, such as DJT, which peaked before the election and then notably declined. Despite the post-election confirmation of a more crypto-friendly policy stance, the market faced the inertia of legal and regulatory progress and a series of scattered, incremental policy outcomes, which failed to offset the overall derisking impact on "Trump-themed assets."

Furthermore, Trump himself, through his association with WLFI and the emergence of TRUMP, created a direct economic exposure to the cryptocurrency industry. This heightened market concerns—cryptocurrency assets had to some extent been financialized around Trump's personal popularity, introducing a "perception risk"—if his political capital were to decline, it could directly translate into a weakening of related asset prices.

Forbes reported that Trump's net worth increased by $30 billion during his presidency.

While these concerns are not entirely unfounded, they can be mitigated entirely through the implementation of long-term policies or a reduction in reliance on demand driven by personal charm. Most notably, the August 2025 signing of the "Executive Order on Popularizing Alternative Asset Investments" expanded the permissible scope for 401(k) retirement plan trustees to include digital assets in portfolios. Though the order did not mandate allocation, it fundamentally lowered legal and reputational barriers to institutional participation, reshaping cryptocurrency from a speculative fringe asset into one that is at least permissible in long-term capital pools.

The true significance of this shift lies not in whether a large inflow of capital will immediately occur in the short term, but in the change of market demand structure. As long-term capital associated with retirement funds is included as a possibility, the crypto market is transitioning from a halving cycle purely driven by supply to a demand-regulated cycle characterized by longer duration and stickier capital. Even if it is just marginal adoption at scale, it has the potential to lift the equilibrium price level and compress the downside volatility space compared to the 50–80% deep retracements seen in past cycles.

Narrowing of the "Risk Appetite" Trading Range

The connotation of "risk appetite" trading is becoming more complex. In contrast to previous cycles, during the risk appetite recovery phase, speculative capital would flood into Memes and long-tail assets, the return differentiation between Beta assets in 2025 was unusually significant. This was particularly evident in early October when BTC hit a new all-time high but Meme performance remained relatively muted.

Instead, investors are starting to concentrate funds in a smaller range of crypto asset subsets, such as "stock-like assets" with crypto exposure (DAT, CEX, and funds), prediction markets, or tokens with a clear value capture mechanism. This differentiation reflects market maturity: capital is becoming more selective and rapidly rotating, fund flows are more short-term oriented and narrative-driven. Investors chase local momentum, swiftly harvest gains, and keep rolling liquidity into the next narrative. In 2025, the narrative cycle is compressed, and trading durations are shorter compared to past cycles.

In this environment, the idea of holding altcoins long-term for massive returns has largely become a mirage. Except for major tokens like BTC, ETH, and SOL benefiting from institutional capital accumulation, other tokens often appreciate only during compelling narrative peaks. Once the narrative fades, liquidity dries up, and prices regress. The narrowing of the risk appetite trading range has not extended the lifespan of altcoins; instead, it has accelerated the pace of capital testing, squeezing, and abandoning new narratives. This further reinforces one judgment—true long-term crypto investment still largely focuses on a few assets.

Expansion of Digital Asset Treasuries (DAT)

The rise of Digital Asset Treasuries (DAT) has introduced a new capital formation mechanism designed to replicate MicroStrategy's successful path. DATs allow public companies to raise funds and allocate directly to crypto assets, creating an embedded crypto exposure proxy. This bypasses a regulatory vacuum until the approval of altcoin ETFs.

As this type of structure rapidly proliferates, the market quickly shows signs of frothiness — a large number of new vehicles are eagerly packaging themselves as a "DAT" of some meme coin, even if the asset lacks genuine and sustained demand.

Many of the capital structures adopted by these meme coin DATs we classify as predatory structures. Specifically, these structures often engage in financial engineering by exchanging tokenized assets for equity in a manner designed to introduce a new cohort of participants while creating exit liquidity; paired with a very low-cost, highly favorable lock-up private sale round.

These mechanisms allow insiders to offload substantial amounts with minimal buy-side pressure, causing retail investors to be rapidly drained of value in both the equity and token markets simultaneously. This mismatch of scale is particularly pronounced in some aggressive DAT schemes — with some companies attempting to raise funds far exceeding their public market cap.

Investment Theme for 2026

Conclusion 1: Asymmetric Returns Will Emerge at the Application Layer

The "Fat Protocol Thesis" and "Moneyness" narrative that historically underpinned the "monetary premium era" enjoyed by the new generation of meme Layer1 is coming to an end. This premium was primarily supported by the belief that infrastructure would disproportionately capture value, with its token ultimately evolving into a global store of value asset.

However, the market has already integrated this monetary function around mainstream assets like BTC, ETH, SOL, as well as stablecoins, completely detaching the new Layer1's "moneyness" imaginative space.

Layer1 token Historical All-Time High Fully Diluted Valuation (ATH FDV) per vintage TGE year statistics.

With the disappearance of the "moneyness" moat, the social consensus that previously bestowed multi-billion-dollar valuations upon new public chains is disintegrating. Since 2020, meme Layer1's historical ATH FDV has shown a clear structural downtrend, strongly indicating the continued waning of the monetary premium.

Furthermore, the remaining valuation "floor" that still exists is largely artificial: in recent years, many Layer1 projects have launched through fixed-price ICOs or direct listings on CEXs, with the team artificially setting the initial price. If these assets were subjected to true price discovery at launch, we believe their valuation would most likely fail to come close to historical average levels of past cycles.

This trend of valuation collapse is further amplified by the inertia advantage of existing public chains. The mature ecosystem already has a large number of "sticky applications" that firmly hold users, creating a very high barrier to entry for new entrants to the Layer1 scene.

From a data perspective, since 2022, around 70–80% of DEX trading volume and TVL has consistently been concentrated on three chains. Ethereum has always held its ground, while the other two positions have rotated in different cycles. For newcomers, breaking this oligopoly structure is almost like fighting an uphill battle, as historical experience shows that most projects ultimately fail to secure a long-term position.

Comparison of Application Revenue / Chain Revenue for ETH, SOL, and BNB.

We believe the repricing of application tokens has begun, with the key driver being a significant deviation in value capture ability between Layer1 tokens and underlying applications. As shown in the chart above, over the past two years, application layer revenue has diverged significantly from infrastructure revenue: application revenue in the ETH and SOL ecosystems has grown by as much as 200–300 times.

However, the market value of applications still only represents a small fraction of their L1 market value. As the market gradually matures, we expect this mismatch to be corrected through capital rotation from overvalued infrastructure assets to applications with real revenue.

Conclusion Two: Midterm Elections Will Shape a High-Volatility Environment

The current focus of the Trump administration's policies appears to be on ensuring victory in the 2026 midterm elections, with an overall policy bias towards supporting short-term economic momentum. The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA)" stimulates demand through deficit financing, marginally increasing the probability of an inflationary reflation environment. For digital assets, this fiscal expansion is favorable for hard assets like Bitcoin, once again making it the ultimate "scarcity hedge tool" in essence.

At the same time, this fiscal expansion is also highly likely to encounter supply-side constraints in certain areas, such as grid capacity and manufacturing capacity. These bottlenecks will create inflationary pressures at the input cost and wage level in relevant industries, even as the overall level remains suppressed by structural deflationary forces such as tariff normalization and AI-driven productivity improvements.

The macro environmental characteristic that emerges from this is—nominal growth is tilted to the upside, but volatility rises in sync, causing the market to periodically reprice inflation risks. This tension will structurally elevate volatility. The market may oscillate between "reflation optimism" and "resurgence of inflation concerns," especially as economic data gradually reveal capacity constraints rather than insufficient demand.

Overlaying this macro backdrop is the historical pattern of the midterm election cycle lifting the political risk premium—investors typically demand higher risk compensation before elections to deal with policy uncertainty. Underpinning this trend is a clear political motive—to tolerate, or even widen, the fiscal deficit during the midterm election cycle. Additionally, if the Fed leadership becomes more dovish, it will also provide a more accommodative liquidity environment for risk assets.

Although this combination implies higher volatility in the short term, looking ahead, with OBBBA's impact compounded by the continued advancement of crypto-specific legislation, we still believe 2026 will be a constructive year for digital assets, albeit with a bumpier path.

Conclusion Three: Selective Enhancement, Shaping a Tokenomics of K-shaped Differentiation

The crypto market is bidding farewell to the era of indiscriminate capital allocation and entering a brutal period of structural differentiation—a K-shaped economy dominated by selectivity. The era of rising tides lifting all boats has ended. The market has shifted from blindly chasing speculative narratives to focusing more on the alignment of interests at the protocol level and among token holders.

At the core of this shift is a wholesale rejection of the "Equity-Token Split" model by the market. This structure was initially designed to withstand regulatory pressures in the Gensler era, but its executable ambiguity has always been a significant hazard. In this model: insiders (the team and VCs) hold the real value (IP, revenue, equity); retail investors, however, only receive "governance tokens" without any executable rights.

This mismatch has created a two-tier system—insiders have the fundamentals, while token holders have sentiment. As the market struggles to differentiate the true state of different protocols, it ultimately opts to uniformly discount the entire sector. Therefore, the current downward cycle is fundamentally a repricing of trust. The future winners will depend on their ability to demonstrate a clear, executable, and sustainable path to capturing value.

In this new paradigm, the "Upper K" of the K-shaped recovery will be composed of teams that replace "trust me" with "verify me." Here, credibility no longer comes from the reputation of the founders or social capital but from their willingness to proactively impose structural constraints on themselves. These teams demonstrate their ability to achieve value alignment through: making the value engine auditable; rendering the flow of revenue executable; proactively divesting themselves of the ability to transfer value off-chain. This transparency will form the basis of token holder confidence—during the downward cycle, sticky capital will be willing to support their valuation because they trust the mechanism, not just the people.

Blockworks' Token Transparency Dashboard is a valuable tool that categorizes protocols based on the level of disclosure required by the framework.

Conversely, assets at the downward end of the "K-shaped" curve are facing a liquidity crisis triggered by team reputation collapse. The market now sees opacity as an acknowledgment of conflicting interests. If a team refuses to clarify the relationship between protocol revenue and the token, investors often assume this relationship does not exist at all. In the absence of the high-cost signal of "executable value capture," these tokens cannot be fundamentally valued, and when the narrative fades, there are no natural buyers to support them. Teams that require investors to rely on "good faith" or selectively opaque future commitments are systematically being eliminated, destined to continue bleeding out in competition with high-quality protocols.

Other Initial Insights

The collectibles market will further expand — and extend into the sports memorabilia sector, especially items related to major historical moments with high intrinsic value. For example, Shohei Ohtani's 50/50 home run ball set a new auction record.

The prediction market is poised to become the new Meta. Following Hyperliquid's TGE, which had a demonstrative effect on the entire track, the TGEs of Polymarket and Kalshi are expected to ignite the prediction market narrative.

The scrutiny of the "Equity-Token" dual structure will continue to intensify. More and more investors will demand clear, auditable explanations of value distribution, clarifying how economic value is divided between equity holders and token holders; otherwise, a shift to a pure token structure will be necessary.

The potential risk of DAT being excluded from the MSCI index (final decision date: January 15, 2026) is closely watched by the market. Once this uncertainty is removed, it could trigger a new round of early-year rebound.

"Ownership Coins" will become the new norm, structurally reducing founder's "chronic Rug" risk.

DApps with privacy capabilities will be welcomed to a higher degree by both retail and institutional players. Protocols that can balance user experience and programmability while achieving a high level of compliance will win the final victory in the privacy race.

Tokenized stocks will go through an accelerated version of the "boom-bust" cycle as their initial adoption scale is likely still limited.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more