40 Million Token Liquidity Standstill: How Do Project Teams 'Eat' During a Bear Market?

By: blockbeats|2025/03/31 06:45:03
Share
copy
Original Article Title: When Tokens Burn
Original Article Author: @desh_saurabh, Decentralised.Co
Original Article Translation: Deep Tide TechFlow

Zero-Sum Attention Game

In 2021, each cryptocurrency asset had an average of around $1.8 million in stablecoin liquidity. However, by March 2025, this number had plummeted to just $5,500.

40 Million Token Liquidity Standstill: How Do Project Teams 'Eat' During a Bear Market?

This chart visually demonstrates the decline in averages, while also reflecting the zero-sum nature of attention in today's crypto space. Despite the number of tokens skyrocketing to over 40,000 assets, stablecoin liquidity (as a rough measure of capital) has remained stagnant. The result is brutal—less capital per project, weaker communities, and rapidly declining user engagement.

In this environment, fleeting attention is no longer a channel for growth but a burden. Without the support of cash flow, this attention swiftly shifts, showing no mercy.

Income as the Anchor of Development

Most projects still build communities in the same way as they did in 2021: create a Discord channel, offer airdrop incentives, and hope users will "GM" (Good Morning) long enough to generate interest. However, once the airdrop ends, users quickly depart. This outcome is not surprising as they have no reason to stay.

At this point, the role of income becomes apparent—it is not just a financial metric but also a critical proof of project relevance. A product that can generate income implies demand. Demand supports valuation, and valuation, in turn, gives the token gravity.

While income may not be the ultimate goal for every project, without income, most tokens simply cannot survive long enough to become foundational assets.

It is important to note that some projects' positioning is vastly different from other parts of the industry. Take Ethereum, for example; it does not need additional income as it already has a mature and sticky ecosystem. Validator rewards come from an inflation of about 2.8% annually, but with EIP-1559's fee burn mechanism, this inflation can be offset. As long as burn and revenue can balance, ETH holders can avoid dilution risk.

However, for new projects, they do not have such a luxury. When only 20% of the tokens are in circulation and you are still struggling to find product-market fit, you are essentially like a startup. You need to make a profit and prove that you have the ability to sustain profitability in order to survive.

Protocol Lifecycle: From Explorer to Giant

Similar to traditional companies, crypto projects go through different stages of maturity. At each stage, the relationship between the project and revenue—whether to reinvest or distribute revenue—undergoes significant changes.

Explorer: Prioritizing Survival

These are early-stage projects, usually with centralized governance, a fragile ecosystem, and a focus on experimentation rather than monetization. Even if there is revenue, it is often volatile and unsustainable, reflecting more market speculation than user loyalty. Many projects rely on incentives, grants, or venture capital to sustain themselves.

For example, projects like Synthetix and Balancer have been around for about 5 years. Their weekly revenue ranges from $100,000 to $1 million, with occasional spikes during peak activity. This significant volatility is a typical feature of this stage, not a sign of failure but a manifestation of volatility. The key is whether these teams can translate the experiment into a reliable use case.

Climber: Gaining Traction but Still Unstable

Climbers are projects in the advanced stage, with annual revenue between $10 million and $50 million, gradually moving away from a token issuance-driven growth model. Their governance structures are maturing, shifting their focus from mere user acquisition to long-term user retention. Unlike Explorers, Climbers' revenue has already proven demand across different cycles, not solely driven by one-off hype. Additionally, they are undergoing structural evolution—from centralized teams to community-driven governance and diversifying revenue streams.

What sets Climbers apart is their flexibility. They have accumulated enough trust to experiment with revenue distribution—some projects are starting revenue sharing or buyback programs. However, they also face the risk of losing momentum, especially in cases of overexpansion or failure to deepen moats. While Explorers' primary task is survival, Climbers must make strategic trade-offs: choosing between growth and consolidation, revenue distribution or reinvestment, focusing on core business or diversifying.

The vulnerability at this stage is not about volatility, but about the stakes becoming visibly real.

These projects face the toughest decision: if they allocate revenue too early, it could hinder growth; but if they wait too long, token holders may lose interest.

Titans: Ready to Allocate

Projects like Aave, Uniswap, and Hyperliquid have already crossed the threshold. They can generate stable income, have decentralized governance, and benefit from strong network effects. These projects no longer rely on an inflationary tokenomics model, having a solid user base and a market-proven business model.

These titans typically do not try to "do it all." Aave focuses on the lending market, Uniswap leads in spot trading, and Hyperliquid is building an execution-centric DeFi stack. Their strength comes from defensible market positioning and operational discipline.

Most titans are leaders in their respective fields. Their efforts are usually focused on "growing the pie" — driving overall market growth rather than just expanding their own market share.

These projects are the kind that can easily conduct buybacks and still sustain operations for years. While they are not completely immune to volatility, they have enough resilience to cope with market uncertainty.

Seasonal Players: Flashy but Lacking Foundation

Seasonal players are the most prominent yet fragile type. Their revenue may rival or even surpass the titans in a short time, but this revenue is mainly driven by hype, speculation, or short-lived social trends.

For example, projects like FriendTech and PumpFun can create massive engagement and trading volume in a short time, but they rarely can convert these into long-term user retention or sustained business growth.

These projects are not inherently bad. Some may pivot and evolve, but most are merely reliant on short-term games of market momentum rather than building lasting infrastructure.

Lessons from the Public Markets

The public stock market provides a helpful analogy. Young companies usually reinvest free cash flow for scale, while mature companies distribute profits through dividends or stock buybacks.

The chart below illustrates how companies distribute profits. As companies grow, the number of companies engaging in dividends and buybacks increases.

Cryptocurrency projects can learn from each other. Giants should focus on profit distribution, while explorers should emphasize retention and compounding growth. However, not every project clearly identifies which stage it belongs to.

Industry characteristics are also crucial. Projects similar to utilities (e.g., stablecoins) are more like consumer staples: stable and suitable for dividends. This is because these companies have existed for a long time, and demand patterns are largely predictable. Companies often do not deviate from forward-looking guidance or trends. Predictability allows them to consistently share profits with shareholders.

On the other hand, high-growth DeFi projects are more like the tech industry—where a flexible buyback plan is the preferred value distribution method. Tech companies usually experience higher seasonal fluctuations. In most cases, their demand is not as predictable as in some more traditional industries. This unpredictability makes buybacks the preferred way to share value.

If a quarter or year performs exceptionally well? Distribute value through share buybacks.

Comparison of Dividends and Buybacks

Dividends have stickiness. Once a dividend payment is committed, the market expects consistency. In contrast, buybacks are more flexible, allowing teams to adjust the timing of value distribution based on market cycles or when the token is undervalued. From a distribution of around 20% of profits in the 1990s to about 60% in 2024, buybacks have grown rapidly over the past few decades. In dollar terms, the scale of buybacks has exceeded dividends since 1999.

However, buybacks also have some downsides. Improper communication or unreasonable pricing can transfer value from long-term holders to short-term traders. Additionally, governance mechanisms need to be very tight as management typically has key performance indicators (KPIs) such as increasing earnings per share (EPS). When a company buys back shares using profits from outstanding shares, it reduces the denominator, artificially inflating EPS data.

Dividends and buybacks each have their appropriate use cases. However, without proper governance, buybacks can quietly benefit insiders at the community's expense.

Three key elements of a good buyback:

· Strong asset reserve

· Well-thought-out valuation logic

· Transparent reporting mechanism

If a project lacks these conditions, it may still need to be in the reinvestment stage rather than engaging in buybacks or dividends.

Current Revenue Distribution Practices of Leading Projects

@JupiterExchange clearly stated during their token launch that they do not directly share revenue. After achieving a 10x user growth and having enough funds to sustain years of operation, they introduced the "Litterbox Trust" — an escrowless buyback mechanism that currently holds around $9.7 million worth of JUP tokens.

@aave holds over $95 million in asset reserves and through a structured plan called "Buy and Distribute," they allocate $1 million weekly for buybacks. This plan was introduced after months of community dialogue.

@HyperliquidX goes a step further, with 54% of its revenue allocated to buybacks and 46% to liquidity provider incentives (LPs). To date, they have repurchased over $250 million worth of HYPE tokens, all supported by non-venture capital funds.

What do these projects have in common? They all ensure a solid financial foundation before implementing buyback plans.

The Missing Piece: Investor Relations (IR)

The crypto industry often talks about transparency, yet most projects only disclose data when it suits their narrative.

Investor Relations (IR) should be a core infrastructure. Projects need to share not only revenue but also expenses, fund reserves (runway), asset reserve strategy, and buyback execution status. Only then can confidence in long-term development be established.

The goal here is not to claim that a particular value distribution method is the only correct one but to acknowledge that the distribution method should align with the project's maturity. And in the crypto space, truly mature projects are still rare.

Most projects are still finding their footing. But those that get it right — with revenue, strategy, and trust — have the opportunity to become the much-needed "cathedrals" (long-term robust benchmarks) of this industry.

Strong investor relations act as a moat. They can build trust, mitigate panic during market downturns, and sustain ongoing institutional capital participation.

Ideal IR practices may include:

· Quarterly revenue and expense reports

· Real-time asset reserve dashboard

· Public records of buyback execution

· Clear token distribution and unlocking schedule

· On-chain Verification of Grants, Salaries, and Operational Expenses

If we want tokens to be seen as real assets, they need to start communicating more like real companies.

Original Article Link

You may also like

$COIN Joins S&P 500, but Coinbase Isn't Celebrating

On May 13, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced that Coinbase would officially replace Discover Financial Services in the S&P 500 on May 19. While other companies like Block and MicroStrategy, closely tied to Bitcoin, were already part of the S&P 500, Coinbase became the first cryptocurrency exchange whose primary business is in the index. This also signifies that cryptocurrency is gradually moving from the fringes to the mainstream in the U.S.



On the day of the announcement, Coinbase's stock price surged by 23%, surpassing the $250 mark. However, just 3 days later, Coinbase was hit by two consecutive events: a hack where employees were bribed to steal customer data and a demand for a $20 million ransom, and an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the authenticity of its claim of having over 100 million "verified users" in its securities filings and marketing materials. These two events acted as mini-bombs, and at the time of writing, Coinbase's stock had already dropped by over 7.3%.


Coincidentally, Discover Financial Services, being replaced by Coinbase, can also be considered the "Coinbase" of the previous payment era. Discover is a U.S.-based digital banking and payment services company headquartered in Illinois, founded in 1960. Its payment network, Discover Network, is the fourth largest payment network apart from Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.


In April, after the approval of the acquisition of Discover by the sixth-largest U.S. bank, Capital One, this well-established digital banking company of over 60 years smoothly handed over its S&P 500 "seat" to this emerging cryptocurrency "bank." This unexpected coincidence also portrayed the handover between the new and old eras in Coinbase's entry into the S&P 500, resembling a relay race scene. However, this relay baton also brought Coinbase's accumulated "external troubles and internal strife" to a tipping point.


Side Effects of ETFs


Over the past decade, cryptocurrency exchanges have been the most stable "profit machines." They play a role in providing liquidity to the entire industry and rely on trading fees to sustain their operations. However, with the comprehensive rollout of ETF products in the U.S. market, this profit model is facing unprecedented challenges. As the leader in the "American stack," with over 80% of its business coming from the U.S., Coinbase is most affected by this.



Starting from the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, traditional financial capital has significantly onboarded users and funds that originally belonged to exchanges in a more cost-effective, compliant, and transparent manner. The transaction fee revenue of cryptocurrency exchanges has started to decline, and this trend may further intensify in the coming months.


According to Coinbase's 2024 Q4 financial report, the platform's total trading revenue was $417 million, a 45% year-on-year decrease. The contribution of BTC and ETH's trading revenue dropped from 65% in the same period last year to less than 50%.


This decline is not a result of a decrease in market enthusiasm. In fact, since the approval of the Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the inflow of BTC into the U.S. market has continued to reach new highs, with asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity rapidly expanding their management scale. Data shows that BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) alone has surpassed $17 billion in assets under management. As of mid-May 2025, the cumulative net inflow of 11 major institutional Bitcoin spot ETFs on the market has exceeded $41.5 billion, with a total net asset value of $1214.69 billion, accounting for approximately 5.91% of the total Bitcoin market capitalization.


Chart showing the trend of net outflows for Grayscale among the 11 institutions


Institutional investors and some retail investors are shifting towards ETF products, partly due to compliance and tax considerations. On one hand, ETFs have much lower trading costs compared to cryptocurrency exchanges. While Coinbase's spot trading fee rate varies annually in a tiered manner but averages around 1.49%, for example, the management fee for IBIT ETF is only 0.25%, and the majority of ETF institution fees fluctuate around 0.15% to 0.25%.



In other words, the more rational users are, the more likely they are to move from exchanges to ETF products, especially for investors aiming for long-term holdings.


According to multiple sources, several institutions, including VanEck and Grayscale, have submitted applications to the SEC for a Solana (SOL) ETF, with some institutions also planning to submit an XRP ETF proposal. Once approved, this may trigger a new round of fund migration. According to a report submitted by Coinbase to the SEC, as of April, the platform's trading revenue from XRP and Solana accounted for 18% and 10%, nearly one-third of the platform's fee revenue.



However, the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs passed in 2024 also reduced the fees for these two tokens on Coinbase from 30% and 15% to 26% and 10%, respectively. If the SOL and XRP ETFs are approved, it will further undermine the core fee revenue of exchanges like Coinbase.


The expansion of ETF products is gradually weakening the financial intermediary status of cryptocurrency exchanges. From their original roles as matchmakers and clearers to now gradually becoming mere "on-ramps and off-ramps" for funds, exchanges are seeing their marginal value squeezed by ETFs.


Robinhood Takes a Stand, Traditional Brokerages Join the Fray


On May 12, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins gave a keynote speech at the Tokenization and Cryptocurrency Working Group roundtable. The theme of his speech revolved around "It is a new day at the SEC," where he indicated that the SEC would not approach enforcement and regulation the same way as before but would instead pave the way for cryptocurrency assets in the U.S. market.



With signs of cryptocurrency compliance such as the SEC's "NEW DAY" declaration, an increasing number of traditional brokerages are attempting to enter the cryptocurrency industry. One of the most representative cases is the well-known U.S. brokerage Robinhood, which began expanding its crypto business in 2018. By the time of its IPO in 2021, Robinhood's crypto business revenue accounted for over 50% of the company, with a significant boost from the Dogecoin "moonshot" promoted by Musk.


In Q1 2025 earnings report, Robinhood showcased strong growth, especially in revenue from cryptocurrency and options trading. Fueled by Trump's Memecoin, cryptocurrency-related revenue reached $250 million, nearly doubling year-over-year. Consequently, Robinhood Gold subscription users reached 3.5 million, a 90% increase from the previous year, with the rapid growth of Robinhood Gold providing the company with a stable source of income.



Meanwhile, RobinHood is actively pursuing acquisitions in the cryptocurrency space. In 2024, it announced a $2 billion acquisition of the long-standing European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp. Additionally, Canada's largest cryptocurrency CEX, WonderFi, which recently went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also announced its integration with RobinHood Crypto. After obtaining virtual asset licenses in the UK, Canada, Singapore, and other markets, RobinHood has taken a proactive approach in the compliant cryptocurrency trading market.



Furthermore, an increasing number of brokerage firms are exploring the same path. Futu Securities, Tiger Brokers, and others are also dipping their toes into cryptocurrency trading, with some having applied for or obtained the VA license from the Hong Kong SFC. Although their user bases are currently small, traditional brokerages have a natural advantage in user trust, regulatory licenses, and low fee structures. This could pose a threat to native cryptocurrency platforms in the future.



User Data Breach: Is Coinbase Still Secure?


In April 2025, security researchers discovered that some Coinbase user data was leaked on the dark web. While the platform initially responded by attributing it to a "technical misinformation," it still raised concerns among users regarding its security and privacy protection. Just two days before Dow Jones Indexes announced Coinbase's addition to the S&P 500 Index, on May 11, 2025, Coinbase received an email from an unknown threat actor claiming to have obtained customer account information and internal documents, demanding a $20 million ransom to keep the data private. Subsequent investigations confirmed the data breach.


Cybercriminals obtained the data by bribing overseas customer service agents and support staff, mainly in "non-U.S. regions such as India." These agents abused their access to Coinbase's internal customer support system and stole customer data. As early as February this year, blockchain detective ZachXBT revealed on X platform that between December 2024 and January 2025, Coinbase users lost over $65 million to social engineering scams, with the actual amount potentially higher.


Among the victims was a well-known figure, 67-year-old Ed Suman, an established artist in the art world for nearly two decades, having been involved in the creation of artworks such as Jeff Koons' "Balloon Dog" sculpture. Earlier this year, he fell victim to an impersonation scam involving fake Coinbase customer support, resulting in a loss of over $2 million in cryptocurrency. ZachXBT critiqued Coinbase for its inadequate handling of such scams, noting that other major exchanges have not faced similar issues and recommending Coinbase to enhance its security measures.


Amidst a series of ongoing social engineering incidents, although there has not been any impact on user assets at the technical level so far, it has raised concerns among many retail and institutional investors. Especially institutions holding massive assets on Coinbase. Just considering the U.S. BTC ETF institutions, as of mid-May 2025, they collectively hold nearly 840,000 BTC, and 75% of these are custodied by Coinbase. If we price BTC at $100,000, this amount reaches a staggering $63 billion, which is equivalent to the nominal GDP of two Iceland in the year 2024.


Visualization: ChatGPT, Source: Farside


In addition, Coinbase Custody also serves over 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, family offices, pension funds, and endowments. As of the Q1 2025 financial report, Coinbase's total assets under management (including institutional and retail clients) reached $404 billion. The specific amount of institutional custodied assets was not explicitly disclosed in the latest report, but it should still be over 50% based on the Q4 2024 report.


Visualization: ChatGPT


Once this security barrier is breached, not only could the rate of user attrition far exceed expectations, but more importantly, institutional trust in it would undermine the foundation of its business. Therefore, after a hacking event, Coinbase's stock price plummeted significantly.


CEXs are All in Self-Rescue Mode


Facing a decline in spot trading fee revenue, Coinbase is also accelerating its transformation, attempting to find growth opportunities in derivatives and emerging assets. Coinbase acquired a stake in the options platform Deribit at the end of 2024 and announced the official launch of perpetual contract products in 2025. This acquisition fills in Coinbase's gap in options trading and its relatively small global market share.



Deribit has a strong presence in non-U.S. markets, especially in Asia and Europe. The acquisition has enabled Coinbase to gain a dominant position in bitcoin and ethereum options trading on Deribit, accounting for approximately 80% of the global options trading volume, with daily trading volume remaining above $2 billion.


Meanwhile, 80-90% of Deribit's customer base consists of institutional investors, with their professionalism and liquidity in the Bitcoin and Ethereum options market highly favored by institutions. Coinbase's compliance advantage, coupled with its already robust institutional ecosystem, makes it even more suitable. By using institutions as an entry point, it can face the squeeze from giants like Binance and OKX in the derivatives market.



Facing a similar dilemma is Kraken, which is attempting to replicate Binance Futures' model in non-U.S. markets. Since the derivatives market relies more on professional users, fee rates are relatively higher and stickiness is stronger, making it a significant source of revenue for exchanges. In the first half of 2025, Kraken completed the acquisition of TradeStation Crypto and a futures exchange, aiming to build a complete derivatives trading ecosystem to hedge the risk of declining spot transaction fee income.


With the surge of Memecoin in 2024, Binance, OKX, and various CEX platforms began massively listing small-market-cap, highly volatile tokens to activate active trading users. Due to the wealth effect and trading activity of Memecoins, Coinbase was also forced to join the battle, successively listing popular tokens from the Solana ecosystem such as BOOK OF MEME and Dogwifhat. Although these coins are controversial, they are frequently traded, with fee rates several times higher than mainstream coins, serving as a "blood-boosting" method for spot trading.


However, due to its status as a publicly traded company, this practice is a riskier endeavor for Coinbase. Even in the current crypto-friendly environment, the SEC is still investigating whether tokens like SOL, ADA, and SAND constitute securities.


In addition to the forced transformation strategies carried out by the aforementioned CEXs, they are also starting to lay out RWAs and the most talked-about stablecoin payment fields, such as the PYUSD launched through a collaboration between Coinbase and Paypal, Coinbase's support for the Euro stablecoin EURC by Circle that complies with EU MiCA regulatory requirements, or the USD1 launched through a collaboration between Binance and WIFL. In the increasingly crowded trading field, many CEXs have shifted their focus from just the trading market to the application field.


The golden age of transaction fees has quietly ended, and the second half of the crypto exchange platform game has silently begun.


Arthur Hayes: Why I'm Betting on ETH While the Market Is Obsessed with SOL

"I personally have also allocated 20% to gold, expecting the price of gold to potentially rise to $10,000-20,000 by the end of this market cycle."

CryptoPunks Changes Hands Twice, Did the Originator of NFTs Finally Find Its "Forever Home" This Time?

The original NFT pioneer CryptoPunks has once again officially changed ownership after being sold to the Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) developer Yuga Labs.

After Surging 40%, Has Ethereum Price Peaked Upon Exiting the Craze?

Whether you are an insider or an outsider, these days you must be familiar with the news about Ethereum. The reason is simple, causing Ethereum enthusiasts to sigh with emotion and almost throwing off-guard those who defend Ethereum, Ethereum, with a "3-day surge of 40%," climbed to the top of the Douyin Hot List.



Where Does the Rally Come From?


As we all know, Ethereum launched the Pectra upgrade on May 7th. This most significant network upgrade since early 2024 integrates the Prague execution layer hard fork and the Electra consensus layer upgrade, significantly improving Ethereum's performance through 11 improvement proposals. The account abstraction feature (EIP-7702) allows users to flexibly manage wallets through social media accounts or multi-signature schemes, reducing the user threshold, attracting more users and developers. The staking mechanism optimization increases the validator ETH cap from 32ETH to 2048ETH and introduces a flexible withdrawal method, making it easier for institutions and individuals to participate in network security, enhancing the market's confidence in Ethereum's long-term value.


At the same time, Pectra optimized the interaction efficiency of Layer 2 networks such as Arbitrum and Optimism, making transactions faster and cheaper, leading to a surge in on-chain activity. As a crucial step for Ethereum's transition from "2G" to "5G," the Pectra upgrade not only enhances network vitality but also "recharges confidence" in the market, directly driving the price increase.



Related Reading: "Ethereum Skyrockets 22% in One Day, E Enthusiasts Rejoice"


It's not just Ethereum itself, as Wall Street also brought important bullish news.


The world's largest asset management company, BlackRock, proposed to the SEC allowing Ethereum ETFs for staking. This proposal is expected to elevate Ethereum ETFs from a mere investment tool to a bond-like "interest-bearing asset," bringing investors both capital appreciation and passive income, igniting market optimism about Ethereum's future potential.



Specifically, BlackRock has proposed to amend its S-1 filing to allow investors to create and redeem ETF shares directly with Ethereum instead of the U.S. dollar (i.e., in-kind redemption). This move, combined with its $2.9 billion BUIDL Fund launched in March 2024, aims to deepen the integration of traditional finance with blockchain. The BUIDL Fund is a tokenized fund operating on the Ethereum network, investing in traditional assets such as U.S. Treasury bonds. This setup is highly attractive to institutional investors, as they can not only benefit from Ethereum's price appreciation but also earn stable cash flow through staking.


Robert Mitchnick, BlackRock's Head of Digital Assets, stated in a CNBC interview in March 2025 that the addition of staking functionality will significantly enhance the appeal of the Ethereum ETF. He admitted that when the Ethereum spot ETF was launched in July 2024 without staking functionality, the market demand was lackluster, and staking could be the key to reversing this trend.


Meanwhile, the SEC's shifting stance on cryptocurrency regulation has also fueled this upward trend. During the tenure of the previous SEC chairman, the regulatory approach was tough, and staking was strictly viewed through the Howey test as a potential unregistered security. Therefore, when approving the Ethereum spot ETF in May 2024, staking functionality was explicitly prohibited.


However, with Trump back in the White House and Paul Atkins taking over the SEC, there has been a noticeable relaxation in crypto regulation. Apart from BlackRock, ETF issuers such as Invesco Galaxy, VanEck, WisdomTree, and 21Shares have also submitted applications for similar staking and in-kind redemption.


Related reading: "New Chairman Takes Office, SEC Transforms into 'Crypto Daddy' Within 48 Hours"


If staking ETFs are approved, the benefits are likely to go beyond price appreciation. The introduction of staking functionality could redefine the role of crypto assets, making them more similar to traditional financial products that provide returns and value appreciation, thereby driving Ethereum closer to mainstream finance.


Currently, the SEC still needs to address several decisions related to crypto ETFs, including whether to approve ETFs for Solana, XRP, Litecoin, and even Dogecoin. With the calls for an "altcoin season" growing louder, Ethereum's strong performance may just be the beginning of a larger crypto market frenzy.


In addition, the Trump family-related DeFi project WLFI is also bullish on this wave of rise, with frequent on-chain activities. According to on-chain data analyst @ai_9684xtpa's monitoring, a WLFI-related address is currently borrowing coins to go long on ETH, borrowing 4 million U from Aave to buy 1590 ETH at an average price of $2515 per ETH.


Has Ethereum's Price Peaked in This Wave?


For this epic surge of Ethereum after half a year of silence, the community has indeed gained more confidence and hope, which has also led to a revival of the entire altcoin market. However, amidst the joy, there are also voices of pessimism. Below is a summary conducted by BlockBeats based on community discussions.


The optimists point out that the current market structure is similar to the eve of the bull markets in 2016 and 2020, predicting a life-changing surge in the next 3-6 months, where some altcoins may even achieve astonishing single-day gains of up to 40%.


@liuwei16602825 stated that this surge signifies the return of the bull market as a sure thing. There is no need to worry about a pullback. The driving force behind the surge uses a high-cost isolated operation, fearing a drop more than any retail investor and will definitely do everything to support the price.


Related Reading: "Ethereum Leads the Surge Triggering the 'Altcoin Season' Speculation, How Do Traders View the Future Market?"


The bears mainly believe that this surge is different from the bull market of 2021, as the current market lacks the confidence of large-scale retail investors entering and holding positions for the long term, with funds rotating too quickly.


@market_beggar observed that a Bitfinex E/B whale has started to close positions and believes that if this whale maintains its high-speed position-closing operation for the next few days, it can be inferred that the whale no longer sees the upside potential of ETH, preparing to take profits and exit. The closing time will be a key focus going forward.



@FLS_OTC stated that there are still many uncertainties at the macro level, and the liquidity cannot support a major bull market. At this stage, it is a "last hurrah," not a complete reversal, and will continue to remain in a short position.


@off_thetarget believes that after ETH transitioned from POW to POS, it lost the "gold standard" of mining machine power cost support. The staking economic model led to a breakdown in value anchoring. Additionally, the L2 ecosystem (such as Starknet, zkSync, etc.) suffered from liquidity fragmentation, failing to establish an effective capital inflow mechanism, causing the collapse of the split disc pattern. Furthermore, the ETH community's excessive pursuit of technical narratives divorced from real-world needs resulted in a weak ecosystem growth. Therefore, he believes that ETH's intrinsic value system has crumbled, and the price is bound to plummet to the 800-1200 range, with a decisive short position at 1800.


@Airdrop_Guard, based on the core logic of the "High Probability Trading Strategy," where three sets of underlying logic different trading systems (such as volume depletion, price supply-demand, long/short position funding rate, etc.) simultaneously issue a short signal at the same point (2580), creating a high-probability trading opportunity. He emphasizes that these systems must be based on different algorithms and logics (rather than mere technical indicator overlays). The current ETH trend aligns with the short conditions in multiple independent dimensions of his trading system, hence the decision to short.


Overall, Bitcoin still maintains over 54% market dominance, and institutional funds' continued preference for it may limit the altcoin's upward potential. The market's future direction will depend on multiple factors, such as Bitcoin's price trend, global macroeconomic conditions, and whether funds can effectively rotate from Bitcoin to the altcoin sector.


Although Ethereum's recent leadership in the market has brought about optimistic sentiment, investors still need to remain rational as different sectors of altcoins are likely to show divergence in trends. Whether this round of Ethereum's rise will usher in a true altcoin frenzy may require more time and conducive conditions.


How to Get Rich in Crypto Without Relying on Luck? Financial Veteran Raoul Pal's Macro Insights and Investment Path

2008 Financial Crisis "Oracle" Raoul Pal on Cryptocurrency, Resilient Wealth, and Macro Insights.

After CEX and Wallet, OKX enters the payment game

「Road to the Next Billion Users」. — OKX CEO Star

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more