ABCDE: From a VC Perspective, Discuss the Recent Changes in the RWA Space

By: blockbeats|2025/03/19 06:45:03
Share
copy
Original Title: "Discussing Recent Changes in the RWA Track from a VC Perspective"
Original Author: ABCDE, PANews

Having covered the perspectives of the East and the West on the market last time, today, coinciding with YZi Labs' announcement of investing in the Plume Network RWA platform, I want to discuss the recent changes I have observed in the RWA track.

This matter needs to be broken down into four parts:

1. Whether RWA truly has an application scenario, or in other words, Product-Market Fit (PMF)

2. Which RWA assets are suitable for on-chain implementation and which are not

3. What were the past solutions, and what are the current solutions

4. The direction of the RWA track in recent months—have you noticed any changes?

Let's start with 1 - Whether RWA Truly Has an Application Scenario

Or PMF - (Here, first, let's exclude the stablecoin track of on-chain U.S. bonds; projects like Usual, MKR, etc., are considered to have already found PMF). Taking U.S. stocks on-chain as an example, this is one of the most contentious topics on Twitter. Many people think that putting U.S. stocks on-chain is unnecessary. Those who really want to trade U.S. stocks have their own channels, and any asset on-chain is more volatile than U.S. stocks, so there's no need to play stocks on-chain.

I have a different opinion on this. Personally, I believe there is significance in putting U.S. stocks on-chain.

1. In terms of channels—indeed, most big players above A8 and A9 use platforms like Futu, FirstTrade for securities, diversified investments in coins, stocks, gold, etc. However, I believe that most retail investors in the crypto community do not have U.S. stock accounts. On-chain U.S. stock trading can at least provide them with an easy way to access their purchases.

From another perspective, as the total market cap of stablecoins like USDT/USDC continues to grow, this is another way for the U.S. dollar to expand its dominance compared to traditional finance. If Crypto, through stablecoins, Payfi, and smart wallets with an experience similar to Alipay, really moves towards Mass Adoption one day, do you think Americans would be willing to have the whole world come in to buy U.S. stocks? Would people from most other countries prefer to go through various banks and brokerages for days to buy their own struggling stocks, or simply place orders like shopping on Taobao to invest in the seven sisters of the world's largest economy?

2. In terms of application scenarios, imagine this scenario: as a junior P, you recently made a quick $100k trading Mubarak, you know Tesla has recently taken a hit, presenting a good opportunity for a bargain purchase, and now you want to convert that $100k into Tesla stock.

Even if you have a US stock account, you need to first convert these 100,000 U tokens to fiat currency, send the fiat currency to the broker's account via bank transfer, and then start buying on the broker's platform. This whole process usually takes 3-5 business days. (In 2017, before I got into Bitcoin, I bought US stocks in Australia through FirstTrade. Just the Swift transfer took 4 to 5 days and incurred a hefty fee of several tens of dollars). If one day your Telstra stock goes up and you want to sell it to convert to BTC or U, you'll have to go through this process all over again. Imagine if stocks were on the chain, and you could instantly convert the U you earned from a meme to Tesla. The reduction in friction costs is not just a little bit, but a 10x or even 100x level of experience improvement.

Now, let's talk about 2 - Which RWA Assets are Suitable for On-chain

Similarly, assets like T-Bills that have already proven themselves are not up for discussion. As for other RWA assets, it actually depends on the specific target audience.

For the To C side, stocks are undoubtedly the most suitable. Most retail investors have probably never dealt with primary private equity. Even if you tokenize equity of a non-public company, few people would be able to understand, buy, and hold it. Similarly, assets like private credit collateral on platforms like Centrifuge, such as bridge loans in the real estate market and corporate accounts receivable financing, are not suitable for To C. For the vast majority of To C users, the only familiar asset would be stocks. In more To C scenarios, it should be a process of bringing an asset to users who previously had no channel to purchase it, a 0 to 1 process.

On the other hand, for the To B side, there are many more assets that can be tokenized. However, compared to the 0 to 1 progression for To C, To B is more of a 1 to 100 process of reducing friction. Just as primary private equity is already circulated among some institutions and high-net-worth individuals, bridge loan collaterals on Centrifuge could likely be borrowed from traditional banks. It's just that the current flow process is relatively cumbersome with higher friction. Placing these assets on the chain, like Payfi compared to Swift, can significantly enhance user experience and transaction speed.

Thinking back to last year, I discussed an RWA project where the parent company is a prominent US-based asset management firm. They plan to tokenize primary equity of clients on their asset management platform, such as Musk's SpaceX, and issue it in token form on their own trading platform. This way, the token can easily circulate and change hands, and settle all at once when SpaceX goes public. So, for To B, apart from the trading users limited to institutions and enterprises, the issuing entity is also relatively limited. Just like the example above, unless you already hold a significant amount of SpaceX's equity in your hands through asset management, you're simply an STO or RWA platform. If you want to attract SpaceX equity holders to issue tokens representing SpaceX equity on your platform, it involves various frictions such as resource collaboration, legal terms, and more.

There are still many in-between states that can be To C or To B, such as IP on-chain solutions like Story Protocol, or tokenizing things like royalties for a novel, box office revenue for a movie, or sales of a game. It feels like we are still in the early exploration stage where we need to try out one thing at a time to prove its viability. For example, tokenizing influence had FT fail while Kaito relatively succeeded. Tokenizing celebrity time, such as Time.Fun, gained popularity for a few days before disappearing... These things need to be approached gradually.

Next is 3 - What were the past solutions, and what are the current solutions?

Let's use the example of the US stock market - the past solutions were mainly focused on synthetic assets, represented by SNX, Terra's Mirror, and GNS.

From the current perspective, this path has been mostly debunked, as the three platforms mentioned above had already delisted synthetic US stock assets previously available. There are two main reasons for this. First, the community did not show much interest in holding stablecoins or native tokens (like SNX) that synthetically represent "fake assets." You can see the contrast in volume between BTC, WBTC, and SBTC on SNX to understand this mismatch. Synthetic assets, to be frank, don't provide as much peace of mind as WBTC-like "mapped assets." Second, in the past, the SEC was quick to investigate without needing a solid reason. While synthetic assets may be fake, the SEC's scrutiny is something platforms prefer to avoid. Thus, these platforms swiftly delisted the synthetic US stocks.

Now, with Trump in office and a new SEC chairman, regulatory oversight seems much better than in the previous years. For the new on-chain US stock market, two approaches have been observed.

One follows the traditional compliant Broker Dealer route - when users buy tokenized stocks on-chain, it triggers off-chain compliant brokers to perform equivalent operations in the US stock market. Fundamentally, it's similar to the order flow from Robinhood, where Citadel essentially "buys on behalf" in the stock market. The advantage is that the stocks you buy are "real" stocks, or at least backed 1:1 by this broker, somewhat like WBTC to BTC. However, the drawback is that trading times align with the stock market, so it cannot operate 24x7 like crypto. Additionally, trust in the broker or platform is essential, and selling triggers a Taxation Event, requiring US citizens to submit tax-related forms, while non-US citizens need to undergo KYC procedures, making it somewhat cumbersome.

The second approach is by Ondo Global Market, which, after reviewing their documentation, initially intended to follow the Broker Dealer route but later shifted to a stablecoin-like method. This approach permits their authorized issuers to directly issue tokenized stocks (similar to Tether issuing USDT or Circle issuing USDC). The advantage is greater flexibility, potentially overcoming the restrictions of US stock trading hours, settling through the issuer at a specific time. However, the downside is that it will likely cater mainly to non-US users, excluding US residents. Furthermore, there might be concerns about different issuers issuing the same stock with different CAs (similar to how USDC on different chains is not interoperable), but these specific details were not outlined in the documentation, as the product is slated for next year.

Finally, platforms like Plume that are RWA-based feel more like a Framework, encompassing KYC/AML, data storage/execution, consensus, ZKTLS verification, and more. In theory, this could allow partner institutions to issue various Tokenized RWA assets on this side, which brings us back to the previous topic of "which assets are suitable for on-chain," without going into further detail.

Lastly, let's talk about the trend of RWA in these past few months, have you noticed anything?

If you have been observant, you would realize that the RWA trend has actually picked up pace in the past two months. Here are a few "news" items I casually observed:

1. As mentioned above, the Ondo project plans to launch the Ondo Global Market by the end of this year or next year, an on-chain stock market. Additionally, Ondo has recently been closely associated with Trump's WLFI and has plans for collaboration.

2. Sui has recently been cozying up to WLFI.

3. Frax has actively embraced Cedefi and recently launched frxUSD in collaboration with BlackRock and Superstate.

4. Ethena today released a new product, Converge, which focuses on what they consider to be one of the two most important scenarios on the blockchain - Storage and settlement for stablecoins and tokenized assets.

5. AAVE plans to launch a new coin, Horizen, causing a stir in the community. Stani personally clarified, stating, "The Horizen plan aims to complement Aave's current missing RWA business sector, and this plan is expected to surpass Aave's current business line revenue in 5 years."

6. In February 2025, the Financial Services Commission of Korea released a statement planning to gradually allow corporate entities to engage in virtual asset transactions.

From my circle of friends in Korea, I was informed that Korea may be planning to restart the STO (formerly known as RWA in the last cycle) program. Consider this, allowing "corporate entities to transact virtual assets," this is definitely not for your company to speculate on coins; it is certainly aimed at tokenizing some real-world financial assets into "virtual assets" designed for circulation between companies.

7. YZi Labs officially announced today that they have invested in the recently trending Plume Network RWA platform.

This Momentum formed by these messages cannot be ignored. Therefore, my current personal viewpoint on the main track of the next Circle is PayFI+RWA+Web2.5-like Consumer APP. As for AI+Crypto, all I can say is that there is hope, and I am still discussing and observing. After I finish the next article "Some Notable Things on ETH and Solana," I will write a separate article on my recent thoughts on AI+Crypto as the fourth part to conclude this collection

Original Article Link

You may also like

a16z Leads $18M Seed Round for Catena Labs, Crypto Industry Bets on Stablecoin AI Payment

Traditional finance is still stuck in a "human-to-human" model, while Catena aims to achieve "AI-to-AI" interaction.

Never Underestimate the Significance of the US Stablecoin 'Infrastructure Bill'

Original Title: "Never Underestimate the Significance of the US Stablecoin 'Genius Act'"Original Author: 0xTodd, Partner at Nothing Research


If the US stablecoin bill, the "GENIUS Act," passes smoothly this time, its significance will be tremendous. I even think it's significant enough to enter the top five in Crypto history.



Although abbreviated as the GENIUS Act, which translates directly to the Genius Act, it is actually the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins, which translates to "Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Dollar Stablecoins."


The proposal is lengthy, with several key points summarized for everyone:


· Mandatory 1:1 Full Asset Backing: Assets include cash, demand deposits, and short-term US Treasuries. At the same time, misappropriation and rehypothecation are strictly prohibited.


· High-Frequency Disclosure: Reserve reports must be published at least monthly, introducing external audits.


· Licensing Requirement: Once the circulating market cap of the issuer's stablecoin exceeds $100 billion, it must transition into the federal regulatory system within a specified timeframe, adopting banking-grade regulation.


· Introduction of Custody: The custodian of the stablecoin and its reserve assets must be a regulated qualified financial institution.


· Clear Definition as a Payment Medium: The bill explicitly defines stablecoin as a new type of payment medium, primarily regulated by the banking regulatory system, rather than restricted by the securities or commodities regulatory system.


· Embracing Existing Stablecoins: A maximum 18-month grace period after the bill's enactment, aimed at encouraging existing stablecoin issuers (such as USDT, USDC, etc.) to promptly obtain licenses or become compliant.


After finishing the main content, let's talk about the significance of this matter with an excited heart.


Over the years, when others asked, "After working in the Crypto industry for 16 years, what application have you created?"


In the future, you can confidently tell others—Stablecoins.


First, Clearing Concerns is a Prerequisite


Some people have held opposing views. In the past, people's impression of stablecoins was that they were an opaque black box. Every few months, there would be FUD — whether Tether's assets were frozen or Circle had a significant black hole deficit.


In fact, if you think about it, Tether easily rakes in billions of dollars a year just from the interest on those underlying government bonds. Circle, slightly less, also made a $1.7 billion profit last year.


They basically made money while standing there. From a motivational standpoint, they have no malicious intentions. In fact, they are the most eager for compliance.


Now, this opaque black box will become a transparent white box.


In the past, the only complaint was that Tether's funds might have been frozen by the United States. Now, they will be directly placed into U.S. compliant custodial institutions, with high-frequency disclosures, so you can rest assured.


【No need to worry about a rug pull】 is such a huge advantage—I think especially all Crypto people understand this.


Second, Mastering the Standard is Very Important


Stablecoins were once almost on the verge of being overtaken by CBDCs. In any country, if a central bank digital currency really exists, it is highly likely not built on a blockchain, at most it is built on some internal central bank consortium chain, which to be honest, is meaningless.


When CBDCs were at their peak, that was the most dangerous time for stablecoins.


If CBDCs had become a reality back then, stablecoins today would have been relentlessly suppressed into a dark corner, and blockchain would only be able to play a minimal role.


The remaining half-dead stablecoins would even have to learn the standards of central bank digital currencies, completely relinquishing their standard-setting power.


And now, stablecoins have won (or are about to).


Instead, everyone should learn the 【Blockchain + Token】 standard.


Nowadays, many blockchains actually have no meaningful applications on top, only stablecoin transfers. For example, with Aptos, the only scenario I use Aptos for is transfers between Binance and OKX.


And now, stablecoins will be legislated, what does that mean?


That's right, blockchain will become the only standard.


In the future, every stablecoin user will be the first to learn how to use a wallet.


As an aside, I actually think Ethereum's concerted push for EIP-7702 is quite forward-thinking. While other chains are all about memes, thank you Ethereum for sticking to account abstraction.



EIP-7702 is about Account Abstraction, which can support, for example:


· Social Account Registration Wallet

· Paying GAS with Native Coin

· And more


This paves the way for future new users to heavily use stablecoins, solving the last-mile problem.


Third, Deposit Enters a New Era


Furthermore, once stablecoins receive legislative support, deposits and withdrawals will become even easier.


Let's imagine a scenario: previously, hindered by the gray nature of stablecoins, but after the bill passes, many traditional brokerages can support stablecoins themselves. The money from a US stock investor can be converted into stablecoins in minutes and instantly deposited into Coinbase. Believe it or not.



Let's imagine another scenario: if the brilliant bill smoothly passes through the House of Representatives, next, you will see:


Due to the extremely lucrative nature of this trading, existing stablecoin leaders and newly entering traditional giants will crazily start promoting their stablecoin products.


And an outsider, due to these promotions, will start using stablecoins. And then one day, after finding out that the wallet account has been created, will explore Bitcoin inside. Is mining Bitcoin difficult?


Stablecoins are a huge Trojan horse. The moment you start using stablecoins, you unwittingly step half a foot into the Crypto world.


Fourth, Conclusion


As a large reservoir for digesting US debt, although stablecoins cannot directly absorb debt, they at least provide ammunition for the US debt secondary market. These functions are quite important, and slowly, stablecoins are becoming a part of the US debt market's body. Therefore, once the US legislation is passed and experiences the benefits, there is no turning back.


And, we are also confident that stablecoins are indeed one of the great innovations in our industry. People who have used stablecoins will find it hard to return to the traditional cash-banking system.


Once the bill is passed, users can't go back. In the future, concerns are about to be resolved, standards will be mastered, and the era of large deposits seems to be on the horizon.


Original Article Link

Pharos, deeply integrated with AntChain, is about to launch. How can we get involved?

What is the relationship between the $8 million funded NewChain and Ant, and how will they interact?

$COIN Joins S&P 500, but Coinbase Isn't Celebrating

On May 13, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced that Coinbase would officially replace Discover Financial Services in the S&P 500 on May 19. While other companies like Block and MicroStrategy, closely tied to Bitcoin, were already part of the S&P 500, Coinbase became the first cryptocurrency exchange whose primary business is in the index. This also signifies that cryptocurrency is gradually moving from the fringes to the mainstream in the U.S.



On the day of the announcement, Coinbase's stock price surged by 23%, surpassing the $250 mark. However, just 3 days later, Coinbase was hit by two consecutive events: a hack where employees were bribed to steal customer data and a demand for a $20 million ransom, and an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the authenticity of its claim of having over 100 million "verified users" in its securities filings and marketing materials. These two events acted as mini-bombs, and at the time of writing, Coinbase's stock had already dropped by over 7.3%.


Coincidentally, Discover Financial Services, being replaced by Coinbase, can also be considered the "Coinbase" of the previous payment era. Discover is a U.S.-based digital banking and payment services company headquartered in Illinois, founded in 1960. Its payment network, Discover Network, is the fourth largest payment network apart from Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.


In April, after the approval of the acquisition of Discover by the sixth-largest U.S. bank, Capital One, this well-established digital banking company of over 60 years smoothly handed over its S&P 500 "seat" to this emerging cryptocurrency "bank." This unexpected coincidence also portrayed the handover between the new and old eras in Coinbase's entry into the S&P 500, resembling a relay race scene. However, this relay baton also brought Coinbase's accumulated "external troubles and internal strife" to a tipping point.


Side Effects of ETFs


Over the past decade, cryptocurrency exchanges have been the most stable "profit machines." They play a role in providing liquidity to the entire industry and rely on trading fees to sustain their operations. However, with the comprehensive rollout of ETF products in the U.S. market, this profit model is facing unprecedented challenges. As the leader in the "American stack," with over 80% of its business coming from the U.S., Coinbase is most affected by this.



Starting from the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, traditional financial capital has significantly onboarded users and funds that originally belonged to exchanges in a more cost-effective, compliant, and transparent manner. The transaction fee revenue of cryptocurrency exchanges has started to decline, and this trend may further intensify in the coming months.


According to Coinbase's 2024 Q4 financial report, the platform's total trading revenue was $417 million, a 45% year-on-year decrease. The contribution of BTC and ETH's trading revenue dropped from 65% in the same period last year to less than 50%.


This decline is not a result of a decrease in market enthusiasm. In fact, since the approval of the Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the inflow of BTC into the U.S. market has continued to reach new highs, with asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity rapidly expanding their management scale. Data shows that BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) alone has surpassed $17 billion in assets under management. As of mid-May 2025, the cumulative net inflow of 11 major institutional Bitcoin spot ETFs on the market has exceeded $41.5 billion, with a total net asset value of $1214.69 billion, accounting for approximately 5.91% of the total Bitcoin market capitalization.


Chart showing the trend of net outflows for Grayscale among the 11 institutions


Institutional investors and some retail investors are shifting towards ETF products, partly due to compliance and tax considerations. On one hand, ETFs have much lower trading costs compared to cryptocurrency exchanges. While Coinbase's spot trading fee rate varies annually in a tiered manner but averages around 1.49%, for example, the management fee for IBIT ETF is only 0.25%, and the majority of ETF institution fees fluctuate around 0.15% to 0.25%.



In other words, the more rational users are, the more likely they are to move from exchanges to ETF products, especially for investors aiming for long-term holdings.


According to multiple sources, several institutions, including VanEck and Grayscale, have submitted applications to the SEC for a Solana (SOL) ETF, with some institutions also planning to submit an XRP ETF proposal. Once approved, this may trigger a new round of fund migration. According to a report submitted by Coinbase to the SEC, as of April, the platform's trading revenue from XRP and Solana accounted for 18% and 10%, nearly one-third of the platform's fee revenue.



However, the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs passed in 2024 also reduced the fees for these two tokens on Coinbase from 30% and 15% to 26% and 10%, respectively. If the SOL and XRP ETFs are approved, it will further undermine the core fee revenue of exchanges like Coinbase.


The expansion of ETF products is gradually weakening the financial intermediary status of cryptocurrency exchanges. From their original roles as matchmakers and clearers to now gradually becoming mere "on-ramps and off-ramps" for funds, exchanges are seeing their marginal value squeezed by ETFs.


Robinhood Takes a Stand, Traditional Brokerages Join the Fray


On May 12, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins gave a keynote speech at the Tokenization and Cryptocurrency Working Group roundtable. The theme of his speech revolved around "It is a new day at the SEC," where he indicated that the SEC would not approach enforcement and regulation the same way as before but would instead pave the way for cryptocurrency assets in the U.S. market.



With signs of cryptocurrency compliance such as the SEC's "NEW DAY" declaration, an increasing number of traditional brokerages are attempting to enter the cryptocurrency industry. One of the most representative cases is the well-known U.S. brokerage Robinhood, which began expanding its crypto business in 2018. By the time of its IPO in 2021, Robinhood's crypto business revenue accounted for over 50% of the company, with a significant boost from the Dogecoin "moonshot" promoted by Musk.


In Q1 2025 earnings report, Robinhood showcased strong growth, especially in revenue from cryptocurrency and options trading. Fueled by Trump's Memecoin, cryptocurrency-related revenue reached $250 million, nearly doubling year-over-year. Consequently, Robinhood Gold subscription users reached 3.5 million, a 90% increase from the previous year, with the rapid growth of Robinhood Gold providing the company with a stable source of income.



Meanwhile, RobinHood is actively pursuing acquisitions in the cryptocurrency space. In 2024, it announced a $2 billion acquisition of the long-standing European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp. Additionally, Canada's largest cryptocurrency CEX, WonderFi, which recently went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also announced its integration with RobinHood Crypto. After obtaining virtual asset licenses in the UK, Canada, Singapore, and other markets, RobinHood has taken a proactive approach in the compliant cryptocurrency trading market.



Furthermore, an increasing number of brokerage firms are exploring the same path. Futu Securities, Tiger Brokers, and others are also dipping their toes into cryptocurrency trading, with some having applied for or obtained the VA license from the Hong Kong SFC. Although their user bases are currently small, traditional brokerages have a natural advantage in user trust, regulatory licenses, and low fee structures. This could pose a threat to native cryptocurrency platforms in the future.



User Data Breach: Is Coinbase Still Secure?


In April 2025, security researchers discovered that some Coinbase user data was leaked on the dark web. While the platform initially responded by attributing it to a "technical misinformation," it still raised concerns among users regarding its security and privacy protection. Just two days before Dow Jones Indexes announced Coinbase's addition to the S&P 500 Index, on May 11, 2025, Coinbase received an email from an unknown threat actor claiming to have obtained customer account information and internal documents, demanding a $20 million ransom to keep the data private. Subsequent investigations confirmed the data breach.


Cybercriminals obtained the data by bribing overseas customer service agents and support staff, mainly in "non-U.S. regions such as India." These agents abused their access to Coinbase's internal customer support system and stole customer data. As early as February this year, blockchain detective ZachXBT revealed on X platform that between December 2024 and January 2025, Coinbase users lost over $65 million to social engineering scams, with the actual amount potentially higher.


Among the victims was a well-known figure, 67-year-old Ed Suman, an established artist in the art world for nearly two decades, having been involved in the creation of artworks such as Jeff Koons' "Balloon Dog" sculpture. Earlier this year, he fell victim to an impersonation scam involving fake Coinbase customer support, resulting in a loss of over $2 million in cryptocurrency. ZachXBT critiqued Coinbase for its inadequate handling of such scams, noting that other major exchanges have not faced similar issues and recommending Coinbase to enhance its security measures.


Amidst a series of ongoing social engineering incidents, although there has not been any impact on user assets at the technical level so far, it has raised concerns among many retail and institutional investors. Especially institutions holding massive assets on Coinbase. Just considering the U.S. BTC ETF institutions, as of mid-May 2025, they collectively hold nearly 840,000 BTC, and 75% of these are custodied by Coinbase. If we price BTC at $100,000, this amount reaches a staggering $63 billion, which is equivalent to the nominal GDP of two Iceland in the year 2024.


Visualization: ChatGPT, Source: Farside


In addition, Coinbase Custody also serves over 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, family offices, pension funds, and endowments. As of the Q1 2025 financial report, Coinbase's total assets under management (including institutional and retail clients) reached $404 billion. The specific amount of institutional custodied assets was not explicitly disclosed in the latest report, but it should still be over 50% based on the Q4 2024 report.


Visualization: ChatGPT


Once this security barrier is breached, not only could the rate of user attrition far exceed expectations, but more importantly, institutional trust in it would undermine the foundation of its business. Therefore, after a hacking event, Coinbase's stock price plummeted significantly.


CEXs are All in Self-Rescue Mode


Facing a decline in spot trading fee revenue, Coinbase is also accelerating its transformation, attempting to find growth opportunities in derivatives and emerging assets. Coinbase acquired a stake in the options platform Deribit at the end of 2024 and announced the official launch of perpetual contract products in 2025. This acquisition fills in Coinbase's gap in options trading and its relatively small global market share.



Deribit has a strong presence in non-U.S. markets, especially in Asia and Europe. The acquisition has enabled Coinbase to gain a dominant position in bitcoin and ethereum options trading on Deribit, accounting for approximately 80% of the global options trading volume, with daily trading volume remaining above $2 billion.


Meanwhile, 80-90% of Deribit's customer base consists of institutional investors, with their professionalism and liquidity in the Bitcoin and Ethereum options market highly favored by institutions. Coinbase's compliance advantage, coupled with its already robust institutional ecosystem, makes it even more suitable. By using institutions as an entry point, it can face the squeeze from giants like Binance and OKX in the derivatives market.



Facing a similar dilemma is Kraken, which is attempting to replicate Binance Futures' model in non-U.S. markets. Since the derivatives market relies more on professional users, fee rates are relatively higher and stickiness is stronger, making it a significant source of revenue for exchanges. In the first half of 2025, Kraken completed the acquisition of TradeStation Crypto and a futures exchange, aiming to build a complete derivatives trading ecosystem to hedge the risk of declining spot transaction fee income.


With the surge of Memecoin in 2024, Binance, OKX, and various CEX platforms began massively listing small-market-cap, highly volatile tokens to activate active trading users. Due to the wealth effect and trading activity of Memecoins, Coinbase was also forced to join the battle, successively listing popular tokens from the Solana ecosystem such as BOOK OF MEME and Dogwifhat. Although these coins are controversial, they are frequently traded, with fee rates several times higher than mainstream coins, serving as a "blood-boosting" method for spot trading.


However, due to its status as a publicly traded company, this practice is a riskier endeavor for Coinbase. Even in the current crypto-friendly environment, the SEC is still investigating whether tokens like SOL, ADA, and SAND constitute securities.


In addition to the forced transformation strategies carried out by the aforementioned CEXs, they are also starting to lay out RWAs and the most talked-about stablecoin payment fields, such as the PYUSD launched through a collaboration between Coinbase and Paypal, Coinbase's support for the Euro stablecoin EURC by Circle that complies with EU MiCA regulatory requirements, or the USD1 launched through a collaboration between Binance and WIFL. In the increasingly crowded trading field, many CEXs have shifted their focus from just the trading market to the application field.


The golden age of transaction fees has quietly ended, and the second half of the crypto exchange platform game has silently begun.


Arthur Hayes: Why I'm Betting on ETH While the Market Is Obsessed with SOL

"I personally have also allocated 20% to gold, expecting the price of gold to potentially rise to $10,000-20,000 by the end of this market cycle."

Key Market Insights for May 16th, how much did you miss out on?

1. On-chain Flows: $111.3M inflow to Ethereum this week; $237.6M outflow from Berachain 2. Largest Price Swings: $ETHFI, $NEIRO 3. Top News: Data: Solana Network's revenue reached $7.9M on the 13th, surpassing the sum of all other L1 and L2 chains

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more