The Revival of Token Buybacks: Navigating New Regulatory Landscapes

By: crypto insight|2025/11/27 09:00:08

Key Takeaways:

Token buybacks, halted by the SEC in 2022, have returned as a focal point in crypto markets of 2025.
Changes in SEC interpretations and new legislation like the Clarity Act have facilitated the reemergence of buybacks.
The shift in regulations is highlighted by Uniswap’s renewed buyback discussions and the operational models of protocols like Hyperliquid.
The 2025 model focuses on buybacks combined with automatic token burning, distancing mechanisms from previous securities concerns.

WEEX Crypto News, 2025-11-27 08:58:25 (today’s date, format: day, month, year)

Introduction: The Evolution of Token Buybacks

The concept of token buybacks has been a volatile aspect of the cryptocurrency landscape, oscillating between regulatory approvals and suspensions. In 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) halted buyback discussions, seeing them as securities activities. Today, in 2025, buybacks have resurfaced as a model for value management in cryptocurrencies. This revival is not without its backdrop of significant regulatory shifts and legislative developments.

The Regulatory Context: Understanding SEC’s Initial Suspension

The initial suspension of token buybacks was heavily influenced by SEC’s interpretation of securities laws. Utilizing the Howey Test—a framework to determine whether an asset is a security—many cryptocurrencies were deemed investment contracts. This view stemmed from scenarios where an agreement uses its revenue to buy back its tokens, providing economic benefits resembling dividends to token holders. Consequently, tokens with such mechanisms were often classified as securities, propelling major projects to halt or abandon their buyback plans.

Shifts in Regulatory Perception: The SEC’s Evolving Interpretations

Fast forward to 2025, the SEC has not explicitly sanctioned buybacks but has significantly reinterpreted what constitutes a security. Under the earlier leadership of Gary Gensler, the SEC’s stance was focused on the outcomes and behaviors related to token sales and value distributions. Buybacks were perceived as mechanisms impacting token prices, thus falling within the securities ambit. However, current perspectives, led by new SEC leadership, prioritize the structural and control aspects of tokens.

In 2025, attention has shifted to the actual governance of networks—whether decisions are human-made or automated through decentralized code—and the degree of decentralization. This change is underscored by a landmark case involving Ripple (XRP), where tokens were classified differently based on whether they were sold to institutional investors or traded by retail investors. Such decisions have recalibrated the evaluation of buybacks and influenced how token governance models are analyzed.

Legislative Developments: The Impact of the Clarity Act

The legislative landscape in the United States has seen transformative developments, notably the proposal of the Clarity Act by Congress in 2025. This legislation seeks to redefine token classification within legal confines, distancing from the notion of tokens being permanently classified based on initial sale conditions. Whereas previous SEC logic might indefinitely categorize a token sold as part of an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) as a security, the Clarity Act introduces the concept of “investment contract assets” that can transform into “digital commodities” once they enter active trading markets.

This re-categorization is crucial, effectively shifting regulatory oversight from the SEC to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) as tokens transition from initial offerings to secondary market activities. For buyback practices, this legislative shift translates buybacks from dividend-like distributions into tools for supply management akin to monetary policy adjustments, thereby facilitating an environment conducive to buyback and burn strategies.

From Buybacks to Burn: A Modern Approach

The 2025 framework for token buybacks has evolved to incorporate an automatic burning mechanism that further distances such actions from securities-like features. This reimagined model entails the algorithm-driven execution of buybacks, void of direct economic benefit distribution to token holders, and excludes discretionary influence from foundational organizations over token supply and price.

Illustrative of this approach is Uniswap’s “Unified Proposal” announced in November 2025, which exemplifies this transition. In their proposal, a portion of transaction fees is automatically designated to a decentralized autonomous organization’s (DAO) treasury. These fees do not end up in the hands of token holders. Instead, a smart contract governs the buyback and burn of the UNI token on the open market, effectively reducing token supply and indirectly buoying token value.

This model refines the interpretation of buybacks, seeing them not as profit allocations to investors but as adjustments in supply, integral to network policy operations. Within this framework, supply culling is framed more as monetary strategy rather than financial gain distribution, aligning with new SEC and Clarity Act definitions.

The Road Ahead: Implementing Safe Buybacks

Protocols like Hyperliquid epitomize the structured execution of buyback and burn mechanisms in 2025, highlighting features significant for reduced regulatory risk. Their mode of operation showcases automated buyback and burn processes dictated by protocol rules rather than discretionary foundation decisions. Importantly, any revenue derived does not route back to foundation kindreds, ensuring that no direct economic benefit is transferred to token holders.

Despite the resurgence of buybacks, practitioners must remain cautious. Not all buybacks are devoid of regulatory contention. The SEC continues to scrutinize buybacks based on control dynamics and economic effects on token holders. The design of any buyback mechanism must avoid discretionary market timings by foundations, maintain robust decentralized control, and prevent perceived shareholder-like benefits.

Conclusion

In today’s dynamic cryptocurrency environment, token buybacks have emerged from regulatory suspensions into a refined mechanism aligned with contemporary legislative changes and SEC interpretations. The confluence of evolving regulatory perspectives and legislative clarity, particularly through the Clarity Act, has recalibrated how buybacks are structured and perceived. For forward-thinking protocols, navigating this landscape involves embracing innovations in automated governance and supply management, ensuring compliance remains robust in the face of shifting regulatory outlooks.

As the market continues to evolve, understanding and adapting to regulatory frameworks will remain paramount to harness buybacks as a strategic tool in token value management, while maintaining alignment with the requisite legal standards.

FAQs

What triggered the reemergence of token buybacks in 2025?

The reemergence was primarily influenced by changes in regulatory interpretations by the SEC and the introduction of the Clarity Act, which redefined the classification of tokens, reducing the regulatory burdens associated with buybacks.

How does the Clarity Act impact the classification of tokens?

The Clarity Act allows for tokens initially sold under investment contracts to transition to digital commodities once they are actively traded, thus altering the regulating body’s oversight from the SEC to the CFTC.

How do modern buyback models differ from earlier approaches?

Modern buyback models focus on integrating automatic token burning mechanisms, ensuring that buybacks are framed as supply management strategies rather than direct economic benefits or profit-sharing schemes.

Why is decentralization important in the context of token buybacks?

Decentralization is critical as it dictates who controls network operations, affecting regulatory perceptions of whether an asset functions as a security. Decentralized control reduces regulatory risks associated with perceived discretionary management or price influence.

What role does the SEC play in current token buyback regulations?

While the SEC hasn’t explicitly endorsed token buybacks, it has shifted its focus to structural governance over behavioral outcomes, allowing for greater flexibility in token management without crossing into securities domains.

Over the past 24 hours, the crypto market has shown strong momentum across multiple dimensions. The mainstream discussion has focused on Coinbase's official entry into the prediction market through the acquisition of The Clearing Company, as well as the intense controversy within the AAVE community regarding token incentives and governance rights.

In terms of ecosystem development, Solana has introduced the innovative Kora fee layer aimed at reducing user transaction costs; meanwhile, the Perp DEX competition has intensified, with the showdown between Hyperliquid and Lighter sparking widespread community discussion on the future of decentralized derivatives.

I. Mainstream Topics

1. Coinbase Acquires The Clearing Company, Officially Entering Prediction Market

This week, Coinbase announced the acquisition of The Clearing Company, marking another significant move to deepen its presence in this field after last week's announcement of launching a prediction market on its platform.

The Clearing Company's founder, Toni Gemayel, and the team will join Coinbase to jointly drive the development of the prediction market business.

Coinbase's Product Lead, Shan Aggarwal, stated that the growth of the prediction market is still in its early stages and predicts that 2026 will be the breakout year for this field.

The community has reacted positively to this, generally believing that Coinbase's entry will bring significant traffic and compliance advantages to the prediction market. However, this has also sparked discussions about the industry's competitive landscape.

Jai Bhavnani, Founder of Rivalry, commented that for startups, if their product model proves to be successful, industry giants like Coinbase have ample reason to replicate it.

This serves as a reminder to all entrepreneurs in the crypto space that they must build significant moats to withstand competition pressure from these giants.

2. Kalshi Launches Kalshi Research and Integrates BSC Network

Regulated prediction market platform Kalshi launched its research arm, Kalshi Research, this week, aimed at opening its internal data to the academic community and researchers to facilitate exploration of prediction market-related topics.

Its inaugural research report highlights Kalshi's outperformance in predicting inflation compared to Wall Street's traditional models. Kalshi co-founder Luana Lopes Lara commented that the power of prediction markets lies in the valuable data they generate, and it is now time to better utilize this data.

Meanwhile, Kalshi announced its support for the BNB Chain (BSC), allowing users to deposit and withdraw BNB and USDT via the BSC network.

This move is seen as a significant step for Kalshi to open its platform to a broader crypto user base, aiming to unlock access to the world's largest prediction market. Furthermore, Kalshi also revealed plans to host the first Prediction Market Summit in 2026 to further drive industry engagement and development.

3. AAVE Token Incentive Controversy Persists as Founders and Whales Increase Holdings Against the Market Trend

The AAVE community recently engaged in heated debates around an Aave Improvement Proposal (AIP) titled "AAVE Tokenomics Alignment Phase One - Ownership Governance," aiming to transfer ownership and control of the Aave brand from Aave Labs to Aave DAO.

Aave founder Stani Kulechov publicly stated his intention to vote against the proposal, believing it oversimplifies the complex legal and operational structure, potentially slowing down the development process of core products like Aave V4.

The community's reaction was polarized. Some criticized Stani for adopting a "double standard" in governance and questioned whether his team had siphoned off protocol revenue, while others supported his cautious stance, arguing that significant governance changes require more thorough discussion.

This controversy highlights the tension between the ideal of DAO governance in DeFi projects and the actual power held by core development teams.

Despite governance disputes putting pressure on the AAVE token price, on-chain data shows that Stani Kulechov himself has purchased millions of dollars' worth of AAVE in the past few hours.

Simultaneously, a whale address, 0xDDC4, which had been quiet for 6 months, once again spent 500 ETH (approximately $1.53 million) to purchase 9,629 AAVE tokens. Data indicates that this whale has accumulated nearly 40,000 AAVE over the past year but is currently in an unrealized loss position.

The founder and whale's increased holdings during market volatility were interpreted by some investors as a confidence signal in AAVE's long-term value.

4. Top Articles: DeFi Curators and Ethereum Annual Summary

In this week's top article, Morpho Labs' "Curator Explained" detailed the role of "curators" in DeFi.

The article likened curators to asset managers in traditional finance, who design, deploy, and manage on-chain vaults, providing users with a one-click diversified investment portfolio.

Unlike traditional fund managers, DeFi curators execute strategies automatically through non-custodial smart contracts, allowing users to maintain full control of their assets. The article offered a new perspective on the specialization and risk management in the DeFi space.

Another widely circulated article, "Ethereum 2025: From Experiment to Global Infrastructure," provided a comprehensive summary of Ethereum's development over the past year. The article noted that 2025 is a crucial year for Ethereum's transition from an experimental project to global financial infrastructure. Through the Pectra and Fusaka hard forks, Ethereum achieved significant reductions in account abstraction and transaction costs.

Furthermore, the SEC's clarification of Ethereum's "non-securities" nature and the launch of tokenized funds on the Ethereum mainnet by traditional financial giants like JPMorgan marked Ethereum's gaining recognition from mainstream institutions. The article suggested that whether it is the continued growth of DeFi, the thriving L2 ecosystem, or the integration with the AI field, Ethereum's vision as the "world computer" is gradually becoming a reality.

II. Mainstream Ecosystem Updates

1. Solana: Launches Kora Fee Layer and propAMM Data Research

The Solana Foundation engineering team released a fee layer solution called Kora this week.

Kora is a fee relayer and signatory node designed to provide the Solana ecosystem with a more flexible transaction fee payment method. Through Kora, users will be able to achieve gas-free transactions or choose to pay network fees using any stablecoin or SPL token. This innovation is seen as an important step in lowering the barrier of entry for new users and improving Solana network's availability.

Additionally, a deep research report on propAMM (proactive market maker) sparked community interest. The report's data analysis of propAMMs on Solana like HumidiFi indicated that Solana has achieved, or even surpassed, the level of transaction execution quality in traditional finance (TradFi) markets.

For example, on the SOL-USDC trading pair, HumidiFi is able to provide a highly competitive spread for large trades (0.4-1.6 bps), which is already better than the trading slippage of some mid-cap stocks in traditional markets.

Research suggests that propAMM is making the vision of the "Internet Capital Market" a reality, with Solana emerging as the prime venue for all of this to happen.

2. Perp DEX: Hyperliquid vs. Lighter Competition Intensifies

The competition in the perpetual contract DEX (Perp DEX) space is becoming increasingly heated.

In its latest official article, Hyperliquid has positioned its emerging competitor, Lighter, alongside centralized exchanges like Binance, referring to it as a platform utilizing a centralized sequencer. Hyperliquid emphasizes its transparency advantage of being "fully on-chain, operated by a validator network, and with no hidden state."

The community widely interprets this as Hyperliquid declaring "war" on Lighter. The technical differences between the two platforms have also become a focal point of discussion: Hyperliquid focuses on ultimate on-chain transparency, while Lighter emphasizes achieving "verifiable execution" through zero-knowledge proofs to provide users with a Central Limit Order Book (CLOB)-like trading experience.

This battle over the future direction of decentralized derivatives exchanges is expected to peak in 2026.

Meanwhile, discussions about Lighter's trading fees have surfaced. Some users have pointed out that Lighter charged as much as 81 basis points (0.81%) for a $2 million USD/JPY forex trade, far exceeding the near-zero spreads of traditional forex brokers.

Some argue that Lighter does not follow a B-book model that bets against market makers, instead anchoring its prices to the TradFi market, and the high fees may be related to the current liquidity or market maker balance incentives. Providing a more competitive spread for real-world assets (RWA) in the highly volatile crypto market is a key issue Lighter will need to address in the future.

Why Did Market Sentiment Completely Collapse in 2025? Decoding Messari's Ten-Thousand-Word Annual Report

If cryptocurrency is ultimately a form of “money,” then who is worthy of being treated as money?

Twitter 上的「虚假流量」是指通过操纵关注者数量、喜欢和转发等指标来人为增加一条推文的影响力和可信度。下面是一些常见的制造虚假流量的方法： 1. 购买关注者： 一些用户会通过购买关注者来迅速增加他们的关注者数量，从而让他们的账号看起来更受欢迎。 2. 使用机器人账号： 制造虚假流量的另一种常见方法是使用机器人账号自动执行喜欢、转发和评论等互动操作，从而提高一条推文的互动量。 3. 推文交换： 一些用户之间会进行推文交换，即互相喜欢、转发对方的推文...

Why Did Musk and His Tweets Have to Do This?

The State of Cryptocurrency Valuations in 2025

Key Takeaways In 2025, 85% of new tokens saw their valuations fall below their initial issuance value. The…

Nofx’s Two-Month Journey from Stardom to Scandal: The Open Source Dilemma

Key Takeaways Nofx’s rise and fall in two months highlights inherent challenges in open source projects. A transition…

Trump’s World Liberty Financial Token Ends 2025 Down Over 40%

Key Takeaways World Liberty Financial, a Trump family crypto project, faces substantial losses in 2025. The project initially…

Former SEC Counsel Explains What It Takes to Achieve Compliance in RWA Tokenization

Key Takeaways Shifts in the SEC’s regulatory approach to cryptocurrency are aiding the growth of compliance in Real-World…

Understand Tokenization, Differentiating Between the DTCC Model and the Direct Ownership Model

On one hand, there is the modernization upgrade of the infrastructure, and on the other hand, there is innovation at the ownership level.

Open Source Achilles' Heel: Nofx and Its 9,000-Star Drama, Forking Fiasco, and Open Source Controversy

After the open-source AI trading project Nofx skyrocketed in popularity within two months, a series of issues emerged, including security vulnerabilities, internal team disputes, and an open-source license conflict with COAI, causing it to quickly transform from a star project to a triple crisis scene.

Upcoming Lighter TGE: What Is a Reasonable Valuation? As a finance and blockchain translation expert, you are familiar with the field's slang and terminology.

The $40 billion is the market's answer, $60-70 billion is the reasonable upside supported by fundamentals, and anything beyond that is being primarily driven by catalysts for revaluation rather than normal pricing.

Security Tokenization and Prediction Markets: 7 Major Crypto Boons to Watch in 2026

In 2026, the cryptocurrency market will become more professional and rational, reducing speculative trading activities and focusing more on fundamentals, value accumulation, and compounding.

Aave Yield Distribution Dispute, Solana Surpasses Ethereum in Revenue, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?

In the past 24 hours, what was the most trending topic among the foreigners?