Bittensor Revival: Everything You Need to Know About dTAO

By: blockbeats|2025/02/23 03:45:03
Share
copy
Original Article Title: Dynamic TAO: Your No-Nonsense Guide
Original Author: Yau Teng Yan, Founder of Chain of Thought
Original Translation: ChatGPT

Editor's Note: The article points out that the launch of dTAO has addressed the unfairness and centralization issues in Bittensor's early reward distribution. Through a market-driven mechanism, dTAO aligns the TAO rewards of subnets with demand, directing more rewards to high-demand subnets. This change has shifted from validator-driven reward distribution to pricing through the Alpha token market, ensuring that well-performing subnets receive more rewards and incentivizing overall network activity and innovation. While still facing issues of manipulation and liquidity, dTAO has taken a significant step towards decentralization and market-driven incentives.

The following is the original content (rearranged for readability and comprehension):

A year ago, I wrote about Bittensor's economic challenges. Now, with the launch of dTAO, the network is finally starting to address these issues.

Bittensor Revival: Everything You Need to Know About dTAO

This transformation was long overdue. Bittensor's growth had outpaced the ability of root validators to fairly assess new subnets. Influence was concentrated at the top, sometimes not entirely neutral. dTAO addresses this by letting demand, not gatekeepers, determine which subnets can thrive.

Frankly, understanding dTAO was not easy at first. It took some time to piece together all the details.

That's also why I wrote this article: to break it down in plain language, so you don't feel the confusion I felt at the time. And to summarize my key takeaways.

Why dTAO?

First, it's worth asking: What problem is dTAO designed to fix?

Validator Bottleneck

In the old system, freshly minted TAO was allocated based on validator voting. In theory, this "validator democracy" made sense, but in practice, it had issues.

With more and more subnets coming online, top validators simply couldn't keep up. Too many subnets, too much noise, and bandwidth insufficient to fairly assess them.

Over time, the system fell into a state of apathy—where a few closely-knit subnets received most of the rewards, while new subnets struggled to gain support.

Conflict of Interest

Many top validators happen to also be subnet owners. By controlling reward distribution, some have weighted their own subnets more heavily, effectively increasing their own rewards.

Some have even referred to the previous system as more like "giving TAO to their friends."

In extreme cases, validators have reached private agreements or revenue-sharing deals with subnet owners, creating centralization risks, distorting reward distribution, and eroding trust in the system.

Poor Coordination

Validators have their own set of weighting methods to determine rewards, but these methods are not always aligned with the overall network's goals.

What's worse, the stakers providing economic weight cannot directly decide which subnets receive rewards. Most staked TAO is concentrated in the hands of a few validators, effectively giving them control over the entire reward distribution landscape.

dTAO—A Significant Change

Prior to the launch of dTAO, reward distribution was straightforward. Each block produced 1 TAO (equivalent to 7,200 TAO per day), which was allocated to subnets based on the weight set by the root validator. Each subnet distributed TAO to its contributors in a fixed ratio: subnet owner 18%, miner 41%, validator 41%.

For stakers, everything revolved around the Root (Subnet 0). TAO holders staked behind validators, and in return, they received newly minted TAO. This process was direct and predictable.

But all of that has now come to an end.

Under dTAO, rewards are no longer based on validator weightings. Instead, TAO rewards flow through a market-driven system using subnet tokens, also known as Alpha tokens.

The price of these Alpha tokens reflects the market's demand for a specific subnet. The higher the demand, the higher the price, indicating the subnet's greater value.

The subnet tokens use a constant product automated market maker (AMM)—similar to the pricing mechanism used by Uniswap. The price at any given time is determined by the ratio of TAO reserves to Alpha token reserves in the subnet's liquidity pool.

So, rewards are no longer randomly distributed; a subnet's TAO reward share is now determined by how the market perceives its value.

· Higher Alpha Token Price → Reflects strong market demand → More TAO rewards

· Lower Alpha Token Price → Reflects weak market demand → Fewer TAO rewards

Imagine two subnets vying for rewards:

· Subnet A Token Price = $100

· Subnet B Token Price = $50

This mechanism creates a self-adjusting system where subnets perceived to create more value (perform better) receive more TAO rewards, while underperforming subnets naturally see lower rewards.

This mechanism ensures capital flows to the most productive subnets.

Reward Distribution

It took me a while to piece together a clear picture of the actual reward distribution, so let me try to summarize concisely. The following chart is worth referencing multiple times in the upcoming article. I found it to be one of the most informative visuals, showing the distribution of TAO rewards to the Root versus subnets over time.

What's Happening on the Root Network?

In the early stages of the dTAO (like it is now), Stakeholders on the Root (Subnet 0) will still receive the majority of TAO rewards. The reason is simple: the circulating supply of Alpha tokens is still not substantial.

The staking weight of validators on each subnet depends not only on their share of Alpha tokens in that subnet but also on the amount of TAO they stake in the Root.

Because Alpha tokens are still scarce in the early stages, Root validators hold disproportionate influence across the network.

This has resulted in the majority of newly minted Alpha tokens being automatically "sold back" to TAO and distributed to TAO stakers on the Root.

Currently, this is highly beneficial for Root stakers. Since most rewards still flow into the Root, the returns are very lucrative, with the APR reaching as high as 60-70% in the past few days.

However, this situation will not last long.

As more Alpha tokens enter circulation, their weight in the network will increase, gradually shifting the influence away from Root validators. Over time, dTAO ensures that rewards are no longer concentrated on the Root but are more evenly distributed across the network.

Approximately 100 days later, the TAO rewards for Root stakers are expected to balance out with the subnet Alpha tokens.

What Happened to Subnets?

Subnets no longer directly allocate newly minted TAO to miners and validators but instead use Alpha tokens—their native currency—to reward participants.

How Alpha Tokens Work

Each block, each subnet mints Alpha tokens, starting from 2 Alphas per block (which is double the TAO minting rate). The minting rate is dynamic, with the higher the price of Alpha tokens, the lower the minting rate.

Similar to TAO, each Alpha token has a hard cap total supply of 21 million tokens and follows the same halving schedule, with the first halving expected to occur when the total supply reaches 10.5 million—anticipated to be in less than two years.

Each subnet operates an AMM pool where TAO is paired with Alpha tokens. The price of Alpha is dynamically determined based on the ratio of TAO to Alpha tokens in the pool.

When you stake TAO into a subnet pool, you receive an equivalent amount of Alpha tokens at the current market price. Later, if you unstake, you can exchange Alpha tokens back for TAO at the market price.

When people say they are "buying" or "selling" subnet tokens, they are actually just staking or unstaking TAO into the subnet pool. There is currently no standalone mechanism to directly purchase Alpha tokens.

Reward Distribution Mechanism

For each block, the protocol scans the Alpha token prices of all subnets and dynamically determines how much newly minted TAO to inject into each subnet's pool.

· Subnets with higher prices (indicating stronger demand and utility) will receive more TAO rewards.

· Subnets with lower prices will receive fewer TAO rewards.

Subnets now have to earn TAO rewards by demonstrating actual demand for their Alpha tokens. This creates a competitive, market-driven environment where success must be earned, and only the most viable subnets can survive.

Subnets can no longer coast to rewards; they must prove their worth.

Those that demonstrate true utility and maintain a higher Alpha token price will receive more TAO rewards, while underperforming subnets will naturally decline as their rewards gradually deplete.

To prevent reward distribution from being distorted by short-term price fluctuations, the system employs Exponential Moving Average (EMA), which smooths out volatility and ensures that TAO reward distribution remains stable even in cases of sudden price swings. Therefore, changes in Alpha price are reflected with a lag in TAO reward distribution—usually taking a few days rather than hours.

Timeline

Below is a breakdown of key stages to help you anticipate future developments. Please note that these are rough timeframes and conceptual milestones, not set in stone.

Genesis Stage (Day 0 - Day 1)

· Each subnet mints 2 Alphas per block (commencing new minting).

· As Alpha tokens are not yet in circulation, Root will receive around 100% of TAO rewards.

· Validator staking weight on TAO exclusively.

· Highest TAO staking rewards on Root.

Early Adoption Stage (Day 2 - Day 30): We are currently in this stage

· More Alpha tokens enter circulation as subnets start minting Alphas.

· Validators in the subnets start accumulating Alpha, and staking weight gradually shifts to the subnets.

· Root continues to receive the majority of TAO rewards, but its dominance begins to decline.

Transition Phase (Day 30 - Day 100)

· The Alpha supply of the subnet rapidly increases due to a high minting rate.

· Subnet validators with more Alpha start to surpass TAO-based Root validators in staking weight.

· Root's share of TAO rewards significantly decreases.

· By the 100th day, the staking weight of TAO and Alpha will reach equilibrium, meaning that TAO staking will no longer dominate in validator weight calculation.

Post-Transition Phase (Day 100 - Year 1)

· Subnet validators dominate reward distribution.

· Root continues to receive TAO rewards, but at a significantly slower rate.

· Validators staking Alpha tokens in the subnet adapt to maximize earnings.

Long-Term (Year 1 and Beyond)

· TAO rewards are largely determined by market-driven subnet staking.

· Root still allows TAO staking but with minimal rewards, and TAO's weight approaches 0.

· In terms of reward distribution, the network becomes fully decentralized.

What Has Happened So Far

All subnet token pools initially had a 1 Alpha/1 TAO ratio, which can be seen as a model of fair launch.

Shortly after the launch of dTAO, the price of Alpha experienced intense fluctuations. Some subnets surged to 5-10 TAO/Alpha within the first few hours, mainly driven by speculators looking to profit from high rewards. The prices of other subnets remained between 0.1-0.2 TAO, possibly due to strong branding or a lack of early marketing.

However, the early price spikes may not be sustainable for long due to the following reasons:

· Automatic sale of Root rewards: Many newly minted Alpha tokens are automatically sold back into these subnet pools to pay the TAO stakers on Root their rewards, exerting downward pressure on the price.

· Sell Pressure: Miners, Validators, and Subnet Owners earn Alpha tokens (which mint faster than TAO) and then swap them back for TAO to cover operational costs.

Warning: In the early stages, the relative inflation of Subnet Alpha tokens is very high. Low circulation, high price volatility.

The best place I've found to track Subnet Alpha prices is @BackpropFinance.

As of now, the circulation of Alpha per Subnet is less than 0.4%, so you often see a low market cap, but the fully diluted valuation is very high, usually reaching billions of dollars.

For example, one of the most hyped ones recently is Chutes, providing serverless GPU resources by @rayon_labs (Subnet 64). It shows a market cap of about $9.2 million, but the fully diluted valuation is $26 billion, which is quite remarkable compared to TAO's market cap of around $40 billion.

Considering the severe inflation and ongoing sell pressure, I expect these fully diluted valuations (FDV) to eventually retreat to more realistic levels.

One trackable metric is the total FDV of all Subnet tokens compared to TAO's market cap (see the leftmost chart in the image above). It's currently around 2-3x, but clearly, this situation is unsustainable long-term.

However, this is still a low liquidity environment, meaning even small-scale "blind" buys or sellers can quickly drive price movements. In just the past day, we've seen Subnet token prices spike by 100-200% and then quickly cool off.

How to Acquire Subnet Alpha Tokens

Choosing the right Subnet is the first step.

Not all Subnets are created equal, so look for practical utility, an active community, and strong miner participation—tools like Discord, X, GitHub, etc., can help you identify real market momentum.

Once you've found a subnet you like, you'll need a Bittensor wallet. A good wallet is the official Chrome extension from the @OpenTensor Foundation. You can only use TAO staking to receive subnet tokens, so there is currently no direct mechanism to exchange with ETH, USDC, or SOL.

While you can stake directly in the wallet, I prefer using platforms like Taostats.io or Backprop Finance, which provide a familiar trading interface. Just be mindful of slippage: most subnets still have low liquidity, so larger trades may cause significant price changes.

One benefit? Holding Alpha tokens allows you to earn more tokens as newly minted Alpha tokens automatically accrue to your balance. When you wish to exit, you can unstake and exchange back to TAO at the pool's rate. This rate may differ from when you staked, so you may actually lose TAO in the process.

My Thoughts on dTAO

The greatest thing about dTAO and Bittensor subnet tokens is that it makes everyone truly care about the development of each subnet. Here is real Alpha—by doing research, one can actually gain an edge—whereas previously, all you needed to do was buy TAO.

And that's the crux of it.

I'm taking the time to delve into what these subnets are doing, to understand their product vision and business model.

And it's actually very fascinating. Many subnets are led by technical teams with deep AI expertise, working on everything from AI model development to protein folding and advanced computer vision models in scientific research.

These subnets are at different stages of development. Some are still in the early stages, focusing on building a miner community, while others have already begun to produce valuable outputs and secure business partnerships.

If I were to give some advice on subnet tokens, it would be: patience may be your best strategy.

dTAO is a system designed for the long term, gradually transitioning and rewarding those who take the time to deeply understand it. If you like a particular subnet, gradually getting involved through small, regular purchases (rather than a large one-time investment) can help you weather the volatility while steadily increasing liquidity.

For those who are not fans of subnet mania, you may consider continuing to delegate your TAO to the Root over the next few months. The APR there will gradually decrease over time, but it is still respectable.

Of course, there will also be those who want to play the volatility "lottery." If they can accurately time their entries and exits, they may be able to significantly increase their TAO holdings. However, this is a very risky game.

Some Thoughts

dTAO is an important step in the right direction. However, it is not a perfect system (is there such a thing as a perfect system anyway?)

Manipulation is Still Possible


Switching to an Alpha-based staking model has introduced a new set of risks. In theory, it has created a better market-driven incentive mechanism, but in practice, it still leaves room for exploitation. If a subnet's token price collapses, malicious actors could take advantage of the low price to purchase Alpha tokens and use them to manipulate rewards.

Currently, dTAO mitigates this issue by merging Root staking weight, making it harder for any single entity to hijack rewards. However, as the Root weight gradually decreases, subnets will need stronger security mechanisms to prevent hostile takeovers. Subnet owners could still engage in private agreements with large validators or miners—the medium now being Alpha instead of TAO. While the system is more decentralized, it still does not eliminate the possibility of game theory alliances.

1,000 Subnets?

Each time a new subnet is registered, the fee doubles. But over time, the price will also decay, halving approximately every 38,880 blocks—roughly every five and a half days. This means that if demand remains stable, a new subnet could be launched every five days.

What happens when we have a thousand subnets?

At such a large scale, no individual will reasonably be able to track all rewards, performances, and opportunities across the entire network. The data will be too vast, the variables too many, and the noise too much. AI-based analytics tools will become a necessity, not a luxury, to help delegators navigate through the overwhelming options.

For those launching new subnets, early liquidity will be key. They will need to create an initial surge in demand for their Alpha tokens, or else their reward share will remain insignificant.

Over time, the real winners will be those subnets that demonstrate true utility, establishing a strong correlation between usage and Alpha price. Subnets that fail to attract usage may gradually fade away, with their tokens drifting towards zero.

DeFi on Bittensor

I'm excited to see potential future upgrades bring DeFi-like mechanisms into the ecosystem, further enhancing capital efficiency.

One possibility is adopting liquidity pools akin to Uniswap V3, allowing for concentrated liquidity rather than the constant product AMM model. Another possibility is permissionless liquidity provision, where external LPs can deposit funds into Alpha–TAO pairs and earn transaction fees.

These do not exist yet—but if implemented, they could fundamentally change the rules of the game, making subnet tokens more transactional and staking-attractive.

More capital → more liquidity → more capital.

The dTAO is still in its early stages, but with the introduction of new mechanisms, Bittensor's financial layer could evolve into something more complex than what we see today.

Bittensor Renaissance

Last month, in my personal predictions for 2025, I wrote about the possibility of a Bittensor renaissance:

Bittensor spent most of last year in a state of turmoil—overlooked by the emerging narratives despite being the "elder" of crypto AI. While waves of AI token and AI agent hype washed over, TAO struggled to keep up.

Now, with the launch of dTAO, that narrative is changing. Interest is surging, forcing the entire network to pay attention for the first time—not just to TAO but to what each subnet is really building.

Congratulations to the const and Opentensor teams, and everyone who has worked hard for this. I admit I had my doubts.

This isn't just an upgrade. It's the beginning of the Bittensor Renaissance, a process that will unfold over many years.

Related Resources

· Dynamic TAO Whitepaper (Warning: Lots of Math)

· Opentensor's Dynamic TAO FAQ

· Taostats (Great Resource for Tracking Network and Subnet Data)

· Taopill (Overview of Each Subnet's Functionality and Key Achievements)

· Backprop Finance for Monitoring Subnet Token Prices

· Wombo's Automated Subnet Evaluation Paper

· Many Great Tweets from @bloomberg_seth, @Old_Samster (@CrucibleLabs), and @xavi3rlu (Latent Holdings)

· @taotimesdotai / @brodydotai: Best Communication for Bittensor

· @TAOTalkPod: Excellent Podcast for Bittensor

Original Post Link

You may also like

a16z Leads $18M Seed Round for Catena Labs, Crypto Industry Bets on Stablecoin AI Payment

Traditional finance is still stuck in a "human-to-human" model, while Catena aims to achieve "AI-to-AI" interaction.

Never Underestimate the Significance of the US Stablecoin 'Infrastructure Bill'

Original Title: "Never Underestimate the Significance of the US Stablecoin 'Genius Act'"Original Author: 0xTodd, Partner at Nothing Research


If the US stablecoin bill, the "GENIUS Act," passes smoothly this time, its significance will be tremendous. I even think it's significant enough to enter the top five in Crypto history.



Although abbreviated as the GENIUS Act, which translates directly to the Genius Act, it is actually the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins, which translates to "Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Dollar Stablecoins."


The proposal is lengthy, with several key points summarized for everyone:


· Mandatory 1:1 Full Asset Backing: Assets include cash, demand deposits, and short-term US Treasuries. At the same time, misappropriation and rehypothecation are strictly prohibited.


· High-Frequency Disclosure: Reserve reports must be published at least monthly, introducing external audits.


· Licensing Requirement: Once the circulating market cap of the issuer's stablecoin exceeds $100 billion, it must transition into the federal regulatory system within a specified timeframe, adopting banking-grade regulation.


· Introduction of Custody: The custodian of the stablecoin and its reserve assets must be a regulated qualified financial institution.


· Clear Definition as a Payment Medium: The bill explicitly defines stablecoin as a new type of payment medium, primarily regulated by the banking regulatory system, rather than restricted by the securities or commodities regulatory system.


· Embracing Existing Stablecoins: A maximum 18-month grace period after the bill's enactment, aimed at encouraging existing stablecoin issuers (such as USDT, USDC, etc.) to promptly obtain licenses or become compliant.


After finishing the main content, let's talk about the significance of this matter with an excited heart.


Over the years, when others asked, "After working in the Crypto industry for 16 years, what application have you created?"


In the future, you can confidently tell others—Stablecoins.


First, Clearing Concerns is a Prerequisite


Some people have held opposing views. In the past, people's impression of stablecoins was that they were an opaque black box. Every few months, there would be FUD — whether Tether's assets were frozen or Circle had a significant black hole deficit.


In fact, if you think about it, Tether easily rakes in billions of dollars a year just from the interest on those underlying government bonds. Circle, slightly less, also made a $1.7 billion profit last year.


They basically made money while standing there. From a motivational standpoint, they have no malicious intentions. In fact, they are the most eager for compliance.


Now, this opaque black box will become a transparent white box.


In the past, the only complaint was that Tether's funds might have been frozen by the United States. Now, they will be directly placed into U.S. compliant custodial institutions, with high-frequency disclosures, so you can rest assured.


【No need to worry about a rug pull】 is such a huge advantage—I think especially all Crypto people understand this.


Second, Mastering the Standard is Very Important


Stablecoins were once almost on the verge of being overtaken by CBDCs. In any country, if a central bank digital currency really exists, it is highly likely not built on a blockchain, at most it is built on some internal central bank consortium chain, which to be honest, is meaningless.


When CBDCs were at their peak, that was the most dangerous time for stablecoins.


If CBDCs had become a reality back then, stablecoins today would have been relentlessly suppressed into a dark corner, and blockchain would only be able to play a minimal role.


The remaining half-dead stablecoins would even have to learn the standards of central bank digital currencies, completely relinquishing their standard-setting power.


And now, stablecoins have won (or are about to).


Instead, everyone should learn the 【Blockchain + Token】 standard.


Nowadays, many blockchains actually have no meaningful applications on top, only stablecoin transfers. For example, with Aptos, the only scenario I use Aptos for is transfers between Binance and OKX.


And now, stablecoins will be legislated, what does that mean?


That's right, blockchain will become the only standard.


In the future, every stablecoin user will be the first to learn how to use a wallet.


As an aside, I actually think Ethereum's concerted push for EIP-7702 is quite forward-thinking. While other chains are all about memes, thank you Ethereum for sticking to account abstraction.



EIP-7702 is about Account Abstraction, which can support, for example:


· Social Account Registration Wallet

· Paying GAS with Native Coin

· And more


This paves the way for future new users to heavily use stablecoins, solving the last-mile problem.


Third, Deposit Enters a New Era


Furthermore, once stablecoins receive legislative support, deposits and withdrawals will become even easier.


Let's imagine a scenario: previously, hindered by the gray nature of stablecoins, but after the bill passes, many traditional brokerages can support stablecoins themselves. The money from a US stock investor can be converted into stablecoins in minutes and instantly deposited into Coinbase. Believe it or not.



Let's imagine another scenario: if the brilliant bill smoothly passes through the House of Representatives, next, you will see:


Due to the extremely lucrative nature of this trading, existing stablecoin leaders and newly entering traditional giants will crazily start promoting their stablecoin products.


And an outsider, due to these promotions, will start using stablecoins. And then one day, after finding out that the wallet account has been created, will explore Bitcoin inside. Is mining Bitcoin difficult?


Stablecoins are a huge Trojan horse. The moment you start using stablecoins, you unwittingly step half a foot into the Crypto world.


Fourth, Conclusion


As a large reservoir for digesting US debt, although stablecoins cannot directly absorb debt, they at least provide ammunition for the US debt secondary market. These functions are quite important, and slowly, stablecoins are becoming a part of the US debt market's body. Therefore, once the US legislation is passed and experiences the benefits, there is no turning back.


And, we are also confident that stablecoins are indeed one of the great innovations in our industry. People who have used stablecoins will find it hard to return to the traditional cash-banking system.


Once the bill is passed, users can't go back. In the future, concerns are about to be resolved, standards will be mastered, and the era of large deposits seems to be on the horizon.


Original Article Link

Pharos, deeply integrated with AntChain, is about to launch. How can we get involved?

What is the relationship between the $8 million funded NewChain and Ant, and how will they interact?

$COIN Joins S&P 500, but Coinbase Isn't Celebrating

On May 13, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced that Coinbase would officially replace Discover Financial Services in the S&P 500 on May 19. While other companies like Block and MicroStrategy, closely tied to Bitcoin, were already part of the S&P 500, Coinbase became the first cryptocurrency exchange whose primary business is in the index. This also signifies that cryptocurrency is gradually moving from the fringes to the mainstream in the U.S.



On the day of the announcement, Coinbase's stock price surged by 23%, surpassing the $250 mark. However, just 3 days later, Coinbase was hit by two consecutive events: a hack where employees were bribed to steal customer data and a demand for a $20 million ransom, and an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the authenticity of its claim of having over 100 million "verified users" in its securities filings and marketing materials. These two events acted as mini-bombs, and at the time of writing, Coinbase's stock had already dropped by over 7.3%.


Coincidentally, Discover Financial Services, being replaced by Coinbase, can also be considered the "Coinbase" of the previous payment era. Discover is a U.S.-based digital banking and payment services company headquartered in Illinois, founded in 1960. Its payment network, Discover Network, is the fourth largest payment network apart from Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.


In April, after the approval of the acquisition of Discover by the sixth-largest U.S. bank, Capital One, this well-established digital banking company of over 60 years smoothly handed over its S&P 500 "seat" to this emerging cryptocurrency "bank." This unexpected coincidence also portrayed the handover between the new and old eras in Coinbase's entry into the S&P 500, resembling a relay race scene. However, this relay baton also brought Coinbase's accumulated "external troubles and internal strife" to a tipping point.


Side Effects of ETFs


Over the past decade, cryptocurrency exchanges have been the most stable "profit machines." They play a role in providing liquidity to the entire industry and rely on trading fees to sustain their operations. However, with the comprehensive rollout of ETF products in the U.S. market, this profit model is facing unprecedented challenges. As the leader in the "American stack," with over 80% of its business coming from the U.S., Coinbase is most affected by this.



Starting from the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, traditional financial capital has significantly onboarded users and funds that originally belonged to exchanges in a more cost-effective, compliant, and transparent manner. The transaction fee revenue of cryptocurrency exchanges has started to decline, and this trend may further intensify in the coming months.


According to Coinbase's 2024 Q4 financial report, the platform's total trading revenue was $417 million, a 45% year-on-year decrease. The contribution of BTC and ETH's trading revenue dropped from 65% in the same period last year to less than 50%.


This decline is not a result of a decrease in market enthusiasm. In fact, since the approval of the Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the inflow of BTC into the U.S. market has continued to reach new highs, with asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity rapidly expanding their management scale. Data shows that BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) alone has surpassed $17 billion in assets under management. As of mid-May 2025, the cumulative net inflow of 11 major institutional Bitcoin spot ETFs on the market has exceeded $41.5 billion, with a total net asset value of $1214.69 billion, accounting for approximately 5.91% of the total Bitcoin market capitalization.


Chart showing the trend of net outflows for Grayscale among the 11 institutions


Institutional investors and some retail investors are shifting towards ETF products, partly due to compliance and tax considerations. On one hand, ETFs have much lower trading costs compared to cryptocurrency exchanges. While Coinbase's spot trading fee rate varies annually in a tiered manner but averages around 1.49%, for example, the management fee for IBIT ETF is only 0.25%, and the majority of ETF institution fees fluctuate around 0.15% to 0.25%.



In other words, the more rational users are, the more likely they are to move from exchanges to ETF products, especially for investors aiming for long-term holdings.


According to multiple sources, several institutions, including VanEck and Grayscale, have submitted applications to the SEC for a Solana (SOL) ETF, with some institutions also planning to submit an XRP ETF proposal. Once approved, this may trigger a new round of fund migration. According to a report submitted by Coinbase to the SEC, as of April, the platform's trading revenue from XRP and Solana accounted for 18% and 10%, nearly one-third of the platform's fee revenue.



However, the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs passed in 2024 also reduced the fees for these two tokens on Coinbase from 30% and 15% to 26% and 10%, respectively. If the SOL and XRP ETFs are approved, it will further undermine the core fee revenue of exchanges like Coinbase.


The expansion of ETF products is gradually weakening the financial intermediary status of cryptocurrency exchanges. From their original roles as matchmakers and clearers to now gradually becoming mere "on-ramps and off-ramps" for funds, exchanges are seeing their marginal value squeezed by ETFs.


Robinhood Takes a Stand, Traditional Brokerages Join the Fray


On May 12, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins gave a keynote speech at the Tokenization and Cryptocurrency Working Group roundtable. The theme of his speech revolved around "It is a new day at the SEC," where he indicated that the SEC would not approach enforcement and regulation the same way as before but would instead pave the way for cryptocurrency assets in the U.S. market.



With signs of cryptocurrency compliance such as the SEC's "NEW DAY" declaration, an increasing number of traditional brokerages are attempting to enter the cryptocurrency industry. One of the most representative cases is the well-known U.S. brokerage Robinhood, which began expanding its crypto business in 2018. By the time of its IPO in 2021, Robinhood's crypto business revenue accounted for over 50% of the company, with a significant boost from the Dogecoin "moonshot" promoted by Musk.


In Q1 2025 earnings report, Robinhood showcased strong growth, especially in revenue from cryptocurrency and options trading. Fueled by Trump's Memecoin, cryptocurrency-related revenue reached $250 million, nearly doubling year-over-year. Consequently, Robinhood Gold subscription users reached 3.5 million, a 90% increase from the previous year, with the rapid growth of Robinhood Gold providing the company with a stable source of income.



Meanwhile, RobinHood is actively pursuing acquisitions in the cryptocurrency space. In 2024, it announced a $2 billion acquisition of the long-standing European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp. Additionally, Canada's largest cryptocurrency CEX, WonderFi, which recently went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also announced its integration with RobinHood Crypto. After obtaining virtual asset licenses in the UK, Canada, Singapore, and other markets, RobinHood has taken a proactive approach in the compliant cryptocurrency trading market.



Furthermore, an increasing number of brokerage firms are exploring the same path. Futu Securities, Tiger Brokers, and others are also dipping their toes into cryptocurrency trading, with some having applied for or obtained the VA license from the Hong Kong SFC. Although their user bases are currently small, traditional brokerages have a natural advantage in user trust, regulatory licenses, and low fee structures. This could pose a threat to native cryptocurrency platforms in the future.



User Data Breach: Is Coinbase Still Secure?


In April 2025, security researchers discovered that some Coinbase user data was leaked on the dark web. While the platform initially responded by attributing it to a "technical misinformation," it still raised concerns among users regarding its security and privacy protection. Just two days before Dow Jones Indexes announced Coinbase's addition to the S&P 500 Index, on May 11, 2025, Coinbase received an email from an unknown threat actor claiming to have obtained customer account information and internal documents, demanding a $20 million ransom to keep the data private. Subsequent investigations confirmed the data breach.


Cybercriminals obtained the data by bribing overseas customer service agents and support staff, mainly in "non-U.S. regions such as India." These agents abused their access to Coinbase's internal customer support system and stole customer data. As early as February this year, blockchain detective ZachXBT revealed on X platform that between December 2024 and January 2025, Coinbase users lost over $65 million to social engineering scams, with the actual amount potentially higher.


Among the victims was a well-known figure, 67-year-old Ed Suman, an established artist in the art world for nearly two decades, having been involved in the creation of artworks such as Jeff Koons' "Balloon Dog" sculpture. Earlier this year, he fell victim to an impersonation scam involving fake Coinbase customer support, resulting in a loss of over $2 million in cryptocurrency. ZachXBT critiqued Coinbase for its inadequate handling of such scams, noting that other major exchanges have not faced similar issues and recommending Coinbase to enhance its security measures.


Amidst a series of ongoing social engineering incidents, although there has not been any impact on user assets at the technical level so far, it has raised concerns among many retail and institutional investors. Especially institutions holding massive assets on Coinbase. Just considering the U.S. BTC ETF institutions, as of mid-May 2025, they collectively hold nearly 840,000 BTC, and 75% of these are custodied by Coinbase. If we price BTC at $100,000, this amount reaches a staggering $63 billion, which is equivalent to the nominal GDP of two Iceland in the year 2024.


Visualization: ChatGPT, Source: Farside


In addition, Coinbase Custody also serves over 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, family offices, pension funds, and endowments. As of the Q1 2025 financial report, Coinbase's total assets under management (including institutional and retail clients) reached $404 billion. The specific amount of institutional custodied assets was not explicitly disclosed in the latest report, but it should still be over 50% based on the Q4 2024 report.


Visualization: ChatGPT


Once this security barrier is breached, not only could the rate of user attrition far exceed expectations, but more importantly, institutional trust in it would undermine the foundation of its business. Therefore, after a hacking event, Coinbase's stock price plummeted significantly.


CEXs are All in Self-Rescue Mode


Facing a decline in spot trading fee revenue, Coinbase is also accelerating its transformation, attempting to find growth opportunities in derivatives and emerging assets. Coinbase acquired a stake in the options platform Deribit at the end of 2024 and announced the official launch of perpetual contract products in 2025. This acquisition fills in Coinbase's gap in options trading and its relatively small global market share.



Deribit has a strong presence in non-U.S. markets, especially in Asia and Europe. The acquisition has enabled Coinbase to gain a dominant position in bitcoin and ethereum options trading on Deribit, accounting for approximately 80% of the global options trading volume, with daily trading volume remaining above $2 billion.


Meanwhile, 80-90% of Deribit's customer base consists of institutional investors, with their professionalism and liquidity in the Bitcoin and Ethereum options market highly favored by institutions. Coinbase's compliance advantage, coupled with its already robust institutional ecosystem, makes it even more suitable. By using institutions as an entry point, it can face the squeeze from giants like Binance and OKX in the derivatives market.



Facing a similar dilemma is Kraken, which is attempting to replicate Binance Futures' model in non-U.S. markets. Since the derivatives market relies more on professional users, fee rates are relatively higher and stickiness is stronger, making it a significant source of revenue for exchanges. In the first half of 2025, Kraken completed the acquisition of TradeStation Crypto and a futures exchange, aiming to build a complete derivatives trading ecosystem to hedge the risk of declining spot transaction fee income.


With the surge of Memecoin in 2024, Binance, OKX, and various CEX platforms began massively listing small-market-cap, highly volatile tokens to activate active trading users. Due to the wealth effect and trading activity of Memecoins, Coinbase was also forced to join the battle, successively listing popular tokens from the Solana ecosystem such as BOOK OF MEME and Dogwifhat. Although these coins are controversial, they are frequently traded, with fee rates several times higher than mainstream coins, serving as a "blood-boosting" method for spot trading.


However, due to its status as a publicly traded company, this practice is a riskier endeavor for Coinbase. Even in the current crypto-friendly environment, the SEC is still investigating whether tokens like SOL, ADA, and SAND constitute securities.


In addition to the forced transformation strategies carried out by the aforementioned CEXs, they are also starting to lay out RWAs and the most talked-about stablecoin payment fields, such as the PYUSD launched through a collaboration between Coinbase and Paypal, Coinbase's support for the Euro stablecoin EURC by Circle that complies with EU MiCA regulatory requirements, or the USD1 launched through a collaboration between Binance and WIFL. In the increasingly crowded trading field, many CEXs have shifted their focus from just the trading market to the application field.


The golden age of transaction fees has quietly ended, and the second half of the crypto exchange platform game has silently begun.


Arthur Hayes: Why I'm Betting on ETH While the Market Is Obsessed with SOL

"I personally have also allocated 20% to gold, expecting the price of gold to potentially rise to $10,000-20,000 by the end of this market cycle."

Key Market Insights for May 16th, how much did you miss out on?

1. On-chain Flows: $111.3M inflow to Ethereum this week; $237.6M outflow from Berachain 2. Largest Price Swings: $ETHFI, $NEIRO 3. Top News: Data: Solana Network's revenue reached $7.9M on the 13th, surpassing the sum of all other L1 and L2 chains

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more