An Analysis of the Curve Founder's New Project, Yield Basis - What Other Potential Opportunities Exist for BTC Yield Farming?

By: blockbeats|2025/03/28 03:00:02
Share
copy
Original Title: Yield Basis: Real Yield On Bitcoin
Original Author: Rui, Investor at SevenX Ventures
Original Translation: CryptoLeo, Translator at Odaily
Editor's Note: Curve Finance founder Michael Egorov launched a new project called Yield Basis in February, raising $5 million through a $50 million token valuation. In this article, a SevenX Ventures investor wrote about the current state of BTC yield sources, analyzed the operational process of the Yield Basis protocol, and the potential opportunities for the future BTC yield layer. The following is the original content, translated by Odaily:

BTC APR sounds attractive, but it may be a house of cards built on layers of altcoin incentives, ready to collapse at any time.

Faced with BTC APR, people usually ask some questions: Is the yield settled in BTC or altcoins? What risks are involved? How much potential principal loss is there? Is this yield sustainable? Will it be diluted as TVL grows?

This article focuses on sustainable BTC settlement yield in CeFi and DeFi, divided into three parts:

1. Original BTC Yield Sources: Quantitative trading, DEX LP, lending, staking, collateral, LST, and Pendle;

2. New Venues for BTC Yield: Yield Basis Protocol;

3. Outlook: Small mistakes could lead to catastrophic failures; the scarcity of elite quant teams; the convergence of TradFi, CeFi, and DeFi, and IPO opportunities.

An Analysis of the Curve Founder's New Project, Yield Basis - What Other Potential Opportunities Exist for BTC Yield Farming?

Original BTC Yield Sources

While there are many ways to cycle and compound, we can categorize original yields into five major types: quantitative trading, DEX LP, lending, staking, and collateral. (The following chart compares yield and risk.)

1. Quantitative Trading Strategy: The "Zero Sum" Game

Ensure that your Alpha strategy is net profitable. Arbitrage strategies include funding rates, spot-futures basis, cross-exchange and borrowing arbitrage, or event-driven trading, requiring deep liquidity — mostly currently on TradFi and CeFi. Additionally, TradFi to DeFi arbitrage lacks cross-domain infrastructure.

· BTC Yield: Varies based on asset size, risk profile, and execution. The target for market-neutral strategies may be a 4-8% bitcoin-denominated annual rate with around 1% stop loss. Top-performing quant teams may even pursue a 200-300%+ annual rate and engage in intricate risk controls around the 10-30% stop loss mark.

· Risk: Highly subjective with model, judgment, and execution risks — even neutral strategies can end up directional bets. Requires real-time monitoring, robust infrastructure (e.g., latency, custody, and settlement protocols), loss insurance, and exchange risk controls.

2. DEX LP: Constrained by Supply and Demand

In addition to arbitrage, DEX also drives actual trading volumes. Due to limited supply and demand, only about 3% of wrapped BTC is currently on DEX. In volatile LPing pairs (e.g., WBTC-USDC), supply is constrained by impermanent loss, while demand faces attrition of wrapped BTC and limited utility in DeFi.

· BTC Yield: High volatility, Uniswap currently offers an annual rate of 6.88%, which can go up to double digits.

· Risk: Due to impermanent loss, simply holding BTC often outperforms providing liquidity. However, new LPs are often misled, reflecting a common behavioral bias: fee yield and APR are prominent indicators, tempting LPs to maximize short-term gains while overlooking less obvious long-term capital erosion, DeFi risks apply here too.

3. Lending: BTC Lending

BTC primarily serves as collateral for dollar-pegged or stablecoin borrowing, used for cycling or leveraged trading, rather than concerning with the APR for lending out BTC — as current lending demand is low.

· BTC Yield: CeFi and DeFi loan interest rates are usually lower, around 0.02%-0.5% annual interest rate. The loan-to-value (LTV) ratio varies: TradFi has a 60-75% LTV with a current discounted rate of 2-3%, CeFi has a 33-50% LTV with the current USDC rate at 7%; DeFi LTV is 33-67% with the current USDC rate at 5.2%.

· Risk: Despite the low LTV ratio helping to reduce capital efficiency and hedge strategies providing additional protection, there are risks in both CeFi and DeFi, including liquidation risk.

4. Staking: Earning Altcoin Rewards

Babylon is in a unique position where staking contributes to the security of the associated PoS chain.

· Altcoin Yield: Denominated in altcoins, with an unknown APR.

· Risk: The Babylon protocol should undergo multiple security audits and disclose the expected staking rewards post-system launch. If the Babylon token issuance is unsuccessful, the ecosystem's sustainability is at risk.

5. Collateral: Liquidity Mining

When you provide BTC to DeFi, BTC L2, and other protocols as TVL to earn altcoin rewards.

· Altcoin Yield Rate: Varies but is approximately between 5-7%, with whales always able to get more favorable rates.

· Risk: Each protocol has different reliability and verifiable records, along with varying lock-up periods and capital requirements.

6. Liquidity Staking Token: Composite Yield

BTC "LST" akin to Lombard, PumpBTC, Solv Protocol, BitFi, these LST protocols originating from the Babylon ecosystem are now yield cross-chain BTC with sophisticated yield strategies. Veda acts like an aggregator.

· Yield is Mainly Presented in Altcoin Form: Combines Babylon staking rewards, points from different chains, Pendle, some introducing quant strategies through third parties. Additionally, it offers its token as an incentive.

· Risk: LST has low liquidity, with the presence of cascading liquidation risk. There are single points of failure in the minting, redeeming, staking, and bridging processes. It heavily relies on both proprietary and third-party meme coin yields, indicating significant yield volatility.

7. Yield Tokenization: Yield Trading

Pendle is the primary platform for LST to earn additional yield, currently managing a $4.4417 billion BTC TVL, enabling traders to earn fixed yield from their principal (such as spot alternatives), hedge interest rate volatility, and gain yield liquidity, long/short yield positions.

· Meme Coin Yield: The yield rate may be unstable. YT holders can receive base yield of LST, swap fees, fixed yield rate, and PENDLE tokens.

· Risk: A decline in the PENDLE token price would significantly impact participation. Pendle relies on sustainable yield volatility—it becomes tricky when most of its assets depend on multi-tiered token incentives (including Pendle itself).

New Frontier for BTC Yield: Yield Basis

(The above image illustrates the operation flow of Yield Basis)

As mentioned above, while meme coin-denominated yields are unsustainable, true BTC-based yields are scarce and high-risk. Quant teams need sufficient liquidity, but DEXs fall short.

· What is Yield Basis: YB is an automated market maker (AMM) that minimizes impermanent loss and facilitates BTC LP, cross-market arbitrage, and real trading.

· BTC Yield Base Layer: Based on a simulated data of the past 6 years, YB can provide an average of 20% APR (net profit), even higher during a bull market. Additionally, it can be combined with any LST portfolio seeking BTC-based real yield exposure, where Pendle can collaborate with yields generated by YB.

· Venue for Complex Trading Strategies: Building a venue with sufficient liquidity for meaningful quant trading. It also offers a lucrative compounding opportunity to boost the BTC lending rate in lending protocols; currently, there is $32.86 billion WBTC on Aave with a lending rate of about 0.02%.

· Retail BTC Trading Venue: YB's long-term goal is to create the deepest on-chain liquidity for wrapped BTC and compete with CeFi exchanges.

Mechanism: Solving Impermanent Loss

· Mechanism: One AMM Embedded within Another AMM

When BTC LP is deposited into YB, it mints LP by borrowing half of the LP value and continuously re-leveraging. This will create a stablecoin to BTC pool with a rebalancing model, where borrowing interest rates and 50% of pool production fees will subsidize the pool's rebalancing.

APR is 2 times pool yield rate (borrowing interest rate + re-leverage loss), with a fixed cost against crvUSD borrowing interest, which is controllable as the system will use it to generate more yield. Higher volatility increases re-leverage losses but also increases pool revenue, so this strategy remains effective unless volatility exceeds the chosen max liquidity concentration. Parameter selection is crucial: more aggressive parameters can increase yield but carry a greater risk of re-leverage loss, and vice versa.

YB Increasing APR Mechanism

LPs can choose to earn pool fees or stake to earn YB tokens. When the YB token is attractive, more LPs choose to exit the pool, leading to a higher APR.

Future Outlook

BTC yield generation will become increasingly complex, focusing on risk management, BTC pricing, and institutional products. The winners will be those who can provide deep liquidity and fair returns without excessive risk exposure and innovate within a regulatory framework.

Small Errors Can Lead to Catastrophic Losses

“Nothing is unhackable—just unhacked yet.” BTC faces increasingly complex attacks from multiple risk fronts: CEX trust delegation, self-custody phishing, smart contract vulnerabilities (permission, logic, algorithm), and mechanism risks (liquidation, principal loss). Social engineering poses a serious threat through relationship and interface exploitation, with major BTC LPs even requiring chain halts and bridge blocks. While counterintuitive, public chains and high liquidity permissionless protocols are not ideal for its security. Aquarius proposes a security framework that enables comprehensive testing, monitoring, and risk tracking.

Scarcity of Elite Quant Teams

Clearly, the true return measured in BTC is more attractive. While DEX LP is still in its early stages, quantitative trading still dominates. Some teams package their strategies into BTC-yielding products and raise funds from external LPs. However, the ability for high-frequency arbitrage may be limited, with top teams usually keeping these strategies in-house, reducing external capital — forming a form of "adverse selection." Nevertheless, productizing market-neutral and other low-risk strategies as BTC yield products makes sense.

TradFi, CeFi, and DeFi Convergence, with IPO Opportunity

As BTC liquidity continues to deepen, we are witnessing the convergence of TradFi conservatism, CeFi accessibility, and DeFi innovation. In January 2025, Coinbase launched Morpho Labs, a BTC-backed lending product. This is a signal: CeFi is implementing DeFi mechanisms for a broader audience. In this process, institutional asset management companies will have the opportunity to emerge and potentially go public. Companies combining security-first infrastructure, transparent risk disclosure, and trustworthy governance will build strong brands, providing the recurring revenue needed by TradFi asset managers and serving all areas from high-net-worth clients to pension and endowment funds.

Original Article Link

You may also like

a16z Leads $18M Seed Round for Catena Labs, Crypto Industry Bets on Stablecoin AI Payment

Traditional finance is still stuck in a "human-to-human" model, while Catena aims to achieve "AI-to-AI" interaction.

Never Underestimate the Significance of the US Stablecoin 'Infrastructure Bill'

Original Title: "Never Underestimate the Significance of the US Stablecoin 'Genius Act'"Original Author: 0xTodd, Partner at Nothing Research


If the US stablecoin bill, the "GENIUS Act," passes smoothly this time, its significance will be tremendous. I even think it's significant enough to enter the top five in Crypto history.



Although abbreviated as the GENIUS Act, which translates directly to the Genius Act, it is actually the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins, which translates to "Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Dollar Stablecoins."


The proposal is lengthy, with several key points summarized for everyone:


· Mandatory 1:1 Full Asset Backing: Assets include cash, demand deposits, and short-term US Treasuries. At the same time, misappropriation and rehypothecation are strictly prohibited.


· High-Frequency Disclosure: Reserve reports must be published at least monthly, introducing external audits.


· Licensing Requirement: Once the circulating market cap of the issuer's stablecoin exceeds $100 billion, it must transition into the federal regulatory system within a specified timeframe, adopting banking-grade regulation.


· Introduction of Custody: The custodian of the stablecoin and its reserve assets must be a regulated qualified financial institution.


· Clear Definition as a Payment Medium: The bill explicitly defines stablecoin as a new type of payment medium, primarily regulated by the banking regulatory system, rather than restricted by the securities or commodities regulatory system.


· Embracing Existing Stablecoins: A maximum 18-month grace period after the bill's enactment, aimed at encouraging existing stablecoin issuers (such as USDT, USDC, etc.) to promptly obtain licenses or become compliant.


After finishing the main content, let's talk about the significance of this matter with an excited heart.


Over the years, when others asked, "After working in the Crypto industry for 16 years, what application have you created?"


In the future, you can confidently tell others—Stablecoins.


First, Clearing Concerns is a Prerequisite


Some people have held opposing views. In the past, people's impression of stablecoins was that they were an opaque black box. Every few months, there would be FUD — whether Tether's assets were frozen or Circle had a significant black hole deficit.


In fact, if you think about it, Tether easily rakes in billions of dollars a year just from the interest on those underlying government bonds. Circle, slightly less, also made a $1.7 billion profit last year.


They basically made money while standing there. From a motivational standpoint, they have no malicious intentions. In fact, they are the most eager for compliance.


Now, this opaque black box will become a transparent white box.


In the past, the only complaint was that Tether's funds might have been frozen by the United States. Now, they will be directly placed into U.S. compliant custodial institutions, with high-frequency disclosures, so you can rest assured.


【No need to worry about a rug pull】 is such a huge advantage—I think especially all Crypto people understand this.


Second, Mastering the Standard is Very Important


Stablecoins were once almost on the verge of being overtaken by CBDCs. In any country, if a central bank digital currency really exists, it is highly likely not built on a blockchain, at most it is built on some internal central bank consortium chain, which to be honest, is meaningless.


When CBDCs were at their peak, that was the most dangerous time for stablecoins.


If CBDCs had become a reality back then, stablecoins today would have been relentlessly suppressed into a dark corner, and blockchain would only be able to play a minimal role.


The remaining half-dead stablecoins would even have to learn the standards of central bank digital currencies, completely relinquishing their standard-setting power.


And now, stablecoins have won (or are about to).


Instead, everyone should learn the 【Blockchain + Token】 standard.


Nowadays, many blockchains actually have no meaningful applications on top, only stablecoin transfers. For example, with Aptos, the only scenario I use Aptos for is transfers between Binance and OKX.


And now, stablecoins will be legislated, what does that mean?


That's right, blockchain will become the only standard.


In the future, every stablecoin user will be the first to learn how to use a wallet.


As an aside, I actually think Ethereum's concerted push for EIP-7702 is quite forward-thinking. While other chains are all about memes, thank you Ethereum for sticking to account abstraction.



EIP-7702 is about Account Abstraction, which can support, for example:


· Social Account Registration Wallet

· Paying GAS with Native Coin

· And more


This paves the way for future new users to heavily use stablecoins, solving the last-mile problem.


Third, Deposit Enters a New Era


Furthermore, once stablecoins receive legislative support, deposits and withdrawals will become even easier.


Let's imagine a scenario: previously, hindered by the gray nature of stablecoins, but after the bill passes, many traditional brokerages can support stablecoins themselves. The money from a US stock investor can be converted into stablecoins in minutes and instantly deposited into Coinbase. Believe it or not.



Let's imagine another scenario: if the brilliant bill smoothly passes through the House of Representatives, next, you will see:


Due to the extremely lucrative nature of this trading, existing stablecoin leaders and newly entering traditional giants will crazily start promoting their stablecoin products.


And an outsider, due to these promotions, will start using stablecoins. And then one day, after finding out that the wallet account has been created, will explore Bitcoin inside. Is mining Bitcoin difficult?


Stablecoins are a huge Trojan horse. The moment you start using stablecoins, you unwittingly step half a foot into the Crypto world.


Fourth, Conclusion


As a large reservoir for digesting US debt, although stablecoins cannot directly absorb debt, they at least provide ammunition for the US debt secondary market. These functions are quite important, and slowly, stablecoins are becoming a part of the US debt market's body. Therefore, once the US legislation is passed and experiences the benefits, there is no turning back.


And, we are also confident that stablecoins are indeed one of the great innovations in our industry. People who have used stablecoins will find it hard to return to the traditional cash-banking system.


Once the bill is passed, users can't go back. In the future, concerns are about to be resolved, standards will be mastered, and the era of large deposits seems to be on the horizon.


Original Article Link

$COIN Joins S&P 500, but Coinbase Isn't Celebrating

On May 13, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced that Coinbase would officially replace Discover Financial Services in the S&P 500 on May 19. While other companies like Block and MicroStrategy, closely tied to Bitcoin, were already part of the S&P 500, Coinbase became the first cryptocurrency exchange whose primary business is in the index. This also signifies that cryptocurrency is gradually moving from the fringes to the mainstream in the U.S.



On the day of the announcement, Coinbase's stock price surged by 23%, surpassing the $250 mark. However, just 3 days later, Coinbase was hit by two consecutive events: a hack where employees were bribed to steal customer data and a demand for a $20 million ransom, and an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the authenticity of its claim of having over 100 million "verified users" in its securities filings and marketing materials. These two events acted as mini-bombs, and at the time of writing, Coinbase's stock had already dropped by over 7.3%.


Coincidentally, Discover Financial Services, being replaced by Coinbase, can also be considered the "Coinbase" of the previous payment era. Discover is a U.S.-based digital banking and payment services company headquartered in Illinois, founded in 1960. Its payment network, Discover Network, is the fourth largest payment network apart from Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.


In April, after the approval of the acquisition of Discover by the sixth-largest U.S. bank, Capital One, this well-established digital banking company of over 60 years smoothly handed over its S&P 500 "seat" to this emerging cryptocurrency "bank." This unexpected coincidence also portrayed the handover between the new and old eras in Coinbase's entry into the S&P 500, resembling a relay race scene. However, this relay baton also brought Coinbase's accumulated "external troubles and internal strife" to a tipping point.


Side Effects of ETFs


Over the past decade, cryptocurrency exchanges have been the most stable "profit machines." They play a role in providing liquidity to the entire industry and rely on trading fees to sustain their operations. However, with the comprehensive rollout of ETF products in the U.S. market, this profit model is facing unprecedented challenges. As the leader in the "American stack," with over 80% of its business coming from the U.S., Coinbase is most affected by this.



Starting from the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, traditional financial capital has significantly onboarded users and funds that originally belonged to exchanges in a more cost-effective, compliant, and transparent manner. The transaction fee revenue of cryptocurrency exchanges has started to decline, and this trend may further intensify in the coming months.


According to Coinbase's 2024 Q4 financial report, the platform's total trading revenue was $417 million, a 45% year-on-year decrease. The contribution of BTC and ETH's trading revenue dropped from 65% in the same period last year to less than 50%.


This decline is not a result of a decrease in market enthusiasm. In fact, since the approval of the Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the inflow of BTC into the U.S. market has continued to reach new highs, with asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity rapidly expanding their management scale. Data shows that BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) alone has surpassed $17 billion in assets under management. As of mid-May 2025, the cumulative net inflow of 11 major institutional Bitcoin spot ETFs on the market has exceeded $41.5 billion, with a total net asset value of $1214.69 billion, accounting for approximately 5.91% of the total Bitcoin market capitalization.


Chart showing the trend of net outflows for Grayscale among the 11 institutions


Institutional investors and some retail investors are shifting towards ETF products, partly due to compliance and tax considerations. On one hand, ETFs have much lower trading costs compared to cryptocurrency exchanges. While Coinbase's spot trading fee rate varies annually in a tiered manner but averages around 1.49%, for example, the management fee for IBIT ETF is only 0.25%, and the majority of ETF institution fees fluctuate around 0.15% to 0.25%.



In other words, the more rational users are, the more likely they are to move from exchanges to ETF products, especially for investors aiming for long-term holdings.


According to multiple sources, several institutions, including VanEck and Grayscale, have submitted applications to the SEC for a Solana (SOL) ETF, with some institutions also planning to submit an XRP ETF proposal. Once approved, this may trigger a new round of fund migration. According to a report submitted by Coinbase to the SEC, as of April, the platform's trading revenue from XRP and Solana accounted for 18% and 10%, nearly one-third of the platform's fee revenue.



However, the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs passed in 2024 also reduced the fees for these two tokens on Coinbase from 30% and 15% to 26% and 10%, respectively. If the SOL and XRP ETFs are approved, it will further undermine the core fee revenue of exchanges like Coinbase.


The expansion of ETF products is gradually weakening the financial intermediary status of cryptocurrency exchanges. From their original roles as matchmakers and clearers to now gradually becoming mere "on-ramps and off-ramps" for funds, exchanges are seeing their marginal value squeezed by ETFs.


Robinhood Takes a Stand, Traditional Brokerages Join the Fray


On May 12, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins gave a keynote speech at the Tokenization and Cryptocurrency Working Group roundtable. The theme of his speech revolved around "It is a new day at the SEC," where he indicated that the SEC would not approach enforcement and regulation the same way as before but would instead pave the way for cryptocurrency assets in the U.S. market.



With signs of cryptocurrency compliance such as the SEC's "NEW DAY" declaration, an increasing number of traditional brokerages are attempting to enter the cryptocurrency industry. One of the most representative cases is the well-known U.S. brokerage Robinhood, which began expanding its crypto business in 2018. By the time of its IPO in 2021, Robinhood's crypto business revenue accounted for over 50% of the company, with a significant boost from the Dogecoin "moonshot" promoted by Musk.


In Q1 2025 earnings report, Robinhood showcased strong growth, especially in revenue from cryptocurrency and options trading. Fueled by Trump's Memecoin, cryptocurrency-related revenue reached $250 million, nearly doubling year-over-year. Consequently, Robinhood Gold subscription users reached 3.5 million, a 90% increase from the previous year, with the rapid growth of Robinhood Gold providing the company with a stable source of income.



Meanwhile, RobinHood is actively pursuing acquisitions in the cryptocurrency space. In 2024, it announced a $2 billion acquisition of the long-standing European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp. Additionally, Canada's largest cryptocurrency CEX, WonderFi, which recently went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also announced its integration with RobinHood Crypto. After obtaining virtual asset licenses in the UK, Canada, Singapore, and other markets, RobinHood has taken a proactive approach in the compliant cryptocurrency trading market.



Furthermore, an increasing number of brokerage firms are exploring the same path. Futu Securities, Tiger Brokers, and others are also dipping their toes into cryptocurrency trading, with some having applied for or obtained the VA license from the Hong Kong SFC. Although their user bases are currently small, traditional brokerages have a natural advantage in user trust, regulatory licenses, and low fee structures. This could pose a threat to native cryptocurrency platforms in the future.



User Data Breach: Is Coinbase Still Secure?


In April 2025, security researchers discovered that some Coinbase user data was leaked on the dark web. While the platform initially responded by attributing it to a "technical misinformation," it still raised concerns among users regarding its security and privacy protection. Just two days before Dow Jones Indexes announced Coinbase's addition to the S&P 500 Index, on May 11, 2025, Coinbase received an email from an unknown threat actor claiming to have obtained customer account information and internal documents, demanding a $20 million ransom to keep the data private. Subsequent investigations confirmed the data breach.


Cybercriminals obtained the data by bribing overseas customer service agents and support staff, mainly in "non-U.S. regions such as India." These agents abused their access to Coinbase's internal customer support system and stole customer data. As early as February this year, blockchain detective ZachXBT revealed on X platform that between December 2024 and January 2025, Coinbase users lost over $65 million to social engineering scams, with the actual amount potentially higher.


Among the victims was a well-known figure, 67-year-old Ed Suman, an established artist in the art world for nearly two decades, having been involved in the creation of artworks such as Jeff Koons' "Balloon Dog" sculpture. Earlier this year, he fell victim to an impersonation scam involving fake Coinbase customer support, resulting in a loss of over $2 million in cryptocurrency. ZachXBT critiqued Coinbase for its inadequate handling of such scams, noting that other major exchanges have not faced similar issues and recommending Coinbase to enhance its security measures.


Amidst a series of ongoing social engineering incidents, although there has not been any impact on user assets at the technical level so far, it has raised concerns among many retail and institutional investors. Especially institutions holding massive assets on Coinbase. Just considering the U.S. BTC ETF institutions, as of mid-May 2025, they collectively hold nearly 840,000 BTC, and 75% of these are custodied by Coinbase. If we price BTC at $100,000, this amount reaches a staggering $63 billion, which is equivalent to the nominal GDP of two Iceland in the year 2024.


Visualization: ChatGPT, Source: Farside


In addition, Coinbase Custody also serves over 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, family offices, pension funds, and endowments. As of the Q1 2025 financial report, Coinbase's total assets under management (including institutional and retail clients) reached $404 billion. The specific amount of institutional custodied assets was not explicitly disclosed in the latest report, but it should still be over 50% based on the Q4 2024 report.


Visualization: ChatGPT


Once this security barrier is breached, not only could the rate of user attrition far exceed expectations, but more importantly, institutional trust in it would undermine the foundation of its business. Therefore, after a hacking event, Coinbase's stock price plummeted significantly.


CEXs are All in Self-Rescue Mode


Facing a decline in spot trading fee revenue, Coinbase is also accelerating its transformation, attempting to find growth opportunities in derivatives and emerging assets. Coinbase acquired a stake in the options platform Deribit at the end of 2024 and announced the official launch of perpetual contract products in 2025. This acquisition fills in Coinbase's gap in options trading and its relatively small global market share.



Deribit has a strong presence in non-U.S. markets, especially in Asia and Europe. The acquisition has enabled Coinbase to gain a dominant position in bitcoin and ethereum options trading on Deribit, accounting for approximately 80% of the global options trading volume, with daily trading volume remaining above $2 billion.


Meanwhile, 80-90% of Deribit's customer base consists of institutional investors, with their professionalism and liquidity in the Bitcoin and Ethereum options market highly favored by institutions. Coinbase's compliance advantage, coupled with its already robust institutional ecosystem, makes it even more suitable. By using institutions as an entry point, it can face the squeeze from giants like Binance and OKX in the derivatives market.



Facing a similar dilemma is Kraken, which is attempting to replicate Binance Futures' model in non-U.S. markets. Since the derivatives market relies more on professional users, fee rates are relatively higher and stickiness is stronger, making it a significant source of revenue for exchanges. In the first half of 2025, Kraken completed the acquisition of TradeStation Crypto and a futures exchange, aiming to build a complete derivatives trading ecosystem to hedge the risk of declining spot transaction fee income.


With the surge of Memecoin in 2024, Binance, OKX, and various CEX platforms began massively listing small-market-cap, highly volatile tokens to activate active trading users. Due to the wealth effect and trading activity of Memecoins, Coinbase was also forced to join the battle, successively listing popular tokens from the Solana ecosystem such as BOOK OF MEME and Dogwifhat. Although these coins are controversial, they are frequently traded, with fee rates several times higher than mainstream coins, serving as a "blood-boosting" method for spot trading.


However, due to its status as a publicly traded company, this practice is a riskier endeavor for Coinbase. Even in the current crypto-friendly environment, the SEC is still investigating whether tokens like SOL, ADA, and SAND constitute securities.


In addition to the forced transformation strategies carried out by the aforementioned CEXs, they are also starting to lay out RWAs and the most talked-about stablecoin payment fields, such as the PYUSD launched through a collaboration between Coinbase and Paypal, Coinbase's support for the Euro stablecoin EURC by Circle that complies with EU MiCA regulatory requirements, or the USD1 launched through a collaboration between Binance and WIFL. In the increasingly crowded trading field, many CEXs have shifted their focus from just the trading market to the application field.


The golden age of transaction fees has quietly ended, and the second half of the crypto exchange platform game has silently begun.


Arthur Hayes: Why I'm Betting on ETH While the Market Is Obsessed with SOL

"I personally have also allocated 20% to gold, expecting the price of gold to potentially rise to $10,000-20,000 by the end of this market cycle."

May 16 Key Market Information Gap, A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report

1. Top News: Coinbase Faces Double Blow with 'SEC Investigation' and 'User Data Breach,' Stock Price Drops by 7.2% 2. Token Unlocking: $ARB, $AVAX, $PRIME, $ASTR, $1INCH

Key Market Intelligence on May 14th, how much did you miss out on?

Featured News


1.Binance Alpha Launches HIPPO, BLUE, and Other Tokens

2.Believe Ecosystem Tokens See General Rise, LAUNCHCOIN Surges Over 250% in 24 Hours

3.Tiger Securities Introduces Cryptocurrency Deposit and Withdrawal Service, Supports Mainstream Cryptocurrencies such as BTC and ETH

4.Current Bitcoin Rally Possibly Driven by Institutions, Retail Traders Yet to Join

5.Binance Wallet's New TGE Privasea AI Participation Requires a 198 Point Threshold, with a Point Consumption of 15


Trending Topics


Source: Overheard on CT (tg: @overheardonct), Kaito


PUMP: Today's discussions about PUMP focus on its new creator revenue-sharing model: the platform will allocate 50% of PumpSwap revenue to token creators, sparking varied reactions from users. Some criticize the move as insufficient or even misleading, while others view it as a positive step the platform is taking to reward creators. Meanwhile, PUMP faces market pressure from emerging competitors like LetsBONKfun and Raydium, which are rapidly gaining market share. Users also express concerns about PUMP's sustainability and potential regulatory risks in the U.S., with discussions extending to the platform's impact on the entire memecoin ecosystem.


COINBASE: Today, Coinbase became the first crypto company to join the S&P 500 Index, replacing Discover Financial Services, sparking widespread industry attention. The entire crypto community views this milestone as a significant development, signaling that crypto assets are further integrating into the mainstream financial system. The news has sparked lively discussions on Twitter, with many users pointing out that this may attract more institutional investors to enter the Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency markets.


XRP: XRP became the focal point of today's crypto discussion, with its significant market movements and strategic advances drawing attention. XRP has surpassed USDT to become the third-largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization, sparking market excitement and discussions about its future potential. The surge in market capitalization and price is believed to be related to increasing institutional interest, deepening strategic partnerships, and its role in the crypto ecosystem. Additionally, XRP's integration into multiple financial systems and its potential as a macro asset class are also seen as key factors driving the current market sentiment.


DYDX: Today's discussions about DYDX mainly focused on the dYdX Yapper Leaderboard launched by KaitoAI. The leaderboard aims to identify the most active community participants, with a total of $150,000 in rewards to be distributed over the first three seasons. This initiative has sparked broad community participation, with many users discussing the potential rewards and the incentive effect on the DYDX ecosystem. Meanwhile, progress on the ethDYDX to dYdX native chain migration and historical airdrop events have also been topics of discussion.


Featured Articles


1. "What Is 'ICM'? Holding Up the $4 Billion Market Cap Solana's New Narrative"

Overnight, the hottest narrative in the crypto space has become "Internet Capital Markets," with a host of crypto projects and founders, led by the Solana ecosystem's new Launchpad platform Believe, releasing this phrase. Together with "Believe in something," it has become the new slogan heralding the onset of a bull market. What exactly is the so-called "Internet Capital Market," will it become a short-lived hype phrase like the Base ecosystem's previous Content Coin, and what related targets are available for selection?


2.《LaunchCoin Surges 20x in One Day, How Did Believe Create a $200M Market Cap Shiba Inu After Going to Zero?|100x Retrospective》

LAUNCHCOIN broke through a $200 million market cap today, with the long-lost liquidity and such a high market cap "Memecoin" almost bringing half of the on-chain crypto community CT into the fray. The community is crazily discussing this token, with half of it being FOMO and the other half being FUD. This token, originally issued by Believe founder Ben Pasternak under his personal identity, transformed into a new platform token after a renaming. From once going to zero to a $200 million market cap, what happened in between?


On-chain Data


May 14 On-chain Fund Flow


Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more