Rejecting the "Security Theater": Wallet Security is Entering the Era of Verifiability
Source: OKX
By 2025, Web3 will enter a new stage of "larger scale, higher-frequency usage," and wallets will accelerate their evolution from a "coin storage tool" to a chain-entry and transaction operating system. Market research firm Fortune Business Insights estimates that the cryptocurrency wallet market will reach around $12.2 billion in 2025 and may grow to $98.57 billion by 2034.
User-side expansion is also evident: a16z crypto estimated in the "State of Crypto 2025" that there are approximately 40-70 million active crypto users, with about 716 million crypto asset holders who "hold assets but may not necessarily be active on-chain"; Crypto.com Research's report also states that the global crypto holders increased from 681 million in the first half of 2025 to 708 million.
On the flip side of the increasing scale and penetration rate is the simultaneous amplification of security risks. It is no longer just about "whether the smart contract has vulnerabilities" but about intercepting risks at the user's critical points, such as clicking on links, connecting wallets, signing authorizations, and processing transactions.
In the on-chain world, the "attack surface" often extends beyond smart contract vulnerabilities and is more commonly related to low-barrier phishing, fake domains, impersonation of customer service, and authorization fraud as "pre-transaction risks." For example, Chainalysis defines "crypto drainers (wallet emptiers/phishing authorization tools)" as tools that do not steal account passwords but instead deceive users into connecting their wallets and approving malicious transaction authorizations, allowing assets to be drained directly. Public data also shows that in 2024, losses related to "wallet drainers" were close to the $500 million mark.
Therefore, enhancing the security of Web3 wallets will no longer focus solely on whether smart contracts have vulnerabilities but will need to pay further attention to how to proactively intercept risks at key user behavior points, known as "pre-transaction security."
In such an industry context, "security" is becoming increasingly challenging to address with a simple slogan but instead resembles a governance capability that needs continuous validation: whether it can be verified, whether it can be traced, and whether it can be disclosed in a timely manner are becoming important criteria for users in choosing a wallet.
From "Security Claims" to "Understandable Security Capability List"
For a long time, when wallet projects discussed security, common rhetoric included "we have undergone audits," "we have a whitepaper," and "we focus heavily on risk management." However, with the industrialization of scams and phishing, this "security claim" is losing its persuasiveness. The moment users truly encounter issues often happens in very brief interactions such as clicking on links, connecting wallets, and signing authorizations. The "crypto drainers" described by Chainalysis are a typical path: attackers disguise themselves as a legitimate page, guide users to complete authorization, and then transfer the assets; their research even mentions cases of forging Magic Eden pages and carrying out malicious transactions targeting Ordinals users.
Public data is also driving the industry narrative towards "understandability." Security Week, citing Scam Sniffer's statistics, reported that in 2024, nearly $500 million in losses were caused by wallet emptiers, with over 332,000 victims. These types of events do not require attackers to breach complex systems but rather rely more on users not understanding the risks during interactions. On the other hand, Chainalysis, in its 2025 disclosure, estimated that in 2024, on-chain scam revenue was at least $9.9 billion and could increase as more addresses are identified. When the main risk comes from the "user-side readability gap," wallet manufacturers must shift security from backend engineering to front-facing expression.
As a result, more and more wallets in the industry are starting to "productize" their security capabilities: they no longer just tell you "we are secure" but break down protective actions into a list that users can understand—such as which tokens will be flagged as high risk, which transactions will trigger alerts, which addresses or DApps will be blocked, and why the blocking is happening. The essence of this change is to transform security from a "qualification narrative" to an "interaction narrative": enabling users to receive actionable information before signing, rather than having to look at an audit PDF afterwards.
Following this trend, the newly launched and upgraded Security Center page of the OKX wallet provides a more typical example of "expressing in a list format." The page explicitly outlines three "frontline defenses" aimed at users: Token risk detection, Transaction monitoring, and Address screening, and explains their functions in a single sentence each, such as "Flagging high-risk tokens to reduce exposure to honeypots and bad actors," "Cross-chain real-time monitoring to identify suspicious on-chain activities," and "Intercepting interactions with malicious DApps and addresses." The benefit of this approach is that even if users do not understand security terminology, they can quickly relate to the action they are currently taking—whether to click, sign, or transfer.

Click to visit: OKX Wallet Security Landing Page Audit Report
More importantly, "understandability" does not mean "talking to oneself." On the same page, the OKX wallet also provides an "View audit reports" link, connecting the "capability list" with "third-party verification." Furthermore, the audit report collection page in its help center further elaborates on the audit scope, number of issues found, and repair status, allowing users to transition from "understanding capabilities" to "verifying evidence" when needed.
This kind of transition from "security claim" to "understandable checklist" is not about making security sound grander, but about making security more actionable: as fraud increasingly relies on deception and disguise, whether a wallet can place risk alerts at interaction points, explain in user-friendly language "where the danger lies, why it's dangerous, and what you should do," is becoming part of security capability and increasingly determines whether users will stumble at a crucial step.
Audit Information "Publicly Verifiable": Transforming Third-Party Endorsement from "Linked" to "Verifiable Evidence Chain"
In the wallet industry, audits have long faced a practical problem: many projects have indeed "undergone audits," but the information is scattered across announcements, PDFs, and social media reposts, making it difficult for ordinary users to quickly understand "who audited it, what was audited, whether any issues were fixed, and when was it last updated." This time, the more prominent action by the OKX wallet is to consolidate publicly available third-party audit reports into a unified portal and directly indicate on the page "published on November 11, 2022, updated on November 17, 2025," allowing users to quickly determine at a glance that this is not just a one-time showcase but an ongoing information disclosure window that is actively maintained.
From the entries publicly displayed on this collection page, the scope of disclosure has not only focused on the traditional audit target of "smart contracts." Taking CertiK's entry dated May 23, 2024, as an example, the audit content clearly covers key code paths on the mobile end and frontend: including iOS/Android components, frontend ReactJS UI components, JS controllers interacting with the keyring, and multiple wallet SDK modules, while also providing the audit methodology and conclusion criteria.
In the same page, SlowMist's entry is closer to the "new paradigm" of wallet evolution in the past two years—auditable objects such as AA smart contract accounts, MPC keyless wallets, Ordinals transaction modules are all listed; in addition, audit information on the "private key security module" is separately presented, stating directly "private keys or mnemonic phrases are only stored on the user's device and are not transmitted to external servers," responding to the user's core concerns about key security with clearer boundary descriptions.
The value of this "centralized display" is not only in having more comprehensive information but, more crucially, in binding "new capabilities" with "verifiability" at the same entry point: as the wallet industry increasingly moves towards complex architectures such as AA and MPC, what users need most is not just a statement saying "we are very secure" but evidence that can be quickly verified—whether the audit scope covers critical modules, what the methodology is, whether risks have been mitigated, and if the information is consistently updated.
Furthermore, according to the OKX Wallet, after this upgrade, new audit reports and related information can be directly updated through configuration without the need for a new release. If this mechanism can operate stably in the long term, it effectively shortens the "externally verifiable" path, saving not only development and release costs.

For users, this means that when an audit is added or completed, the public entrance can more quickly reflect the "latest status," reducing the uncertainty of "having to rely on forwarding screenshots/old links" during key risk windows. For third-party observers and researchers, it is easier to form a traceable timeline: which modules completed the audit when, what level of issues were discovered, when the fixes were confirmed and publicly updated. This turns "third-party endorsement" into a continuously auditable evidence chain, rather than a one-time display of a PDF.
This article is a contributed submission and does not represent the views of BlockBeats.
You may also like

Kalshi First Research Report: When Predicting CPI, Crowd Wisdom Beats Wall Street Analysts

Venture Capital Post-Mortem 2025: Hashrate is King, Narrative is Dead

Key Market Information Discrepancy on December 24th - A Must-See! | Alpha Morning Report

2025 Token Postmortem: 84% Peak at Launch, High-Cap Project Turns into a "Rug Pull" Epicenter?

CFTC Welcomes New Chairman, Which Way Will Crypto Regulation Go?

Why Did Market Sentiment Completely Collapse in 2025? Decoding Messari's Ten-Thousand-Word Annual Report

In Vietnam, USDT’s Use and the Reality of Web3 Adoption
Key Takeaways Vietnam has emerged as a leading nation in the adoption of cryptocurrencies, despite cultural and regulatory…

Facing Losses: A Trader’s Journey to Redemption
Key Takeaways Emotional reactions to trading losses, such as increasing risks or exiting the market entirely, often reflect…

Beacon Guiding Directions, Torches Contending Sovereignty: A Covert AI Allocation War
Key Takeaways The AI that rules today’s landscape exists in two forms—a centralized “lighthouse” model by major tech…

Exploring the Automated Market-Making Mechanism of Snowball Meme Coin
Key Takeaways Snowball is a new meme coin leveraging an automated market-making mechanism to utilize transaction fees for…

Decoding the Next Generation AI Agent Economy: Identity, Recourse, and Attribution
Key Takeaways AI agents require the development of robust identity, recourse, and attribution systems to operate autonomously and…

The State of Cryptocurrency Valuations in 2025
Key Takeaways In 2025, 85% of new tokens saw their valuations fall below their initial issuance value. The…

Nofx’s Two-Month Journey from Stardom to Scandal: The Open Source Dilemma
Key Takeaways Nofx’s rise and fall in two months highlights inherent challenges in open source projects. A transition…

MiniMax Knocks on the Door of Hong Kong Stock Exchange with Billion-Dollar Valuation
Key Takeaways MiniMax, a prominent AI startup, is rapidly progressing towards an IPO on the Hong Kong Stock…

Trump’s World Liberty Financial Token Ends 2025 Down Over 40%
Key Takeaways World Liberty Financial, a Trump family crypto project, faces substantial losses in 2025. The project initially…

JPMorgan Explores Crypto Trading for Institutional Clients: A Potential Paradigm Shift
Key Takeaways JPMorgan Chase is contemplating entering the cryptocurrency trading market for institutional clients, signifying a major shift…

Fintechs’ Prediction Market Add-ons and the Risk of User Churn: Insights from Inversion CEO
Key Takeaways Fintech platforms like Robinhood are increasingly adding prediction markets, which may result in higher user churn…

Coinbase to Acquire The Clearing Company in Prediction Markets Push
Key Takeaways Coinbase is set to acquire The Clearing Company, a prediction markets startup, to expand its product…
Kalshi First Research Report: When Predicting CPI, Crowd Wisdom Beats Wall Street Analysts
Venture Capital Post-Mortem 2025: Hashrate is King, Narrative is Dead
Key Market Information Discrepancy on December 24th - A Must-See! | Alpha Morning Report
2025 Token Postmortem: 84% Peak at Launch, High-Cap Project Turns into a "Rug Pull" Epicenter?
CFTC Welcomes New Chairman, Which Way Will Crypto Regulation Go?
Why Did Market Sentiment Completely Collapse in 2025? Decoding Messari's Ten-Thousand-Word Annual Report
Popular coins
Latest Crypto News
Customer Support:@weikecs
Business Cooperation:@weikecs
Quant Trading & MM:bd@weex.com
VIP Services:support@weex.com