Political Passion in the Trump Era: Where to Rebuild After the Destruction?

By: blockbeats|2025/03/19 13:15:03
Share
copy
Original Article Title: This thing will fail
Original Article Author: Noah Smith
Translated Article: Block unicorn

Political Passion in the Trump Era: Where to Rebuild After the Destruction?

“Men don’t care what’s on TV. They only care what else is on TV.” —Jerry Seinfeld

N.S. Leons is a popular essayist in the "national conservative" tradition. His Substack, "The Upheaval," is recommended reading, although I disagree with less than half of what he writes. But he is well-read, broad-minded, able to integrate information from multiple fields, and unafraid to think deeply about historical questions in real time. Reading his work will help you understand the beliefs of the modern right. On many issues, his information is urgently needed by people in the MAGA world.

In a recent article titled "America's Mighty God," Leons pointed out what I think is a profound truth of our current historical moment. He wrote, "The long 20th century is over, a period defined by liberalism (social, political, and economic), anchored in the rejection of Adolf Hitler:

I believe what we are seeing today is indeed the end of an era, a epochal upheaval of the world we know, the full meaning and impact of which has not yet truly touched us.

More specifically, I believe Donald Trump marks the belated end of the "long 20th century"...

Our "long 20th century" got off to a late start, not fully solidified until 1945, but in the following 80 years, its spirit dominated our civilization's entire understanding of the world order and its rightful face...After the terror of the Second World War, the leadership of America and Europe naturally made 'never let history repeat itself' the core of its ideological system. They were determined, together, never to let fascism, war, and genocide again threaten humanity...

The anti-fascism of the 20th century evolved into a great crusade...By making 'never let history repeat itself' the ultimate priority, the ideology of the open society placed the 'greatest evil' (summum malum) at the core, rather than the 'highest good' (summum bonum). This unique figure of Hitler not only lurked in the depths of 20th-century thought; he also dominated people's subconscious, becoming a secular Satan...As René Girard mockingly called it, this 'Adolf Hitler's second profession' provided a quasi-religious justification for the open society consensus and the entire post-war liberal order: to prevent the resurrection of the immortal leader...

The “Long Twentieth Century” was characterized by three interrelated post-war projects: the gradual opening of society through the deconstruction of norms and boundaries, the consolidation of the managerial state, and the hegemony of a free international order. It was hoped that these three projects could together lay the foundation for ultimately achieving world peace and harmonious coexistence of all humanity.

Like all great articles, this article is somewhat hyperbolic. The post-war American-led liberalism was not a purely defensive project. The motivations behind the United Nations Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights were not fueled by a fear of Hitler’s return but by a desire to extend the boundaries of human freedom and dignity to unprecedented levels. Ronald Reagan did not need Hitler as a bogeyman to promote his vision of American freedom but rather saw it as a universal ideal.

However, in some important sense, Lyons is correct. The shocking terror and spectacular failure of the Hitler regime provided a moral anchor for liberals, allowing them to always invoke a larger liberalism based on this. Advocates of the Civil Rights Act in the United States and other liberalizing laws often used Nazi Germany as a rhetorical foil. Anti-communism briefly provided another Satan for the right, but its influence was never quite the same, as the U.S. had been Stalin’s ally in World War II; anti-communism was soon forgotten after the Soviet Union's collapse, but Hitler and the Nazis were not.

Lyons is right in saying that the Trump era marked the end of Hitler as the Western cultural “evil”—at least in the U.S. The two most popular media personalities on the American right, Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson, invited Daryl Cooper—a historical revisionist who downplays Nazi atrocities and considers Winston Churchill the real villain of World War II—to speak on their shows. Here is a (now-deleted) tweet from Cooper for reference:

This tweet, I believe, showcases the mindset of the American right. It is wrong to say that the Trump movement or modern national conservatism represents full-throated support for Nazism. However, it is undisputed that the American right believes that “awokeness” poses a greater threat than the potential return of Hitler.

Why has the legend of Hitler lost its terror? There are several reasons. The generation that defeated the Nazis has largely passed away, meaning that for most Americans, Hitler is just a character in movies and books; like Tamerlane or Genghis Khan, over time, the fear of a mass murderer has gradually faded. The Palestinian movement effectively removed Jews from the list of minority groups protected by the left, those whose rights might be defended through riots. Social media has led to an overuse of the “Nazi” label, giving rise to the popular saying “everyone I don’t like is Hitler.”

Leontes's attitude toward this transformation is far more optimistic than mine. Personally, I think demonizing Hitler is a good idea. As a general moral principle, "don't be Hitler" does indeed seem quite reliable. Even if you only care about the strength of Western civilization, someone who, out of ideological motivations, initiated military actions, led to the end of the European global empire, massacred over 20 million Slavic people, ended Germany's great power status, and solidified Soviet control over half of Europe, seems like a case to be avoided.

But Leontes believes that the end of anti-Nazi-ism as a guiding Western principle will pave the way for the return of morality, community, roots, faith, and civilizational pride—things conservatives like:

Highly influential liberal thinkers such as Karl Popper and Theodor Adorno helped convince the post-war ideologically compliant establishment that the fundamental source of authoritarianism and conflict in the world is the "closed society." This society was marked by characteristics that Reno calls the "god of the strong": strong beliefs and truth claims, strong moral codes, strong interpersonal bonds, strong community identities and connections to place and the past—ultimately, all these "objects of human affection and loyalty… are the source of a community's passions and loyalties."

Now, the unifying power of the god of the strong is seen as dangerous, a hellish source of fanaticism, oppression, hatred, and violence. Bonds of faith, family, and especially meaningful national identity are now seen as suspicious and worrisome regressive temptations leading back to fascism…

The open society consensus and its flimsy divinities have not produced a utopian world of peace and progress but rather led to the disintegration and despair of civilization. As expected, the god of the strong in history was exiled, religious traditions and moral norms were laid bare, community bonds and loyalties weakened, distinctions and boundaries dismantled, autonomous disciplines handed over to top-down technocratic management. It is hardly surprising that this has resulted in a lack of cohesion in nation-states and wider civilizations, let alone the ability to resist external threats from closed, delusional societies. In short, the radical self-denial movement pursued by the post-war open society consensus has effectively become a collective suicide pact for Western liberal democratic nations.

I'm not entirely sure if Leontes's interpretation of history is correct. After all, as Robert Putnam documented in his book "Bowling Alone," the post-war decades in America witnessed the largest surge in church attendance, civic engagement, family formation, and social cohesion since the early days of the Republic. Here are the data on church attendance, which skyrocketed after World War II and remained high especially among those over 40 in the 2010s:

Here is Putnam's index of social capital, combining measures of civic and religious engagement along with family formation:

The New Deal and the post-war period even witnessed a substantial growth in the use of the word "we" over "I" in American books:

The "god-like figure" has never been as potent as in the American generation that grew up listening to Roosevelt preach liberalism on the radio and continued to grind Adolf Hitler into the dust. From the unified struggle of World War II to the subsequent great American unity, a causal line is not difficult to draw.

The greatest generation wholeheartedly believed that Hitler was Satan on Earth. But they did not see the need to crush family, community, and tradition to preserve an open society. In fact, their society was both open and deeply rooted. My grandparents knew the name and life story of every neighbor until the day they died; how many "national conservative" intellectuals and die-hard Trump fans can say the same?

Nevertheless, the American "god-like figure" did eventually fade. Lions believes that Trump is bringing them back:

Mary Harrington recently observed that the Trumpian revolution seems both political and archetypal, noting that the widespread "excited response" among men to Elon Musk and his "young tech-bro cadre" recent work reflects a phenomenon that can be "understood from an archetypal perspective as their engaging in combat with a vast, fog-like enemy with the objective of destroying male heroism itself" when breaking down the entrenched bureaucratic system. This masculine-tinted spirit of "thymotic vitality" was suppressed throughout the "long 20th century," but now it is back...

Today's populism is... a long-suppressed desire for thymotic aspiration, a desire to take the actions that should have been taken long ago, to break free from the suffocating lethargy brought about by proceduralism, and to fight passionately for collective survival and self-interest. This is politics returning to politics. It demands a restoration of ancient virtues, including a vital sense of the nation and civilization's self-worth...

This is what Trump, with all his ruggedness, represents: the powerful deity has escaped exile and returned to America... Trump himself is a man of action, not of contemplation... he... is the embodiment of the entire rebellious new world spirit that is overturning the old order... The boldness of Trump's actions reflects not only partisan political gamesmanship—it represents the overturning of the old paradigm; now "you can just get things done."

Here, the term "thumotic" refers to Harvey Mansfield's use of the Greek word "thumos" to denote a political passion and drive. Francis Fukuyama spells it as "thymos" and as early as 1992 predicted that Donald Trump could be the perfect embodiment of the "thumotic" impulse of Americans to dismantle the liberal establishment.

Therefore, Leonhardt sees Trumpism as a reassertion of a wild, unapologetically male-driven force in the style of "Fight Club" — just different from Tyler Durden in that while he directed it towards anarchy, Leonhardt sees Trump and Musk indulging in their masculine fervor in dismantling the bureaucratic system.

Yet Leonhardt never specifically explains how this destructive impulse would bring about the return of the "strongman" he desires. He views the bureaucratic system and other post-war American institutions as obstacles to revival — foundations of family, community, and faith — but he never truly moves beyond the shattering of these so-called barriers to envision actual rebuilding. He simply assumes it will happen naturally or considers it a future problem.

I believe he will be disappointed. Trump's movement has existed for a decade now, and during this time, it has built nothing at all. There are no Trump Youth. No Trump community centers, Trump neighborhood associations, or Trump business clubs. Trump supporters have not flocked to traditional religion either; while Christianity's decline halted since the pandemic, feelings of Christian identity and church attendance remain well below levels seen at the turn of the century. Republicans still have more children than Democrats, but red-state birth rates are also declining.

In Trump's first term, right-wing efforts to organize civic engagement were almost laughably sparse. A few hundred "proud boys" gathered, brawling with antifascists on the streets of Berkeley and Portland. There were some smaller right-wing anti-lockdown protests in 2020. About two thousand people participated in the January 6th riot — mostly middle-aged. None of these formed the kind of enduring grassroots organizations common in the 1950s.

For a few, Trump's first term was a live-action role-playing game; for others, it was just a YouTube channel.

And what about Trump's second term to date? Nothing at all. Even rally attendance has sharply declined. National conservatives who might have gone out in 2017 to meet up are now curled up alone in their living rooms, flipping between X, OnlyFans, and DraftKings, throwing punches in the air when they read about Elon Musk and his tech-nerd squad firing employees or Trump cutting aid to Ukraine. "You can just get things done," yet hardly any of Trump's supporters are actually doing anything, except passively cheering for their team in name only. Unless you are one of the few geeks helping Musk dismantle the bureaucracy, this "vision" is entirely secondhand.

You see, the MAGA movement is an online phenomenon. It is another vertical online community — a group of disconnected, atomized individuals weakly connected over vast distances through the illusory bonds of ideology and identity. It has no sense of family, community, or rootedness to a place. It is a digital commodity. It is a subforum. It is a fan club.

N.S. Léonce and the National Conservatives completely misunderstand the reasons why America abandoned its roots, community, family, and faith. We didn't abandon these "strong gods" because the liberals were too harsh on old Adolf (Hitler). We abandoned them because of technology.

In the 1920s, America saw a surge in widespread prosperity along with the emergence of technology that granted individuals unprecedented autonomy and control over their physical location and access to information. The ownership of cars allowed Americans to travel anywhere, anytime, freeing them from their ties to specific locations. Telephone ownership enabled people to communicate over long distances. Television and radio exposed them to new ideas and cultures, while the internet exposed them to even more.

Then came social media and smartphones. Suddenly, "society" no longer meant the people in your physical surroundings—your neighbors, coworkers, workout partners, and so on. First, "society" turned into a group of avatars typing messages to you on a small glass screen in your pocket. Your phone became the place where you met and conversed with friends and loved ones, as well as where you argued about politics and ideas. People's roots shifted from physical space to digital space.

Increasing evidence indicates that smartphone-enabled social media is linked to isolation and alienation, loneliness, declining religious belief, decreased family formation, and reduced birth rates. The technologies of the 20th century—cars, phones, TV, and the internet—made American society somewhat disjointed, but they managed to partially resist and retain remnants of the roots. However, social media enabled by smartphones broke through these final resistance barriers, turning us into free particles floating in the intangible space of memes, identities, and distractions.

Indeed, the mighty gods are more fragile than the new gods made of silicon.

The people who have achieved this feat are more or less the ones N.S. Léonce is now cheering for. Of course, not Elon Musk himself; he only makes cars and rockets. But Steve Jobs, Jack Dorsey, Zhang Yiming, and a large group of entrepreneurs who follow their "grand visions" to pursue immense wealth have built the virtual world that has become our most real home.

I'm not saying what they did is evil. Technology has a way of progressing in an advanced society; if it can be done, it's likely it will be done. No one could have foreseen its downsides. But the ironic part is that N.S. Léonce now believes that the group of people who will usher in a new era of roots and community is the same group that destroyed the old era.

Regardless, yes, this thing will fail because nothing was built up. Yes, every ideological movement assures us that after the old order is completely overturned, a utopia will take its place. Somehow, the utopia never seems to arrive. Instead, the so-called temporary period of pain and sacrifice gets longer and longer, and the ideologues in charge become increasingly enthusiastic about blaming enemies and purging revolutionary foes. At some point, people will see clearly that the promise of utopia was just an excuse to eliminate enemies—the "grand vision" itself has become the purpose.

The former U.S. Treasury Secretary has already told us that the economic pain caused by Trump is just a "detox period." Trump has blamed the stock market drop on "globalists," and Trump's Department of Justice has attributed egg prices to hoarders and speculators. If you can't recognize this storyline, then you must not follow the news or history very closely.

Mere destruction of the old order itself will not create anything. The Visigoths and Vandals built nothing on the ruins of Rome. They indulged in their "greatness," plundered wealth for a while, and then vanished into myth and memory.

Over the past fifteen years, I have watched in dismay as the real-world communities and families I knew in my youth have been torn apart, replaced by a bunch of fictional online identity movements. I am still waiting for someone to figure out how to put society back together — how to do what Roosevelt and the Greatest Generation did a century ago. Watching the MAGA movement, I am pretty sure this is not the answer.

Original Article Link

You may also like

$COIN Joins S&P 500, but Coinbase Isn't Celebrating

On May 13, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced that Coinbase would officially replace Discover Financial Services in the S&P 500 on May 19. While other companies like Block and MicroStrategy, closely tied to Bitcoin, were already part of the S&P 500, Coinbase became the first cryptocurrency exchange whose primary business is in the index. This also signifies that cryptocurrency is gradually moving from the fringes to the mainstream in the U.S.



On the day of the announcement, Coinbase's stock price surged by 23%, surpassing the $250 mark. However, just 3 days later, Coinbase was hit by two consecutive events: a hack where employees were bribed to steal customer data and a demand for a $20 million ransom, and an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the authenticity of its claim of having over 100 million "verified users" in its securities filings and marketing materials. These two events acted as mini-bombs, and at the time of writing, Coinbase's stock had already dropped by over 7.3%.


Coincidentally, Discover Financial Services, being replaced by Coinbase, can also be considered the "Coinbase" of the previous payment era. Discover is a U.S.-based digital banking and payment services company headquartered in Illinois, founded in 1960. Its payment network, Discover Network, is the fourth largest payment network apart from Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.


In April, after the approval of the acquisition of Discover by the sixth-largest U.S. bank, Capital One, this well-established digital banking company of over 60 years smoothly handed over its S&P 500 "seat" to this emerging cryptocurrency "bank." This unexpected coincidence also portrayed the handover between the new and old eras in Coinbase's entry into the S&P 500, resembling a relay race scene. However, this relay baton also brought Coinbase's accumulated "external troubles and internal strife" to a tipping point.


Side Effects of ETFs


Over the past decade, cryptocurrency exchanges have been the most stable "profit machines." They play a role in providing liquidity to the entire industry and rely on trading fees to sustain their operations. However, with the comprehensive rollout of ETF products in the U.S. market, this profit model is facing unprecedented challenges. As the leader in the "American stack," with over 80% of its business coming from the U.S., Coinbase is most affected by this.



Starting from the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, traditional financial capital has significantly onboarded users and funds that originally belonged to exchanges in a more cost-effective, compliant, and transparent manner. The transaction fee revenue of cryptocurrency exchanges has started to decline, and this trend may further intensify in the coming months.


According to Coinbase's 2024 Q4 financial report, the platform's total trading revenue was $417 million, a 45% year-on-year decrease. The contribution of BTC and ETH's trading revenue dropped from 65% in the same period last year to less than 50%.


This decline is not a result of a decrease in market enthusiasm. In fact, since the approval of the Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the inflow of BTC into the U.S. market has continued to reach new highs, with asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity rapidly expanding their management scale. Data shows that BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) alone has surpassed $17 billion in assets under management. As of mid-May 2025, the cumulative net inflow of 11 major institutional Bitcoin spot ETFs on the market has exceeded $41.5 billion, with a total net asset value of $1214.69 billion, accounting for approximately 5.91% of the total Bitcoin market capitalization.


Chart showing the trend of net outflows for Grayscale among the 11 institutions


Institutional investors and some retail investors are shifting towards ETF products, partly due to compliance and tax considerations. On one hand, ETFs have much lower trading costs compared to cryptocurrency exchanges. While Coinbase's spot trading fee rate varies annually in a tiered manner but averages around 1.49%, for example, the management fee for IBIT ETF is only 0.25%, and the majority of ETF institution fees fluctuate around 0.15% to 0.25%.



In other words, the more rational users are, the more likely they are to move from exchanges to ETF products, especially for investors aiming for long-term holdings.


According to multiple sources, several institutions, including VanEck and Grayscale, have submitted applications to the SEC for a Solana (SOL) ETF, with some institutions also planning to submit an XRP ETF proposal. Once approved, this may trigger a new round of fund migration. According to a report submitted by Coinbase to the SEC, as of April, the platform's trading revenue from XRP and Solana accounted for 18% and 10%, nearly one-third of the platform's fee revenue.



However, the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs passed in 2024 also reduced the fees for these two tokens on Coinbase from 30% and 15% to 26% and 10%, respectively. If the SOL and XRP ETFs are approved, it will further undermine the core fee revenue of exchanges like Coinbase.


The expansion of ETF products is gradually weakening the financial intermediary status of cryptocurrency exchanges. From their original roles as matchmakers and clearers to now gradually becoming mere "on-ramps and off-ramps" for funds, exchanges are seeing their marginal value squeezed by ETFs.


Robinhood Takes a Stand, Traditional Brokerages Join the Fray


On May 12, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins gave a keynote speech at the Tokenization and Cryptocurrency Working Group roundtable. The theme of his speech revolved around "It is a new day at the SEC," where he indicated that the SEC would not approach enforcement and regulation the same way as before but would instead pave the way for cryptocurrency assets in the U.S. market.



With signs of cryptocurrency compliance such as the SEC's "NEW DAY" declaration, an increasing number of traditional brokerages are attempting to enter the cryptocurrency industry. One of the most representative cases is the well-known U.S. brokerage Robinhood, which began expanding its crypto business in 2018. By the time of its IPO in 2021, Robinhood's crypto business revenue accounted for over 50% of the company, with a significant boost from the Dogecoin "moonshot" promoted by Musk.


In Q1 2025 earnings report, Robinhood showcased strong growth, especially in revenue from cryptocurrency and options trading. Fueled by Trump's Memecoin, cryptocurrency-related revenue reached $250 million, nearly doubling year-over-year. Consequently, Robinhood Gold subscription users reached 3.5 million, a 90% increase from the previous year, with the rapid growth of Robinhood Gold providing the company with a stable source of income.



Meanwhile, RobinHood is actively pursuing acquisitions in the cryptocurrency space. In 2024, it announced a $2 billion acquisition of the long-standing European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp. Additionally, Canada's largest cryptocurrency CEX, WonderFi, which recently went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also announced its integration with RobinHood Crypto. After obtaining virtual asset licenses in the UK, Canada, Singapore, and other markets, RobinHood has taken a proactive approach in the compliant cryptocurrency trading market.



Furthermore, an increasing number of brokerage firms are exploring the same path. Futu Securities, Tiger Brokers, and others are also dipping their toes into cryptocurrency trading, with some having applied for or obtained the VA license from the Hong Kong SFC. Although their user bases are currently small, traditional brokerages have a natural advantage in user trust, regulatory licenses, and low fee structures. This could pose a threat to native cryptocurrency platforms in the future.



User Data Breach: Is Coinbase Still Secure?


In April 2025, security researchers discovered that some Coinbase user data was leaked on the dark web. While the platform initially responded by attributing it to a "technical misinformation," it still raised concerns among users regarding its security and privacy protection. Just two days before Dow Jones Indexes announced Coinbase's addition to the S&P 500 Index, on May 11, 2025, Coinbase received an email from an unknown threat actor claiming to have obtained customer account information and internal documents, demanding a $20 million ransom to keep the data private. Subsequent investigations confirmed the data breach.


Cybercriminals obtained the data by bribing overseas customer service agents and support staff, mainly in "non-U.S. regions such as India." These agents abused their access to Coinbase's internal customer support system and stole customer data. As early as February this year, blockchain detective ZachXBT revealed on X platform that between December 2024 and January 2025, Coinbase users lost over $65 million to social engineering scams, with the actual amount potentially higher.


Among the victims was a well-known figure, 67-year-old Ed Suman, an established artist in the art world for nearly two decades, having been involved in the creation of artworks such as Jeff Koons' "Balloon Dog" sculpture. Earlier this year, he fell victim to an impersonation scam involving fake Coinbase customer support, resulting in a loss of over $2 million in cryptocurrency. ZachXBT critiqued Coinbase for its inadequate handling of such scams, noting that other major exchanges have not faced similar issues and recommending Coinbase to enhance its security measures.


Amidst a series of ongoing social engineering incidents, although there has not been any impact on user assets at the technical level so far, it has raised concerns among many retail and institutional investors. Especially institutions holding massive assets on Coinbase. Just considering the U.S. BTC ETF institutions, as of mid-May 2025, they collectively hold nearly 840,000 BTC, and 75% of these are custodied by Coinbase. If we price BTC at $100,000, this amount reaches a staggering $63 billion, which is equivalent to the nominal GDP of two Iceland in the year 2024.


Visualization: ChatGPT, Source: Farside


In addition, Coinbase Custody also serves over 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, family offices, pension funds, and endowments. As of the Q1 2025 financial report, Coinbase's total assets under management (including institutional and retail clients) reached $404 billion. The specific amount of institutional custodied assets was not explicitly disclosed in the latest report, but it should still be over 50% based on the Q4 2024 report.


Visualization: ChatGPT


Once this security barrier is breached, not only could the rate of user attrition far exceed expectations, but more importantly, institutional trust in it would undermine the foundation of its business. Therefore, after a hacking event, Coinbase's stock price plummeted significantly.


CEXs are All in Self-Rescue Mode


Facing a decline in spot trading fee revenue, Coinbase is also accelerating its transformation, attempting to find growth opportunities in derivatives and emerging assets. Coinbase acquired a stake in the options platform Deribit at the end of 2024 and announced the official launch of perpetual contract products in 2025. This acquisition fills in Coinbase's gap in options trading and its relatively small global market share.



Deribit has a strong presence in non-U.S. markets, especially in Asia and Europe. The acquisition has enabled Coinbase to gain a dominant position in bitcoin and ethereum options trading on Deribit, accounting for approximately 80% of the global options trading volume, with daily trading volume remaining above $2 billion.


Meanwhile, 80-90% of Deribit's customer base consists of institutional investors, with their professionalism and liquidity in the Bitcoin and Ethereum options market highly favored by institutions. Coinbase's compliance advantage, coupled with its already robust institutional ecosystem, makes it even more suitable. By using institutions as an entry point, it can face the squeeze from giants like Binance and OKX in the derivatives market.



Facing a similar dilemma is Kraken, which is attempting to replicate Binance Futures' model in non-U.S. markets. Since the derivatives market relies more on professional users, fee rates are relatively higher and stickiness is stronger, making it a significant source of revenue for exchanges. In the first half of 2025, Kraken completed the acquisition of TradeStation Crypto and a futures exchange, aiming to build a complete derivatives trading ecosystem to hedge the risk of declining spot transaction fee income.


With the surge of Memecoin in 2024, Binance, OKX, and various CEX platforms began massively listing small-market-cap, highly volatile tokens to activate active trading users. Due to the wealth effect and trading activity of Memecoins, Coinbase was also forced to join the battle, successively listing popular tokens from the Solana ecosystem such as BOOK OF MEME and Dogwifhat. Although these coins are controversial, they are frequently traded, with fee rates several times higher than mainstream coins, serving as a "blood-boosting" method for spot trading.


However, due to its status as a publicly traded company, this practice is a riskier endeavor for Coinbase. Even in the current crypto-friendly environment, the SEC is still investigating whether tokens like SOL, ADA, and SAND constitute securities.


In addition to the forced transformation strategies carried out by the aforementioned CEXs, they are also starting to lay out RWAs and the most talked-about stablecoin payment fields, such as the PYUSD launched through a collaboration between Coinbase and Paypal, Coinbase's support for the Euro stablecoin EURC by Circle that complies with EU MiCA regulatory requirements, or the USD1 launched through a collaboration between Binance and WIFL. In the increasingly crowded trading field, many CEXs have shifted their focus from just the trading market to the application field.


The golden age of transaction fees has quietly ended, and the second half of the crypto exchange platform game has silently begun.


Key Market Insights for May 16th, how much did you miss out on?

1. On-chain Flows: $111.3M inflow to Ethereum this week; $237.6M outflow from Berachain 2. Largest Price Swings: $ETHFI, $NEIRO 3. Top News: Data: Solana Network's revenue reached $7.9M on the 13th, surpassing the sum of all other L1 and L2 chains

MOG Coin Skyrockets as Elon Musk and Garry Tan Embrace "mog/acc" Identity

「mog/acc」 is rapidly sweeping through various figures, from Elon Musk to Garry Tan, boosting the project's visibility and ultimately driving up the price.

STARTUP's Price Surges 40x in 30 Minutes: How did he become the Emotion King of Believe?

He is both a KOL and understands the market script, playing a game where attention is the currency.

Key Market Intelligence on May 14th, how much did you miss out on?

Featured News


1.Binance Alpha Launches HIPPO, BLUE, and Other Tokens

2.Believe Ecosystem Tokens See General Rise, LAUNCHCOIN Surges Over 250% in 24 Hours

3.Tiger Securities Introduces Cryptocurrency Deposit and Withdrawal Service, Supports Mainstream Cryptocurrencies such as BTC and ETH

4.Current Bitcoin Rally Possibly Driven by Institutions, Retail Traders Yet to Join

5.Binance Wallet's New TGE Privasea AI Participation Requires a 198 Point Threshold, with a Point Consumption of 15


Trending Topics


Source: Overheard on CT (tg: @overheardonct), Kaito


PUMP: Today's discussions about PUMP focus on its new creator revenue-sharing model: the platform will allocate 50% of PumpSwap revenue to token creators, sparking varied reactions from users. Some criticize the move as insufficient or even misleading, while others view it as a positive step the platform is taking to reward creators. Meanwhile, PUMP faces market pressure from emerging competitors like LetsBONKfun and Raydium, which are rapidly gaining market share. Users also express concerns about PUMP's sustainability and potential regulatory risks in the U.S., with discussions extending to the platform's impact on the entire memecoin ecosystem.


COINBASE: Today, Coinbase became the first crypto company to join the S&P 500 Index, replacing Discover Financial Services, sparking widespread industry attention. The entire crypto community views this milestone as a significant development, signaling that crypto assets are further integrating into the mainstream financial system. The news has sparked lively discussions on Twitter, with many users pointing out that this may attract more institutional investors to enter the Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency markets.


XRP: XRP became the focal point of today's crypto discussion, with its significant market movements and strategic advances drawing attention. XRP has surpassed USDT to become the third-largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization, sparking market excitement and discussions about its future potential. The surge in market capitalization and price is believed to be related to increasing institutional interest, deepening strategic partnerships, and its role in the crypto ecosystem. Additionally, XRP's integration into multiple financial systems and its potential as a macro asset class are also seen as key factors driving the current market sentiment.


DYDX: Today's discussions about DYDX mainly focused on the dYdX Yapper Leaderboard launched by KaitoAI. The leaderboard aims to identify the most active community participants, with a total of $150,000 in rewards to be distributed over the first three seasons. This initiative has sparked broad community participation, with many users discussing the potential rewards and the incentive effect on the DYDX ecosystem. Meanwhile, progress on the ethDYDX to dYdX native chain migration and historical airdrop events have also been topics of discussion.


Featured Articles


1. "What Is 'ICM'? Holding Up the $4 Billion Market Cap Solana's New Narrative"

Overnight, the hottest narrative in the crypto space has become "Internet Capital Markets," with a host of crypto projects and founders, led by the Solana ecosystem's new Launchpad platform Believe, releasing this phrase. Together with "Believe in something," it has become the new slogan heralding the onset of a bull market. What exactly is the so-called "Internet Capital Market," will it become a short-lived hype phrase like the Base ecosystem's previous Content Coin, and what related targets are available for selection?


2.《LaunchCoin Surges 20x in One Day, How Did Believe Create a $200M Market Cap Shiba Inu After Going to Zero?|100x Retrospective》

LAUNCHCOIN broke through a $200 million market cap today, with the long-lost liquidity and such a high market cap "Memecoin" almost bringing half of the on-chain crypto community CT into the fray. The community is crazily discussing this token, with half of it being FOMO and the other half being FUD. This token, originally issued by Believe founder Ben Pasternak under his personal identity, transformed into a new platform token after a renaming. From once going to zero to a $200 million market cap, what happened in between?


On-chain Data


May 14 On-chain Fund Flow


Within 24 hours, GOONC's market cap soared to 70 million, could GOONC be the next billion-dollar dog on the Believe platform?

Bitcoin has broken $100,000, Ethereum has surpassed 2500, and is Solana's hot streak about to make a comeback?


The current market is in a state of macro euphoria, with GOONC riding the wave today, skyrocketing 10x in just a few hours, reaching a market cap of tens of millions of dollars, trading volume soaring past 50 million, and rumors swirling that the developer may be from OpenAI (unconfirmed but intriguing enough).


The "gooning" Culture in Forums


A ludicrous and absurd Solana meme that some actually buy into.


GOONC is a meme coin that has sprouted from the "gooning" subculture, offering no technological innovation or practical use, its sole function being speculation.


It takes inspiration from an NSFW term "gooning," which refers to a person being deeply immersed in certain content (you know what), eventually entering a nearly religious-like trance.


In Reddit (such as r/GOONED, r/GoonCaves) and some counterculture media outlets (such as MEL Magazine in 2020), "gooning" has gradually transitioned from an adult label to a meme-addicted, digital content and virtual self-indulgence synonym, arguably the epitome of Degen spirit.


GOONC is playing around with this concept, packaging the addictive nature, uselessness, and irony of gooning into a tradable financial product. The project team has made it clear: "We do not solve blockchain problems, we only trade absurdity." Blunt but oddly genuine.


GOONC launched on May 13, 2025, using the meme coin launch platform Believe App's LaunchCoin module on Solana. This tool is highly Degen: zero technical barriers, a few clicks to create a coin, perfect for projects like GOONC that can come up with ideas out of the blue.



The mastermind behind GOONC is also quite something and is the most talked-about, with KOL @basedalexandoor on X platform (alias "Pata van Goon") personally involved. His profile even caught the attention of Marc Andreessen, co-founder of a16z, making onlookers unable to resist speculating if GOONC has a hint of OpenAI lineage.



While this 'OpenAI Endorsement' is currently just community speculation, it is definitely a good card to play to fuel hype. Saying "we are pure speculation" on one hand, while tagging a few "AI + a16z" on the other.


From Wasteland to Moon in One Night


GOONC took off as soon as it launched. After its launch on May 13, 2025, its market capitalization skyrocketed to $22 million within 4 hours, with a trading volume exceeding $25.6 million in 24 hours. According to platform data, the first day of trading saw an astonishing +41,100% surge, soaring from $0.0000001 to $0.02, becoming a "missed-the-boat" situation.


GOONC quickly formed an active trading community post-launch, with a lot of discussion and trading signals appearing on X platform (such as the 292x return signal provided by DeBot). Liquidity pools on exchanges like Raydium and Meteora grew rapidly, supporting high trading volumes and price increases.


The real climax occurred between May 13 and May 14, with the market cap rising to $5.5 million in the morning and directly surpassing $55 million in the afternoon. By the 14th, it briefly approached a $70 million market cap, with the trading volume soaring to $59 million. Some community members even posted screenshots claiming an increase of +85,000%, creating a new myth out of the ruins.


As of 1:30 pm on May 14, the price stabilized around $0.039, with a total market cap and FDV both around $39.6 million, and a 24-hour trading volume of $5.43 million. Active platforms include XT.COM, LBank, Meteora, and others.


Although there was a slight pullback from the peak ($0.07), the coin's popularity remains strong. For a coin that relies purely on "irony + community + X post" to thrive, this performance is already at a stellar level.



Currently, the background of the token's development team is not transparent, increasing the potential risk of a rug pull. Rugcheck.xyz warns that the creator of the GOONC contract may have permission to modify the contract (e.g., change fees or mint additional tokens), posing certain security risks.


Community members speculate that the meteoric rise of GOONC may be the "last hurrah".


Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more