logo

Arthur Hayes: BTC Could Fall to $70,000 at Worst, But Bull Market Cycle Still Intact

By: blockbeats|2025/03/04 03:15:03
Share
copy
Original Title: KISS of Death
Original Author: Arthur Hayes
Original Translation: Bitpush News
(The views expressed in this article are those of the author and should not be taken as investment advice, nor interpreted as recommendations or opinions to engage in investment transactions.)

Arthur Hayes: BTC Could Fall to $70,000 at Worst, But Bull Market Cycle Still Intact

Keep—It—Simple—Stupid = KISS

Many readers, when dealing with the deluge of policies from the US President Donald Trump's administration, often forget the KISS principle.

Trump's media strategy goal is to have you wake up every day and say to your friends, partner, or to yourself, "My goodness, did you see what Trump/Musk/Little Kennedy did yesterday, I can't believe they actually did that." Whether you are in high spirits or feeling down, this farce called "The Emperor's Day" is quite entertaining.

For investors, this ongoing state of excitement is not conducive to stacking sats. You may buy in today, only to quickly sell out after digesting the next headline news. The market oscillates throughout this process, rapidly depleting your Bitcoin reserves.

Remember the KISS principle.

Who is Trump? Trump is a real estate showman. To succeed in real estate, you must master the art of borrowing large sums of money at the lowest possible interest rates. Then, to sell condo units or rent out space, you must boast about how impressive the new building or development project is. I am not interested in Trump's ability to evoke sympathy in global society, but I am interested in his ability to finance policy objectives.

I am convinced Trump wants to achieve his "America First" policy through debt financing. If not, he would allow the market to naturally clear the credit embedded in the system, ushering in an even more severe economic depression than that of the 1930s. Is Trump seeking to be called the Herbert Hoover of the 21st century or the Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR)? American history belittles Hoover because historians believe he did not print money fast enough and praises FDR because his New Deal policies were paid for with printed money. I believe Trump wants to be considered the greatest president in history, so he does not want to destroy the empire's foundation through a contractionary policy.

To emphasize this point, remember that Andrew Mellon, the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury under Hoover, once said the following when discussing how to address the over-leveraging of the U.S. and global economy after a stock market crash:

“Liquidate labor, liquidate stocks, liquidate farmers, liquidate real estate. It will purge the rottenness out of the system. High costs of living and high living will come down. People will work harder, live a more moral life. Values will be adjusted, and enterprising people will pick up the wrecks from less competent people.”

Current U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is unlikely to make such bold statements.

If my view is correct that Trump will pursue “America First” through debt financing, how does this affect my outlook on future global risk asset markets, especially cryptocurrency?

To answer this question, I must form an opinion on how Trump may increase the money/credit supply (i.e., printing money) and lower its price (i.e., interest rates). Therefore, I must have a view on how the relationship between the U.S. Treasury led by Scott Bessent and the Federal Reserve led by Jerome Powell may evolve.

KISS Principle

Who do Bessent and Powell serve? Are they the same person?

Bessent was appointed by Trump 2.0, and from his past and present interviews, he seems to align closely with this “emperor’s” worldview.

Powell was appointed by Trump 1.0 but has been a fickle turncoat, switching sides to the Obama and Clinton camps. When Powell aggressively cut rates by 0.5% in September 2024, destroying what little credibility he had left, the U.S. economy was growing above trend and inflationary pressures were present, making a rate cut unnecessary. However, the Obama-Clinton puppet Kamala Harris needed a boost, and Powell dutifully cut rates. The outcome did not pan out as expected, but after Trump's reelection, Powell announced he would fulfill his term and once again staunchly fight inflation.

When you carry a large debt burden, several things happen.

First, interest payments consume most of your free cash flow. Second, you cannot secure additional asset financing because no one will lend to you given the high debt levels. Therefore, you must restructure your debt, extending maturities and lowering coupon rates. This is a form of soft default as it mathematically reduces the present value burden of the debt. Once your effective debt burden is reduced, you can again borrow at an affordable price. Viewing the issue from these angles, both the Treasury and the Fed play a role in restoring American financial health. However, due to Bessent and Powell serving different masters, the success of this effort has been hindered.

Debt Restructuring

Bessent publicly stated that the current debt structure in the United States needs to change. He hopes to eventually extend the average term of the debt burden, known on Wall Street as "debt maturity extension." Various macroeconomic experts have proposed suggestions on how to achieve this goal; I discussed such solutions in detail in The Genie article. However, for investors, the most important thing is that the United States will soft default on its debt burden by reducing the net present value.

Given the global distribution of U.S. debt holders, achieving this kind of restructuring will take time. This is a geopolitical "Gordian Knot." Therefore, in the short term, within the next three to six months, this is unrelated to our cryptocurrency inventors.

New Loans

Powell and the Federal Reserve have broad control over the quantity and pricing of credit. The law allows the Fed to print money to purchase debt securities, thereby increasing the money/credit supply, i.e., printing money. The Fed also sets short-term rates. Since the U.S. cannot default on the nominal dollar, the Fed determines the risk-free rate of the dollar, i.e., the Effective Federal Funds Rate (EFFR).

The Fed has four main levers to manipulate the short-term rate: Reverse Repurchase Agreements (RRP), Interest on Reserve Balances (IORB), the Federal Funds Rate floor, and the Federal Funds Rate ceiling. Without delving into the intricate details of the money market, all we need to understand is that the Fed can unilaterally increase the quantity of dollars and lower their price.

If Bessent and Powell were serving the same Leader, then analyzing the future path of dollar liquidity and the reactions of China, Japan, and the EU to U.S. monetary policy would be very easy. As they are clearly not serving the same person, I wonder how Trump can allow Powell to stick to the Fed's task of fighting inflation while still manipulating Powell to print money and lower rates.

Economic Collapse

Fed - Recession Law: If the U.S. economy enters a recession, or if the Fed fears the U.S. economy will enter a recession, it will cut rates and/or print money.

Let's test this law with recent economic history (thanks to the excellent table provided by Bianco Research).

This is a direct cause list of modern U.S. economic recessions post-World War II. A recession is defined as a negative quarterly GDP growth rate. I will focus on the 1980s to the present.

This is a chart of the Federal Funds Rate Lower Bound. Each red arrow represents the beginning of an easing cycle coinciding with a recession. As you can see, it is very clear that the Federal Reserve will at least cut rates during a recession.

Fundamentally, "Pax Americana" and its dominance of the global economy are built on debt financing. Large corporations fund future production expansion and current operations by issuing bonds. If cash flow growth significantly slows down or declines entirely, the repayment of debt eventually comes into question. This is problematic because a significant portion of a company's debt is essentially an asset to banks. The corporate debt assets held by banks support their customer deposit liabilities. In essence, if debt cannot be repaid, it calls into question the "value" of all existing legal credit banknotes.

Furthermore, in the United States, most households are leveraged. Their consumption patterns are marginally financed with mortgage loans, car loans, and personal loans. If their cash flow generation capability slows down or diminishes, they will be unable to meet their debt obligations. Similarly, the banking system holds this debt and supports it with their deposit liabilities.

It is crucial that the Federal Reserve does not allow a significant rise in default probabilities for corporate and/or household debt during an economic recession or before cash flow generation slows down or contracts. This could lead to corporate and consumer debt defaults, resulting in systemic financial distress. To safeguard the solvency of a debt-financed economic system, whenever a recession occurs or people's perception of recession risk intensifies, the Federal Reserve will proactively or reactively cut rates and print money.

KISS Principle

Trump manipulates Powell to ease the financial environment by triggering a recession or making the market believe that a recession is imminent.

To avoid a financial crisis, Powell will subsequently take the following partial or full measures: rate cuts, ending quantitative tightening (QT), restarting quantitative easing (QE), and/or suspending the Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) for banks buying U.S. Treasuries.

Insert a chart from DOGE here:

How Can Trump Unilaterally Trigger a Recession?

The marginal driver of U.S. economic growth has always been the government itself. Whether the spending is fraudulent or necessary, government expenditures create economic activity. Additionally, government spending has a money multiplier effect. That's why the Washington D.C. metropolitan area is one of the wealthiest regions in America because there are plenty of professional parasites feeding off the government. It's challenging to estimate the exact money multiplier directly, but in concept, it's easy to understand the delayed effects of government spending.

According to Perplexity's data:

● The median household income in Washington D.C. is $122,246, much higher than the national median household income.

● This places Washington D.C. at the 96th percentile in U.S. cities by median household income.

As a former president, Trump is well aware of the extent of fraud, waste, and abuse within the government. The establishment of both parties does not want to curb this situation as everyone benefits from it. Considering Trump supporters are outside of the Democrats and Republicans, they unreservedly expose the flaws in government spending plans. Establishing an advisory council led by Elon Musk and backed by Trump, named the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), is a key driver in significantly reducing government spending.

When many of the largest expenditure items are non-discretionary spending, how does DOGE achieve this? If payments are fraudulent, they can be stopped. If computers can replace government employees managing these projects, the human resource costs will plummet. The question then becomes, how much fraud and inefficiency is there in government spending each year? If DOGE and Trump are to be believed, the annual amount would reach trillions of dollars.

One potentially very visible example is the Social Security Administration (SSA) and who they send checks to. If we believe DOGE's claims, the department is issuing trillions of dollars to deceased individuals and persons whose identities have not been properly verified. I do not know the veracity of these claims. But imagine you are an SSA welfare fraudster and know that Elon and the "big shots" are deeply analyzing the data, potentially uncovering the fraudulent payments you have received over the years and submitting them to the Department of Justice. Would you continue your scheme or flee? The key is that the mere threat of discovery could lead to a reduction in fraudulent activities. As the old Chinese saying goes, kill the chicken to scare the monkey. Therefore, even though the establishment media is trying to hoodwink Elon and DOGE, I believe that even if it's not trillions of dollars, it's likely hundreds of billions of dollars.

Next, let's discuss the human resources aspect of the government spending equation. Trump and DOGE are in the process of laying off hundreds of thousands of government employees. Whether unions have enough power to legally challenge the mass removal of "non-essential" government workers remains to be seen. But the consequences are already apparent.

DeAntonio explains, "So far, the workforce reductions we've seen may only be the tip of the iceberg. The scale and timing of future layoffs will determine whether the labor market can remain stable. We currently anticipate that due to ongoing hiring freezes, delayed retirements, and layoffs initiated by DOGE, the number of federal government employees is expected to decrease by approximately 400,000 by 2025."

– Fox Business

Even though the Trump 2.0 presidential term has just begun a little over a month ago, the impact of DOGE is already evident. Unemployment claims in the Washington D.C. area have surged. Housing prices have plummeted. And consumer discretionary spending, arguably driven by widespread government fraud and malfeasance, has also left financial analysts disappointed. The market is starting to talk about the "R" word — recession.

A new analysis by real estate transaction platform Parcl Labs shows that since the beginning of this year, housing prices in the Washington D.C. area have dropped by 11%, with the analysis tracking the effects of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) on the city's real estate market.

– Newsweek

Rothstein posted on Bluesky stating that due to massive government layoffs and abrupt cancellation of federal contracts, the U.S. is almost certain to head towards a severe economic recession.

– The Economic Times

The "R" word is an economic disgrace. Powell does not want to be a modern-day Hester Prynne (subjected to public shame and condemnation), thus, he must respond.

Powell's Pivot Again

How many times has Powell pivoted since 2018? He must be feeling quite dizzy by now. The question for investors is whether Powell will act preemptively to save the financial system from collapse or only react after a major financial institution has gone bankrupt. Powell's chosen path is purely political. Therefore, I cannot predict.

But what I do know is that this year, $2.08 trillion of U.S. corporate debt and $10 trillion of U.S. national debt need to be rolled over. If the U.S. is on the brink of or in a recession, the cash flow shock would make it nearly impossible to roll over these massive bonds at current interest rates. Therefore, to uphold the sanctity of the "American peace" financial system, the Fed must and will act.

For us cryptocurrency investors, the question is how fast and at what scale will the U.S. unleash credit? Let's break down the four key measures the Fed will take to turn the tide.

Rate Cut

It is estimated that for every 0.25% reduction in the federal funds rate, it is equivalent to $100 billion in quantitative easing or money printing. Assuming the Fed lowers the rate from 4.25% to 0%.

This is equivalent to $1.7 trillion of quantitative easing. Powell may not lower the rate to 0%, but you can be sure Trump will allow Elon to continue cutting expenses until Powell lowers the rate to the desired level. Once the acceptable rate level is reached, Trump will control his "mad dog."

Stop Quantitative Tightening (QT)

The recently released Fed minutes from the January 2025 meeting detail that some committee members believe quantitative tightening must end at some point in 2025. Quantitative tightening is the Fed's process of reducing the size of its balance sheet, thereby reducing the amount of US dollar credit. The Fed is conducting $600 billion of quantitative tightening each month. Assuming the Fed takes action in April, this means that relative to previous expectations, stopping quantitative tightening will inject $540 billion of liquidity into 2025.

Restart Quantitative Easing (QE) / Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) Exemption

To absorb the supply of US Treasuries, the Fed can restart quantitative easing and grant banks a supplementary leverage ratio exemption. Through quantitative easing, the Fed can print money and purchase Treasuries, thereby increasing the credit quantity. The supplementary leverage ratio exemption allows US commercial banks to use unlimited leverage to purchase Treasuries, thereby increasing the credit quantity. The key is that both the Fed and the commercial banking system are allowed to create money out of thin air. Restarting quantitative easing and granting a supplementary leverage ratio exemption are decisions that only the Fed can make.

If the federal deficit stays in the range of $1 trillion to $2 trillion per year, and the Fed or banks absorb half of the new issuance, this means the annual money supply will increase by $500 billion to $1 trillion. A 50% participation rate is conservative, as during COVID-19, the Fed bought 40% of the new issuance. Nevertheless, in 2025, a major exporting country (China) or an oil-producing country (Saudi Arabia) has ceased or significantly slowed down their behavior of using dollar surpluses to buy Treasuries; therefore, the Fed and banks have more maneuvering room.

Let's do the math:

Rate Cut: $1.7 trillion + Stop Quantitative Tightening: $0.54 trillion + Restart Quantitative Easing/SLR Exemption: $500 billion to $1 trillion = Total = $2.74 trillion to $3.24 trillion

COVID-19 vs. DOGE Money Printing

In the United States alone, the Fed and the Treasury created approximately $4 trillion in credit from 2020 to 2022 to address the Covid-19 pandemic.

The DOGE-inspired money printing scale could reach 70% to 80% of the level seen during the COVID-19 pandemic.

With the U.S. alone printing $4 trillion, Bitcoin surged approximately 24x from its 2020 low to 2021 high. Considering Bitcoin's market cap is much larger now than it was then, let's conservatively call a 10x surge in the U.S. alone printing $3.24 trillion as an increase. That's the answer for those wondering how Bitcoin could reach $1 million during President Trump's term.

Several Key Assumptions

Even amidst the current market turmoil, I have painted a very optimistic future outlook for Bitcoin. Let's look at my assumptions so readers can judge for themselves whether these assumptions are reasonable.

Trump will achieve "America First" through debt financing.

Trump is using DOGE as a means to clear out politically addicted to fraudulent income sources, reduce government spending, and increase U.S. government spending to slow down the possibility of a recession.

The Fed will take a series of actions before or after a recession, increasing the money supply and lowering the price of money.

It's up to your worldview to decide whether this is reasonable.

U.S. Strategic Reserve

Waking up on Monday morning, I saw the Trump rally kick off. On Truth Social, Trump reiterated that the U.S. will establish a strategic reserve filled with Bitcoin and a bunch of junk coins. The market surged due to the "news." This is nothing new, but the market will view Trump's reiteration of his cryptocurrency policy intentions as an excuse for a violent dead cat bounce.

If this reserve is to have a positive impact on prices, the U.S. government needs the ability to physically buy these cryptocurrencies. There is no secret stash of dollars waiting to be deployed. Trump needs the help of Republican lawmakers to raise the debt ceiling and/or revalue gold to match current market prices. These are the only two ways to fund a strategic cryptocurrency reserve. I'm not saying Trump won't keep his promise, but the timeframe for when purchases might start could be longer than how long traders can hold on before getting liquidated. Therefore, sell on rallies.

Trading Strategy

Bitcoin and the broader cryptocurrency market are the only truly global free markets in existence. Bitcoin's price in real-time tells the world how global society views the current state of fiat currency liquidity. Bitcoin reached a high of $110,000 on the eve of Trump's coronation in mid-January, touching a local low of $78,000, representing a drop of around 30%. Bitcoin is screaming, and a liquidity crisis is looming, even as U.S. stock market indices remain near all-time highs. I believe Bitcoin's signal, therefore, a severe pullback in the U.S. stock market driven by recession concerns is imminent.

error

You may also like

This Week in Review | Trump to Host Dinner for TRUMP Holders; Musk and US Treasury Secretary Engage in Heated Argument at the White House

Binance has announced its listing and delisting criteria, and has introduced the Alpha Point rating system. The son of the US Secretary of Commerce's 21 Capital has raised $3 billion to establish a Bitcoin investment fund in partnership with SoftBank, Tether, and Bitfinex.

One Month Left in Office, Has Trump and Musk's Political Alliance Broken Down?

Recently, a high-profile dispute at the White House once again brought the U.S. government into the spotlight. The head of the Department of Government Efficiency, Musk, and the U.S. Treasury Secretary Bennett engaged in a heated argument due to ideological differences, almost escalating into a physical confrontation. In the end, Trump accepted Bennett's appointment proposal, raising concerns about cracks in the relationship between Trump and Musk. Behind this conflict is not only a power clash between Silicon Valley and Washington but also a revealing of the complex game from "close allies" to "power balancing" between Trump and Musk.


Looking back to the beginning of the year, Trump's most significant political reform involving Musk was the establishment of the "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE) to promote radical reform under the guise of "streamlining the government." Its core objectives include reducing government spending, digitizing the bureaucratic system, and replacing human decision-making with algorithms. The core team consists of 6 technical elites aged 19-25. Since Trump took office on January 20th, DOGE has swiftly carried out its restructuring, from shutting down the U.S. International Development Agency to significantly reducing the number of federal government employees, and even obtaining taxpayer privacy information to enhance fiscal efficiency. Under Trump's direction and support, Musk has bravely faced the challenges and spearheaded a radical reform storm in the United States.


Related Reading: "Terminating hundreds of contracts in 18 days, Musk and six post-00s revolutionize the United States" "Cutting billions of dollars in contracts again, what peculiar government departments has Musk's D.O.G.E identified?"


According to DOGE's official website data, as of April 20, 2025, DOGE has saved approximately $160 billion in total, averaging about $993.79 saved per taxpayer, with savings in various areas:


Contract Terminations: 8,454 contracts terminated, saving about $30 billion. For example, terminating the Risk Management Agency's lease in Topeka, Kansas, with an annual rent of $121,800, is expected to save approximately $964,000 over multiple years.


Grant Cancellations: 9,699 grants terminated, saving about $33 billion. For example, terminating grants from the U.S. International Development Agency to the Global Vaccine and Immunization Alliance Foundation, saving a total of $1.75 billion.


Lease Terminations: 643 leases terminated, saving about $3 billion.



However, an NPR analysis points out that some contract terminations did not result in actual savings. For example, 794 contract cancellations were expected to bring no savings as the funds were already fully committed. Additionally, the DOGE calculated savings using the potential highest value of the contract rather than actual expenditures, leading to controversy.


Honeymoon Period: Political Allies' "Two-Way Commitment"


As early as the 2024 U.S. presidential election, Musk began frequent interactions with Trump. At that time, Musk contributed $259 million, mobilized all Silicon Valley resources, and with his personal influence endorsement, became a key supporter for Trump's return to the White House. After Trump took office, as his "angel investor," Musk naturally gained unprecedented political status and power.


On February 7, Musk publicly expressed his support for Trump on social media. He said his love for Trump was "the maximum love that a straight man can give to another man."



On March 4, while attending Trump's State of the Union address, Musk was wearing a tie borrowed from Trump.



As Musk massively laid off federal employees from government agencies, a wave of vandalism against Tesla cars, intimidation of owners, and protests at dealership stores erupted nationwide. Tesla factories faced peaceful demonstrations and acts of destruction, including charging station fires. Vandalism of Cybertrucks surged across the U.S., with some owners even graffitiing their own Tesla vehicles to protest against Musk.


Reports of Tesla car and dealership vandalism as well as protest activities suggest that opposition to Musk has reached a boiling point. Bell Analyst Ben Carlo stated on CNBC, "When people's cars are at risk of being scratched or burned, even those who support Musk or are indifferent to Musk may have second thoughts about whether to buy a Tesla."


Musk has also stated multiple times that running his own businesses is "very challenging." Tesla's stock price has experienced its most severe drop in five years, and his social media company X has also suffered multiple outages.


However, such swift reforms are bound to harm the interests of a considerable portion of people. From the day Musk entered politics, opposition voices have been constant. Tesla's stock has plummeted since Musk took office, nearly halving its market value, marking the most severe decline in five years. This has led to Musk's personal assets evaporating by approximately $121 billion since the beginning of the year.



As Musk's biggest political backer and ally, Trump inevitably had to stand up for him when Musk came under attack.


On the afternoon of March 11th, local time in the U.S., Trump held a 30-minute press conference on the White House driveway. The press conference looked more like a large-scale Tesla car show—accompanied by Musk, Trump answered questions about the U.S. stock market, Canadian tariffs, and the Russia-Ukraine conflict while test-driving five different types and colors of Tesla cars.


"The one I like is that one," Trump pointed to a bright red Model S priced at about $80,000, saying. In the end, Trump chose the Model S and said he would write an $80,000 check to buy the car in full.



Trump also criticized those who were boycotting Tesla, believing that they were harming a great American company. He claimed that if the boycotters continued to treat Tesla this way, he would root out these people and "curse" them to "hell." White House spokesperson Harrison Fields also stated: "The despicable acts of violence being continuously carried out by radical left-wing activists against Tesla are no different from domestic terrorism."


Under Trump's "endorsement," Tesla's stock price rebounded during trading on Tuesday, rising 3.79% at the close.


To show loyalty, on March 24th, at Trump's third cabinet meeting, Musk wore a red hat with the words "Trump is always right."



During this period, the two were still intimate comrades-in-arms dedicated to advancing reform. Trump needed a "sharp tool" to expand his territory, while Musk needed a platform to realize his political ambitions. Both were highly aligned in their goals and interests.


The First Cracks Appear: Policy Differences and Power Struggles


Since Trump announced his high tariffs policy, a conflict arose between Trump's political goals and Musk's personal interests, leading to a crack in their relationship. The high tariffs caused a sharp drop in the U.S. stock market in a short period, and Musk's assets have shrunk by over $100 billion since the beginning of the year. Musk, as an entrepreneur, views issues from an economic rather than political perspective, supporting barrier reduction and free trade. He has also repeatedly expressed his opposition to the tariff policy.



On April 5, during the Italian Alliance Assembly held in Florence, Musk, in a video call interview with Italian Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini, expressed, "Ultimately, I hope that Europe and the United States can reach an agreement. In my view, ideally, we should move towards zero tariffs, effectively establishing a free trade area between Europe and North America." On April 7, Musk shared a video on Twitter featuring the late free-market economist Milton Friedman discussing the benefits of free trade. Musk did not add any text, but this move was widely interpreted as a criticism of Trump's tariff policies.



Musk's brother, Kimbal Musk, also criticized Trump's tariff policy on Twitter, pointing out that "Taxing consumption means less consumption, which also means fewer job opportunities, leading to even less consumption and fewer job opportunities." He believes that taxation is a "structural, permanent tax on American consumers."



Particularly targeted at trade advisor Peter Navarro, Musk has also made many criticisms and sarcastic comments. On April 8, he replied to a post quoting Navarro's interview where Navarro referred to Tesla more as an "assembler" than a "manufacturer," criticizing its components coming from China, Japan, and Taiwan. Musk directly responded in a heated manner, stating, "Navarro is a complete idiot, what he said here is obviously false," followed by a community note proving the Tesla Model Y is the "most American-made car." One retort apparently wasn't enough, as Musk further referred to Navarro as "dumber than a sack of bricks" in another post.



Intensifying Conflict: Bezos and Musk Engage in Fierce War of Words


Their contradictory stances on the tariff issue gradually fermented in the intricate power struggle.


On April 23, local time, it was reported by insiders that on April 17, Musk and Treasury Secretary Bezos had a heated clash during a meeting in the West Wing of the White House. Bezos lost control of his emotions and erupted with profanity, to which Musk provocatively responded with a "raise your voice." The confrontation even escalated to personal attacks, with Bezos angrily accusing Musk of exaggerating the DOGE budget cut issue, leading to no progress. Musk, in turn, directly retorted that Bezos was a "Soros puppet" and mocked him for his previous hedge fund debacle. The argument alarmed Trump and visiting Italian Prime Minister Meloni, and it took assistant intervention to separate the two.



The direct cause of this conflict was the controversy over the appointment of the IRS Commissioner. As Elon Musk, serving as the head of the U.S. Department of Efficiency, proposed the appointment of Gary Sharply as the Acting Commissioner of the IRS without the approval of Treasury Secretary Bennett, Bennett viewed this as a violation of his authority. He lobbied President Trump to revoke the appointment and instead support his own deputy, Deputy Treasury Secretary Michael Falkend, for the position of IRS Commissioner.


The outcome of this power struggle seemed to favor Bennett as President Trump eventually supported Bennett's proposal, revoked Musk's nomination of Sharply, and appointed Falkend as the Acting Commissioner of the IRS.


The fact that two top U.S. officials could be so enraged as to publicly curse each other at the White House gates despite their public image was due to their long-standing animosity. Back when Trump first took office, Musk had strongly advocated for nominating Howard Lutnick as Treasury Secretary, but Trump ultimately chose Bennett and appointed Lutnick to lead the Department of Commerce. Perhaps from the beginning, Trump had strategically set up a situation where his subordinates would check each other, siding with whoever aligned more with his own ideas. This set the stage for future conflicts.


The conflict between the two was fundamentally a power struggle and game of influence between two factions within the Trump administration. The reformist faction represented by Musk sought to reshape the landscape through new policies, while the traditional faction represented by Bennett resisted actions that harmed their own interests. Trump's handling of this event was seen as a sign of Musk's diminished influence within the government.


It is worth noting that, regarding tariff policies, Bennett, unlike Musk's clear opposition, had publicly supported tariff policies, believing that implementing new tariffs in the U.S. was necessary. He also refuted the idea that new tariffs would cause an economic downturn. Perhaps the consistency in policy preferences was also a reason why Trump gradually leaned towards Bennett and distanced himself from Musk. After all, to Trump, a businessman by background, permanent interests matter more than permanent friends.


Musk's role was constrained by the 130-day term limit for special government employees, which began counting from Trump's inauguration on January 20, 2025, and is expected to expire at the end of May. Anonymous sources within the White House hinted at the end of February that Musk "will stay," but on March 31, Trump himself openly acknowledged Musk's prioritization of his commercial duties and showed no signs of insisting on retention. Perhaps as the mission of DOGE is accomplished, Musk's 130-day government employee term enters its final phase, and Trump will gradually sideline Musk from the power center, shifting to new allies who align more with his current interests. In retrospect, it's a poignant reminder of how fleeting alliances can be.


The world's richest person, Musk, experienced the thrill of a "Tech Disruption Workplace" at the center of American politics. He ignited a fire for Trump's "New Sheriff in Town," touching the interests of countless people. He reformed the behemoth of the American government at an incredible speed, leaving behind not only a controversial outline of "Algorithmic Governance" but also exposing the deep-seated contradictions between capital and power in American politics. This radical experiment of "Tech Transforming Politics" seems to be nearing its conclusion. When Musk truly departs, that red hat proclaiming "Trump Is Always Right" may perhaps become the most dramatic footnote to this brief "political marriage."


April 23 Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-Chain Flows: $9.7M USD inflow to Arbitrum today; $9.7M USD outflow from Solana 2. Biggest Gainers and Losers: $DEEP, $AERGO 3. Top News: Bitcoin Decoupling from US Stocks, Potential Return to "Digital Gold" Status

Arthur Hayes New Article: Bitcoin to Return to “Gold Tier” Safe Haven, Altseason to Potentially Follow

Once Bitcoin breaks its all-time high of $110,000, it is likely to skyrocket.

ArkStream Capital: The Power Play of WLFI's CEX-DEX Convergence

As the dust settled in the first quarter, the market presented a stark picture of "macro narrative strong volatility, micro innovation deeply dormant."

Trump Administration Official's Crypto Holdings Revealed, BTC Still the Top Choice

Vice President Vance turns out to be the poorest, with only $4 million in assets, and less than $500,000 in cryptocurrency assets.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

17:16

The probability of the Fed holding interest rates steady in January next year has risen to 86.7%

BlockBeats News, December 25th, according to CME's FedWatch tool, the probability of the Fed cutting interest rates by 25 basis points in January next year is 13.3%, while the probability of keeping the interest rates unchanged is 86.7%.
16:46

In the past 24 hours, the entire network has seen $182 million in liquidations, with long positions hit the hardest.

BlockBeats News, December 25th, according to Coinglass data, the total liquidation in the past 24 hours was $182 million, with long liquidations totaling $121 million and short liquidations totaling $60.35 million.
16:16

「BTC OG Insider Whale」 Continues to Hold the Line, Long Position now at a Total Unrealized Loss of $53.23 Million

BlockBeats News, December 25th, according to HyperInsight monitoring, the "BTC OG Insider Whale" continues to hold a total of $717.9 million in BTC, ETH, and SOL long positions, with a total unrealized loss of $53.23 million. They have paid $2.614 million in funding fees. The current positions are a...
15:46

Circle Launches Digital Precious Metals Platform, Supporting Tokenized Gold and Silver Exchange via USDC

BlockBeats News, December 24th, according to Decrypt, Circle's CircleMetals announced today that it will expand its cryptocurrency platform to the tokenized precious metals market. This new service allows customers to seamlessly convert USDC to tokenized gold (GLDC) and tokenized silver (SILC) at re...
15:46

Former Acting CFTC Chair Caroline Pham Joins MoonPay as Chief Legal Officer

BlockBeats News, December 24, FOX Business reporter Eleanor Terrett posted stating that former acting chair of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Caroline Pham has joined the crypto payment company MoonPay as Chief Legal Officer and Chief Administrative Officer.
Read more
Community
iconiconiconiconiconiconicon

Customer Support：@weikecs

Business Cooperation：@weikecs

Quant Trading & MM：bd@weex.com

VIP Services：support@weex.com