ACT Flash Crash Night: When Exchange Circuit Breaker Turns into a Short-Selling Bullet

By: blockbeats|2025/04/02 04:00:04
Share
copy
Original Article Title: "Decrypting the Triple Labyrinth Behind ACT's Flash Crash, Has Exchange Risk Control Become a 'Nuclear Button'?"
Original Article Author: Frank, PANews

A routine contract rule adjustment by Binance unexpectedly exposed the most vulnerable sore spot in the crypto market.

On April 1st, a flash crash event that collectively halved the value of low-market-cap tokens like ACT in half an hour brought the exchange risk control mechanisms, market maker algorithm strategies, and the fatal flaws of the MEME coin ecosystem into the spotlight simultaneously.

Despite Binance's emergency response blaming "whale selling," the cliff-like evaporation of 75% of the contract positions, the precise synchronous price fluctuations of multiple currencies, and the mysterious on-chain dump by market maker Wintermute after the crash, all revealed a deeper industry vulnerability in this dilemma. In the current environment of weak liquidity, exchanges attempting to patch up system risks may instead become the final straw that crushes the market.

Half-Hour Flash Crash of Multiple Tokens

On April 1st at 15:32, Binance released an announcement regarding the adjustment of leverage and margin tier of multiple U-based perpetual futures contracts, involving several trading pairs such as 1000SATSUSDT, ACTUSDT, PNUTUSDT, NEOUSDT, NEOUSDC, etc. Based on the content of this adjustment, it mainly focused on adjusting the contract trading position limits and leverage margin ratios of these tokens. Taking ACT as an example, the pre-adjustment position limit was a maximum of $4.5 million, which was reduced to a maximum of $3.5 million after the adjustment. The announcement indicated the adjustment time was 18:30.

ACT Flash Crash Night: When Exchange Circuit Breaker Turns into a Short-Selling Bullet

At 18:30 on the same day, ACT plummeted from $0.1899 to $0.0836 within 36 minutes, a 55% drop, sparking intense discussions in the market.

Almost simultaneously with ACT, several low-market-cap tokens on Binance such as TST, HIPPO, DEXE, PNUT experienced flash crash events to varying degrees, with price drops ranging between 20% to 50%. Market data shows that 18:30 became the starting point for a cliff-like drop in prices of multiple tokens, extending far beyond a single project, demonstrating clear synchronicity.

Specifically, this adjustment reduced the maximum position size one could hold with leverage. For example, previously, with a certain leverage, you could hold $1 million worth of a token, but now with the rule change, you may only be able to hold a maximum of $800,000. If users did not voluntarily close their positions, the system would forcibly liquidate the excess positions at market price when the rule took effect. Therefore, a significant drop in contract prices could occur within a short time frame, triggering a cascading event.

In response, a significant amount of discussion was sparked on social media, with @terryroom2014 pointing out, "18:30 Binance contract positions plunged, with the exchange actively liquidating large holders, leading to a price crash"; @yinshanguancha believed that "Market Makers were forcibly liquidated due to insufficient margin, and the rule adjustment was the catalyst." Most users pointed their fingers at Binance's rule adjustment, believing that lowering the position limit triggered forced liquidation, subsequently causing panic selling and a market stampede effect.

Some users also speculated that this was due to ACT's Market Makers actively dumping the price, with @Web3Tinkle noting that ACT's position on Binance decreased by $73 million in just 15 minutes, suggesting that the project team and Market Makers instantly dumped their holdings to harvest the market.

In response, Binance's co-founder He Yi stated during an interaction on Platform X that when asked whether the sharp drop in ACT was due to Binance modifying the contract rules, He Yi responded that the "team is preparing the details for a reply."

Approximately 2 hours later, Binance released a preliminary investigation report on the incident, stating that this ACT's decline was mainly due to three VIP users and one non-VIP user selling about $1.05 million worth of spot tokens in a short period, causing the price drop and affecting the decline of other tokens. In summary, Binance's response believes that the main reason for this short-term plunge was the large holders selling off, rather than Binance's rule adjustments.

Exchange Risk Control: Overcorrection or Market Maker Liquidation for Self-Protection?

This market flash crash event inevitably brings back memories of the recent Hyperliquid lightning attack incident. On March 26, Decentralized Exchange Hyperliquid encountered a trader exploiting a liquidity design flaw to cascade a huge short order onto the platform by withdrawing collateral, nearly causing a loss of over tens of millions of dollars to Hyperliquid's treasury.

Perhaps taking a cue from the Hyperliquid event, Binance attempted to mitigate risks by lowering the parameters for low-cap tokens in contracts, but inadvertently triggered a market minefield beforehand.

In addition to Binance's rule adjustment seemingly serving as the catalyst, Market Maker Wintermute was also suspected as the mastermind behind the scenes. On one hand, the rule adjustment by Binance had the most significant impact on the Market Maker group. @CnmdRain analyzed, "This adjustment particularly affects Market Makers (MM) because they usually rely on high leverage and large positions to maintain market liquidity and earn spread profits."

Prior speculation by Ember indicated that Wintermute may be the market maker for ACT (having received 9.482 million ACT tokens from the ACT community wallet in November 2024) and, following a sharp decline in ACT's price, Wintermute withdrew multiple batches of ACT tokens from the Binance exchange and sold them on-chain.

In response to this, Wintermute's founder, Evgeny Gaevoy, stated that the company was not involved in the orchestrated operation behind the meme coin crash of ACT and only arbitrated the AMM liquidity pool after significant price fluctuations. He emphasized that Wintermute was not the party responsible for triggering the market turbulence this time and is currently monitoring the developments post-event.

Faced with this tumultuous event, the ACT team also responded by initiating an investigation, collaborating with relevant parties to address the issue, and working with trusted partners to devise a response plan together.

Can 75% Asset Disappearance be Explained by "Whale Dump"?

So far, all parties involved in this flash crash event seem to have responded promptly and distanced themselves from any responsibility. However, there are still many questions lingering.

Firstly, Binance's initial investigation report appears to lack credibility. Binance's report suggests that the ACT token's decline was linked to three VIP users and one non-VIP user dumping large amounts of ACT tokens. However, this does not mean that every token's decline was driven by similar user sell-offs. For the ACT token, user sell-offs may be the direct cause of ACT's decline, while the underlying reasons for multiple token declines seem to still be somewhat related to this rule adjustment.

CoinGlass data shows that at 18:30, Binance's ACT contract holdings plummeted by 75%, and similar situations were observed in the holdings of several other tokens mentioned in adjustment announcements. This is hard to explain as solely caused by individual whale spot sell-offs.

Secondly, however, this decline does not seem to be entirely due to the rule adjustment. From the trends of several tokens, ACT experienced the most significant drop, while other tokens undergoing the same adjustments, such as 1000SATS, also saw declines but not as extreme as ACT's. Additionally, another token, DEXE, that experienced a significant drop is not part of this adjustment. Tokens like MEW, which are listed for adjustment, did not fall as a result but rather began an upward trend.

Third, was Wintermute's exit a coincidence or intentional? During the ACT crash, Wintermute sold off multiple holdings of MEME tokens, causing varying degrees of flash crashes in the prices of these tokens. Some social media users speculated that the main reason for this decline was that Wintermute's algorithmic bots ran into issues due to rule constraints.

Overall, this brief flash crash seems to be more comprehensively explained as a trigger point where Binance adjusted some token contract position rules, leading to algorithmic bots of market makers like Wintermute failing to adjust promptly.

However, regardless of the specific cause of this flash crash, the market/user always ends up holding the bag.

According to Coinglass data, following the ACT flash crash, ACT contracts liquidated $8.71 million, ranking third globally (only behind Bitcoin and Ethereum). Moreover, users holding spot assets also suffered halving of their assets and seemed to have difficulty recovering in a short period.

Overall, there are several underlying reasons for this flash crash. First, after the Hyperliquid incident, exchanges began to pay more attention to the risk of whale manipulation in the market and started making adjustments. While this was supposed to be a good move, it inadvertently triggered another stampede. Second, due to the cooling of the MEME market, related tokens became fragile and sensitive in terms of trading depth and sentiment. Hence, once an abnormal trade occurred, it exposed the reality that MEME tokens lack substantial value support.

This multi-million-dollar crypto market "April Fool's Day Nightmare" ultimately concluded with an "responsibility shifting" agreement among exchanges, market makers, and project teams. However, the warning buried within is far more chilling than what meets the eye. While this flash crash may not have a clear "culprit," it exposed the most fundamental rule of survival in the crypto market: within the intricate system built by institutions and whales, retail investors often become passive bearers of systemic fluctuations.

Original Article Link

You may also like

$COIN Joins S&P 500, but Coinbase Isn't Celebrating

On May 13, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced that Coinbase would officially replace Discover Financial Services in the S&P 500 on May 19. While other companies like Block and MicroStrategy, closely tied to Bitcoin, were already part of the S&P 500, Coinbase became the first cryptocurrency exchange whose primary business is in the index. This also signifies that cryptocurrency is gradually moving from the fringes to the mainstream in the U.S.



On the day of the announcement, Coinbase's stock price surged by 23%, surpassing the $250 mark. However, just 3 days later, Coinbase was hit by two consecutive events: a hack where employees were bribed to steal customer data and a demand for a $20 million ransom, and an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the authenticity of its claim of having over 100 million "verified users" in its securities filings and marketing materials. These two events acted as mini-bombs, and at the time of writing, Coinbase's stock had already dropped by over 7.3%.


Coincidentally, Discover Financial Services, being replaced by Coinbase, can also be considered the "Coinbase" of the previous payment era. Discover is a U.S.-based digital banking and payment services company headquartered in Illinois, founded in 1960. Its payment network, Discover Network, is the fourth largest payment network apart from Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.


In April, after the approval of the acquisition of Discover by the sixth-largest U.S. bank, Capital One, this well-established digital banking company of over 60 years smoothly handed over its S&P 500 "seat" to this emerging cryptocurrency "bank." This unexpected coincidence also portrayed the handover between the new and old eras in Coinbase's entry into the S&P 500, resembling a relay race scene. However, this relay baton also brought Coinbase's accumulated "external troubles and internal strife" to a tipping point.


Side Effects of ETFs


Over the past decade, cryptocurrency exchanges have been the most stable "profit machines." They play a role in providing liquidity to the entire industry and rely on trading fees to sustain their operations. However, with the comprehensive rollout of ETF products in the U.S. market, this profit model is facing unprecedented challenges. As the leader in the "American stack," with over 80% of its business coming from the U.S., Coinbase is most affected by this.



Starting from the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, traditional financial capital has significantly onboarded users and funds that originally belonged to exchanges in a more cost-effective, compliant, and transparent manner. The transaction fee revenue of cryptocurrency exchanges has started to decline, and this trend may further intensify in the coming months.


According to Coinbase's 2024 Q4 financial report, the platform's total trading revenue was $417 million, a 45% year-on-year decrease. The contribution of BTC and ETH's trading revenue dropped from 65% in the same period last year to less than 50%.


This decline is not a result of a decrease in market enthusiasm. In fact, since the approval of the Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the inflow of BTC into the U.S. market has continued to reach new highs, with asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity rapidly expanding their management scale. Data shows that BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) alone has surpassed $17 billion in assets under management. As of mid-May 2025, the cumulative net inflow of 11 major institutional Bitcoin spot ETFs on the market has exceeded $41.5 billion, with a total net asset value of $1214.69 billion, accounting for approximately 5.91% of the total Bitcoin market capitalization.


Chart showing the trend of net outflows for Grayscale among the 11 institutions


Institutional investors and some retail investors are shifting towards ETF products, partly due to compliance and tax considerations. On one hand, ETFs have much lower trading costs compared to cryptocurrency exchanges. While Coinbase's spot trading fee rate varies annually in a tiered manner but averages around 1.49%, for example, the management fee for IBIT ETF is only 0.25%, and the majority of ETF institution fees fluctuate around 0.15% to 0.25%.



In other words, the more rational users are, the more likely they are to move from exchanges to ETF products, especially for investors aiming for long-term holdings.


According to multiple sources, several institutions, including VanEck and Grayscale, have submitted applications to the SEC for a Solana (SOL) ETF, with some institutions also planning to submit an XRP ETF proposal. Once approved, this may trigger a new round of fund migration. According to a report submitted by Coinbase to the SEC, as of April, the platform's trading revenue from XRP and Solana accounted for 18% and 10%, nearly one-third of the platform's fee revenue.



However, the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs passed in 2024 also reduced the fees for these two tokens on Coinbase from 30% and 15% to 26% and 10%, respectively. If the SOL and XRP ETFs are approved, it will further undermine the core fee revenue of exchanges like Coinbase.


The expansion of ETF products is gradually weakening the financial intermediary status of cryptocurrency exchanges. From their original roles as matchmakers and clearers to now gradually becoming mere "on-ramps and off-ramps" for funds, exchanges are seeing their marginal value squeezed by ETFs.


Robinhood Takes a Stand, Traditional Brokerages Join the Fray


On May 12, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins gave a keynote speech at the Tokenization and Cryptocurrency Working Group roundtable. The theme of his speech revolved around "It is a new day at the SEC," where he indicated that the SEC would not approach enforcement and regulation the same way as before but would instead pave the way for cryptocurrency assets in the U.S. market.



With signs of cryptocurrency compliance such as the SEC's "NEW DAY" declaration, an increasing number of traditional brokerages are attempting to enter the cryptocurrency industry. One of the most representative cases is the well-known U.S. brokerage Robinhood, which began expanding its crypto business in 2018. By the time of its IPO in 2021, Robinhood's crypto business revenue accounted for over 50% of the company, with a significant boost from the Dogecoin "moonshot" promoted by Musk.


In Q1 2025 earnings report, Robinhood showcased strong growth, especially in revenue from cryptocurrency and options trading. Fueled by Trump's Memecoin, cryptocurrency-related revenue reached $250 million, nearly doubling year-over-year. Consequently, Robinhood Gold subscription users reached 3.5 million, a 90% increase from the previous year, with the rapid growth of Robinhood Gold providing the company with a stable source of income.



Meanwhile, RobinHood is actively pursuing acquisitions in the cryptocurrency space. In 2024, it announced a $2 billion acquisition of the long-standing European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp. Additionally, Canada's largest cryptocurrency CEX, WonderFi, which recently went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also announced its integration with RobinHood Crypto. After obtaining virtual asset licenses in the UK, Canada, Singapore, and other markets, RobinHood has taken a proactive approach in the compliant cryptocurrency trading market.



Furthermore, an increasing number of brokerage firms are exploring the same path. Futu Securities, Tiger Brokers, and others are also dipping their toes into cryptocurrency trading, with some having applied for or obtained the VA license from the Hong Kong SFC. Although their user bases are currently small, traditional brokerages have a natural advantage in user trust, regulatory licenses, and low fee structures. This could pose a threat to native cryptocurrency platforms in the future.



User Data Breach: Is Coinbase Still Secure?


In April 2025, security researchers discovered that some Coinbase user data was leaked on the dark web. While the platform initially responded by attributing it to a "technical misinformation," it still raised concerns among users regarding its security and privacy protection. Just two days before Dow Jones Indexes announced Coinbase's addition to the S&P 500 Index, on May 11, 2025, Coinbase received an email from an unknown threat actor claiming to have obtained customer account information and internal documents, demanding a $20 million ransom to keep the data private. Subsequent investigations confirmed the data breach.


Cybercriminals obtained the data by bribing overseas customer service agents and support staff, mainly in "non-U.S. regions such as India." These agents abused their access to Coinbase's internal customer support system and stole customer data. As early as February this year, blockchain detective ZachXBT revealed on X platform that between December 2024 and January 2025, Coinbase users lost over $65 million to social engineering scams, with the actual amount potentially higher.


Among the victims was a well-known figure, 67-year-old Ed Suman, an established artist in the art world for nearly two decades, having been involved in the creation of artworks such as Jeff Koons' "Balloon Dog" sculpture. Earlier this year, he fell victim to an impersonation scam involving fake Coinbase customer support, resulting in a loss of over $2 million in cryptocurrency. ZachXBT critiqued Coinbase for its inadequate handling of such scams, noting that other major exchanges have not faced similar issues and recommending Coinbase to enhance its security measures.


Amidst a series of ongoing social engineering incidents, although there has not been any impact on user assets at the technical level so far, it has raised concerns among many retail and institutional investors. Especially institutions holding massive assets on Coinbase. Just considering the U.S. BTC ETF institutions, as of mid-May 2025, they collectively hold nearly 840,000 BTC, and 75% of these are custodied by Coinbase. If we price BTC at $100,000, this amount reaches a staggering $63 billion, which is equivalent to the nominal GDP of two Iceland in the year 2024.


Visualization: ChatGPT, Source: Farside


In addition, Coinbase Custody also serves over 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, family offices, pension funds, and endowments. As of the Q1 2025 financial report, Coinbase's total assets under management (including institutional and retail clients) reached $404 billion. The specific amount of institutional custodied assets was not explicitly disclosed in the latest report, but it should still be over 50% based on the Q4 2024 report.


Visualization: ChatGPT


Once this security barrier is breached, not only could the rate of user attrition far exceed expectations, but more importantly, institutional trust in it would undermine the foundation of its business. Therefore, after a hacking event, Coinbase's stock price plummeted significantly.


CEXs are All in Self-Rescue Mode


Facing a decline in spot trading fee revenue, Coinbase is also accelerating its transformation, attempting to find growth opportunities in derivatives and emerging assets. Coinbase acquired a stake in the options platform Deribit at the end of 2024 and announced the official launch of perpetual contract products in 2025. This acquisition fills in Coinbase's gap in options trading and its relatively small global market share.



Deribit has a strong presence in non-U.S. markets, especially in Asia and Europe. The acquisition has enabled Coinbase to gain a dominant position in bitcoin and ethereum options trading on Deribit, accounting for approximately 80% of the global options trading volume, with daily trading volume remaining above $2 billion.


Meanwhile, 80-90% of Deribit's customer base consists of institutional investors, with their professionalism and liquidity in the Bitcoin and Ethereum options market highly favored by institutions. Coinbase's compliance advantage, coupled with its already robust institutional ecosystem, makes it even more suitable. By using institutions as an entry point, it can face the squeeze from giants like Binance and OKX in the derivatives market.



Facing a similar dilemma is Kraken, which is attempting to replicate Binance Futures' model in non-U.S. markets. Since the derivatives market relies more on professional users, fee rates are relatively higher and stickiness is stronger, making it a significant source of revenue for exchanges. In the first half of 2025, Kraken completed the acquisition of TradeStation Crypto and a futures exchange, aiming to build a complete derivatives trading ecosystem to hedge the risk of declining spot transaction fee income.


With the surge of Memecoin in 2024, Binance, OKX, and various CEX platforms began massively listing small-market-cap, highly volatile tokens to activate active trading users. Due to the wealth effect and trading activity of Memecoins, Coinbase was also forced to join the battle, successively listing popular tokens from the Solana ecosystem such as BOOK OF MEME and Dogwifhat. Although these coins are controversial, they are frequently traded, with fee rates several times higher than mainstream coins, serving as a "blood-boosting" method for spot trading.


However, due to its status as a publicly traded company, this practice is a riskier endeavor for Coinbase. Even in the current crypto-friendly environment, the SEC is still investigating whether tokens like SOL, ADA, and SAND constitute securities.


In addition to the forced transformation strategies carried out by the aforementioned CEXs, they are also starting to lay out RWAs and the most talked-about stablecoin payment fields, such as the PYUSD launched through a collaboration between Coinbase and Paypal, Coinbase's support for the Euro stablecoin EURC by Circle that complies with EU MiCA regulatory requirements, or the USD1 launched through a collaboration between Binance and WIFL. In the increasingly crowded trading field, many CEXs have shifted their focus from just the trading market to the application field.


The golden age of transaction fees has quietly ended, and the second half of the crypto exchange platform game has silently begun.


Key Market Insights for May 16th, how much did you miss out on?

1. On-chain Flows: $111.3M inflow to Ethereum this week; $237.6M outflow from Berachain 2. Largest Price Swings: $ETHFI, $NEIRO 3. Top News: Data: Solana Network's revenue reached $7.9M on the 13th, surpassing the sum of all other L1 and L2 chains

MOG Coin Skyrockets as Elon Musk and Garry Tan Embrace "mog/acc" Identity

「mog/acc」 is rapidly sweeping through various figures, from Elon Musk to Garry Tan, boosting the project's visibility and ultimately driving up the price.

STARTUP's Price Surges 40x in 30 Minutes: How did he become the Emotion King of Believe?

He is both a KOL and understands the market script, playing a game where attention is the currency.

Key Market Intelligence on May 14th, how much did you miss out on?

Featured News


1.Binance Alpha Launches HIPPO, BLUE, and Other Tokens

2.Believe Ecosystem Tokens See General Rise, LAUNCHCOIN Surges Over 250% in 24 Hours

3.Tiger Securities Introduces Cryptocurrency Deposit and Withdrawal Service, Supports Mainstream Cryptocurrencies such as BTC and ETH

4.Current Bitcoin Rally Possibly Driven by Institutions, Retail Traders Yet to Join

5.Binance Wallet's New TGE Privasea AI Participation Requires a 198 Point Threshold, with a Point Consumption of 15


Trending Topics


Source: Overheard on CT (tg: @overheardonct), Kaito


PUMP: Today's discussions about PUMP focus on its new creator revenue-sharing model: the platform will allocate 50% of PumpSwap revenue to token creators, sparking varied reactions from users. Some criticize the move as insufficient or even misleading, while others view it as a positive step the platform is taking to reward creators. Meanwhile, PUMP faces market pressure from emerging competitors like LetsBONKfun and Raydium, which are rapidly gaining market share. Users also express concerns about PUMP's sustainability and potential regulatory risks in the U.S., with discussions extending to the platform's impact on the entire memecoin ecosystem.


COINBASE: Today, Coinbase became the first crypto company to join the S&P 500 Index, replacing Discover Financial Services, sparking widespread industry attention. The entire crypto community views this milestone as a significant development, signaling that crypto assets are further integrating into the mainstream financial system. The news has sparked lively discussions on Twitter, with many users pointing out that this may attract more institutional investors to enter the Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency markets.


XRP: XRP became the focal point of today's crypto discussion, with its significant market movements and strategic advances drawing attention. XRP has surpassed USDT to become the third-largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization, sparking market excitement and discussions about its future potential. The surge in market capitalization and price is believed to be related to increasing institutional interest, deepening strategic partnerships, and its role in the crypto ecosystem. Additionally, XRP's integration into multiple financial systems and its potential as a macro asset class are also seen as key factors driving the current market sentiment.


DYDX: Today's discussions about DYDX mainly focused on the dYdX Yapper Leaderboard launched by KaitoAI. The leaderboard aims to identify the most active community participants, with a total of $150,000 in rewards to be distributed over the first three seasons. This initiative has sparked broad community participation, with many users discussing the potential rewards and the incentive effect on the DYDX ecosystem. Meanwhile, progress on the ethDYDX to dYdX native chain migration and historical airdrop events have also been topics of discussion.


Featured Articles


1. "What Is 'ICM'? Holding Up the $4 Billion Market Cap Solana's New Narrative"

Overnight, the hottest narrative in the crypto space has become "Internet Capital Markets," with a host of crypto projects and founders, led by the Solana ecosystem's new Launchpad platform Believe, releasing this phrase. Together with "Believe in something," it has become the new slogan heralding the onset of a bull market. What exactly is the so-called "Internet Capital Market," will it become a short-lived hype phrase like the Base ecosystem's previous Content Coin, and what related targets are available for selection?


2.《LaunchCoin Surges 20x in One Day, How Did Believe Create a $200M Market Cap Shiba Inu After Going to Zero?|100x Retrospective》

LAUNCHCOIN broke through a $200 million market cap today, with the long-lost liquidity and such a high market cap "Memecoin" almost bringing half of the on-chain crypto community CT into the fray. The community is crazily discussing this token, with half of it being FOMO and the other half being FUD. This token, originally issued by Believe founder Ben Pasternak under his personal identity, transformed into a new platform token after a renaming. From once going to zero to a $200 million market cap, what happened in between?


On-chain Data


May 14 On-chain Fund Flow


Within 24 hours, GOONC's market cap soared to 70 million, could GOONC be the next billion-dollar dog on the Believe platform?

Bitcoin has broken $100,000, Ethereum has surpassed 2500, and is Solana's hot streak about to make a comeback?


The current market is in a state of macro euphoria, with GOONC riding the wave today, skyrocketing 10x in just a few hours, reaching a market cap of tens of millions of dollars, trading volume soaring past 50 million, and rumors swirling that the developer may be from OpenAI (unconfirmed but intriguing enough).


The "gooning" Culture in Forums


A ludicrous and absurd Solana meme that some actually buy into.


GOONC is a meme coin that has sprouted from the "gooning" subculture, offering no technological innovation or practical use, its sole function being speculation.


It takes inspiration from an NSFW term "gooning," which refers to a person being deeply immersed in certain content (you know what), eventually entering a nearly religious-like trance.


In Reddit (such as r/GOONED, r/GoonCaves) and some counterculture media outlets (such as MEL Magazine in 2020), "gooning" has gradually transitioned from an adult label to a meme-addicted, digital content and virtual self-indulgence synonym, arguably the epitome of Degen spirit.


GOONC is playing around with this concept, packaging the addictive nature, uselessness, and irony of gooning into a tradable financial product. The project team has made it clear: "We do not solve blockchain problems, we only trade absurdity." Blunt but oddly genuine.


GOONC launched on May 13, 2025, using the meme coin launch platform Believe App's LaunchCoin module on Solana. This tool is highly Degen: zero technical barriers, a few clicks to create a coin, perfect for projects like GOONC that can come up with ideas out of the blue.



The mastermind behind GOONC is also quite something and is the most talked-about, with KOL @basedalexandoor on X platform (alias "Pata van Goon") personally involved. His profile even caught the attention of Marc Andreessen, co-founder of a16z, making onlookers unable to resist speculating if GOONC has a hint of OpenAI lineage.



While this 'OpenAI Endorsement' is currently just community speculation, it is definitely a good card to play to fuel hype. Saying "we are pure speculation" on one hand, while tagging a few "AI + a16z" on the other.


From Wasteland to Moon in One Night


GOONC took off as soon as it launched. After its launch on May 13, 2025, its market capitalization skyrocketed to $22 million within 4 hours, with a trading volume exceeding $25.6 million in 24 hours. According to platform data, the first day of trading saw an astonishing +41,100% surge, soaring from $0.0000001 to $0.02, becoming a "missed-the-boat" situation.


GOONC quickly formed an active trading community post-launch, with a lot of discussion and trading signals appearing on X platform (such as the 292x return signal provided by DeBot). Liquidity pools on exchanges like Raydium and Meteora grew rapidly, supporting high trading volumes and price increases.


The real climax occurred between May 13 and May 14, with the market cap rising to $5.5 million in the morning and directly surpassing $55 million in the afternoon. By the 14th, it briefly approached a $70 million market cap, with the trading volume soaring to $59 million. Some community members even posted screenshots claiming an increase of +85,000%, creating a new myth out of the ruins.


As of 1:30 pm on May 14, the price stabilized around $0.039, with a total market cap and FDV both around $39.6 million, and a 24-hour trading volume of $5.43 million. Active platforms include XT.COM, LBank, Meteora, and others.


Although there was a slight pullback from the peak ($0.07), the coin's popularity remains strong. For a coin that relies purely on "irony + community + X post" to thrive, this performance is already at a stellar level.



Currently, the background of the token's development team is not transparent, increasing the potential risk of a rug pull. Rugcheck.xyz warns that the creator of the GOONC contract may have permission to modify the contract (e.g., change fees or mint additional tokens), posing certain security risks.


Community members speculate that the meteoric rise of GOONC may be the "last hurrah".


Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more