The 10·11 Crypto Crash: Anatomy of a Market MeltdownPlease be informed that the original content is in English. Some of our translated content may be generated using automated tools which may not be fully accurate. In case of any discrepancies, the English version shall prevail.

The 10·11 Crypto Crash: Anatomy of a Market Meltdown

By: WEEX|2025/10/15 01:52:37

On October 11, 2025, the crypto market experienced its largest-ever liquidation event. Here’s a breakdown of what happened — and why it mattered:

  • Macro shock: Trump’s new tariff announcement sparked global risk aversion, accelerating the sell-off.
  • Leverage overload: Record-long open interest magnified downside risk.
  • USDe depeg and loop lending failure: USDe briefly dropped to $0.65 on Binance, triggering collateral liquidations.
  • Liquidity breakdown: Market makers withdrew during peak volatility, leaving order books thin.

Within 24 hours, $19 billion in leveraged positions were liquidated, 1.6 million traders were forced out, and altcoin markets saw historic drawdowns.


I. Introduction — Another “Crypto Memorial Day”

On October 11, 2025, digital asset markets underwent one of their most dramatic stress events in history.

  • Bitcoin (BTC) briefly fell below $11,000, dropping more than 9% intraday.
  • Ethereum (ETH) plunged nearly 16%.
  • Solana (SOL) fell to around $168.79, its sharpest one-day decline in months.
  • USDe, Ethena’s yield-bearing stablecoin, lost its peg, falling to $0.65 before rebounding to around $0.99 within hours.

The crash exposed how intertwined macro conditions, leveraged derivatives, and liquidity depth have become in the post-2024 bull cycle.


II. Timeline — How the Crash Unfolded

Time (UTC)EventImpact
Oct 10Trump announces 100% tariffs on Chinese tech importsGlobal risk sentiment turns negative
Oct 11, 5:20 AMBTC & ETH flash crash across major exchangesLeverage pressure triggers liquidations
5:43 AMUSDe, wBETH, and bnSOL begin to depegCollateral instability spreads
6:00 AM → onwardCascading liquidations across Binance, OKX, Bybit, Hyperliquid$19B positions wiped out in 24h
  • Time period: October 11–12, 2025
  • Total liquidations: $19.18 billion
  • Long positions: $16.7 billion (≈ 86% of total)
  • Traders liquidated: 1.6 million+ accounts
  • Fully erased wallets: ~1,000+, with 205 wallets losing over $1M each

BTC and ETH led the initial wave, but smaller altcoins faced 30–35% drawdowns due to thinner liquidity.


III. The Leverage Factor — Open Interest at Record Highs

Before October 11, aggregate open interest in perpetual futures had reached multi-month highs, signaling an overheated long market.

  • BTC open interest dropped from $9.04B → $7.01B (-22.2%) during the crash (RootData).
  • SOL open interest fell from $1.48B → $981M, a 36% decline (AMBCrypto).
  • Across all exchanges, total long-side liquidations reached $16.7B — the highest in crypto history (Bitget).

This extreme concentration of long leverage meant even modest price declines could trigger cascading margin calls, amplifying volatility.


IV. The USDe Spiral — When “Yield” Meets Systemic Risk

USDe, Ethena’s algorithmic, yield-bearing stablecoin, became the focal point of the contagion.

Key facts:

  • Lowest price: $0.65 (on Binance, Oct 11)
  • Recovery: Back to ~$0.99 within several hours (Coindesk)
  • Mechanism: Overcollateralized synthetic stablecoin designed to generate yield via delta-neutral positions

During the crash, however, USDe’s peg broke due to oracle desynchronization and recursive lending pressure.

Many users had leveraged USDe in loop lending structures — using borrowed USDe as collateral to mint more USDe, creating up to 4.5× recursive exposure.

When prices turned, the chain of liquidations reversed the loop: collateral values dropped, triggering further sell-offs, which then deepened the peg deviation.

Ethena later confirmed that its mint/redeem function remained active and the system stayed overcollateralized throughout the event.

Still, the episode revealed how algorithmic and exchange-linked stablecoins can propagate systemic risk during liquidity shocks.


V. Liquidity Breakdown — When Market Makers Step Back

The speed and depth of the October 11 decline were amplified by structural liquidity gaps.

  • Liquidity concentration: Most depth was clustered in BTC and ETH pairs; altcoin order books were comparatively thin.
  • Timing: The crash occurred during Asian early morning hours, a low-liquidity window when both Asian and U.S. markets were largely inactive.
  • Institutional absence: Major market-making firms, including Jump and GSR, had reduced on-chain activity throughout 2025, limiting backstop capacity.

As volatility spiked, many market makers widened spreads or pulled liquidity from small-cap altcoins to preserve depth on major assets. With insufficient buy-side support, even moderate liquidation flows cascaded into near-vertical price drops.


VI. Macro Catalyst — Policy Shock Meets Fragile Structure

The immediate external trigger came from Trump’s 100% tariff announcement on Chinese tech goods (Oct 10). The policy move triggered a global “risk-off” rotation:

  • Investors shifted toward USD and U.S. Treasuries
  • Risk assets — equities, commodities, and crypto — faced synchronized outflows

Crypto, sitting at the high end of the risk curve, was the first sector to absorb the impact.

This macro shock interacted with existing leverage and liquidity fragility, converting localized stress into a market-wide cascade.


VII. Post-Crash Market Overview

  • BTC and ETH staged partial recoveries within 48 hours, with ETH leading short-term rebounds.
  • USDe regained near-parity at ~$0.99 but continues to be monitored for stability under stress.
  • Open interest across exchanges declined sharply, indicating deleveraging and reduced speculative exposure.
  • Liquidity providers remain cautious; order book depth has yet to fully normalize.
  • Macro uncertainty — including trade policy and U.S. rate expectations — remains an overhang.

VIII. Structural Lessons

The 10·11 event underscores several structural realities of today’s crypto ecosystem:

Leverage concentration magnifies volatility — high open interest equates to fragility.

Algorithmic stablecoins remain dependent on both design soundness and external liquidity.

Liquidity distribution defines resilience; over-reliance on BTC/ETH pairs creates systemic gaps.

Market geography and timing matter; off-peak crashes accelerate due to regional liquidity asymmetry.

Transparency in funding rates, collateralization, and oracle data is crucial for systemic stability.

These are analytical takeaways — not investment advice — intended to inform risk assessment and infrastructure design.


IX. Conclusion — 10·11 Wasn’t an Attack, It Was a Stress Test

The October 11 crash was not a targeted attack or a single protocol failure. It was a systemic stress test exposing the interaction between macro shocks, leverage dynamics, and liquidity infrastructure. While the losses were significant, the event yielded critical data for understanding how the modern crypto market behaves under coordinated stress. As the ecosystem matures, transparency, diversified liquidity, and controlled leverage will remain key to long-term resilience.

You may also like

Share
copy

Gainers

Community
iconiconiconiconiconiconicon

Customer Support@weikecs

Business Cooperation@weikecs

Quant Trading & MMbd@weex.com

VIP Servicessupport@weex.com