Sui Q1 Advanced Report: The Rise of BTCfi Infrastructure, the Boom of Lending Protocols, and the Future of Rollup-Based Scalability

By: blockbeats|2025/04/30 06:05:19
Share
copy
Original Title: Sui's Q1 Wrapped: BitcoinFi, MEV, and Scaling
Original Author: Delphi Digital
Original Translation: Glendon, Techub News

Since Delphi Digital's last in-depth exploration of Sui's architecture, ecosystem, and tokenomics, the network has completed a series of key upgrades in its infrastructure and application stack. In this follow-up report, we will analyze the ecosystem's key developments, including the build-out of Bitcoin Finance (BTCfi) infrastructure, the growth trajectory of the lending protocol Suilend, and the expansion of Aftermath Finance's footprint.

In terms of infrastructure, the launch of Mysticeti v2 introduced a "Fast Path" for low-fee transactions, significantly reducing latency and rebalancing validator workloads. Meanwhile, Move VM 2.0 achieved significant execution improvements through advanced composability, region-based memory management, modular architecture, and enhanced features designed to support more complex and dynamic on-chain logic.

Simultaneously, Sui's scaling roadmap has continued to evolve with the advancement of Pilotfish execution sharding to achieve true horizontal scalability and flexible validator configurations. These improvements in Sui were further reinforced by implementing localized object-based fee markets and MEV-aware optimizations (including priority transaction inclusion and consensus block ordering).

Ecosystem Updates

DEX trading volume on Sui has decreased from the previous quarter's peak, but it can be observed that following the launch of the WAL token of the decentralized storage protocol Walrus on March 27, trading volume has seen an increase.

Sui Q1 Advanced Report: The Rise of BTCfi Infrastructure, the Boom of Lending Protocols, and the Future of Rollup-Based Scalability

BTCfi on Sui

BTCfi has recently emerged as a niche market on Sui, bringing lending, staking, and yield basics to Bitcoin, traditionally seen as passive collateral. According to DeFiLlama, the total value locked (TVL) in the BTCfi space has grown from less than $100 million to over $4.5 billion, covering various assets such as re-collateralization, anchoring, and decentralized BTC.

By the end of 2024, Sui announced a partnership with Babylon Labs and Lombard Protocol to introduce native BTC staking through LBTC. LBTC is a liquidity staking token minted directly by Lombard on the Sui and Cubist platforms, aimed at assisting users with deposit, minting, cross-chain, and staking management. Several weeks later, in December 2024, Sailayer collaborated with LBTC and WBTC to launch a BTC re-staking opportunity for LBTC and WBTC. Prior to this, the Lorenzo Protocol had introduced stBTC on Sui, a Babylon-driven liquidity staking token designed to aggregate BTC yields and integrate with DeFi protocols like Cetus and Navi. In early February 2025, Sui Bridge added support for wrapped BTC assets such as WBTC and LBTC, with over 587 BTC flowing into the Sui DeFi platform since then.

So far, over $111 million worth of wrapped BTC has been deposited into Sui-native protocols such as Suilend, Navi, and Cetus.

DeFi Protocols on Sui

Suilend

Suilend is a lending protocol in the Sui ecosystem, and within less than a year of operation, its annualized revenue reached $15 million in February 2024, with 70% flowing into the SEND treasury. The treasury initially received 1.2 million SUI from the "mdrop."

Suilend also introduced an Automated Market Maker (AMM) called Steamm, featuring an integrated money market component designed to maximize capital efficiency by depositing idle liquidity into the lending market. The protocol has a composable architecture supporting various pricing systems, including constant product pricing, stablecoin-centric pricing, and market volatility-based dynamic fee pricing. By allowing idle funds to earn yield in the lending market while remaining available for trading, Steamm enhances capital efficiency and provides additional returns to liquidity providers through its bToken mechanism.

Aftermath

MetaStables, incubated by Aftermath on Sui, serves as a treasury system that allows users to deposit cross-chain or native assets to mint stablecoins such as mUSD (pegged to the US dollar) and mETH (pegged to ETH), with plans to introduce meta-tokens like mBTC in the future. It facilitates slippage-free trading between treasury assets based on oracle-provided exchange rates (e.g., Pyth), avoiding the inefficiencies of AMM slippage and supporting lending of deposited assets to boost returns. MetaStables aims to address liquidity fragmentation by promoting meta-tokens and enabling users to earn mPOINTS.

In addition to MetaStables, Aftermath has also launched Perp DEX on the testnet, which is a fully Sui-native on-chain perpetual contract order book.

Walrus Goes Live

The decentralized storage protocol Walrus launched its mainnet on March 27, 2025, and completed a $140 million funding round led by Standardcrypto.

Walrus is a decentralized storage network built on Sui designed to store various types of data, from NFT assets and AI model weights to blockchain archives and website content. It can also serve as a data availability layer for rollups, similar to Celestia or EigenDA. While Walrus leverages Sui for metadata and governance, it delegates storage tasks to a set of separate nodes, thus avoiding the overhead of Sui validators.

At the core of Walrus is Red Stuff, a two-dimensional encoding protocol that enables efficient single-file encoding with robust data recovery capabilities. The system is secured through a staking-based WAL token incentive model, where nodes are rewarded for uptime and correct data handling and punished for failures or malicious behavior. The breakdown of the WAL tokenomics is as follows:

· Community Reserve: 43%

· Core Contributors: 30%

· Walrus User Airdrop: 10%

· Grants: 10%

· Investors: 7%

Technical Updates

Sui Core Development Project

Mysticeti V2 Update

Delphi Digital previously detailed Mysticeti v1 in the report "Sui Network: Unveiling the Mysterious Competitor." It eliminated the need for block validation by embedding submission rules directly into the DAG structure. This theoretically reduced the consensus latency of each block to as low as three message rounds, bringing Sui's consensus delay down from around 1900 milliseconds (Bullshark testnet) to about 390 milliseconds. Additionally, requiring only one signature per block reduced validator CPU load, increasing execution throughput and response speed.

The Mysticeti-FPC (v2) is an extension of Mysticeti-C (v1) that introduces a "Fast Path" for transactions that do not require full consensus, particularly useful for common scenarios such as token transfers or NFT minting, which only involve assets owned by a single address. Mysticeti-FPC does not operate as a standalone protocol (e.g., FastPay or Sui Lutris), but embeds the Fast Path logic into the same DAG, avoiding additional message passing, redundant cryptographic operations, and post-consensus checkpoints.

Move VM 2.0 Enhancements

Sui's Move VM v2 is a foundational optimization focused on execution efficiency and system composability. Core improvements include Arena Allocation, Package Caching, and Low Lock Contention, aimed at reducing latency under load. With cross-package pointer references (including system-level access), internal call speeds have seen significant improvement.

Additionally, this virtual machine has introduced a multi-stage abstract syntax tree (AST) for validation, optimization, and execution, as well as linking logic for cross-package virtual table resolution and updates to simplify modular development. Early benchmark tests have shown speedups ranging from 30% to 65% across various execution paths. This will enable Sui to expand into more complex, high-throughput use cases leveraging Move VM v2.

Execution Sharding with PilotFish

PilotFish is a horizontally scalable execution engine that overcomes the bottleneck of Sui's original single-machine execution model. Traditionally, Sui validators were monolithic, processing consensus, data retrieval, and state execution on a single machine, limited by vertical scaling constraints in compute, memory, and storage.

PilotFish decomposes this monolith into three distinct layers:

· Primary: Central coordinator handling transaction ordering and consensus;

· SequencingWorkers (SWs): Scalable nodes responsible for transaction extraction and routing;

· ExecutionWorkers (EWs): Horizontally distributed machines storing fragments of on-chain state and performing actual execution.

Pilotfish Sharding Workload Distribution:

· Each transaction is routed to a specific sequencer.

· Each on-chain object (i.e., state) is mapped to a specific executor.

Transactions needing access to objects across multiple shards are resolved through coordinated data exchange, which is a pull-based model where executors request remote state on demand. This maintains consistency without sacrificing parallel execution and closely integrates with Sui's lazy consensus design, which achieves consensus based on batched metadata rather than full transaction data.

This can achieve parallelism without shared memory, allowing computationally intensive workloads to linearly scale with available hardware. Benchmark testing shows that Pilotfish achieves up to a 10x throughput improvement using 8 EWs compared to a baseline execution engine.

Horizontal scaling paves the way for true resiliency in validator infrastructure. Unlike vertical scaling, which is constrained by hardware costs and configuration latency, horizontal scaling allows validators to elastically spin up commodity servers (such as 32-core servers on AWS or GCP) to meet demand spikes. If traffic persists, validators can migrate to more cost-effective bare-metal servers.

Its impact has three aspects:

· Validator operations become hardware-agnostic: no need for special high-end configurations;

· Infrastructure configuration becomes elastic and programmatic: automatically scales based on demand;

· Design space opens up new possibilities for Sui-native innovation, such as a package-specific fee market or priority queue, innovations achieved by Sui's object-centric state model.

This will make Sui one of the few environments capable of absorbing consumer-grade transaction throughput without increasing centralization or affecting latency.

Implementing an Object-Based Local Fee Market

Sui employs a multi-dimensional Gas pricing mechanism, dividing fees into two primary parts: computation fees and storage fees. So, how does Sui's local fee market operate in the Sui object environment?

Sui has implemented an Object-Based local fee market mechanism, which, unlike Ethereum, is more similar to Solana's fee structure. Sui sets fees based on specific requirements related to individual objects or assets. Each asset or application on Sui has an independent fee market, enabling local adjustments without impacting the entire network.

On the other hand, Ethereum operates a unified global fee market where each transaction contributes to overall network congestion, causing fees to rise across the chain during periods of increased demand. Similarly, Solana employs a localized fee market system, adjusting fees around specific contentious state objects or accounts.

Sui further extends this localization concept by directly associating fees with an "object" rather than "state." By linking fees to specific objects, Sui can process transactions involving different assets in parallel, avoiding fee interactions or congestion overflow. This isolation means that even if other applications on Sui are highly active, new applications can also achieve a high level of activity. For example, a popular trading pair on a DEX can independently adjust fees based on its own demand. As a result, Sui's object-level granularity in the localized fee market is more equitable for its user base and more efficient for its developer community.

Canonical Balance Accumulators

Sui's "Canonical Balance Accumulators" are designed based on objects, where balances are Move objects on the chain. These objects are not abstract concepts within contracts but independent, verifiable state objects. This setup achieves transaction-level parallelism as execution relies solely on access to specific objects rather than shared global storage.

Ethereum uses a centralized mapping in ERC-20 contracts to track balances. Each transfer triggers shared state, hindering parallelism and binding composability with contract-specific logic. Each token has its own implementation, often leading to integration edge cases.

On the other hand, Solana handles balances through token accounts, aiding in parallel execution. However, developers need to predefine all accounts for each transaction, creating resistance to building modular systems and limiting flexibility under dynamic conditions.

Sui simplifies this process. Standardized balance objects and managers like "BalanceManager" provide a clear way for the protocol to track and modify balances without holding state. Execution is horizontally scalable by default, with balance logic portable across modules without needing to wrap it in custom interfaces. Building and unlocking with object-level fee markets, isolation, and composability will be clearer without coordination overhead.

Multisignature Account Implementation

Sui's multisignature implementation is based on a weighted k-of-n signature model. Each signer is assigned a weight, and when the sum of all weights reaches or exceeds a preset threshold, the transaction is executed. This allows for flexible signature strategies, such as requiring 2 out of 3 signers or enforcing one key to always be signed together with other keys to achieve a setup similar to two-factor authentication (2FA).

The uniqueness of the Sui method lies in its support for using a heterogeneous key scheme within the same multisig. Users can mix Ed25519, secp256k1, and secp256r1 keys in a single authentication object, enabling more composable wallet and custody designs without the need for specialized tools.

Unlike threshold signatures that aggregate approvals into a single opaque signature, Sui's multisig exposes which keys signed which approvals. This enhances auditability and cross-party coordination without the need for complex multiparty computation (MPC) setups. Therefore, it is easier to reason about, easier to rotate participants, and natively compatible with the Sui transaction model.

MEV Developments on Sui

Priority Transaction Submission

At an execution level, Sui resolves conflicts on shared objects through a gas-based prioritization mechanism. Priority Gas Auctions (PGAs) serve as the primary coordination layer. As Sui's execution is object-centric and transactions modifying the same object must be serialized, PGAs act as a congestion pricing mechanism, particularly useful in object hotspots or DEX volatility.

SIP-19 introduced a soft bundling mechanism, submitting off-chain aggregated transaction groups as a unit. This enables reverse auctions (e.g., through Shio) where searchers can bid to have their transactions included in bundles with a high probability of execution.

SIP-45 introduced consensus amplification. Transactions with gas prices above kx RGP will be submitted multiple times by different validators, effectively amplifying their presence in consensus. This reduces fluctuations caused by validator asynchrony or leader rotations, ensuring the gas price accurately reflects inclusion priority, thereby curbing spam and improving fairness.

Mysticeti Block Streaming

One of the most intriguing upgrades Sui is undergoing is Block Streaming. Full nodes will be able to subscribe directly to consensus blocks, allowing access to pending transactions with a latency of less than 200 milliseconds before finality, reducing the on-chain searcher advantage and democratizing MEV opportunity capture.

Unlike off-chain relays, it is permissionless and open. It also provides a deterministic view of transaction ordering for third-party nodes, enabling speculative execution, arbitrage, and reentrancy logic to operate nearly in real-time.

Time-lock encryption is in the works to assist Sui in combating harmful MEV, and an MEV revenue distribution model is also being explored. Incentives will benefit validators, applications, and users, not just searchers.

DevX Update

Sui has seen some improvements in DevX. Move Registry has enhanced dependency management by introducing on-chain package naming and versioned imports, eliminating address-based fragile links. Key frameworks and libraries are being open-sourced with registry support, enabling developers to securely develop and upgrade applications. Additionally, Sui also features Programmable Transaction Blocks (PTB) replay and Move tracing capabilities to provide deep debugging support, allowing developers to step through transaction execution and precisely pinpoint fault states in multi-call processes.

Conclusion

Sui had several highlights in the last quarter. Both Mysticeti v2 and Pilotfish are not just regular upgrades; they will change how Sui handles transactions under load and how validators operate their infrastructure. Move VM 2.0 has also brought many improvements for developers building modular applications. These enhancements collectively propel Sui towards being able to truly support high-frequency use cases without adding coordination overhead.

In terms of the ecosystem, BTCfi is evidently becoming a wedge and may be favored by institutions. Protocols like Suilend and Aftermath are exploring new primitives that are natively compatible with the Sui architecture, such as object-based stablecoins, AMM lending pools, meta-tokens, and more. The interesting part now is observing how the fee market performs during demand spikes, whether MEV tools like soft bundling or block streaming will be adopted by searchers, and how infrastructure like Pilotfish will change validator economics in practice.

Additionally, Delphi Digital has observed an increase in institutional interest, with Canary Capital submitting an application for the Canary SUI ETF in the first quarter. Earlier reports indicated the involvement of financial institutions such as Grayscale, Franklin Templeton, VanEck, Libre, and Ant Group, all launching related investment products on the Sui network, ranging from tokenized funds to Exchange-Traded Notes (ETNs).

Original Article Link

You may also like

a16z Leads $18M Seed Round for Catena Labs, Crypto Industry Bets on Stablecoin AI Payment

Traditional finance is still stuck in a "human-to-human" model, while Catena aims to achieve "AI-to-AI" interaction.

Pharos, deeply integrated with AntChain, is about to launch. How can we get involved?

What is the relationship between the $8 million funded NewChain and Ant, and how will they interact?

$COIN Joins S&P 500, but Coinbase Isn't Celebrating

On May 13, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced that Coinbase would officially replace Discover Financial Services in the S&P 500 on May 19. While other companies like Block and MicroStrategy, closely tied to Bitcoin, were already part of the S&P 500, Coinbase became the first cryptocurrency exchange whose primary business is in the index. This also signifies that cryptocurrency is gradually moving from the fringes to the mainstream in the U.S.



On the day of the announcement, Coinbase's stock price surged by 23%, surpassing the $250 mark. However, just 3 days later, Coinbase was hit by two consecutive events: a hack where employees were bribed to steal customer data and a demand for a $20 million ransom, and an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the authenticity of its claim of having over 100 million "verified users" in its securities filings and marketing materials. These two events acted as mini-bombs, and at the time of writing, Coinbase's stock had already dropped by over 7.3%.


Coincidentally, Discover Financial Services, being replaced by Coinbase, can also be considered the "Coinbase" of the previous payment era. Discover is a U.S.-based digital banking and payment services company headquartered in Illinois, founded in 1960. Its payment network, Discover Network, is the fourth largest payment network apart from Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.


In April, after the approval of the acquisition of Discover by the sixth-largest U.S. bank, Capital One, this well-established digital banking company of over 60 years smoothly handed over its S&P 500 "seat" to this emerging cryptocurrency "bank." This unexpected coincidence also portrayed the handover between the new and old eras in Coinbase's entry into the S&P 500, resembling a relay race scene. However, this relay baton also brought Coinbase's accumulated "external troubles and internal strife" to a tipping point.


Side Effects of ETFs


Over the past decade, cryptocurrency exchanges have been the most stable "profit machines." They play a role in providing liquidity to the entire industry and rely on trading fees to sustain their operations. However, with the comprehensive rollout of ETF products in the U.S. market, this profit model is facing unprecedented challenges. As the leader in the "American stack," with over 80% of its business coming from the U.S., Coinbase is most affected by this.



Starting from the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, traditional financial capital has significantly onboarded users and funds that originally belonged to exchanges in a more cost-effective, compliant, and transparent manner. The transaction fee revenue of cryptocurrency exchanges has started to decline, and this trend may further intensify in the coming months.


According to Coinbase's 2024 Q4 financial report, the platform's total trading revenue was $417 million, a 45% year-on-year decrease. The contribution of BTC and ETH's trading revenue dropped from 65% in the same period last year to less than 50%.


This decline is not a result of a decrease in market enthusiasm. In fact, since the approval of the Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the inflow of BTC into the U.S. market has continued to reach new highs, with asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity rapidly expanding their management scale. Data shows that BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) alone has surpassed $17 billion in assets under management. As of mid-May 2025, the cumulative net inflow of 11 major institutional Bitcoin spot ETFs on the market has exceeded $41.5 billion, with a total net asset value of $1214.69 billion, accounting for approximately 5.91% of the total Bitcoin market capitalization.


Chart showing the trend of net outflows for Grayscale among the 11 institutions


Institutional investors and some retail investors are shifting towards ETF products, partly due to compliance and tax considerations. On one hand, ETFs have much lower trading costs compared to cryptocurrency exchanges. While Coinbase's spot trading fee rate varies annually in a tiered manner but averages around 1.49%, for example, the management fee for IBIT ETF is only 0.25%, and the majority of ETF institution fees fluctuate around 0.15% to 0.25%.



In other words, the more rational users are, the more likely they are to move from exchanges to ETF products, especially for investors aiming for long-term holdings.


According to multiple sources, several institutions, including VanEck and Grayscale, have submitted applications to the SEC for a Solana (SOL) ETF, with some institutions also planning to submit an XRP ETF proposal. Once approved, this may trigger a new round of fund migration. According to a report submitted by Coinbase to the SEC, as of April, the platform's trading revenue from XRP and Solana accounted for 18% and 10%, nearly one-third of the platform's fee revenue.



However, the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs passed in 2024 also reduced the fees for these two tokens on Coinbase from 30% and 15% to 26% and 10%, respectively. If the SOL and XRP ETFs are approved, it will further undermine the core fee revenue of exchanges like Coinbase.


The expansion of ETF products is gradually weakening the financial intermediary status of cryptocurrency exchanges. From their original roles as matchmakers and clearers to now gradually becoming mere "on-ramps and off-ramps" for funds, exchanges are seeing their marginal value squeezed by ETFs.


Robinhood Takes a Stand, Traditional Brokerages Join the Fray


On May 12, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins gave a keynote speech at the Tokenization and Cryptocurrency Working Group roundtable. The theme of his speech revolved around "It is a new day at the SEC," where he indicated that the SEC would not approach enforcement and regulation the same way as before but would instead pave the way for cryptocurrency assets in the U.S. market.



With signs of cryptocurrency compliance such as the SEC's "NEW DAY" declaration, an increasing number of traditional brokerages are attempting to enter the cryptocurrency industry. One of the most representative cases is the well-known U.S. brokerage Robinhood, which began expanding its crypto business in 2018. By the time of its IPO in 2021, Robinhood's crypto business revenue accounted for over 50% of the company, with a significant boost from the Dogecoin "moonshot" promoted by Musk.


In Q1 2025 earnings report, Robinhood showcased strong growth, especially in revenue from cryptocurrency and options trading. Fueled by Trump's Memecoin, cryptocurrency-related revenue reached $250 million, nearly doubling year-over-year. Consequently, Robinhood Gold subscription users reached 3.5 million, a 90% increase from the previous year, with the rapid growth of Robinhood Gold providing the company with a stable source of income.



Meanwhile, RobinHood is actively pursuing acquisitions in the cryptocurrency space. In 2024, it announced a $2 billion acquisition of the long-standing European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp. Additionally, Canada's largest cryptocurrency CEX, WonderFi, which recently went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also announced its integration with RobinHood Crypto. After obtaining virtual asset licenses in the UK, Canada, Singapore, and other markets, RobinHood has taken a proactive approach in the compliant cryptocurrency trading market.



Furthermore, an increasing number of brokerage firms are exploring the same path. Futu Securities, Tiger Brokers, and others are also dipping their toes into cryptocurrency trading, with some having applied for or obtained the VA license from the Hong Kong SFC. Although their user bases are currently small, traditional brokerages have a natural advantage in user trust, regulatory licenses, and low fee structures. This could pose a threat to native cryptocurrency platforms in the future.



User Data Breach: Is Coinbase Still Secure?


In April 2025, security researchers discovered that some Coinbase user data was leaked on the dark web. While the platform initially responded by attributing it to a "technical misinformation," it still raised concerns among users regarding its security and privacy protection. Just two days before Dow Jones Indexes announced Coinbase's addition to the S&P 500 Index, on May 11, 2025, Coinbase received an email from an unknown threat actor claiming to have obtained customer account information and internal documents, demanding a $20 million ransom to keep the data private. Subsequent investigations confirmed the data breach.


Cybercriminals obtained the data by bribing overseas customer service agents and support staff, mainly in "non-U.S. regions such as India." These agents abused their access to Coinbase's internal customer support system and stole customer data. As early as February this year, blockchain detective ZachXBT revealed on X platform that between December 2024 and January 2025, Coinbase users lost over $65 million to social engineering scams, with the actual amount potentially higher.


Among the victims was a well-known figure, 67-year-old Ed Suman, an established artist in the art world for nearly two decades, having been involved in the creation of artworks such as Jeff Koons' "Balloon Dog" sculpture. Earlier this year, he fell victim to an impersonation scam involving fake Coinbase customer support, resulting in a loss of over $2 million in cryptocurrency. ZachXBT critiqued Coinbase for its inadequate handling of such scams, noting that other major exchanges have not faced similar issues and recommending Coinbase to enhance its security measures.


Amidst a series of ongoing social engineering incidents, although there has not been any impact on user assets at the technical level so far, it has raised concerns among many retail and institutional investors. Especially institutions holding massive assets on Coinbase. Just considering the U.S. BTC ETF institutions, as of mid-May 2025, they collectively hold nearly 840,000 BTC, and 75% of these are custodied by Coinbase. If we price BTC at $100,000, this amount reaches a staggering $63 billion, which is equivalent to the nominal GDP of two Iceland in the year 2024.


Visualization: ChatGPT, Source: Farside


In addition, Coinbase Custody also serves over 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, family offices, pension funds, and endowments. As of the Q1 2025 financial report, Coinbase's total assets under management (including institutional and retail clients) reached $404 billion. The specific amount of institutional custodied assets was not explicitly disclosed in the latest report, but it should still be over 50% based on the Q4 2024 report.


Visualization: ChatGPT


Once this security barrier is breached, not only could the rate of user attrition far exceed expectations, but more importantly, institutional trust in it would undermine the foundation of its business. Therefore, after a hacking event, Coinbase's stock price plummeted significantly.


CEXs are All in Self-Rescue Mode


Facing a decline in spot trading fee revenue, Coinbase is also accelerating its transformation, attempting to find growth opportunities in derivatives and emerging assets. Coinbase acquired a stake in the options platform Deribit at the end of 2024 and announced the official launch of perpetual contract products in 2025. This acquisition fills in Coinbase's gap in options trading and its relatively small global market share.



Deribit has a strong presence in non-U.S. markets, especially in Asia and Europe. The acquisition has enabled Coinbase to gain a dominant position in bitcoin and ethereum options trading on Deribit, accounting for approximately 80% of the global options trading volume, with daily trading volume remaining above $2 billion.


Meanwhile, 80-90% of Deribit's customer base consists of institutional investors, with their professionalism and liquidity in the Bitcoin and Ethereum options market highly favored by institutions. Coinbase's compliance advantage, coupled with its already robust institutional ecosystem, makes it even more suitable. By using institutions as an entry point, it can face the squeeze from giants like Binance and OKX in the derivatives market.



Facing a similar dilemma is Kraken, which is attempting to replicate Binance Futures' model in non-U.S. markets. Since the derivatives market relies more on professional users, fee rates are relatively higher and stickiness is stronger, making it a significant source of revenue for exchanges. In the first half of 2025, Kraken completed the acquisition of TradeStation Crypto and a futures exchange, aiming to build a complete derivatives trading ecosystem to hedge the risk of declining spot transaction fee income.


With the surge of Memecoin in 2024, Binance, OKX, and various CEX platforms began massively listing small-market-cap, highly volatile tokens to activate active trading users. Due to the wealth effect and trading activity of Memecoins, Coinbase was also forced to join the battle, successively listing popular tokens from the Solana ecosystem such as BOOK OF MEME and Dogwifhat. Although these coins are controversial, they are frequently traded, with fee rates several times higher than mainstream coins, serving as a "blood-boosting" method for spot trading.


However, due to its status as a publicly traded company, this practice is a riskier endeavor for Coinbase. Even in the current crypto-friendly environment, the SEC is still investigating whether tokens like SOL, ADA, and SAND constitute securities.


In addition to the forced transformation strategies carried out by the aforementioned CEXs, they are also starting to lay out RWAs and the most talked-about stablecoin payment fields, such as the PYUSD launched through a collaboration between Coinbase and Paypal, Coinbase's support for the Euro stablecoin EURC by Circle that complies with EU MiCA regulatory requirements, or the USD1 launched through a collaboration between Binance and WIFL. In the increasingly crowded trading field, many CEXs have shifted their focus from just the trading market to the application field.


The golden age of transaction fees has quietly ended, and the second half of the crypto exchange platform game has silently begun.


Arthur Hayes: Why I'm Betting on ETH While the Market Is Obsessed with SOL

"I personally have also allocated 20% to gold, expecting the price of gold to potentially rise to $10,000-20,000 by the end of this market cycle."

CryptoPunks Changes Hands Twice, Did the Originator of NFTs Finally Find Its "Forever Home" This Time?

The original NFT pioneer CryptoPunks has once again officially changed ownership after being sold to the Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) developer Yuga Labs.

May 16 Key Market Information Gap, A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report

1. Top News: Coinbase Faces Double Blow with 'SEC Investigation' and 'User Data Breach,' Stock Price Drops by 7.2% 2. Token Unlocking: $ARB, $AVAX, $PRIME, $ASTR, $1INCH

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more