Ethereum OG Lambasts 'ETH Dilemma': Foundation Must Confront Four Major Strategic Mistakes, Once Holding the World's Most Powerful Hash Rate but Missing Out on Opportunities

By: blockbeats|2025/04/03 04:15:02
Share
copy
Original Title: "Ethereum OG Goes on a Rant: 'ETH Is Doomed' - Foundation Must Admit Four Major Mistakes, Held World's Largest Hash Power in 2021"
Original Author: 0xJigglypuff, from BlockTempo at DappReview

The Ethereum to Bitcoin ratio (ETH/BTC) hit a near five-year low of 0.02193, causing Ethereum supporters and investors to feel low pressure. Recent actions by Ethereum's founder and "key figure" — Vitalik, as well as the Foundation, have also sparked dissatisfaction in the community. Institutions have recently been pessimistic about Ethereum, seeing it unlikely to have any new breakthroughs in the near term.

This great public chain that created the concept of smart contracts, advancing blockchain technology from zero to one after Bitcoin, from one to many, and the potential integration with traditional finance. Why has it declined to this extent today? This has been a recent focal point of discussion in the Ethereum community. In some early Ethereum technical discussion groups, DappReview contacted an individual who claims to have joined the Ethereum development community in 2016 and exited in 2021, (codenamed ReverseScaleDragon). In private conversations, ReverseScaleDragon elaborated on the significant decisions and influences of Ethereum's development to date. This article will integrate ReverseScaleDragon's mentions of the major reforms and decisions made by Ethereum since 2021, as well as key failure points, with DappReview supplementing the story with additional details from that time.

Ethereum's Golden Age: Early 2021

When discussing Ethereum's most glorious era, nothing surpasses the early 2021 period following DeFi Summer. Not only did roles such as "on-chain detectives" emerge to address flash loan issues, but there were also numerous innovations in tokens, such as NFTs, liquidity fragmentation, and discussions on "farming" for fixed on-chain yields. The first generation of on-chain leverage and contract protocols also appeared. It was an era of abundant genius and continuous on-chain innovation.

In my career, the highest returns I have encountered, aside from Bitcoin and Ethereum themselves, were concentrated in projects from 2020 to 2021, especially in 2021, which should be considered the era where the most projects survived. Foundational assets like Ethereum, BNB, and SOL saw their valuations break into the billions, many of which were established during that period.

Compared to the "wild" and "crazy" atmosphere of many projects in 2020, in the first half of 2021, many founders were not only truly brilliant, but they also knew what kind of products the market needed and how to survive. However, towards the end of 2021 and the beginning of 2022, many projects were clearly intended to rug-pull. Therefore, I personally believe that the middle of 2021 was a watershed period. Those who entered the space after 2021 or 2022 are already part of a different atmosphere.

The Rise of the "ETH Deflation Narrative" with EIP-1559

During Ethereum's glorious days, when did it start to go downhill? In our discussions with the community and a poll initiated in the old OG group, with 117 people voting, 59 of them believed that the most significant decision and moment that impacted Ethereum was around the EIP-1559 proposal in mid-2021.

The Ethereum community began to experience division and conflict, leading to a small-scale Ethereum talent drain at the time. However, in community discussions, it was deemed that the most important impact was not the content of the proposal itself, EIP-1559, but rather the "deflationary asset" idea surrounding this proposal, which continues to significantly affect Ethereum's overall development to this day.

At that time, many Ethereum developers were barely making any money until DeFi Summer when transaction fees surged, enabling PoW miners to start earning, which may have caused some imbalance in Ethereum developers' mindset. I myself had a bit of that feeling at the time. Colleagues found that a few traders seemed to be using the extra fees mined by pools for trading, further inflating the Gas Fee. This was spread within the core developer circle as a "transaction congestion perpetual motion machine" idea, leading to a suggestion to burn these fees using EIP-1559. Of course, this proposal sparked a lot of controversy at the time, with some arguing that this idea was disconnected from reality. However, ultimately, amidst the community's two opposing factions, the "progressives" emerged victorious.

The impact of EIP-1559 is still profound and has lingering effects. At that time, many core developers believed that the "PoS" merge could be achieved in 2021. To push through EIP-1559 and future PoS advancements, they suddenly introduced a "deflationary asset" narrative. Therefore, there were many people and articles advocating for the benefits of PoS at the time, including the Ethereum-friendly media community Bankless. In that environment, it seemed that one had to catch this train to avoid being left behind by the times.

Developers believed that simply by holding Ethereum and maintaining it, they could earn interest, and the price of ETH would also appreciate. At the time, Ethereum developers all thought their careers were very promising. Looking back now, however, it seems that this vision was a bit too optimistic.

Community Politicization, Seeking "Ethereum Values" Legitimacy  

The Scales Ethdragon mentions that the "deflationary asset" idea brought by EIP-1559 to the community is actually very lethal. This not only goes against the original Ethereum's concept and the Ethereum Classic split but also reveals that Ethereum's core developers politically sought a new slogan to counter Bitcoin's "digital gold." However, such a proposal and political idealism have brought significant unintended consequences in reality.

More importantly, the controversy surrounding EIP-1559 has given rise to a community ethos: the search for "Ethereum value," where those outside the tribe are to be excluded. This has plunged Ethereum into an atmosphere full of political maneuvering.

The core developers never imagined that Ethereum would have so few users today... Now all metrics, transaction volume, and Gwei fees have hit recent lows, and the price surge brought about by the "deflationary asset" has almost entirely retraced. Considering other factors, I believe Ethereum may continue to struggle for some time.

The Perfect Miss of the AI Era Bonus  

After Ethereum completes the merge to PoS, it has also undergone several major upgrades, including the Shanghai upgrade and the Dencun upgrade. But do these upgrades really make a difference to Ethereum users? In a discussion group, we conducted a poll, with 117 people participating. Only 3 people believe Ethereum has made progress, 102 people believe there has been no progress at all, and 12 people are unsure.

Let's rewind to the eve of the Merge in 2022. How many artists were entering the NFT industry back then, complaining about Ethereum's lack of environmental friendliness? How many enterprises were seeking the integration of DeFi with traditional finance and experimenting in a sandbox, but worried that it did not align with the international ESG trend? However, these pursuits are now completely out of touch with the AI era.

Once, Ethereum had the world's largest computing power. If it could have held out until the AI era, the PoW layer could have transferred the computing power for effective computation. Then today's Ethereum might be the world's most important platform. Imagine a scene where Vitalik is a co-founder who can stand on par with Elon Musk, and his decentralized ideal that he wants to promote, would it be harder to achieve than it is now?

However, the reality is that Ethereum chose to reverse course in terms of the era. In contrast, Bitcoin, mining enterprises became the favorite computing power configuration scene for AI servers. Even though Bitcoin mining profits are limited, mining enterprise stocks and earnings are still surging alongside AI. Ethereum, on the other hand, missed out on all of this due to politicization.

Conclusion: Future Ethereum Prediction  

In the future, the value gap between Ethereum and Bitcoin may continue to widen, and Ethereum may experience a significant pullback. Ethereum's brand influence is no longer what it used to be, and even if enterprises use Ethereum, the value created will not be reflected in ETH itself but rather in the enterprise's token or stock.

ETH/BTC may continue to decline for a long time, even if many enterprises join the Ethereum protocol, it will not be a bullish factor for ETH because the narrative of the "deflationary asset" has already been shattered...

Original Article Link

You may also like

a16z Leads $18M Seed Round for Catena Labs, Crypto Industry Bets on Stablecoin AI Payment

Traditional finance is still stuck in a "human-to-human" model, while Catena aims to achieve "AI-to-AI" interaction.

Pharos, deeply integrated with AntChain, is about to launch. How can we get involved?

What is the relationship between the $8 million funded NewChain and Ant, and how will they interact?

$COIN Joins S&P 500, but Coinbase Isn't Celebrating

On May 13, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced that Coinbase would officially replace Discover Financial Services in the S&P 500 on May 19. While other companies like Block and MicroStrategy, closely tied to Bitcoin, were already part of the S&P 500, Coinbase became the first cryptocurrency exchange whose primary business is in the index. This also signifies that cryptocurrency is gradually moving from the fringes to the mainstream in the U.S.



On the day of the announcement, Coinbase's stock price surged by 23%, surpassing the $250 mark. However, just 3 days later, Coinbase was hit by two consecutive events: a hack where employees were bribed to steal customer data and a demand for a $20 million ransom, and an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the authenticity of its claim of having over 100 million "verified users" in its securities filings and marketing materials. These two events acted as mini-bombs, and at the time of writing, Coinbase's stock had already dropped by over 7.3%.


Coincidentally, Discover Financial Services, being replaced by Coinbase, can also be considered the "Coinbase" of the previous payment era. Discover is a U.S.-based digital banking and payment services company headquartered in Illinois, founded in 1960. Its payment network, Discover Network, is the fourth largest payment network apart from Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.


In April, after the approval of the acquisition of Discover by the sixth-largest U.S. bank, Capital One, this well-established digital banking company of over 60 years smoothly handed over its S&P 500 "seat" to this emerging cryptocurrency "bank." This unexpected coincidence also portrayed the handover between the new and old eras in Coinbase's entry into the S&P 500, resembling a relay race scene. However, this relay baton also brought Coinbase's accumulated "external troubles and internal strife" to a tipping point.


Side Effects of ETFs


Over the past decade, cryptocurrency exchanges have been the most stable "profit machines." They play a role in providing liquidity to the entire industry and rely on trading fees to sustain their operations. However, with the comprehensive rollout of ETF products in the U.S. market, this profit model is facing unprecedented challenges. As the leader in the "American stack," with over 80% of its business coming from the U.S., Coinbase is most affected by this.



Starting from the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, traditional financial capital has significantly onboarded users and funds that originally belonged to exchanges in a more cost-effective, compliant, and transparent manner. The transaction fee revenue of cryptocurrency exchanges has started to decline, and this trend may further intensify in the coming months.


According to Coinbase's 2024 Q4 financial report, the platform's total trading revenue was $417 million, a 45% year-on-year decrease. The contribution of BTC and ETH's trading revenue dropped from 65% in the same period last year to less than 50%.


This decline is not a result of a decrease in market enthusiasm. In fact, since the approval of the Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the inflow of BTC into the U.S. market has continued to reach new highs, with asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity rapidly expanding their management scale. Data shows that BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) alone has surpassed $17 billion in assets under management. As of mid-May 2025, the cumulative net inflow of 11 major institutional Bitcoin spot ETFs on the market has exceeded $41.5 billion, with a total net asset value of $1214.69 billion, accounting for approximately 5.91% of the total Bitcoin market capitalization.


Chart showing the trend of net outflows for Grayscale among the 11 institutions


Institutional investors and some retail investors are shifting towards ETF products, partly due to compliance and tax considerations. On one hand, ETFs have much lower trading costs compared to cryptocurrency exchanges. While Coinbase's spot trading fee rate varies annually in a tiered manner but averages around 1.49%, for example, the management fee for IBIT ETF is only 0.25%, and the majority of ETF institution fees fluctuate around 0.15% to 0.25%.



In other words, the more rational users are, the more likely they are to move from exchanges to ETF products, especially for investors aiming for long-term holdings.


According to multiple sources, several institutions, including VanEck and Grayscale, have submitted applications to the SEC for a Solana (SOL) ETF, with some institutions also planning to submit an XRP ETF proposal. Once approved, this may trigger a new round of fund migration. According to a report submitted by Coinbase to the SEC, as of April, the platform's trading revenue from XRP and Solana accounted for 18% and 10%, nearly one-third of the platform's fee revenue.



However, the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs passed in 2024 also reduced the fees for these two tokens on Coinbase from 30% and 15% to 26% and 10%, respectively. If the SOL and XRP ETFs are approved, it will further undermine the core fee revenue of exchanges like Coinbase.


The expansion of ETF products is gradually weakening the financial intermediary status of cryptocurrency exchanges. From their original roles as matchmakers and clearers to now gradually becoming mere "on-ramps and off-ramps" for funds, exchanges are seeing their marginal value squeezed by ETFs.


Robinhood Takes a Stand, Traditional Brokerages Join the Fray


On May 12, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins gave a keynote speech at the Tokenization and Cryptocurrency Working Group roundtable. The theme of his speech revolved around "It is a new day at the SEC," where he indicated that the SEC would not approach enforcement and regulation the same way as before but would instead pave the way for cryptocurrency assets in the U.S. market.



With signs of cryptocurrency compliance such as the SEC's "NEW DAY" declaration, an increasing number of traditional brokerages are attempting to enter the cryptocurrency industry. One of the most representative cases is the well-known U.S. brokerage Robinhood, which began expanding its crypto business in 2018. By the time of its IPO in 2021, Robinhood's crypto business revenue accounted for over 50% of the company, with a significant boost from the Dogecoin "moonshot" promoted by Musk.


In Q1 2025 earnings report, Robinhood showcased strong growth, especially in revenue from cryptocurrency and options trading. Fueled by Trump's Memecoin, cryptocurrency-related revenue reached $250 million, nearly doubling year-over-year. Consequently, Robinhood Gold subscription users reached 3.5 million, a 90% increase from the previous year, with the rapid growth of Robinhood Gold providing the company with a stable source of income.



Meanwhile, RobinHood is actively pursuing acquisitions in the cryptocurrency space. In 2024, it announced a $2 billion acquisition of the long-standing European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp. Additionally, Canada's largest cryptocurrency CEX, WonderFi, which recently went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also announced its integration with RobinHood Crypto. After obtaining virtual asset licenses in the UK, Canada, Singapore, and other markets, RobinHood has taken a proactive approach in the compliant cryptocurrency trading market.



Furthermore, an increasing number of brokerage firms are exploring the same path. Futu Securities, Tiger Brokers, and others are also dipping their toes into cryptocurrency trading, with some having applied for or obtained the VA license from the Hong Kong SFC. Although their user bases are currently small, traditional brokerages have a natural advantage in user trust, regulatory licenses, and low fee structures. This could pose a threat to native cryptocurrency platforms in the future.



User Data Breach: Is Coinbase Still Secure?


In April 2025, security researchers discovered that some Coinbase user data was leaked on the dark web. While the platform initially responded by attributing it to a "technical misinformation," it still raised concerns among users regarding its security and privacy protection. Just two days before Dow Jones Indexes announced Coinbase's addition to the S&P 500 Index, on May 11, 2025, Coinbase received an email from an unknown threat actor claiming to have obtained customer account information and internal documents, demanding a $20 million ransom to keep the data private. Subsequent investigations confirmed the data breach.


Cybercriminals obtained the data by bribing overseas customer service agents and support staff, mainly in "non-U.S. regions such as India." These agents abused their access to Coinbase's internal customer support system and stole customer data. As early as February this year, blockchain detective ZachXBT revealed on X platform that between December 2024 and January 2025, Coinbase users lost over $65 million to social engineering scams, with the actual amount potentially higher.


Among the victims was a well-known figure, 67-year-old Ed Suman, an established artist in the art world for nearly two decades, having been involved in the creation of artworks such as Jeff Koons' "Balloon Dog" sculpture. Earlier this year, he fell victim to an impersonation scam involving fake Coinbase customer support, resulting in a loss of over $2 million in cryptocurrency. ZachXBT critiqued Coinbase for its inadequate handling of such scams, noting that other major exchanges have not faced similar issues and recommending Coinbase to enhance its security measures.


Amidst a series of ongoing social engineering incidents, although there has not been any impact on user assets at the technical level so far, it has raised concerns among many retail and institutional investors. Especially institutions holding massive assets on Coinbase. Just considering the U.S. BTC ETF institutions, as of mid-May 2025, they collectively hold nearly 840,000 BTC, and 75% of these are custodied by Coinbase. If we price BTC at $100,000, this amount reaches a staggering $63 billion, which is equivalent to the nominal GDP of two Iceland in the year 2024.


Visualization: ChatGPT, Source: Farside


In addition, Coinbase Custody also serves over 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, family offices, pension funds, and endowments. As of the Q1 2025 financial report, Coinbase's total assets under management (including institutional and retail clients) reached $404 billion. The specific amount of institutional custodied assets was not explicitly disclosed in the latest report, but it should still be over 50% based on the Q4 2024 report.


Visualization: ChatGPT


Once this security barrier is breached, not only could the rate of user attrition far exceed expectations, but more importantly, institutional trust in it would undermine the foundation of its business. Therefore, after a hacking event, Coinbase's stock price plummeted significantly.


CEXs are All in Self-Rescue Mode


Facing a decline in spot trading fee revenue, Coinbase is also accelerating its transformation, attempting to find growth opportunities in derivatives and emerging assets. Coinbase acquired a stake in the options platform Deribit at the end of 2024 and announced the official launch of perpetual contract products in 2025. This acquisition fills in Coinbase's gap in options trading and its relatively small global market share.



Deribit has a strong presence in non-U.S. markets, especially in Asia and Europe. The acquisition has enabled Coinbase to gain a dominant position in bitcoin and ethereum options trading on Deribit, accounting for approximately 80% of the global options trading volume, with daily trading volume remaining above $2 billion.


Meanwhile, 80-90% of Deribit's customer base consists of institutional investors, with their professionalism and liquidity in the Bitcoin and Ethereum options market highly favored by institutions. Coinbase's compliance advantage, coupled with its already robust institutional ecosystem, makes it even more suitable. By using institutions as an entry point, it can face the squeeze from giants like Binance and OKX in the derivatives market.



Facing a similar dilemma is Kraken, which is attempting to replicate Binance Futures' model in non-U.S. markets. Since the derivatives market relies more on professional users, fee rates are relatively higher and stickiness is stronger, making it a significant source of revenue for exchanges. In the first half of 2025, Kraken completed the acquisition of TradeStation Crypto and a futures exchange, aiming to build a complete derivatives trading ecosystem to hedge the risk of declining spot transaction fee income.


With the surge of Memecoin in 2024, Binance, OKX, and various CEX platforms began massively listing small-market-cap, highly volatile tokens to activate active trading users. Due to the wealth effect and trading activity of Memecoins, Coinbase was also forced to join the battle, successively listing popular tokens from the Solana ecosystem such as BOOK OF MEME and Dogwifhat. Although these coins are controversial, they are frequently traded, with fee rates several times higher than mainstream coins, serving as a "blood-boosting" method for spot trading.


However, due to its status as a publicly traded company, this practice is a riskier endeavor for Coinbase. Even in the current crypto-friendly environment, the SEC is still investigating whether tokens like SOL, ADA, and SAND constitute securities.


In addition to the forced transformation strategies carried out by the aforementioned CEXs, they are also starting to lay out RWAs and the most talked-about stablecoin payment fields, such as the PYUSD launched through a collaboration between Coinbase and Paypal, Coinbase's support for the Euro stablecoin EURC by Circle that complies with EU MiCA regulatory requirements, or the USD1 launched through a collaboration between Binance and WIFL. In the increasingly crowded trading field, many CEXs have shifted their focus from just the trading market to the application field.


The golden age of transaction fees has quietly ended, and the second half of the crypto exchange platform game has silently begun.


Arthur Hayes: Why I'm Betting on ETH While the Market Is Obsessed with SOL

"I personally have also allocated 20% to gold, expecting the price of gold to potentially rise to $10,000-20,000 by the end of this market cycle."

Key Market Insights for May 16th, how much did you miss out on?

1. On-chain Flows: $111.3M inflow to Ethereum this week; $237.6M outflow from Berachain 2. Largest Price Swings: $ETHFI, $NEIRO 3. Top News: Data: Solana Network's revenue reached $7.9M on the 13th, surpassing the sum of all other L1 and L2 chains

CryptoPunks Changes Hands Twice, Did the Originator of NFTs Finally Find Its "Forever Home" This Time?

The original NFT pioneer CryptoPunks has once again officially changed ownership after being sold to the Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) developer Yuga Labs.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more