- Buy Crypto
- Markets
- Futures
- Spot
- Copy Trade
WE-Launch
Hyperliquid JELLY Exploiter Faces Potential $1M Loss, Arkham Reveals
Imagine diving into the wild world of crypto trading, where a single clever move can make or break fortunes overnight. That’s exactly the thrilling yet risky scene unfolding on Hyperliquid, where a trader’s bold attempt to game the system with the JELLY memecoin has backfired spectacularly. According to fresh insights from blockchain analytics experts at Arkham Intelligence, this so-called exploiter might be staring down a hefty loss, with nearly a million dollars still trapped on the platform as of August 21, 2025. Let’s unpack this high-stakes drama and see how it highlights the perils of manipulative trading in the decentralized finance space.
Suspicious Activity on Hyperliquid Leaves Trader in a Bind
Picture a trader spotting an opportunity to outsmart the market, only to get caught in their own web. That’s the story Arkham Intelligence shared in their March 26 analysis on X, detailing how this individual engaged in questionable maneuvers on Hyperliquid involving the Jelly my Jelly (JELLY) memecoin. The result? The platform froze and delisted the token, leaving the trader potentially out almost $1 million from their risky plays.
Arkham’s deep dive reveals the trader set up three accounts in quick succession—just five minutes apart. Two accounts loaded up with massive long positions: one at $2.15 million and another at $1.9 million. The third? A whopping $4.1 million short position designed to offset those longs. This setup was no accident; it was a calculated bid to ramp up leverage and siphon funds from Hyperliquid itself, as Arkham explained in their post-mortem breakdown.
When JELLY’s price skyrocketed by more than 400%, that $4 million short hit liquidation territory. But here’s where it gets tricky— the position was so enormous that it didn’t liquidate right away. Instead, it shifted to Hyperliquid’s Liquidity Provider Vault (HLP), which is built to handle and unwind such oversized trades smoothly.
The Trader’s Quick Moves and Hyperliquid’s Response
In a twist that feels straight out of a crypto thriller, the trader tried to cash in by pulling collateral from the other two accounts amid a seven-figure unrealized profit. Arkham noted they managed to withdraw funds while the system lagged, but Hyperliquid wasn’t about to let that slide. The platform slapped restrictions on those accounts, limiting them to reduce-only orders. This forced the trader to offload tokens from the first account directly on the market, scraping back whatever they could.
Eventually, Hyperliquid stepped in decisively, shutting down the JELLY token market at a fixed price of 0.0095—matching the trader’s original short entry. This move effectively wiped out all floating profits and losses on the first two accounts, neutralizing the scheme. All told, the trader walked away with $6.26 million in withdrawals, but a significant chunk— at least $1 million— remains locked in the accounts.
Arkham crunched the numbers: if the trader can eventually access those funds, their escapade cost them a mere $4,000. But if not, they’re looking at a near-million-dollar hit. Hyperliquid followed up by delisting the perpetual futures for JELLY, pointing to clear signs of dodgy market behavior as the reason.
To put this in perspective, think of it like trying to cheat at a high-stakes poker game where the house has eyes everywhere. The trader’s leverage play was like stacking the deck, but Hyperliquid’s safeguards acted as the vigilant dealer, reshuffling to protect the table. This incident underscores how platforms like Hyperliquid use mechanisms like the HLP to maintain fairness, much like a safety net in a trapeze act, catching falls before they turn disastrous.
Patterns of Similar Tactics Emerge on Hyperliquid
This JELLY saga isn’t an isolated blip on Hyperliquid’s radar. Back on March 14, the platform ramped up margin requirements after its liquidity pool took a $4 million hit from a massive Ether (ETH) liquidation event. A big-time trader deliberately tanked a $200 million ETH long position on March 12, costing the HLP dearly as it scrambled to close the trade.
Traders have since turned this into a sort of game, actively scouting and targeting oversized leveraged positions in what some call a “democratized” hunt for whales. It’s like a digital safari, where smaller players band together to take down the giants, adding an extra layer of excitement—and risk—to the ecosystem.
Recent buzz on Twitter as of August 21, 2025, shows users still debating these tactics, with posts from crypto influencers highlighting how such exploits echo broader DeFi vulnerabilities. For instance, a viral thread from @CryptoWhaleWatcher discussed similar manipulation attempts on other platforms, amassing over 10,000 likes and sparking conversations about the need for stronger on-chain protections. Official announcements from Hyperliquid confirm they’ve enhanced monitoring since the incident, with a blog post last month emphasizing upgraded liquidation algorithms to prevent repeats.
On Google, frequently searched questions revolve around “How to avoid liquidation on Hyperliquid” and “Is Hyperliquid safe for trading memecoins?”—reflecting user concerns amid these events. The most discussed Twitter topics include the ethics of whale hunting and whether platforms should impose stricter position limits, with recent updates noting no new major exploits reported in the past quarter.
Aligning with Reliable Trading Platforms Like WEEX
In the midst of these turbulent stories, it’s refreshing to consider platforms that prioritize security and user trust, aligning perfectly with the evolving needs of crypto enthusiasts. Take WEEX exchange, for example—a standout in the space known for its robust risk management and transparent operations. By offering advanced tools for safe leveraged trading without the pitfalls seen elsewhere, WEEX helps traders navigate volatile markets confidently, fostering a community where innovation meets reliability. This kind of brand alignment ensures that whether you’re chasing memecoins or building long-term strategies, you’re backed by a platform committed to fairness and cutting-edge tech.
Exploring Native Rollups and Broader Innovations
Diving deeper into the tech side, it’s worth noting related advancements like native rollups, which are revolutionizing Ethereum’s scalability. These innovations act like turbochargers for blockchain efficiency, bundling transactions to reduce costs and speed—much like compressing a file to make it zip through the internet faster. In contrast to Hyperliquid’s challenges, such tech could inspire more resilient DeFi systems, backed by real-world examples from projects scaling millions of transactions daily without the drama.
Wrapping this up, the Hyperliquid JELLY incident serves as a compelling reminder of the fine line between smart trading and outright manipulation. It’s a story that keeps the crypto community on its toes, pushing for better safeguards while celebrating the ingenuity that drives the space forward.
FAQ
What exactly happened with the JELLY token on Hyperliquid?
A trader attempted to manipulate JELLY’s price through coordinated long and short positions across multiple accounts, leading to a market freeze and delisting after suspicious activity was detected, as detailed by Arkham Intelligence.
Is Hyperliquid still vulnerable to such exploits?
While Hyperliquid has bolstered margin requirements and monitoring since the March incidents, ongoing discussions suggest risks persist in high-leverage trading, though recent updates show improved liquidation handling to mitigate large-scale manipulations.
How can traders protect themselves from similar liquidation risks?
Focus on platforms with strong safeguards, manage leverage carefully, and stay informed via analytics like Arkham’s reports—using tools that align with secure practices to avoid getting caught in volatile swings.
You may also like
December 24th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?
Aave Community Governance Drama Escalates, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?
Where Did $362 Million Go? Hyperliquid Counters FUD in Decentralization Showdown
2025 Whale Saga: Mansion Kidnapping, Supply Chain Poisoning, and Billions Liquidated
Coinbase Joins Prediction Market, AAVE Governance Dispute - What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?
Over the past 24 hours, the crypto market has shown strong momentum across multiple dimensions. The mainstream discussion has focused on Coinbase's official entry into the prediction market through the acquisition of The Clearing Company, as well as the intense controversy within the AAVE community regarding token incentives and governance rights.
In terms of ecosystem development, Solana has introduced the innovative Kora fee layer aimed at reducing user transaction costs; meanwhile, the Perp DEX competition has intensified, with the showdown between Hyperliquid and Lighter sparking widespread community discussion on the future of decentralized derivatives.
This week, Coinbase announced the acquisition of The Clearing Company, marking another significant move to deepen its presence in this field after last week's announcement of launching a prediction market on its platform.
The Clearing Company's founder, Toni Gemayel, and the team will join Coinbase to jointly drive the development of the prediction market business.
Coinbase's Product Lead, Shan Aggarwal, stated that the growth of the prediction market is still in its early stages and predicts that 2026 will be the breakout year for this field.
The community has reacted positively to this, generally believing that Coinbase's entry will bring significant traffic and compliance advantages to the prediction market. However, this has also sparked discussions about the industry's competitive landscape.
Jai Bhavnani, Founder of Rivalry, commented that for startups, if their product model proves to be successful, industry giants like Coinbase have ample reason to replicate it.
This serves as a reminder to all entrepreneurs in the crypto space that they must build significant moats to withstand competition pressure from these giants.
Regulated prediction market platform Kalshi launched its research arm, Kalshi Research, this week, aimed at opening its internal data to the academic community and researchers to facilitate exploration of prediction market-related topics.
Its inaugural research report highlights Kalshi's outperformance in predicting inflation compared to Wall Street's traditional models. Kalshi co-founder Luana Lopes Lara commented that the power of prediction markets lies in the valuable data they generate, and it is now time to better utilize this data.
Meanwhile, Kalshi announced its support for the BNB Chain (BSC), allowing users to deposit and withdraw BNB and USDT via the BSC network.
This move is seen as a significant step for Kalshi to open its platform to a broader crypto user base, aiming to unlock access to the world's largest prediction market. Furthermore, Kalshi also revealed plans to host the first Prediction Market Summit in 2026 to further drive industry engagement and development.
The AAVE community recently engaged in heated debates around an Aave Improvement Proposal (AIP) titled "AAVE Tokenomics Alignment Phase One - Ownership Governance," aiming to transfer ownership and control of the Aave brand from Aave Labs to Aave DAO.
Aave founder Stani Kulechov publicly stated his intention to vote against the proposal, believing it oversimplifies the complex legal and operational structure, potentially slowing down the development process of core products like Aave V4.
The community's reaction was polarized. Some criticized Stani for adopting a "double standard" in governance and questioned whether his team had siphoned off protocol revenue, while others supported his cautious stance, arguing that significant governance changes require more thorough discussion.
This controversy highlights the tension between the ideal of DAO governance in DeFi projects and the actual power held by core development teams.
Despite governance disputes putting pressure on the AAVE token price, on-chain data shows that Stani Kulechov himself has purchased millions of dollars' worth of AAVE in the past few hours.
Simultaneously, a whale address, 0xDDC4, which had been quiet for 6 months, once again spent 500 ETH (approximately $1.53 million) to purchase 9,629 AAVE tokens. Data indicates that this whale has accumulated nearly 40,000 AAVE over the past year but is currently in an unrealized loss position.
The founder and whale's increased holdings during market volatility were interpreted by some investors as a confidence signal in AAVE's long-term value.
In this week's top article, Morpho Labs' "Curator Explained" detailed the role of "curators" in DeFi.
The article likened curators to asset managers in traditional finance, who design, deploy, and manage on-chain vaults, providing users with a one-click diversified investment portfolio.
Unlike traditional fund managers, DeFi curators execute strategies automatically through non-custodial smart contracts, allowing users to maintain full control of their assets. The article offered a new perspective on the specialization and risk management in the DeFi space.
Another widely circulated article, "Ethereum 2025: From Experiment to Global Infrastructure," provided a comprehensive summary of Ethereum's development over the past year. The article noted that 2025 is a crucial year for Ethereum's transition from an experimental project to global financial infrastructure. Through the Pectra and Fusaka hard forks, Ethereum achieved significant reductions in account abstraction and transaction costs.
Furthermore, the SEC's clarification of Ethereum's "non-securities" nature and the launch of tokenized funds on the Ethereum mainnet by traditional financial giants like JPMorgan marked Ethereum's gaining recognition from mainstream institutions. The article suggested that whether it is the continued growth of DeFi, the thriving L2 ecosystem, or the integration with the AI field, Ethereum's vision as the "world computer" is gradually becoming a reality.
The Solana Foundation engineering team released a fee layer solution called Kora this week.
Kora is a fee relayer and signatory node designed to provide the Solana ecosystem with a more flexible transaction fee payment method. Through Kora, users will be able to achieve gas-free transactions or choose to pay network fees using any stablecoin or SPL token. This innovation is seen as an important step in lowering the barrier of entry for new users and improving Solana network's availability.
Additionally, a deep research report on propAMM (proactive market maker) sparked community interest. The report's data analysis of propAMMs on Solana like HumidiFi indicated that Solana has achieved, or even surpassed, the level of transaction execution quality in traditional finance (TradFi) markets.
For example, on the SOL-USDC trading pair, HumidiFi is able to provide a highly competitive spread for large trades (0.4-1.6 bps), which is already better than the trading slippage of some mid-cap stocks in traditional markets.
Research suggests that propAMM is making the vision of the "Internet Capital Market" a reality, with Solana emerging as the prime venue for all of this to happen.
The competition in the perpetual contract DEX (Perp DEX) space is becoming increasingly heated.
In its latest official article, Hyperliquid has positioned its emerging competitor, Lighter, alongside centralized exchanges like Binance, referring to it as a platform utilizing a centralized sequencer. Hyperliquid emphasizes its transparency advantage of being "fully on-chain, operated by a validator network, and with no hidden state."
The community widely interprets this as Hyperliquid declaring "war" on Lighter. The technical differences between the two platforms have also become a focal point of discussion: Hyperliquid focuses on ultimate on-chain transparency, while Lighter emphasizes achieving "verifiable execution" through zero-knowledge proofs to provide users with a Central Limit Order Book (CLOB)-like trading experience.
This battle over the future direction of decentralized derivatives exchanges is expected to peak in 2026.
Meanwhile, discussions about Lighter's trading fees have surfaced. Some users have pointed out that Lighter charged as much as 81 basis points (0.81%) for a $2 million USD/JPY forex trade, far exceeding the near-zero spreads of traditional forex brokers.
Some argue that Lighter does not follow a B-book model that bets against market makers, instead anchoring its prices to the TradFi market, and the high fees may be related to the current liquidity or market maker balance incentives. Providing a more competitive spread for real-world assets (RWA) in the highly volatile crypto market is a key issue Lighter will need to address in the future.
Why Did Market Sentiment Completely Collapse in 2025? Decoding Messari's Ten-Thousand-Word Annual Report
Open Source Achilles' Heel: Nofx and Its 9,000-Star Drama, Forking Fiasco, and Open Source Controversy
Upcoming Lighter TGE: What Is a Reasonable Valuation? As a finance and blockchain translation expert, you are familiar with the field's slang and terminology.
Security Tokenization and Prediction Markets: 7 Major Crypto Boons to Watch in 2026
Aave Yield Distribution Dispute, Solana Surpasses Ethereum in Revenue, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?
Wang Chun was also a victim: A $50 million USD sky-high "tuition fee". Why is address poisoning so successful?
Messari 2026 Research Report: Insights into Seven Key Crypto Trends
Key Market Insights from December 19th, How Much Did You Miss Out?
UNI Burn Proposal Vote, Lighter TGE Outlook, What's the Topic of Conversation in the Global Crypto Community Today?
Hyperliquid Price Projection: Anticipated Decline to $19.46 by December 22, 2025
Hyperliquid’s market sentiment remains overwhelmingly bearish, with a projected price drop of -22.76% in the next five days.…
Fartcoin Falls Below Critical Price Point Amidst Market Uncertainty
Key Takeaways Fartcoin’s value briefly dipped below $0.29, registering an approximate 8.4% decline to reach $0.28 before stabilizing.…
Hyperliquid User Experiences $21 Million Loss Due to Key Leak
Key Takeaways A Hyperliquid user experienced a $21 million loss as a result of a private key leak,…
Why does Hyperliquid earn less than Coinbase?
December 24th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?
Aave Community Governance Drama Escalates, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?
Where Did $362 Million Go? Hyperliquid Counters FUD in Decentralization Showdown
2025 Whale Saga: Mansion Kidnapping, Supply Chain Poisoning, and Billions Liquidated
Coinbase Joins Prediction Market, AAVE Governance Dispute - What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?
Over the past 24 hours, the crypto market has shown strong momentum across multiple dimensions. The mainstream discussion has focused on Coinbase's official entry into the prediction market through the acquisition of The Clearing Company, as well as the intense controversy within the AAVE community regarding token incentives and governance rights.
In terms of ecosystem development, Solana has introduced the innovative Kora fee layer aimed at reducing user transaction costs; meanwhile, the Perp DEX competition has intensified, with the showdown between Hyperliquid and Lighter sparking widespread community discussion on the future of decentralized derivatives.
This week, Coinbase announced the acquisition of The Clearing Company, marking another significant move to deepen its presence in this field after last week's announcement of launching a prediction market on its platform.
The Clearing Company's founder, Toni Gemayel, and the team will join Coinbase to jointly drive the development of the prediction market business.
Coinbase's Product Lead, Shan Aggarwal, stated that the growth of the prediction market is still in its early stages and predicts that 2026 will be the breakout year for this field.
The community has reacted positively to this, generally believing that Coinbase's entry will bring significant traffic and compliance advantages to the prediction market. However, this has also sparked discussions about the industry's competitive landscape.
Jai Bhavnani, Founder of Rivalry, commented that for startups, if their product model proves to be successful, industry giants like Coinbase have ample reason to replicate it.
This serves as a reminder to all entrepreneurs in the crypto space that they must build significant moats to withstand competition pressure from these giants.
Regulated prediction market platform Kalshi launched its research arm, Kalshi Research, this week, aimed at opening its internal data to the academic community and researchers to facilitate exploration of prediction market-related topics.
Its inaugural research report highlights Kalshi's outperformance in predicting inflation compared to Wall Street's traditional models. Kalshi co-founder Luana Lopes Lara commented that the power of prediction markets lies in the valuable data they generate, and it is now time to better utilize this data.
Meanwhile, Kalshi announced its support for the BNB Chain (BSC), allowing users to deposit and withdraw BNB and USDT via the BSC network.
This move is seen as a significant step for Kalshi to open its platform to a broader crypto user base, aiming to unlock access to the world's largest prediction market. Furthermore, Kalshi also revealed plans to host the first Prediction Market Summit in 2026 to further drive industry engagement and development.
The AAVE community recently engaged in heated debates around an Aave Improvement Proposal (AIP) titled "AAVE Tokenomics Alignment Phase One - Ownership Governance," aiming to transfer ownership and control of the Aave brand from Aave Labs to Aave DAO.
Aave founder Stani Kulechov publicly stated his intention to vote against the proposal, believing it oversimplifies the complex legal and operational structure, potentially slowing down the development process of core products like Aave V4.
The community's reaction was polarized. Some criticized Stani for adopting a "double standard" in governance and questioned whether his team had siphoned off protocol revenue, while others supported his cautious stance, arguing that significant governance changes require more thorough discussion.
This controversy highlights the tension between the ideal of DAO governance in DeFi projects and the actual power held by core development teams.
Despite governance disputes putting pressure on the AAVE token price, on-chain data shows that Stani Kulechov himself has purchased millions of dollars' worth of AAVE in the past few hours.
Simultaneously, a whale address, 0xDDC4, which had been quiet for 6 months, once again spent 500 ETH (approximately $1.53 million) to purchase 9,629 AAVE tokens. Data indicates that this whale has accumulated nearly 40,000 AAVE over the past year but is currently in an unrealized loss position.
The founder and whale's increased holdings during market volatility were interpreted by some investors as a confidence signal in AAVE's long-term value.
In this week's top article, Morpho Labs' "Curator Explained" detailed the role of "curators" in DeFi.
The article likened curators to asset managers in traditional finance, who design, deploy, and manage on-chain vaults, providing users with a one-click diversified investment portfolio.
Unlike traditional fund managers, DeFi curators execute strategies automatically through non-custodial smart contracts, allowing users to maintain full control of their assets. The article offered a new perspective on the specialization and risk management in the DeFi space.
Another widely circulated article, "Ethereum 2025: From Experiment to Global Infrastructure," provided a comprehensive summary of Ethereum's development over the past year. The article noted that 2025 is a crucial year for Ethereum's transition from an experimental project to global financial infrastructure. Through the Pectra and Fusaka hard forks, Ethereum achieved significant reductions in account abstraction and transaction costs.
Furthermore, the SEC's clarification of Ethereum's "non-securities" nature and the launch of tokenized funds on the Ethereum mainnet by traditional financial giants like JPMorgan marked Ethereum's gaining recognition from mainstream institutions. The article suggested that whether it is the continued growth of DeFi, the thriving L2 ecosystem, or the integration with the AI field, Ethereum's vision as the "world computer" is gradually becoming a reality.
The Solana Foundation engineering team released a fee layer solution called Kora this week.
Kora is a fee relayer and signatory node designed to provide the Solana ecosystem with a more flexible transaction fee payment method. Through Kora, users will be able to achieve gas-free transactions or choose to pay network fees using any stablecoin or SPL token. This innovation is seen as an important step in lowering the barrier of entry for new users and improving Solana network's availability.
Additionally, a deep research report on propAMM (proactive market maker) sparked community interest. The report's data analysis of propAMMs on Solana like HumidiFi indicated that Solana has achieved, or even surpassed, the level of transaction execution quality in traditional finance (TradFi) markets.
For example, on the SOL-USDC trading pair, HumidiFi is able to provide a highly competitive spread for large trades (0.4-1.6 bps), which is already better than the trading slippage of some mid-cap stocks in traditional markets.
Research suggests that propAMM is making the vision of the "Internet Capital Market" a reality, with Solana emerging as the prime venue for all of this to happen.
The competition in the perpetual contract DEX (Perp DEX) space is becoming increasingly heated.
In its latest official article, Hyperliquid has positioned its emerging competitor, Lighter, alongside centralized exchanges like Binance, referring to it as a platform utilizing a centralized sequencer. Hyperliquid emphasizes its transparency advantage of being "fully on-chain, operated by a validator network, and with no hidden state."
The community widely interprets this as Hyperliquid declaring "war" on Lighter. The technical differences between the two platforms have also become a focal point of discussion: Hyperliquid focuses on ultimate on-chain transparency, while Lighter emphasizes achieving "verifiable execution" through zero-knowledge proofs to provide users with a Central Limit Order Book (CLOB)-like trading experience.
This battle over the future direction of decentralized derivatives exchanges is expected to peak in 2026.
Meanwhile, discussions about Lighter's trading fees have surfaced. Some users have pointed out that Lighter charged as much as 81 basis points (0.81%) for a $2 million USD/JPY forex trade, far exceeding the near-zero spreads of traditional forex brokers.
Some argue that Lighter does not follow a B-book model that bets against market makers, instead anchoring its prices to the TradFi market, and the high fees may be related to the current liquidity or market maker balance incentives. Providing a more competitive spread for real-world assets (RWA) in the highly volatile crypto market is a key issue Lighter will need to address in the future.
Why Did Market Sentiment Completely Collapse in 2025? Decoding Messari's Ten-Thousand-Word Annual Report
Popular coins
Latest Crypto News
Customer Support：@weikecs
Business Cooperation：@weikecs
Quant Trading & MM：bd@weex.com
VIP Services：support@weex.com
App