Trump Urged by Crypto Groups to Intervene in Roman Storm Retrial
Key Takeaways
- Over 65 cryptocurrency and blockchain advocacy groups have called on former President Donald Trump to assist in Roman Storm’s retrial involving Tornado Cash.
- Roman Storm faces legal challenges after being convicted of operating an unlicensed money transmitting business.
- Heavy emphasis is placed on the argument that “writing code is not a crime,” which resonates broadly within the tech and crypto communities.
- The broader implications of this case reflect on the ongoing debate around regulatory clarity and innovation in crypto technologies.
Advocacy Groups Rally Behind Roman Storm
In an unexpected plea to a former president, a coalition of over 65 cryptocurrency and blockchain companies, along with advocacy groups, has sought the intervention of Donald Trump in what is becoming a critical retrial for Roman Storm, co-founder of Tornado Cash. The call to action was conveyed through a letter that not only advocated for Storm but also highlighted key policy recommendations concerning the broader crypto ecosystem in the United States.
The advocacy bodies, which include organizations such as the Solana Policy Institute, Blockchain Association, and DeFi Education Fund, used this platform to address broader issues intertwining with Storm’s case. They urged Trump to direct relevant financial authorities—the IRS and US Treasury—to devise more coherent tax policies on digital assets. They also stressed the importance of protecting decentralized finance (DeFi) from excessive regulatory intervention and called for clearer guidance on digital asset governance from financial regulators like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
Roman Storm’s Legal Battle
Roman Storm’s legal predicament has become a touchstone for debates around software development and regulatory policy. Already found guilty of running an unlicensed money transmitting business, Storm now faces a potential retrial on two other charges lingering from his original conviction. Despite his conviction, the jury did not reach a consensus on whether Storm participated in conspiracies involving money laundering and sanctions evasion.
A significant aspect of Storm’s defense—one that has piqued the interest of his supporters and advocacy groups—is the notion that writing and publishing open-source software does not constitute a financial crime. Storm and his advocates argue that the work involving Tornado Cash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency mixer, falls under freedom of expression, aligning with the First Amendment.
Furthermore, internal comments from the Department of Justice (DOJ) have added layers to the narrative. At a cryptocurrency summit, Matthew Galeotti from the DOJ’s criminal division acknowledged that simply writing code, without malicious intent, should not be deemed criminal behavior. Despite this, the DOJ continues to oppose Storm’s motions for acquittal, indicating ongoing tension and uncertainty about the interpretation and enforcement of laws surrounding digital currencies.
The Implications for Crypto Regulation
The Roman Storm case echoes broader concerns within the crypto industry about the regulatory environment in the U.S., which many argue remains ambiguous and fragmented. This ambiguity, advocates say, stymies innovation and dissuades developers and entrepreneurs who fear undefined legal repercussions.
Crypto advocacy groups are leveraging Storm’s case to push for more well-defined and crypto-friendly regulation, reinforcing the idea that innovation in blockchain and decentralized technologies should not be stifled by outdated or unclear laws. By positioning Storm’s software development as an innocuous act of publication, they hope to set a precedent that safeguards technological creativity and protects developers under free speech doctrines.
This incident also illuminates how judicial outcomes might influence policy directions at the federal level. Although a president has limited direct control over prosecutorial independence, their administration’s stance can sway the broader regulatory climate and priorities of federal agencies.
Calls for Presidential Influence
While the separation of powers and prosecutorial independence remain paramount in democratic governance, the advocacy groups appeal to Trump, not necessarily for direct intervention but rather for wielding influence to encourage a reconsideration of the charges against Storm. They argue that dismissing the charges would reaffirm the U.S. as a bastion of innovation, freedom, and technological progress.
As the crypto sector eagerly watches the unfolding of Storm’s legal journey, the community remains hopeful for outcomes that support the development and proliferation of blockchain technologies without overbearing legal constraints. This case serves as a potential pivot point in how digital asset regulations could evolve, highlighting both the pitfalls and possibilities against a backdrop of legal ambiguity.
FAQ
What is the Roman Storm case about?
Roman Storm is a co-founder of Tornado Cash, and he was convicted for running an unlicensed money transmitting business. He faces potential retrials on related charges, with advocacy groups rallying to highlight this as a freedom of speech issue relating to open-source software publication.
Why are crypto advocacy groups asking Trump to intervene?
The groups believe that the charges against Storm threaten the principle that “writing code is not a crime.” They seek Trump’s influence to promote policies that support regulatory clarity and protect innovation in the cryptocurrency sphere.
What is Tornado Cash?
Tornado Cash is a privacy-focused tool designed to provide anonymity in cryptocurrency transactions by obscuring transaction trails. It operates in the realm of open-source software but has faced scrutiny from regulators.
How might this case impact future cryptocurrency regulations?
If influenced to set a new precedent, Storm’s case could encourage greater regulatory clarity and leniency, potentially reshaping how crypto technologies and their developers are treated under U.S. law.
Is writing code considered a crime under current U.S. law?
Presently, writing code in itself is not a crime. However, when the code is part of a service that allegedly violates legal regulations, such as those covering money transmission and sanctions, it could become subject to legal action, as in the case with Storm.
You may also like

DeFi 2.0 Explosion Post-Disorderly Restructuring in 2026

Lighter Token Distribution Sparks Controversy, Zama Launches USDT Private Transfers, What is the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?

4 Years of Web3 Entrepreneurship: 7 Key Takeaways

Key Market Intelligence on December 30th, how much did you miss out on?

Matrixdock 2025: The Practical Path to Sovereign-Grade RWA of Gold Tokenization

Without Narrative Power, Web3 Will Not Tap into the Vastness

Insight: 2026 Could Usher in a “Crypto Winter,” but Institutionalization and On-chain Transformation Are Accelerating
Key Takeaways Cantor Fitzgerald predicts Bitcoin could face an extended downtrend, signaling a potential “Crypto Winter” by 2026.…

From Failures to Success: Building Crypto Products That Truly Matter
Key Takeaways Building infrastructure in crypto doesn’t guarantee success; understanding user needs is critical. Products aimed at younger…

Lighter Founder’s Latest Response on Token Launch Progress, What Was Said
Lighter’s Founder, Vladimir Novakovski, clarifies key concerns in an AMA, focusing on detecting and resolving bot account manipulations…

Cryptocurrency Trends and Insights: Navigating the 2025 Landscape
Key Takeaways Cryptocurrency continues to evolve rapidly, with new trends reshaping the market. Blockchain technology’s applications extend beyond…

UNI Burn Arbitrage Opportunity, Ondo Tokenized Stock Liquidity Debate, What’s the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?
Key Takeaways The crypto market is buzzing with multi-threaded discussions, from macro trends to specific protocols and scams.…

“Elon Musk’s Nemesis Trade” Colossal ETH Short Sparks Debate in Crypto Circles
Key Takeaways A colossal short position was secured against Ethereum (ETH) worth approximately $106 million by a single…

Dragonfly Partner Foresees BTC Surpassing $150K by 2026 but Market Share Decline
Key Takeaways Bitcoin is anticipated to climb over $150,000 by the end of 2026, although its market dominance…

Elon Musk Liquidation Wall: Liquidates $106M Short Position, Faces $479K Loss
Key Takeaways A $106 million ETH short position was liquidated after just 15 hours, resulting in a $479,000…

MMA Completes $3 Million Private Sale to Develop Web3 Platform with Trump Jr.’s Investment
Key Takeaways MMA’s Strategic Funding Move: U.S. mixed martial arts firm MMA has successfully secured $3 million through…

After 500 Rejections, I Started Building a Product People Actually Use

UNI Burn Arbitrage Opportunity, Ondo Tokenized Stock Liquidity Debate, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?

Will Ethereum See a Strong Breakout After the End of the Staking Net Outflow?
DeFi 2.0 Explosion Post-Disorderly Restructuring in 2026
Lighter Token Distribution Sparks Controversy, Zama Launches USDT Private Transfers, What is the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?
4 Years of Web3 Entrepreneurship: 7 Key Takeaways
Key Market Intelligence on December 30th, how much did you miss out on?
Matrixdock 2025: The Practical Path to Sovereign-Grade RWA of Gold Tokenization
Without Narrative Power, Web3 Will Not Tap into the Vastness
Popular coins
Latest Crypto News
Customer Support:@weikecs
Business Cooperation:@weikecs
Quant Trading & MM:bd@weex.com
VIP Services:support@weex.com