KOL Cycle: From Win-Win Tool to Multi-Loss Trap

By: blockbeats|2025/03/06 04:15:02
Share
copy
Original Title: "When KOLs Fight for 'KOL Rounds' Rights, There Are No Winners in a Bear Market Anymore"
Original Source: Deep Tide TechFlow

KOL Cycle: From Win-Win Tool to Multi-Loss Trap

Presidential NFT scandals, celebrity token launches, long and short liquidations, AI disappointments... From the beginning of the year to the present, any of these incidents in the crypto market are enough to make the general public suffer.

As a seasoned member of the general public, it's challenging to avoid drinking from these incidents --- not having enough information, following the crowd blindly, trading without discipline, and so on. These weaknesses are more easily magnified during Scam Season and a bear market, making loss a high-probability event.

But it's not just the general public who gets hurt.

When the market is down, most people, no matter how hard they try, are unlikely to be winners, including even KOLs.

KOLs, who have always been seen as being on the same side as project teams to reap rewards, have also started losing money and lamenting in this bull-to-bear cycle;

And what has turned them into "major league members of the general public" is something they once didn't miss the opportunity to touch, but now has become a hot potato:

KOL Rounds.

KOL Rounds: From a Win-Win Tool to a Multi-Loss Trap

Bear markets involve a lot of infighting and calls for rights, but no one expected KOLs to start advocating for their own rights.

On March 4, 2025, ChainDoctor sighed, "Don't envy KOL Rounds. I invested in over ten KOL Rounds last year, and all of them lost money. Most of them didn't even issue tokens; they just disappeared."

Perhaps KOLs have a higher tolerance for losses than the general public, but this does not change the fact that they are also losing money.

You can certainly view it as a performance and act of self-pity, but many KOLs' venting only serves to indirectly prove that they have indeed fallen into a pit.

After this post was made, various influential KOLs in the Chinese crypto community began a collective criticism and mockery of KOL Rounds in the following days. For example, renowned KOL yuyue straightforwardly criticized:

"Some KOL Rounds are disguised by project teams as paid promotions, where they sell the private sale round and overpriced fundraising to KOLs, taking advantage of the resources of those around them to profit at their expense..."

You might still question the logic behind KOLs losing money, but in the entire token listing chain, KOLs are actually positioned downstream in the ecosystem.

The entire chain usually includes:

Seed Round (early investors such as friends and family participating), Private Sale Round (targeting venture capitalists and strategic partners), KOL Round (project team selling tokens to KOLs at a discounted price in exchange for promotion), Public Sale Round (retail investors), and Exchange Listing (token being listed for trading).

The KOL Round usually appears after the Private Sale Round, where the project team sells tokens to KOLs at a low price or discounted price, and KOLs use their influence on platforms like X and Telegram to promote the project, thus increasing the project's visibility.

In a bull market, the KOL Round may be a win-win tool. The project team raises funds through the KOL Round, KOLs earn money through the token's cost price and secondary price difference, and retail investors may also benefit when the market conditions are favorable.

However, in a bear market, the situation is not as optimistic.

Liquidity dries up, secondary market trading volume shrinks, token prices plummet, project teams often cash out early and exit, while KOLs are left with locked tokens—a lock-up period usually lasting 3 to 6 months that prevents KOLs from selling in a timely manner, leading to the token's value plummeting to zero.

In the post above, you can also see sharp comments:

"Nowadays, the KOL Round is already a typical scenario of losing both money and troops. When the project team can't raise funds or can't engage in secondary selling, they target KOLs who eat up advertising costs. KOL is equivalent to putting in money, effort, and people."

This is no longer a passive stage where the market conditions are poor, and everyone understands each other. Instead, certain project teams have even taken the initiative to act maliciously, considering KOLs as part of the liquidity exit as well.

What's even worse is that KOLs are also facing a dilemma: project teams know the risks of this model, and KOLs are aware as well, but they still use KOLs' greed or survival pressure (demand for monetizing traffic) to drive cooperation. KOLs hope to "give it a try," but the outcome often turns out contrary to their wishes.

On the other hand, retail investors have reduced their blind trust in KOLs, and a "reverse indicator" phenomenon has even emerged (projects recommended by KOLs are viewed as likely to fall). As KOLs' promotional effectiveness declines, token prices struggle to rise, further exacerbating damage to their reputation.

If we don't consider making a quick profit and leaving, who wouldn't want to cherish their feathers and make money together with everyone?

From Win-Win Tools to Multi-Loss Traps, in a bear market, most of those standing downstream in the value chain may no longer have any winners.

Agency, the Professionalism of a Broker

You may not know this, but behind the scenes of the crypto market's KOL circle, there is another lesser-known role: the Agency.

In simple terms, their responsibility is to take on the promotional needs of the project team, help find suitable KOLs in the market for promotion.

However, the Agency's duties go far beyond mere matchmaking. They need to balance the interests of the project team—who hope to attract maximum traffic at the lowest cost—and the demands of the KOLs—who seek stable income through promotion, breaking even or even making a profit.

For example, a representative of the Agency, Dov, posted:

"I have never let my KOLs lose any money. Either I pay for direct promotion through U, or the KOL has a guaranteed minimum for the round, and in the worst case, the principal is returned."

From here, you can see that the motivations and business capabilities of any practitioner in the crypto ecosystem are actually varied.

An excellent Agency will try to consider a guarantee mechanism to ensure that KOLs do not lose money, such as direct cash payment or returning the KOL's principal. However, if an Agency lacks professional judgment and selects low-quality projects, KOLs may face token depreciation, lock-up risks, and ultimately losses.

The fate of the doer often depends on the professionalism of the sender.

In this chain of crypto marketing, perhaps only scammers hope to engage in a "one-off deal." Continuing to deceive one after another will only result in less business and a narrower path.

After all, no one is a fool, and sustainable win-win situations are the way to prosperity.

But perhaps everyone is a good broker in the downstream, yet seemingly inevitably becomes a victim in the upstream.

No Winners, but No Endgame Either

The cruelty of a bear market lies in the fact that it not only makes ordinary investors (the lambs) feel the market's chill but also forces KOLs who once stood at a higher point in the profit chain to face reality.

In this cycle of bull and bear, project teams, KOLs, retail investors, and even Agencies are playing different roles, but ultimately there are no winners.

A Key Opinion Leader's "Rights Protection" is actually a microcosm of the entire crypto ecosystem.

From a "win-win tool" in a bull market to a "multi-loss trap" in a bear market, the transformation of KOL circles has exposed a deep-seated trust crisis in the crypto market. The short-sighted behavior of project teams, the profit-driven mentality of KOLs, the blind follow-the-crowd behavior of retail investors, and even the inadequate professional capabilities of agencies have all been magnified in this game.

When the market is trending downward, everyone is trying to protect themselves but struggling to escape the fate of being harvested.

The "harvesting" of KOLs is not just a simple dispute over benefits but a manifestation of the ecosystem imbalance in the crypto market during a bear market environment. When liquidity dries up and the fund chain breaks, all roles downstream of the value chain become passive sacrifices.

In retrospect, the controversy surrounding KOL circles is essentially a growing pain in the industry's development.

When KOLs stand up for their rights, they are also indirectly speaking up for the entire ecosystem. Perhaps only after experiencing such a bear market can everyone truly understand that in a market without rules and trust, short-term winners will ultimately become long-term losers.

However, from a longer-term perspective, this may also be an opportunity for reshuffling. The market's nadir is often the starting point for ecosystem optimization. Only through reflection and adjustment in pain can the next round of prosperity be ushered in.

Will the next bull market arrive as expected? Perhaps it depends on whether every participant today can truly learn from the lessons of this bear market, find a new balance of "win-win."

Original Article Link

You may also like

a16z Leads $18M Seed Round for Catena Labs, Crypto Industry Bets on Stablecoin AI Payment

Traditional finance is still stuck in a "human-to-human" model, while Catena aims to achieve "AI-to-AI" interaction.

Pharos, deeply integrated with AntChain, is about to launch. How can we get involved?

What is the relationship between the $8 million funded NewChain and Ant, and how will they interact?

$COIN Joins S&P 500, but Coinbase Isn't Celebrating

On May 13, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced that Coinbase would officially replace Discover Financial Services in the S&P 500 on May 19. While other companies like Block and MicroStrategy, closely tied to Bitcoin, were already part of the S&P 500, Coinbase became the first cryptocurrency exchange whose primary business is in the index. This also signifies that cryptocurrency is gradually moving from the fringes to the mainstream in the U.S.



On the day of the announcement, Coinbase's stock price surged by 23%, surpassing the $250 mark. However, just 3 days later, Coinbase was hit by two consecutive events: a hack where employees were bribed to steal customer data and a demand for a $20 million ransom, and an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the authenticity of its claim of having over 100 million "verified users" in its securities filings and marketing materials. These two events acted as mini-bombs, and at the time of writing, Coinbase's stock had already dropped by over 7.3%.


Coincidentally, Discover Financial Services, being replaced by Coinbase, can also be considered the "Coinbase" of the previous payment era. Discover is a U.S.-based digital banking and payment services company headquartered in Illinois, founded in 1960. Its payment network, Discover Network, is the fourth largest payment network apart from Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.


In April, after the approval of the acquisition of Discover by the sixth-largest U.S. bank, Capital One, this well-established digital banking company of over 60 years smoothly handed over its S&P 500 "seat" to this emerging cryptocurrency "bank." This unexpected coincidence also portrayed the handover between the new and old eras in Coinbase's entry into the S&P 500, resembling a relay race scene. However, this relay baton also brought Coinbase's accumulated "external troubles and internal strife" to a tipping point.


Side Effects of ETFs


Over the past decade, cryptocurrency exchanges have been the most stable "profit machines." They play a role in providing liquidity to the entire industry and rely on trading fees to sustain their operations. However, with the comprehensive rollout of ETF products in the U.S. market, this profit model is facing unprecedented challenges. As the leader in the "American stack," with over 80% of its business coming from the U.S., Coinbase is most affected by this.



Starting from the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, traditional financial capital has significantly onboarded users and funds that originally belonged to exchanges in a more cost-effective, compliant, and transparent manner. The transaction fee revenue of cryptocurrency exchanges has started to decline, and this trend may further intensify in the coming months.


According to Coinbase's 2024 Q4 financial report, the platform's total trading revenue was $417 million, a 45% year-on-year decrease. The contribution of BTC and ETH's trading revenue dropped from 65% in the same period last year to less than 50%.


This decline is not a result of a decrease in market enthusiasm. In fact, since the approval of the Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the inflow of BTC into the U.S. market has continued to reach new highs, with asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity rapidly expanding their management scale. Data shows that BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) alone has surpassed $17 billion in assets under management. As of mid-May 2025, the cumulative net inflow of 11 major institutional Bitcoin spot ETFs on the market has exceeded $41.5 billion, with a total net asset value of $1214.69 billion, accounting for approximately 5.91% of the total Bitcoin market capitalization.


Chart showing the trend of net outflows for Grayscale among the 11 institutions


Institutional investors and some retail investors are shifting towards ETF products, partly due to compliance and tax considerations. On one hand, ETFs have much lower trading costs compared to cryptocurrency exchanges. While Coinbase's spot trading fee rate varies annually in a tiered manner but averages around 1.49%, for example, the management fee for IBIT ETF is only 0.25%, and the majority of ETF institution fees fluctuate around 0.15% to 0.25%.



In other words, the more rational users are, the more likely they are to move from exchanges to ETF products, especially for investors aiming for long-term holdings.


According to multiple sources, several institutions, including VanEck and Grayscale, have submitted applications to the SEC for a Solana (SOL) ETF, with some institutions also planning to submit an XRP ETF proposal. Once approved, this may trigger a new round of fund migration. According to a report submitted by Coinbase to the SEC, as of April, the platform's trading revenue from XRP and Solana accounted for 18% and 10%, nearly one-third of the platform's fee revenue.



However, the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs passed in 2024 also reduced the fees for these two tokens on Coinbase from 30% and 15% to 26% and 10%, respectively. If the SOL and XRP ETFs are approved, it will further undermine the core fee revenue of exchanges like Coinbase.


The expansion of ETF products is gradually weakening the financial intermediary status of cryptocurrency exchanges. From their original roles as matchmakers and clearers to now gradually becoming mere "on-ramps and off-ramps" for funds, exchanges are seeing their marginal value squeezed by ETFs.


Robinhood Takes a Stand, Traditional Brokerages Join the Fray


On May 12, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins gave a keynote speech at the Tokenization and Cryptocurrency Working Group roundtable. The theme of his speech revolved around "It is a new day at the SEC," where he indicated that the SEC would not approach enforcement and regulation the same way as before but would instead pave the way for cryptocurrency assets in the U.S. market.



With signs of cryptocurrency compliance such as the SEC's "NEW DAY" declaration, an increasing number of traditional brokerages are attempting to enter the cryptocurrency industry. One of the most representative cases is the well-known U.S. brokerage Robinhood, which began expanding its crypto business in 2018. By the time of its IPO in 2021, Robinhood's crypto business revenue accounted for over 50% of the company, with a significant boost from the Dogecoin "moonshot" promoted by Musk.


In Q1 2025 earnings report, Robinhood showcased strong growth, especially in revenue from cryptocurrency and options trading. Fueled by Trump's Memecoin, cryptocurrency-related revenue reached $250 million, nearly doubling year-over-year. Consequently, Robinhood Gold subscription users reached 3.5 million, a 90% increase from the previous year, with the rapid growth of Robinhood Gold providing the company with a stable source of income.



Meanwhile, RobinHood is actively pursuing acquisitions in the cryptocurrency space. In 2024, it announced a $2 billion acquisition of the long-standing European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp. Additionally, Canada's largest cryptocurrency CEX, WonderFi, which recently went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also announced its integration with RobinHood Crypto. After obtaining virtual asset licenses in the UK, Canada, Singapore, and other markets, RobinHood has taken a proactive approach in the compliant cryptocurrency trading market.



Furthermore, an increasing number of brokerage firms are exploring the same path. Futu Securities, Tiger Brokers, and others are also dipping their toes into cryptocurrency trading, with some having applied for or obtained the VA license from the Hong Kong SFC. Although their user bases are currently small, traditional brokerages have a natural advantage in user trust, regulatory licenses, and low fee structures. This could pose a threat to native cryptocurrency platforms in the future.



User Data Breach: Is Coinbase Still Secure?


In April 2025, security researchers discovered that some Coinbase user data was leaked on the dark web. While the platform initially responded by attributing it to a "technical misinformation," it still raised concerns among users regarding its security and privacy protection. Just two days before Dow Jones Indexes announced Coinbase's addition to the S&P 500 Index, on May 11, 2025, Coinbase received an email from an unknown threat actor claiming to have obtained customer account information and internal documents, demanding a $20 million ransom to keep the data private. Subsequent investigations confirmed the data breach.


Cybercriminals obtained the data by bribing overseas customer service agents and support staff, mainly in "non-U.S. regions such as India." These agents abused their access to Coinbase's internal customer support system and stole customer data. As early as February this year, blockchain detective ZachXBT revealed on X platform that between December 2024 and January 2025, Coinbase users lost over $65 million to social engineering scams, with the actual amount potentially higher.


Among the victims was a well-known figure, 67-year-old Ed Suman, an established artist in the art world for nearly two decades, having been involved in the creation of artworks such as Jeff Koons' "Balloon Dog" sculpture. Earlier this year, he fell victim to an impersonation scam involving fake Coinbase customer support, resulting in a loss of over $2 million in cryptocurrency. ZachXBT critiqued Coinbase for its inadequate handling of such scams, noting that other major exchanges have not faced similar issues and recommending Coinbase to enhance its security measures.


Amidst a series of ongoing social engineering incidents, although there has not been any impact on user assets at the technical level so far, it has raised concerns among many retail and institutional investors. Especially institutions holding massive assets on Coinbase. Just considering the U.S. BTC ETF institutions, as of mid-May 2025, they collectively hold nearly 840,000 BTC, and 75% of these are custodied by Coinbase. If we price BTC at $100,000, this amount reaches a staggering $63 billion, which is equivalent to the nominal GDP of two Iceland in the year 2024.


Visualization: ChatGPT, Source: Farside


In addition, Coinbase Custody also serves over 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, family offices, pension funds, and endowments. As of the Q1 2025 financial report, Coinbase's total assets under management (including institutional and retail clients) reached $404 billion. The specific amount of institutional custodied assets was not explicitly disclosed in the latest report, but it should still be over 50% based on the Q4 2024 report.


Visualization: ChatGPT


Once this security barrier is breached, not only could the rate of user attrition far exceed expectations, but more importantly, institutional trust in it would undermine the foundation of its business. Therefore, after a hacking event, Coinbase's stock price plummeted significantly.


CEXs are All in Self-Rescue Mode


Facing a decline in spot trading fee revenue, Coinbase is also accelerating its transformation, attempting to find growth opportunities in derivatives and emerging assets. Coinbase acquired a stake in the options platform Deribit at the end of 2024 and announced the official launch of perpetual contract products in 2025. This acquisition fills in Coinbase's gap in options trading and its relatively small global market share.



Deribit has a strong presence in non-U.S. markets, especially in Asia and Europe. The acquisition has enabled Coinbase to gain a dominant position in bitcoin and ethereum options trading on Deribit, accounting for approximately 80% of the global options trading volume, with daily trading volume remaining above $2 billion.


Meanwhile, 80-90% of Deribit's customer base consists of institutional investors, with their professionalism and liquidity in the Bitcoin and Ethereum options market highly favored by institutions. Coinbase's compliance advantage, coupled with its already robust institutional ecosystem, makes it even more suitable. By using institutions as an entry point, it can face the squeeze from giants like Binance and OKX in the derivatives market.



Facing a similar dilemma is Kraken, which is attempting to replicate Binance Futures' model in non-U.S. markets. Since the derivatives market relies more on professional users, fee rates are relatively higher and stickiness is stronger, making it a significant source of revenue for exchanges. In the first half of 2025, Kraken completed the acquisition of TradeStation Crypto and a futures exchange, aiming to build a complete derivatives trading ecosystem to hedge the risk of declining spot transaction fee income.


With the surge of Memecoin in 2024, Binance, OKX, and various CEX platforms began massively listing small-market-cap, highly volatile tokens to activate active trading users. Due to the wealth effect and trading activity of Memecoins, Coinbase was also forced to join the battle, successively listing popular tokens from the Solana ecosystem such as BOOK OF MEME and Dogwifhat. Although these coins are controversial, they are frequently traded, with fee rates several times higher than mainstream coins, serving as a "blood-boosting" method for spot trading.


However, due to its status as a publicly traded company, this practice is a riskier endeavor for Coinbase. Even in the current crypto-friendly environment, the SEC is still investigating whether tokens like SOL, ADA, and SAND constitute securities.


In addition to the forced transformation strategies carried out by the aforementioned CEXs, they are also starting to lay out RWAs and the most talked-about stablecoin payment fields, such as the PYUSD launched through a collaboration between Coinbase and Paypal, Coinbase's support for the Euro stablecoin EURC by Circle that complies with EU MiCA regulatory requirements, or the USD1 launched through a collaboration between Binance and WIFL. In the increasingly crowded trading field, many CEXs have shifted their focus from just the trading market to the application field.


The golden age of transaction fees has quietly ended, and the second half of the crypto exchange platform game has silently begun.


Key Market Insights for May 16th, how much did you miss out on?

1. On-chain Flows: $111.3M inflow to Ethereum this week; $237.6M outflow from Berachain 2. Largest Price Swings: $ETHFI, $NEIRO 3. Top News: Data: Solana Network's revenue reached $7.9M on the 13th, surpassing the sum of all other L1 and L2 chains

MOG Coin Skyrockets as Elon Musk and Garry Tan Embrace "mog/acc" Identity

「mog/acc」 is rapidly sweeping through various figures, from Elon Musk to Garry Tan, boosting the project's visibility and ultimately driving up the price.

The End and Rebirth of NFTs: How the Meme Coin Craze Ended the PFP Era?

There must be another Labubu hidden beneath the ruins.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more