2024 Airdrop Big Revealing: Exploring Wealth-Building Opportunities and Avoiding Risk Traps

By: blockbeats|2025/01/29 09:15:03
Share
copy
Original Author: 0x Lao Dong

2024 Airdrop Rankings

• Day 1 Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) Top: StarkNet, $19.2 billion.

• Highest Airdrop Value: Hyperliquid, $2.613 billion, averaging 28,000 U per address.

• Largest Airdrop in USD: Movement, $734.8 million airdrop.

• Most Airdrop Addresses: HMSTR, 1.29 billion TG accounts, averaging 3U.

• Top Gainer: UXLINK, 15x ATH compared to closing price on listing day.

• Top Loser: HLG, 90.66% price drop in 30 days.

Key Insights

·  Emerging Narrative Tracks Rise, Traditional Hot Tracks Cool Down

The 30-day average price change of traditional hot tracks (Infrastructure, Layer2, GameFi) is -1.34%, while emerging narrative tracks like DEPIN, RWA, AI have an average increase of 41.98% over 30 days, suggesting investors should focus on emerging tracks.

·  High Valuations in 2024 Projects, Market Expectations Bullish

On listing day, the FDV/raise ratio of 79 projects averages 103.9x, indicating that the overall 2024 project valuations are high, with a relatively bullish market expectation, but a potential bubble may exist.

·  Frequent Early Speculative Trading, Significant Price Volatility

40% of projects hit their all-time high on the first day, while 1% hit their all-time low. This indicates that most projects face significant sell pressure early on, with many investors tending to engage in speculative trading in the initial listing period, causing potential rapid price retracements after reaching highs.

·  Most Projects Show Noticeable Short-term Price Declines

62% of projects exhibit a downtrend within the first 7 days, and 65% within 30 days, with most projects showing a price decline trend shortly after Token Generation Event (TGE), and over time, both the proportion and magnitude of declines increase.

·  Projects with a Larger Distribution Ratio and Fewer Lock-up Mechanisms Perform Better

Projects with a larger distribution ratio tend to be more stable and perform well, with a 30-day average increase of 16.66%. Tokens with lock-up mechanisms perform poorly, with a 30-day average decline of -43.73%.

·  More Platforms Bring More Recognition

With the increasing number of exchange listings, the average project funding amount and FDV have significantly increased, indicating that market recognition and liquidity have increased, and risk tolerance has also improved

Foreword

2024 is a year of bull-bear alternation and unusually volatile in the cryptocurrency market. BTC broke through its all-time high from the year's low of $38,500, soaring to over $100,000. Meanwhile, as the market heats up, project activities have gradually become more frequent.

Compared to the 270 TGE projects in 2023, this number surged to 731 in 2024, a growth rate of 170%. Among these numerous projects, only a few are "large-cap" and "mid-cap," while the majority are still "small-cap" and "micro-cap." How have these projects performed after launch?

To answer this question, Lao Dong selected 100 relatively hot and representative projects in 2024, conducted a systematic analysis combining key data such as funding scale, price performance, distribution rules, etc., to reveal the trends and patterns of current airdrop projects. This article will speak through data to help readers understand the airdrop project situation in 2024.

Data Table

Click to view detailed data

This article does not provide any investment advice but only objective data statistics and analysis

Data Analysis

I. 2024 TGE Track Analysis

2024 Airdrop Big Revealing: Exploring Wealth-Building Opportunities and Avoiding Risk Traps

The chart shows the distribution of project types in 2024. It can be seen that 2024's VC coin TGEs are mainly concentrated in traditional popular tracks such as infrastructure, GameFi, Layer2. Projects in these tracks usually require a longer development cycle, with many projects actually being developed in the past few years and only going live in 2024.

·  Infrastructure projects: 19, with a 30-day average increase of 12.18%

·  Layer2 Projects: 12, Average 30-Day Price Change -0.2%

·  Gamefi Projects: 12, Average 30-Day Price Change 2.3%

This year, the primary emerging narrative revolves around topics such as DEPIN, RWA, AI, etc. While the overall number of TGE (Token Generation Event) projects is not high, the performance of these types of projects is quite remarkable. There may continue to be a breakout in the future.

·  AI Projects: 3, Average 30-Day Price Change 24.56%

·  DEPIN Projects: 3, Average 30-Day Price Change 53.56%

·  RWA Projects: 3, Average 30-Day Price Change 42.17%

Traditional popular tracks are gradually cooling down, while new emerging narratives are rapidly rising. Focusing on new narrative tracks may be a more promising investment direction.

II. Funding Situation and FDV Analysis

·  Out of 100 projects, 79 have disclosed their funding, with an average funding amount of $38.91 million.

There are 8 projects with funding exceeding $100 million.

·  The largest proportion of projects, 44 in total, fall within the $10 million to $100 million range.

·  There are 26 projects in the $2 million to $10 million range.

VC (Venture Capital) firms usually conduct rigorous due diligence on projects, reflecting the market's level of acceptance of the projects. Generally, a larger funding amount indicates a stronger confidence from investors in its future development. Through funding frequency, one can also gauge changes in track popularity and the direction of capital attention. However, funding amount alone cannot fully determine the quality of a project; a multidimensional analysis is required.

FDV (Fully Diluted Valuation) is an indicator used to assess a project's potential future value. FDV is influenced by various factors before a project goes live, including funding amount, initial circulating supply, market sentiment, narrative direction, track popularity, liquidity, and trading depth, among others.

To more objectively evaluate the relationship between a project's initial valuation and actual funding, we use the FDV/Funding ratio based on the closing price of the day to divide into ranges and analyze the market performance of projects in different ranges:

·  FDV/Funding Range 0-20: Reasonable or Conservative

In this range, there are a total of 21 projects with an average funding amount of $48.83 million. The data shows that 57% of the projects did not exceed the closing price on the day within 7 and 30 days. Compared to other ranges, these projects have a more stable market expectation, relatively reasonable valuation, and lower investment risk.

·  FDV/Funding 20-100 Range: High Expectation

There are 33 projects in this range with an average funding amount of $51.64 million. Statistics show that 63.6% of the projects experienced price weakness within 7 days, and this percentage increased to 75.8% after 30 days. This indicates that investors had higher initial expectations for these projects, but prices experienced significant corrections in the short term, presenting a certain level of volatility risk.

·  FDV/Funding 100 and above Range: High-Risk Speculation

This range contains 24 projects with an average funding amount of $12.72 million. These projects are mostly small-scale projects with no projects funded over a billion. The data shows that 70.8% of the projects experienced price weakness after 7 days, and this percentage decreased to 54.2% after 30 days. These projects are mostly concentrated in hot sectors such as infrastructure, GameFi, and LSD.

Among the 79 projects analyzed, the average FDV/Funding ratio was 103.9x, indicating that the overall valuation of 2024 projects is relatively high, and market expectations are optimistic.

III. ATH vs ATL Analysis

Analyzing ATH (All-Time High) and ATL (All-Time Low) can help us fully understand the overall performance of a project in the market and the level of investor recognition. Analyzing ATH/Today's Price and Today's Price/ATL can evaluate a project's profit potential and selling pressure risk, providing data support for assessing the project's stability in the early stages, reasonable valuation, and investment timing.

Price trends of 100 projects were analyzed, and as of today, 40% of the projects reached their ATH on the first day, while 1% of the projects hit ATL on the same day.

·  Price Trend Analysis of 100 Projects: 40% of the projects reached their ATH on the first day. 1% of the projects hit ATL on the first day.

·  ATH vs. Same-Day Price averages 245.22%, indicating that the same-day price has a 2.45x potential increase from the all-time high (ATH). The top-performing projects include UXLINK, WEN, DRIFT

·  Same-Day Price vs. ATL averages 633.52%, meaning that the price would need to increase by 6.34x from the all-time low (ATL) to reach the same-day closing price. The worst-performing projects are SLN, FRIEND, DEFI

The market shows a strong speculative sentiment, with 40% of projects reaching their ATH on the first day. This indicates that many investors tend to engage in speculative trading early in the project's listing, which may subsequently lead to a rapid price decline.

The 245.22% ATH increase compared to the 633.52% ATL decrease highlights that the market's selling pressure risk is much higher than the project's profit potential. This data reflects that during the initial listing phase, investors are more likely to see rapid price increases driven by high market sentiment. However, this may be followed by a quick price drop due to selling pressure or factors such as token unlocks.

IV. Short-Term Project Performance Comparison

The main purpose is to analyze the short-term performance of projects. By comparing the closing price on the listing day with prices after 7 days and 30 days, we can gain a clearer understanding of the project's short-term performance and trends.

From the chart, it can be observed:

·  Day 7:

62% of projects have a price lower than the closing price on the listing day, with an average decrease of 27.03%.

38% of projects have a price higher than the closing price on the listing day, with an average increase of 60.34%.

·  Day 30:

65% of projects have a price lower than the closing price on the listing day, with an average decrease of 37.42%.

35% of projects have a price higher than the closing price on the listing day, with an average increase of 74.26%.

Most projects face a downward price trend shortly after their TGE, with the magnitude of the decline increasing over time.

While the majority of projects experience price drops, there are still a few projects that perform exceptionally well after their TGE, with significant price increases. Some high-quality projects can gain higher market recognition in the short term and achieve notable price growth.

Among them, ISLAND GRASS RUNESTONE performed well, while F AARK HLG performed the worst.

Possible reasons for short-term price increases:

1. Strong Fundamentals: Projects with strong technical support, clear use cases, or innovative business models can attract long-term investor attention, thereby driving price increases.

2. Narrative-Driven: Projects that capitalize on current market trends (such as GameFi, meme, DEPIN, RWA, etc.) are easily able to attract market inflows, leading to price increases.

3. Strong Community Consensus: Community consensus can increase a project's visibility and demand in the market, driving price increases. Furthermore, ongoing community support can alleviate selling pressure, enhancing the project's long-term stability.

4. Good Liquidity: Adequate liquidity helps stabilize project prices and boost investor confidence.

Possible reasons for short-term price decreases:

1. Cooling Market Sentiment: The price on the TGE day is often driven by FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) sentiment, which may be higher than the reasonable price. As the hype subsides, the price will revert to rational levels.

2. Increased Selling Pressure: After TGE, investors, especially airdrop participants or short-term investors, may choose to cash out profits, leading to increased selling pressure and price declines.

3. Token Unlocking Mechanism: Many VC coins adopt a long-term release mechanism. As tokens unlock, early investors (such as private sale participants and the team) may choose to realize profits, adding to the market's selling pressure.

4. Inadequate Liquidity: Some projects post-TGE may suffer from insufficient liquidity and limited trading depth. Once a large sell order occurs, the price can quickly drop, intensifying volatility.

5. Distribution Ratio's Impact on Price

·  Projects with a **distribution ratio greater than 15%**: 15 projects, with an average 7-day price change of 11.87% and an average 30-day price change of 16.66%.

·  Projects with a **distribution ratio less than 15%**: 76 projects, with an average 7-day price change of 8.31% and an average 30-day price change of 3.36%.

·  Projects with a lock-up mechanism: 10 projects, with an average 7-day price change of -16.68% and an average 30-day price change of -43.73%.

The data indicates that projects with a larger distribution ratio tend to have more stable short-term performance, while projects with a strong lock-up mechanism do not perform as expected and experience larger price fluctuations.

6. Exchange Selection and Project Performance

Being listed on different exchanges or multiple exchanges can have varying impacts on the market. To better understand the overall performance of projects listed on major exchanges, Lao Dong has compiled data on several key exchanges, including the number of listings, price fluctuations, and the effect on FDV liquidity. This helps in understanding how projects on different exchanges perform and making wiser investment decisions.

·  Binance: 30 listed projects, with a 7-day price change of -0.02%, 12 projects that have seen an increase (40%), a 30-day price change of -4.57%, and 12 projects that have seen an increase (40%).

·  OKX: 31 listed projects, with a 7-day price change of -13.06%, 7 projects that have seen an increase (22.58%), a 30-day price change of -18.75%, and 10 projects that have seen an increase (32.26%).

·  Bybit: 79 listed projects, with a 7-day price change of +2.27%, 29 projects that have seen an increase (36.7%), a 30-day price change of -4.65%, and 28 projects that have seen an increase (35.44%).

·  Bitget: 74 listed projects, with a 7-day price change of +6.57%, 26 projects that have seen an increase (35.14%), a 30-day price change of +3.3%, and 28 projects that have seen an increase (37.84%).

·  Coinbase: Listed 16 projects, 7-day price change -3.68%, 3 projects up (18.75%), 30-day price change +26.64%, 6 projects up (37.5%)

·  Upbit: Listed 17 projects, 7-day price change -5.05%, 3 projects up (17.65%), 30-day price change +2.94%, 9 projects up (52.94%)

Based on the Number of Listings

Coinbase and Upbit have relatively fewer listings, as they tend to carefully select projects focusing more on long-term stability and compliance to avoid listing projects still in the experimental stage or high-risk.

Bybit and Bitget have more listings and are more aggressive, as these exchanges aim to attract users by frequently listing new projects to expand their market share. This strategy helps them rapidly grow in the market, attracting significant trading volume and liquidity.

Based on Short-Term Project Performance

·  Bitget and Bybit have shown relatively good performance in the 7-day and 30-day periods, especially Bitget, with positive price changes in both the 7-day and 30-day periods and a high percentage of projects in the green.

·  Coinbase has performed well, particularly with a +26.64% price change in the 30-day period and a higher number of projects in the green (37.5%).

·  OKX and Binance have both experienced some decline in the past 30 days, especially OKX, which has seen a significant decrease of about -18.75%.

·  Upbit has shown some recovery in the 30-day period with a price increase of +2.94% and 52.94% of projects in the green, indicating a good performance.

·  Other Exchanges: 7 projects, average funding $6.5 million, average FDV $290 million on the same day

·  Listed on 1 Exchange: 20 projects, average funding $28.86 million, average FDV on listing day $9.81 billion

·  Listed on 2 Exchanges: 33 projects, average funding $20.68 million, average FDV on listing day $10.7 billion

·  Listed on 3 Exchanges: 12 projects, average funding $24.57 million, average FDV on listing day $30.97 billion

·  Listed on 4 Exchanges: 17 projects, average funding $31.67 million, average FDV on listing day $17.83 billion

·  Listed on 5 Exchanges: 9 projects, average funding $152.15 million, average FDV on listing day $63.13 billion

·  Listed on 6 Exchanges: 2 projects, average funding $95.20 million, average FDV on listing day $64.89 billion

As the number of exchanges a project is listed on increases, the average funding amount and the FDV on listing day significantly increase. This indicates high market recognition, improved liquidity, increased resilience to risk, and the ability to attract more investors.

Original Article Link

You may also like

a16z Leads $18M Seed Round for Catena Labs, Crypto Industry Bets on Stablecoin AI Payment

Traditional finance is still stuck in a "human-to-human" model, while Catena aims to achieve "AI-to-AI" interaction.

Pharos, deeply integrated with AntChain, is about to launch. How can we get involved?

What is the relationship between the $8 million funded NewChain and Ant, and how will they interact?

$COIN Joins S&P 500, but Coinbase Isn't Celebrating

On May 13, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced that Coinbase would officially replace Discover Financial Services in the S&P 500 on May 19. While other companies like Block and MicroStrategy, closely tied to Bitcoin, were already part of the S&P 500, Coinbase became the first cryptocurrency exchange whose primary business is in the index. This also signifies that cryptocurrency is gradually moving from the fringes to the mainstream in the U.S.



On the day of the announcement, Coinbase's stock price surged by 23%, surpassing the $250 mark. However, just 3 days later, Coinbase was hit by two consecutive events: a hack where employees were bribed to steal customer data and a demand for a $20 million ransom, and an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the authenticity of its claim of having over 100 million "verified users" in its securities filings and marketing materials. These two events acted as mini-bombs, and at the time of writing, Coinbase's stock had already dropped by over 7.3%.


Coincidentally, Discover Financial Services, being replaced by Coinbase, can also be considered the "Coinbase" of the previous payment era. Discover is a U.S.-based digital banking and payment services company headquartered in Illinois, founded in 1960. Its payment network, Discover Network, is the fourth largest payment network apart from Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.


In April, after the approval of the acquisition of Discover by the sixth-largest U.S. bank, Capital One, this well-established digital banking company of over 60 years smoothly handed over its S&P 500 "seat" to this emerging cryptocurrency "bank." This unexpected coincidence also portrayed the handover between the new and old eras in Coinbase's entry into the S&P 500, resembling a relay race scene. However, this relay baton also brought Coinbase's accumulated "external troubles and internal strife" to a tipping point.


Side Effects of ETFs


Over the past decade, cryptocurrency exchanges have been the most stable "profit machines." They play a role in providing liquidity to the entire industry and rely on trading fees to sustain their operations. However, with the comprehensive rollout of ETF products in the U.S. market, this profit model is facing unprecedented challenges. As the leader in the "American stack," with over 80% of its business coming from the U.S., Coinbase is most affected by this.



Starting from the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, traditional financial capital has significantly onboarded users and funds that originally belonged to exchanges in a more cost-effective, compliant, and transparent manner. The transaction fee revenue of cryptocurrency exchanges has started to decline, and this trend may further intensify in the coming months.


According to Coinbase's 2024 Q4 financial report, the platform's total trading revenue was $417 million, a 45% year-on-year decrease. The contribution of BTC and ETH's trading revenue dropped from 65% in the same period last year to less than 50%.


This decline is not a result of a decrease in market enthusiasm. In fact, since the approval of the Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the inflow of BTC into the U.S. market has continued to reach new highs, with asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity rapidly expanding their management scale. Data shows that BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) alone has surpassed $17 billion in assets under management. As of mid-May 2025, the cumulative net inflow of 11 major institutional Bitcoin spot ETFs on the market has exceeded $41.5 billion, with a total net asset value of $1214.69 billion, accounting for approximately 5.91% of the total Bitcoin market capitalization.


Chart showing the trend of net outflows for Grayscale among the 11 institutions


Institutional investors and some retail investors are shifting towards ETF products, partly due to compliance and tax considerations. On one hand, ETFs have much lower trading costs compared to cryptocurrency exchanges. While Coinbase's spot trading fee rate varies annually in a tiered manner but averages around 1.49%, for example, the management fee for IBIT ETF is only 0.25%, and the majority of ETF institution fees fluctuate around 0.15% to 0.25%.



In other words, the more rational users are, the more likely they are to move from exchanges to ETF products, especially for investors aiming for long-term holdings.


According to multiple sources, several institutions, including VanEck and Grayscale, have submitted applications to the SEC for a Solana (SOL) ETF, with some institutions also planning to submit an XRP ETF proposal. Once approved, this may trigger a new round of fund migration. According to a report submitted by Coinbase to the SEC, as of April, the platform's trading revenue from XRP and Solana accounted for 18% and 10%, nearly one-third of the platform's fee revenue.



However, the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs passed in 2024 also reduced the fees for these two tokens on Coinbase from 30% and 15% to 26% and 10%, respectively. If the SOL and XRP ETFs are approved, it will further undermine the core fee revenue of exchanges like Coinbase.


The expansion of ETF products is gradually weakening the financial intermediary status of cryptocurrency exchanges. From their original roles as matchmakers and clearers to now gradually becoming mere "on-ramps and off-ramps" for funds, exchanges are seeing their marginal value squeezed by ETFs.


Robinhood Takes a Stand, Traditional Brokerages Join the Fray


On May 12, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins gave a keynote speech at the Tokenization and Cryptocurrency Working Group roundtable. The theme of his speech revolved around "It is a new day at the SEC," where he indicated that the SEC would not approach enforcement and regulation the same way as before but would instead pave the way for cryptocurrency assets in the U.S. market.



With signs of cryptocurrency compliance such as the SEC's "NEW DAY" declaration, an increasing number of traditional brokerages are attempting to enter the cryptocurrency industry. One of the most representative cases is the well-known U.S. brokerage Robinhood, which began expanding its crypto business in 2018. By the time of its IPO in 2021, Robinhood's crypto business revenue accounted for over 50% of the company, with a significant boost from the Dogecoin "moonshot" promoted by Musk.


In Q1 2025 earnings report, Robinhood showcased strong growth, especially in revenue from cryptocurrency and options trading. Fueled by Trump's Memecoin, cryptocurrency-related revenue reached $250 million, nearly doubling year-over-year. Consequently, Robinhood Gold subscription users reached 3.5 million, a 90% increase from the previous year, with the rapid growth of Robinhood Gold providing the company with a stable source of income.



Meanwhile, RobinHood is actively pursuing acquisitions in the cryptocurrency space. In 2024, it announced a $2 billion acquisition of the long-standing European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp. Additionally, Canada's largest cryptocurrency CEX, WonderFi, which recently went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also announced its integration with RobinHood Crypto. After obtaining virtual asset licenses in the UK, Canada, Singapore, and other markets, RobinHood has taken a proactive approach in the compliant cryptocurrency trading market.



Furthermore, an increasing number of brokerage firms are exploring the same path. Futu Securities, Tiger Brokers, and others are also dipping their toes into cryptocurrency trading, with some having applied for or obtained the VA license from the Hong Kong SFC. Although their user bases are currently small, traditional brokerages have a natural advantage in user trust, regulatory licenses, and low fee structures. This could pose a threat to native cryptocurrency platforms in the future.



User Data Breach: Is Coinbase Still Secure?


In April 2025, security researchers discovered that some Coinbase user data was leaked on the dark web. While the platform initially responded by attributing it to a "technical misinformation," it still raised concerns among users regarding its security and privacy protection. Just two days before Dow Jones Indexes announced Coinbase's addition to the S&P 500 Index, on May 11, 2025, Coinbase received an email from an unknown threat actor claiming to have obtained customer account information and internal documents, demanding a $20 million ransom to keep the data private. Subsequent investigations confirmed the data breach.


Cybercriminals obtained the data by bribing overseas customer service agents and support staff, mainly in "non-U.S. regions such as India." These agents abused their access to Coinbase's internal customer support system and stole customer data. As early as February this year, blockchain detective ZachXBT revealed on X platform that between December 2024 and January 2025, Coinbase users lost over $65 million to social engineering scams, with the actual amount potentially higher.


Among the victims was a well-known figure, 67-year-old Ed Suman, an established artist in the art world for nearly two decades, having been involved in the creation of artworks such as Jeff Koons' "Balloon Dog" sculpture. Earlier this year, he fell victim to an impersonation scam involving fake Coinbase customer support, resulting in a loss of over $2 million in cryptocurrency. ZachXBT critiqued Coinbase for its inadequate handling of such scams, noting that other major exchanges have not faced similar issues and recommending Coinbase to enhance its security measures.


Amidst a series of ongoing social engineering incidents, although there has not been any impact on user assets at the technical level so far, it has raised concerns among many retail and institutional investors. Especially institutions holding massive assets on Coinbase. Just considering the U.S. BTC ETF institutions, as of mid-May 2025, they collectively hold nearly 840,000 BTC, and 75% of these are custodied by Coinbase. If we price BTC at $100,000, this amount reaches a staggering $63 billion, which is equivalent to the nominal GDP of two Iceland in the year 2024.


Visualization: ChatGPT, Source: Farside


In addition, Coinbase Custody also serves over 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, family offices, pension funds, and endowments. As of the Q1 2025 financial report, Coinbase's total assets under management (including institutional and retail clients) reached $404 billion. The specific amount of institutional custodied assets was not explicitly disclosed in the latest report, but it should still be over 50% based on the Q4 2024 report.


Visualization: ChatGPT


Once this security barrier is breached, not only could the rate of user attrition far exceed expectations, but more importantly, institutional trust in it would undermine the foundation of its business. Therefore, after a hacking event, Coinbase's stock price plummeted significantly.


CEXs are All in Self-Rescue Mode


Facing a decline in spot trading fee revenue, Coinbase is also accelerating its transformation, attempting to find growth opportunities in derivatives and emerging assets. Coinbase acquired a stake in the options platform Deribit at the end of 2024 and announced the official launch of perpetual contract products in 2025. This acquisition fills in Coinbase's gap in options trading and its relatively small global market share.



Deribit has a strong presence in non-U.S. markets, especially in Asia and Europe. The acquisition has enabled Coinbase to gain a dominant position in bitcoin and ethereum options trading on Deribit, accounting for approximately 80% of the global options trading volume, with daily trading volume remaining above $2 billion.


Meanwhile, 80-90% of Deribit's customer base consists of institutional investors, with their professionalism and liquidity in the Bitcoin and Ethereum options market highly favored by institutions. Coinbase's compliance advantage, coupled with its already robust institutional ecosystem, makes it even more suitable. By using institutions as an entry point, it can face the squeeze from giants like Binance and OKX in the derivatives market.



Facing a similar dilemma is Kraken, which is attempting to replicate Binance Futures' model in non-U.S. markets. Since the derivatives market relies more on professional users, fee rates are relatively higher and stickiness is stronger, making it a significant source of revenue for exchanges. In the first half of 2025, Kraken completed the acquisition of TradeStation Crypto and a futures exchange, aiming to build a complete derivatives trading ecosystem to hedge the risk of declining spot transaction fee income.


With the surge of Memecoin in 2024, Binance, OKX, and various CEX platforms began massively listing small-market-cap, highly volatile tokens to activate active trading users. Due to the wealth effect and trading activity of Memecoins, Coinbase was also forced to join the battle, successively listing popular tokens from the Solana ecosystem such as BOOK OF MEME and Dogwifhat. Although these coins are controversial, they are frequently traded, with fee rates several times higher than mainstream coins, serving as a "blood-boosting" method for spot trading.


However, due to its status as a publicly traded company, this practice is a riskier endeavor for Coinbase. Even in the current crypto-friendly environment, the SEC is still investigating whether tokens like SOL, ADA, and SAND constitute securities.


In addition to the forced transformation strategies carried out by the aforementioned CEXs, they are also starting to lay out RWAs and the most talked-about stablecoin payment fields, such as the PYUSD launched through a collaboration between Coinbase and Paypal, Coinbase's support for the Euro stablecoin EURC by Circle that complies with EU MiCA regulatory requirements, or the USD1 launched through a collaboration between Binance and WIFL. In the increasingly crowded trading field, many CEXs have shifted their focus from just the trading market to the application field.


The golden age of transaction fees has quietly ended, and the second half of the crypto exchange platform game has silently begun.


Arthur Hayes: Why I'm Betting on ETH While the Market Is Obsessed with SOL

"I personally have also allocated 20% to gold, expecting the price of gold to potentially rise to $10,000-20,000 by the end of this market cycle."

May 16 Key Market Information Gap, A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report

1. Top News: Coinbase Faces Double Blow with 'SEC Investigation' and 'User Data Breach,' Stock Price Drops by 7.2% 2. Token Unlocking: $ARB, $AVAX, $PRIME, $ASTR, $1INCH

The End and Rebirth of NFTs: How the Meme Coin Craze Ended the PFP Era?

There must be another Labubu hidden beneath the ruins.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more