Mirror's Rise and Fall: From Web3 Content Revolution Pioneer to "Decentralization Bubble" Case Study

By: blockbeats|2025/03/17 10:00:05
Share
copy
Original Title: "The Rise and Fall of Mirror: From Web3 Content Revolution Pioneer to 'Decentralized Bubble' Case Study"
Original Author: Lawrence, Mars Finance

From Peak to Collapse: Mirror's Web3 Dream and Reality

Amid the Web3 frenzy, Mirror was once seen as the future of content creation. However, over time, this platform that once led the decentralized revolution is quickly sliding into silence.

Mirror's Rise and Fall: From Web3 Content Revolution Pioneer to

According to website traffic analysis platform SimilarWeb, Mirror's official website had a total of 642,000 visits in the past month, a 23.8% decrease from the previous month, and a staggering drop from its peak—Mirror has plummeted to 2183rd place in the blockchain industry website rankings.

All these changes conceal the shattering of decentralized dreams and the harsh collision with reality. From the spark of innovation to the burst of the bubble, behind Mirror's rise and fall, what kind of industry reflection is hidden?

Genesis: Ambitions to Reshape the Creator Economy (2020-2021)

As one of the earliest platforms to explore the "ownership economy" in the Web3 wave, Mirror's birth is inseparable from two major narratives in the crypto world: NFT assetization and DAO governance experiments.

Its founder Denis Nazarov (former a16z partner) launched a product prototype at the end of 2020, anchoring on a disruptive proposition—freeing content creation from platform monopolies, allowing creators to directly hold content ownership and revenue rights.

The initial feature design directly addressed traditional platform pain points:

· Content NFTization: Each article could be minted as an NFT, with creators retaining permanent copyright and earning a share through secondary market trades;

· Crowdfunding Tools: Supporting creators to launch on-chain crowdfunding, where supporters invest in ETH and receive project tokens, forming a "creation-funding-revenue sharing" loop (e.g., the crowdfunding of Emily Segal's novel raised 408,000 USD);

· Decentralized Storage: Achieving permanent content storage based on Arweave to mitigate platform censorship risks;

· Tokenomics Experiment: Allowing the issuance of ERC-20 tokens to build a fan-driven economic ecosystem.

These features quickly attracted crypto-native creators. At its peak in 2021, Mirror's monthly traffic exceeded tens of millions, ranking in the TOP 50 of blockchain application traffic, being seen as the "Web3 version of Medium."

The key to its success: mapping content value directly to on-chain assets and restructuring the interests of creators, investors, and propagators through a token mechanism.

Peak: DAO Toolkit and the Dream of a "Web3 Media Empire" (2021-2022)

During the bull market of 2021, Mirror experienced its shining moment. With the explosion of the DAO concept, the platform launched tools such as Splits (revenue sharing) and TokenRace (community voting), attempting to become a "DAO operating system." A typical example is the basketball community The Krause House, which crowdfunded 1000 ETH (approximately $2.8 million) through Mirror and used tokens to achieve governance distribution.

At this point, Mirror's positioning had shifted from a content platform to Web3 infrastructure:

· Technical Layer: Integrating components such as ENS domain and MetaMask wallet to lower the user entry barrier;

· Ecosystem Layer: Opening APIs to attract developers to build third-party tools (such as the article search engine Askmirror.xyz);

· Narrative Layer: Claiming to create a "roadshow platform for the value internet" to connect creators, investors, and the community.

During this phase, Mirror's average monthly traffic remained stable at over tens of millions, on-chain data showed that it had minted over 100,000 pieces of NFT content, and the total crowdfunded amount exceeded 5000 ETH. Denis Nazarov even put forward the vision that "every DAO needs a Mirror homepage."

Fracture: Strategic Swings and Product Shortcomings (2022-2023)

1. Feature Drift

Mirror has been oscillating between being a "Tool Platform" and a "Media Community":

In August 2022, it suddenly removed NFT and crowdfunding features, shifting focus to pure content publishing; in 2023, it reintroduced the "Subscribe to Mint" subscription-based NFT feature, but failed to address the creator's traffic distribution issue; core functions (such as data analytics and subscription systems) have long relied on third-party development, causing official stagnation.

2. Regulatory Pressure and Compliance Challenges

The increased scrutiny by the U.S. SEC on token issuance forced Mirror to abandon its most appealing "Crowdfunding-Token" model. Some projects (such as The Krause House) faced investigation for alleged securities violations, leading to a collapse in investor confidence.

3. User Growth Bottleneck

Compared to traditional platforms, Mirror has consistently failed to break through the crypto community:

· High Barrier to Entry: Users need to be familiar with wallet operations, gas fee payments, and other processes;

· Varied Content Quality: Numerous sponsored posts and speculative content flooded the platform;

· Fragmented User Experience: Article reading, NFT transactions, and community interactions are scattered across different interfaces.

By the end of 2023, Mirror's monthly traffic had plummeted to below 2 million, falling out of the top 200 blockchain applications.

Collapse: Acquisition, Transformation, and Industry Reflection (2024-2025)

In May 2024, Paragraph announced the acquisition of Mirror, marking the end of its era as an independent operation. The transaction details revealed:

Mirror's valuation had shrunk by 90% from its peak, with the parent company, Reflective Technologies Inc., selling at a low price citing "high technical debt and a blurred business model"; the core team shifted focus to developing the social app Kiosk, emphasizing "on-chain social + asset trading," but the product remained within the Farcaster framework; the original content ecosystem was migrated to Paragraph, causing many creators to leave due to reduced revenue sharing.

If previous strategic mistakes could be partly attributed to the market environment, then the "On-chain Outage Event" that occurred in the early hours of January 13, 2025, completely shredded the last vestiges of Mirror's dignity.

At 12:38 AM (GMT+8) on the same day, the platform, without issuing any prior announcement, forcibly started storing all newly published articles on a centralized server, halting on-chain content.

Despite the team arguing that "Arweave storage costs are too high and need to optimize user experience," on-chain browser data shows that in the following two months, the Mirror contract address only had 3 new interaction records, all of which were modifications of old articles.

This means that this platform, which once touted "data sovereignty," pressed the delete key in the most fundamental battleground of Web3 narratives — content immutability.

The community's response was nothing short of severe:

· Collective protests from creators: Leading crypto artist pplpleasr withdrew all work and publicly mocked, "Mirror's server lifespan may be shorter than my home Wi-Fi router";

· Data migration wave: Competitors like Paragraph, Lens Protocol, saw a 400% surge in new creators in a single week, with some users even manually engraving article hashes into the Bitcoin Ordinals protocol;

· On-chain evidence archiving: An anonymous developer @0xSisyphus compared Mirror server data with on-chain records and found that at least 12% of historical articles had been tampered with (including the deletion of sensitive regulatory content).

The absurdity of this farce lies in the fact that when users questioned "why no prior notice was given," Mirror customer service actually cited Section 4.7 of the "User Agreement" — "The platform has the right to unilaterally adjust storage policies."

In the early versions of this agreement, this clause originally stated that "all content is automatically permanently stored on-chain." Some users dug up a 2021 Denis Nazarov speech video, where he was seen holding high a banner that read "Storing on-chain is a human right" — today, this video is listed on an NFT marketplace for 0.0001 ETH, labeled as a "historical irony artwork."

Dissecting the Demise: When "decentralization" becomes a growth tool

Mirror's collapse was far from accidental. Looking back at its development trajectory, the "pseudo-decentralization" gene was planted as early as 2022:

1. Selective On-chain "Sleight of Hand"

Despite touting "on-chain storage," Mirror always held core data close:

· User Graph: Data such as fan subscriptions and reading records were never on-chain;

· Traffic Distribution Rules: The article recommendation algorithm has always been a closed-source black-box system;

· Revenue Split Logic: Platform fee adjustments do not require community voting and are directly decided by the San Francisco headquarters.

This "centralization of key data, with edge data on-chain" strategy is fundamentally in line with Web2 platforms' operation of "trading openness through APIs for regulatory compliance."

2. The "Exploitative Pivot" of the Economic Model

The "Subscribe to Mint" feature launched in 2023 exposed Mirror's underlying logic:

· Creator: Needs to pay a 5% platform fee + Gas fee to mint subscription NFTs;

· Reader: Needs to stake tokens to earn voting rights, influencing article recommendation rankings;

· Platform: By controlling token release pace, effectively reconstructed the Web2 closed loop of "traffic acquisition, algorithm manipulation, fee extraction."

This design was sharply criticized by crypto economist Tina Heidenberg: "It replicated YouTube's ad revenue-sharing system with blockchain technology but with lower efficiency and less transparency."

3. The "Suicidal Compromise" of Infrastructure

To pursue user growth, Mirror has lowered technical standards multiple times:

· In 2023, it scrapped mandatory ENS domain binding, allowing email registration (resulting in a surge of Sybil attacks);

· In 2024, it introduced an "off-chain signature" scheme, essentially entrusting private keys to platform servers;

· In 2025, it completely abandoned Arweave in favor of AWS's Singapore node for data storage.

As the team kept conceding on the tech stack, Mirror has long ceased to be the Holy Grail of the Web3 world and instead has become an AWS subdirectory flying the Jolly Roger flag.

Epilogue: Scribbled on the Night of Web3's "Berlin Wall" Collapse

In March 2025, when the last group of Mirror creators on the X platform posted their '#RIPMirror' eulogies, people finally realized: the Web3 revolution had never promised a gentle journey; it required a complete technological purge—killing off all those unwilling to cage their servers, the 'Impostor Prophets'.

As Bitcoin Core developer Jameson Lopp wrote in the eulogy: "Mirror's tombstone should bear the oath of all Web3 entrepreneurs: if you still seek the life-and-death power over data, openly return to Silicon Valley; do not profane the cathedral of the crypto faithful with 'decentralization'."

Original Article Link

You may also like

$COIN Joins S&P 500, but Coinbase Isn't Celebrating

On May 13, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced that Coinbase would officially replace Discover Financial Services in the S&P 500 on May 19. While other companies like Block and MicroStrategy, closely tied to Bitcoin, were already part of the S&P 500, Coinbase became the first cryptocurrency exchange whose primary business is in the index. This also signifies that cryptocurrency is gradually moving from the fringes to the mainstream in the U.S.



On the day of the announcement, Coinbase's stock price surged by 23%, surpassing the $250 mark. However, just 3 days later, Coinbase was hit by two consecutive events: a hack where employees were bribed to steal customer data and a demand for a $20 million ransom, and an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the authenticity of its claim of having over 100 million "verified users" in its securities filings and marketing materials. These two events acted as mini-bombs, and at the time of writing, Coinbase's stock had already dropped by over 7.3%.


Coincidentally, Discover Financial Services, being replaced by Coinbase, can also be considered the "Coinbase" of the previous payment era. Discover is a U.S.-based digital banking and payment services company headquartered in Illinois, founded in 1960. Its payment network, Discover Network, is the fourth largest payment network apart from Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.


In April, after the approval of the acquisition of Discover by the sixth-largest U.S. bank, Capital One, this well-established digital banking company of over 60 years smoothly handed over its S&P 500 "seat" to this emerging cryptocurrency "bank." This unexpected coincidence also portrayed the handover between the new and old eras in Coinbase's entry into the S&P 500, resembling a relay race scene. However, this relay baton also brought Coinbase's accumulated "external troubles and internal strife" to a tipping point.


Side Effects of ETFs


Over the past decade, cryptocurrency exchanges have been the most stable "profit machines." They play a role in providing liquidity to the entire industry and rely on trading fees to sustain their operations. However, with the comprehensive rollout of ETF products in the U.S. market, this profit model is facing unprecedented challenges. As the leader in the "American stack," with over 80% of its business coming from the U.S., Coinbase is most affected by this.



Starting from the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, traditional financial capital has significantly onboarded users and funds that originally belonged to exchanges in a more cost-effective, compliant, and transparent manner. The transaction fee revenue of cryptocurrency exchanges has started to decline, and this trend may further intensify in the coming months.


According to Coinbase's 2024 Q4 financial report, the platform's total trading revenue was $417 million, a 45% year-on-year decrease. The contribution of BTC and ETH's trading revenue dropped from 65% in the same period last year to less than 50%.


This decline is not a result of a decrease in market enthusiasm. In fact, since the approval of the Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the inflow of BTC into the U.S. market has continued to reach new highs, with asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity rapidly expanding their management scale. Data shows that BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) alone has surpassed $17 billion in assets under management. As of mid-May 2025, the cumulative net inflow of 11 major institutional Bitcoin spot ETFs on the market has exceeded $41.5 billion, with a total net asset value of $1214.69 billion, accounting for approximately 5.91% of the total Bitcoin market capitalization.


Chart showing the trend of net outflows for Grayscale among the 11 institutions


Institutional investors and some retail investors are shifting towards ETF products, partly due to compliance and tax considerations. On one hand, ETFs have much lower trading costs compared to cryptocurrency exchanges. While Coinbase's spot trading fee rate varies annually in a tiered manner but averages around 1.49%, for example, the management fee for IBIT ETF is only 0.25%, and the majority of ETF institution fees fluctuate around 0.15% to 0.25%.



In other words, the more rational users are, the more likely they are to move from exchanges to ETF products, especially for investors aiming for long-term holdings.


According to multiple sources, several institutions, including VanEck and Grayscale, have submitted applications to the SEC for a Solana (SOL) ETF, with some institutions also planning to submit an XRP ETF proposal. Once approved, this may trigger a new round of fund migration. According to a report submitted by Coinbase to the SEC, as of April, the platform's trading revenue from XRP and Solana accounted for 18% and 10%, nearly one-third of the platform's fee revenue.



However, the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs passed in 2024 also reduced the fees for these two tokens on Coinbase from 30% and 15% to 26% and 10%, respectively. If the SOL and XRP ETFs are approved, it will further undermine the core fee revenue of exchanges like Coinbase.


The expansion of ETF products is gradually weakening the financial intermediary status of cryptocurrency exchanges. From their original roles as matchmakers and clearers to now gradually becoming mere "on-ramps and off-ramps" for funds, exchanges are seeing their marginal value squeezed by ETFs.


Robinhood Takes a Stand, Traditional Brokerages Join the Fray


On May 12, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins gave a keynote speech at the Tokenization and Cryptocurrency Working Group roundtable. The theme of his speech revolved around "It is a new day at the SEC," where he indicated that the SEC would not approach enforcement and regulation the same way as before but would instead pave the way for cryptocurrency assets in the U.S. market.



With signs of cryptocurrency compliance such as the SEC's "NEW DAY" declaration, an increasing number of traditional brokerages are attempting to enter the cryptocurrency industry. One of the most representative cases is the well-known U.S. brokerage Robinhood, which began expanding its crypto business in 2018. By the time of its IPO in 2021, Robinhood's crypto business revenue accounted for over 50% of the company, with a significant boost from the Dogecoin "moonshot" promoted by Musk.


In Q1 2025 earnings report, Robinhood showcased strong growth, especially in revenue from cryptocurrency and options trading. Fueled by Trump's Memecoin, cryptocurrency-related revenue reached $250 million, nearly doubling year-over-year. Consequently, Robinhood Gold subscription users reached 3.5 million, a 90% increase from the previous year, with the rapid growth of Robinhood Gold providing the company with a stable source of income.



Meanwhile, RobinHood is actively pursuing acquisitions in the cryptocurrency space. In 2024, it announced a $2 billion acquisition of the long-standing European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp. Additionally, Canada's largest cryptocurrency CEX, WonderFi, which recently went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also announced its integration with RobinHood Crypto. After obtaining virtual asset licenses in the UK, Canada, Singapore, and other markets, RobinHood has taken a proactive approach in the compliant cryptocurrency trading market.



Furthermore, an increasing number of brokerage firms are exploring the same path. Futu Securities, Tiger Brokers, and others are also dipping their toes into cryptocurrency trading, with some having applied for or obtained the VA license from the Hong Kong SFC. Although their user bases are currently small, traditional brokerages have a natural advantage in user trust, regulatory licenses, and low fee structures. This could pose a threat to native cryptocurrency platforms in the future.



User Data Breach: Is Coinbase Still Secure?


In April 2025, security researchers discovered that some Coinbase user data was leaked on the dark web. While the platform initially responded by attributing it to a "technical misinformation," it still raised concerns among users regarding its security and privacy protection. Just two days before Dow Jones Indexes announced Coinbase's addition to the S&P 500 Index, on May 11, 2025, Coinbase received an email from an unknown threat actor claiming to have obtained customer account information and internal documents, demanding a $20 million ransom to keep the data private. Subsequent investigations confirmed the data breach.


Cybercriminals obtained the data by bribing overseas customer service agents and support staff, mainly in "non-U.S. regions such as India." These agents abused their access to Coinbase's internal customer support system and stole customer data. As early as February this year, blockchain detective ZachXBT revealed on X platform that between December 2024 and January 2025, Coinbase users lost over $65 million to social engineering scams, with the actual amount potentially higher.


Among the victims was a well-known figure, 67-year-old Ed Suman, an established artist in the art world for nearly two decades, having been involved in the creation of artworks such as Jeff Koons' "Balloon Dog" sculpture. Earlier this year, he fell victim to an impersonation scam involving fake Coinbase customer support, resulting in a loss of over $2 million in cryptocurrency. ZachXBT critiqued Coinbase for its inadequate handling of such scams, noting that other major exchanges have not faced similar issues and recommending Coinbase to enhance its security measures.


Amidst a series of ongoing social engineering incidents, although there has not been any impact on user assets at the technical level so far, it has raised concerns among many retail and institutional investors. Especially institutions holding massive assets on Coinbase. Just considering the U.S. BTC ETF institutions, as of mid-May 2025, they collectively hold nearly 840,000 BTC, and 75% of these are custodied by Coinbase. If we price BTC at $100,000, this amount reaches a staggering $63 billion, which is equivalent to the nominal GDP of two Iceland in the year 2024.


Visualization: ChatGPT, Source: Farside


In addition, Coinbase Custody also serves over 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, family offices, pension funds, and endowments. As of the Q1 2025 financial report, Coinbase's total assets under management (including institutional and retail clients) reached $404 billion. The specific amount of institutional custodied assets was not explicitly disclosed in the latest report, but it should still be over 50% based on the Q4 2024 report.


Visualization: ChatGPT


Once this security barrier is breached, not only could the rate of user attrition far exceed expectations, but more importantly, institutional trust in it would undermine the foundation of its business. Therefore, after a hacking event, Coinbase's stock price plummeted significantly.


CEXs are All in Self-Rescue Mode


Facing a decline in spot trading fee revenue, Coinbase is also accelerating its transformation, attempting to find growth opportunities in derivatives and emerging assets. Coinbase acquired a stake in the options platform Deribit at the end of 2024 and announced the official launch of perpetual contract products in 2025. This acquisition fills in Coinbase's gap in options trading and its relatively small global market share.



Deribit has a strong presence in non-U.S. markets, especially in Asia and Europe. The acquisition has enabled Coinbase to gain a dominant position in bitcoin and ethereum options trading on Deribit, accounting for approximately 80% of the global options trading volume, with daily trading volume remaining above $2 billion.


Meanwhile, 80-90% of Deribit's customer base consists of institutional investors, with their professionalism and liquidity in the Bitcoin and Ethereum options market highly favored by institutions. Coinbase's compliance advantage, coupled with its already robust institutional ecosystem, makes it even more suitable. By using institutions as an entry point, it can face the squeeze from giants like Binance and OKX in the derivatives market.



Facing a similar dilemma is Kraken, which is attempting to replicate Binance Futures' model in non-U.S. markets. Since the derivatives market relies more on professional users, fee rates are relatively higher and stickiness is stronger, making it a significant source of revenue for exchanges. In the first half of 2025, Kraken completed the acquisition of TradeStation Crypto and a futures exchange, aiming to build a complete derivatives trading ecosystem to hedge the risk of declining spot transaction fee income.


With the surge of Memecoin in 2024, Binance, OKX, and various CEX platforms began massively listing small-market-cap, highly volatile tokens to activate active trading users. Due to the wealth effect and trading activity of Memecoins, Coinbase was also forced to join the battle, successively listing popular tokens from the Solana ecosystem such as BOOK OF MEME and Dogwifhat. Although these coins are controversial, they are frequently traded, with fee rates several times higher than mainstream coins, serving as a "blood-boosting" method for spot trading.


However, due to its status as a publicly traded company, this practice is a riskier endeavor for Coinbase. Even in the current crypto-friendly environment, the SEC is still investigating whether tokens like SOL, ADA, and SAND constitute securities.


In addition to the forced transformation strategies carried out by the aforementioned CEXs, they are also starting to lay out RWAs and the most talked-about stablecoin payment fields, such as the PYUSD launched through a collaboration between Coinbase and Paypal, Coinbase's support for the Euro stablecoin EURC by Circle that complies with EU MiCA regulatory requirements, or the USD1 launched through a collaboration between Binance and WIFL. In the increasingly crowded trading field, many CEXs have shifted their focus from just the trading market to the application field.


The golden age of transaction fees has quietly ended, and the second half of the crypto exchange platform game has silently begun.


Arthur Hayes: Why I'm Betting on ETH While the Market Is Obsessed with SOL

"I personally have also allocated 20% to gold, expecting the price of gold to potentially rise to $10,000-20,000 by the end of this market cycle."

Key Market Insights for May 16th, how much did you miss out on?

1. On-chain Flows: $111.3M inflow to Ethereum this week; $237.6M outflow from Berachain 2. Largest Price Swings: $ETHFI, $NEIRO 3. Top News: Data: Solana Network's revenue reached $7.9M on the 13th, surpassing the sum of all other L1 and L2 chains

CryptoPunks Changes Hands Twice, Did the Originator of NFTs Finally Find Its "Forever Home" This Time?

The original NFT pioneer CryptoPunks has once again officially changed ownership after being sold to the Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) developer Yuga Labs.

MOG Coin Skyrockets as Elon Musk and Garry Tan Embrace "mog/acc" Identity

「mog/acc」 is rapidly sweeping through various figures, from Elon Musk to Garry Tan, boosting the project's visibility and ultimately driving up the price.

STARTUP's Price Surges 40x in 30 Minutes: How did he become the Emotion King of Believe?

He is both a KOL and understands the market script, playing a game where attention is the currency.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more