Arthur Hayes' Latest Interview: ETH Will Reach New All-Time High, Circle IPO Not Worth Investing

By: blockbeats|2025/04/09 07:45:02
Share
copy
原文标题:Arthur Hayes on Why Tariffs Will Be Good for Bitcoin and Crypto
原文来源:Unchained
原文整理:比推 BitpushNews

Arthur Hayes' Latest Interview: ETH Will Reach New All-Time High, Circle IPO Not Worth Investing

播客嘉宾:BitMEX 联创、Maelstrom CIO Arthur Hayes

摘要:在本次播客节目中,Arthur Hayes 讨论了特朗普的关税政策、比特币将受益于全球流动性宽松政策,他认为以太坊是最被低估的主流 L1,将先于 SOL 回到历史峰值,谨慎看多 SOL,并讨论了对 USDC 发行商 Circle 申请 IPO 的看法。

以下为访谈内容整理:

主持人:您如何看待特朗普的关税政策?谁会是这场关税战的赢家和输家?

Arthur Hayes: 首先我会摒弃对经济政策的道德评判,专注于适应形势并从中获利。问题的好坏总是相对的,与其情绪化不如调整投资组合。

如果特朗普真想将每年数万亿美元的逆差归零,并向支持他的人证明其政策见效,那么当前举措完全合理。

但硬币的另一面是:当日本等国通过出口赚取美元后,为维持本币低估,它们不会将美元兑换回本币,而是购买美国金融资产(主要是美债和美股)。这正是过去 20-30 年美国市场表现远超全球的原因,也是美债收益率在债务规模增长 7 倍后仍与 30 年前持平的关键。

特朗普试图打破这种循环:他告诉美国人"我将带回优质岗位(尤其对无大学学历群体)",但代价是外国对美国政府和股市的融资支持将减弱——因为它们的美元收入减少了。这本质上是个简单等式:经常账户余额与金融账户余额此消彼长。

至于好坏评判?从特朗普政策逻辑看完全合理。但关键在于:他的选民基础主要是未受高等教育的蓝领阶层;民主党支持者则更多是高学历、持有金融资产的富裕群体。过去 40 年全球化进程中,前者因产业外迁受损,后者因企业利润和股市上涨获益。两种世界观注定对立,而特朗普正兑现对其基本盘的承诺。

主持人:您似乎回避了价值判断。作为美国人,您个人是否认同特朗普的政策目标?

Hayes:这取决于你想取悦谁。数据显示:年收入超 10 万美元者超 50% 投票给哈里斯;低收入群体更多支持特朗普。

· 大学学历是核心分界线:高学历者从事知识工作(科技 / 金融 / 法律等);低学历者传统上从事制造业。

· 而美国过去 40 年的现实是:企业将工厂迁至外国压低工资成本 → 利润增长 → 股票回购 → 股东获益。然而美国本土的制造业工人沦为全球化牺牲品。特朗普代表后者发声,而民主党维护前者利益。没有绝对的对错,只有不同群体诉求的博弈。

主持人:您曾预测美联储不会因关税收紧货币政策,现在是否维持该判断?

Hayes:我在《BBC》文中详细论述了"财政主导"现象——美联储本质上是政府融资工具。前美联储主席伯恩斯 1979 年在南斯拉夫的著名演讲直指核心:当社会认定政府应解决所有问题(必然伴随财政扩张),央行抗通胀的职责就会让位于维持政府融资成本可控。

· 鲍威尔正处于相同困境:美国经济数据强劲(GDP 超趋势增长、失业率历史低位),他却反常地放缓 QT,并在去年 9/12 月降息。根本原因在于 36 万亿美元债务及其指数级增长的利息支出。当日本等刚性美债买家因关税减少美元收入时,美联储必须接盘——鲍威尔最近已明确表态:

· 将减少 QT 规模;考虑用 MBS 到期资金转购美债;称关税通胀影响是"暂时性"(重蹈 2022 年覆辙)。

· 这充分暴露其真实立场:确保财政部获得廉价融资。特朗普所谓"将赤字率从 7% 降至 3%"根本不是真正的紧缩,而是通过名义 GDP 增长稀释债务——比特币将在这场法币泛滥中与黄金同步上涨。

主持人:您此前预测比特币会先突破 11 万,而非跌破 7.65 万,现在是否修正观点?

Hayes:维持原判断,7.65 万是去年 3 月低点,11 万是 1 月 20 日特朗普就职时创下的历史高点。因为全球流动性即将暴增:美联储 / 欧央行 / 日央行都将被迫放水,比特币在通缩崩溃和通胀爆发两种情境下都会受益

主持人: 你提到比特币可能会与传统市场脱钩,那你认为比特币的未来价格走势如何?

Arthur Hayes: 我认为比特币的价格可能会在未来几个月内迎来反弹。我曾预测比特币将突破 110,000 美元,然后可能会一路涨到 250,000 美元。这一切都取决于全球流动性以及美联储和其他主要经济体的货币政策。

主持人:对 Hyperliquid 最近发生的事情有什么看法?

Arthur Hayes:很明显,我认为人们需要认识到,很多项目中的去中心化只是一个理想。Hyperliquid 在这方面的立场很清楚。虽然我不了解他们的技术细节,但这看起来像是中心化控制。我们在 BitMEX 处理过类似的问题,高杠杆、低流动性的合约容易被利用。我认为 Hyperliquid 的开发者应该借鉴其他主要交易所(包括复制 BitMEX 模型的那些)的经验。他们可能需要更仔细地审查他们的保证金政策和清算机制,以避免再次发生类似事件。这种看似去中心化项目中的中心化行为并不新鲜,BitMEX 和其他主要交易所也曾面临过类似问题。

其次,其实大多数人可能更关心价格、速度和费用。只要交易体验良好且盈利,他们不太关心底层是如何运作的。从用户的角度来看,只要他们得到补偿并能继续交易,他们可能并不在意。

这确实是去中心化的两难境地。投资者和交易员需要权衡使用去中心化平台的风险,包括可能被不良行为者利用以及可能面临的监管压力。平台团队也需要考虑这些问题,但他们划出的界限可能并不总是完全一致。这仍然是一个持续辩论的问题,没有明确的对错答案。

主持人: 那你对于 Circle 即将上市有什么看法?

Arthur Hayes: 老实说,我认为 Circle 的 IPO 并不值得投资。Circle 的商业模式依赖于净利差,而它的客户基础已经有了很多竞争者,特别是 Tether。

此外,Circle 在很大程度上依赖 Coinbase 作为分销渠道,他们完全依赖 Coinbase 的分销部门才能生存,因为他们大部分的净利息收入都给了 Coinbase,然后 Coinbase 再进行分销。所以我为什么要买 Circle 的 IPO 呢?如果你想拥有领头羊,直接买 Coinbase 就好了。

主持人: 你对目前加密行业的投资机会怎么看?你目前关注哪些项目?

Arthur Hayes:我们的投资策略是严格控制价格,不会盲目跟风投资热门项目。现在市场上很多项目的估值过高,特别是早期阶段的项目,所以我们现在更倾向于投资那些经过市场洗礼,已经跌得很低但仍具备高质量的项目。

主持人:关于以太坊和 Solana,你的看法是什么?你认为哪个会更有前景?

Arthur Hayes:从风险回报的角度来看,我认为以太坊更有潜力。

尽管以太坊目前被很多人看作不太受欢迎的资产,但正是这种「被讨厌」的资产,在市场反弹时通常会表现最好。Solana 虽然在近期的市场中表现不错,但它的未来发展面临一些不确定性。

我始终坚持逆向投资原则——在新周期中寻找最被市场唾弃的资产。当前以太坊就是典型例子,作为最受质疑的主流 L1,它完全具备先于 Solana 重返 2021 年接近 5000 美元历史高点的潜力,这种市场情绪与价值背离创造了绝佳机会。

所以如果你问我投资哪个,我更倾向于以太坊。以太坊在整个加密生态系统中的地位仍然不可忽视。尤其是在去中心化应用(dApp)和智能合约方面,以太坊仍然是最具竞争力的基础链。只要它能够应对扩展性的问题,它仍然有很大的增长潜力。

主持人: 回到比特币,你曾提到过比特币可能会达到 250,000 美元,那你觉得这种情况什么时候可能发生?

Arthur Hayes:这取决于全球的货币政策。我认为,如果全球主要经济体继续扩张货币供应,金融市场将会充满丰厚的法币流动性。这样一来,比特币作为一种抗通胀资产,将会迎来新一轮的上涨。因此,250,000 美元并不是不可能的目标,特别是在 2025 年左右。

原文链接

You may also like

a16z Leads $18M Seed Round for Catena Labs, Crypto Industry Bets on Stablecoin AI Payment

Traditional finance is still stuck in a "human-to-human" model, while Catena aims to achieve "AI-to-AI" interaction.

Never Underestimate the Significance of the US Stablecoin 'Infrastructure Bill'

Original Title: "Never Underestimate the Significance of the US Stablecoin 'Genius Act'"Original Author: 0xTodd, Partner at Nothing Research


If the US stablecoin bill, the "GENIUS Act," passes smoothly this time, its significance will be tremendous. I even think it's significant enough to enter the top five in Crypto history.



Although abbreviated as the GENIUS Act, which translates directly to the Genius Act, it is actually the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins, which translates to "Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Dollar Stablecoins."


The proposal is lengthy, with several key points summarized for everyone:


· Mandatory 1:1 Full Asset Backing: Assets include cash, demand deposits, and short-term US Treasuries. At the same time, misappropriation and rehypothecation are strictly prohibited.


· High-Frequency Disclosure: Reserve reports must be published at least monthly, introducing external audits.


· Licensing Requirement: Once the circulating market cap of the issuer's stablecoin exceeds $100 billion, it must transition into the federal regulatory system within a specified timeframe, adopting banking-grade regulation.


· Introduction of Custody: The custodian of the stablecoin and its reserve assets must be a regulated qualified financial institution.


· Clear Definition as a Payment Medium: The bill explicitly defines stablecoin as a new type of payment medium, primarily regulated by the banking regulatory system, rather than restricted by the securities or commodities regulatory system.


· Embracing Existing Stablecoins: A maximum 18-month grace period after the bill's enactment, aimed at encouraging existing stablecoin issuers (such as USDT, USDC, etc.) to promptly obtain licenses or become compliant.


After finishing the main content, let's talk about the significance of this matter with an excited heart.


Over the years, when others asked, "After working in the Crypto industry for 16 years, what application have you created?"


In the future, you can confidently tell others—Stablecoins.


First, Clearing Concerns is a Prerequisite


Some people have held opposing views. In the past, people's impression of stablecoins was that they were an opaque black box. Every few months, there would be FUD — whether Tether's assets were frozen or Circle had a significant black hole deficit.


In fact, if you think about it, Tether easily rakes in billions of dollars a year just from the interest on those underlying government bonds. Circle, slightly less, also made a $1.7 billion profit last year.


They basically made money while standing there. From a motivational standpoint, they have no malicious intentions. In fact, they are the most eager for compliance.


Now, this opaque black box will become a transparent white box.


In the past, the only complaint was that Tether's funds might have been frozen by the United States. Now, they will be directly placed into U.S. compliant custodial institutions, with high-frequency disclosures, so you can rest assured.


【No need to worry about a rug pull】 is such a huge advantage—I think especially all Crypto people understand this.


Second, Mastering the Standard is Very Important


Stablecoins were once almost on the verge of being overtaken by CBDCs. In any country, if a central bank digital currency really exists, it is highly likely not built on a blockchain, at most it is built on some internal central bank consortium chain, which to be honest, is meaningless.


When CBDCs were at their peak, that was the most dangerous time for stablecoins.


If CBDCs had become a reality back then, stablecoins today would have been relentlessly suppressed into a dark corner, and blockchain would only be able to play a minimal role.


The remaining half-dead stablecoins would even have to learn the standards of central bank digital currencies, completely relinquishing their standard-setting power.


And now, stablecoins have won (or are about to).


Instead, everyone should learn the 【Blockchain + Token】 standard.


Nowadays, many blockchains actually have no meaningful applications on top, only stablecoin transfers. For example, with Aptos, the only scenario I use Aptos for is transfers between Binance and OKX.


And now, stablecoins will be legislated, what does that mean?


That's right, blockchain will become the only standard.


In the future, every stablecoin user will be the first to learn how to use a wallet.


As an aside, I actually think Ethereum's concerted push for EIP-7702 is quite forward-thinking. While other chains are all about memes, thank you Ethereum for sticking to account abstraction.



EIP-7702 is about Account Abstraction, which can support, for example:


· Social Account Registration Wallet

· Paying GAS with Native Coin

· And more


This paves the way for future new users to heavily use stablecoins, solving the last-mile problem.


Third, Deposit Enters a New Era


Furthermore, once stablecoins receive legislative support, deposits and withdrawals will become even easier.


Let's imagine a scenario: previously, hindered by the gray nature of stablecoins, but after the bill passes, many traditional brokerages can support stablecoins themselves. The money from a US stock investor can be converted into stablecoins in minutes and instantly deposited into Coinbase. Believe it or not.



Let's imagine another scenario: if the brilliant bill smoothly passes through the House of Representatives, next, you will see:


Due to the extremely lucrative nature of this trading, existing stablecoin leaders and newly entering traditional giants will crazily start promoting their stablecoin products.


And an outsider, due to these promotions, will start using stablecoins. And then one day, after finding out that the wallet account has been created, will explore Bitcoin inside. Is mining Bitcoin difficult?


Stablecoins are a huge Trojan horse. The moment you start using stablecoins, you unwittingly step half a foot into the Crypto world.


Fourth, Conclusion


As a large reservoir for digesting US debt, although stablecoins cannot directly absorb debt, they at least provide ammunition for the US debt secondary market. These functions are quite important, and slowly, stablecoins are becoming a part of the US debt market's body. Therefore, once the US legislation is passed and experiences the benefits, there is no turning back.


And, we are also confident that stablecoins are indeed one of the great innovations in our industry. People who have used stablecoins will find it hard to return to the traditional cash-banking system.


Once the bill is passed, users can't go back. In the future, concerns are about to be resolved, standards will be mastered, and the era of large deposits seems to be on the horizon.


Original Article Link

$COIN Joins S&P 500, but Coinbase Isn't Celebrating

On May 13, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced that Coinbase would officially replace Discover Financial Services in the S&P 500 on May 19. While other companies like Block and MicroStrategy, closely tied to Bitcoin, were already part of the S&P 500, Coinbase became the first cryptocurrency exchange whose primary business is in the index. This also signifies that cryptocurrency is gradually moving from the fringes to the mainstream in the U.S.



On the day of the announcement, Coinbase's stock price surged by 23%, surpassing the $250 mark. However, just 3 days later, Coinbase was hit by two consecutive events: a hack where employees were bribed to steal customer data and a demand for a $20 million ransom, and an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the authenticity of its claim of having over 100 million "verified users" in its securities filings and marketing materials. These two events acted as mini-bombs, and at the time of writing, Coinbase's stock had already dropped by over 7.3%.


Coincidentally, Discover Financial Services, being replaced by Coinbase, can also be considered the "Coinbase" of the previous payment era. Discover is a U.S.-based digital banking and payment services company headquartered in Illinois, founded in 1960. Its payment network, Discover Network, is the fourth largest payment network apart from Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.


In April, after the approval of the acquisition of Discover by the sixth-largest U.S. bank, Capital One, this well-established digital banking company of over 60 years smoothly handed over its S&P 500 "seat" to this emerging cryptocurrency "bank." This unexpected coincidence also portrayed the handover between the new and old eras in Coinbase's entry into the S&P 500, resembling a relay race scene. However, this relay baton also brought Coinbase's accumulated "external troubles and internal strife" to a tipping point.


Side Effects of ETFs


Over the past decade, cryptocurrency exchanges have been the most stable "profit machines." They play a role in providing liquidity to the entire industry and rely on trading fees to sustain their operations. However, with the comprehensive rollout of ETF products in the U.S. market, this profit model is facing unprecedented challenges. As the leader in the "American stack," with over 80% of its business coming from the U.S., Coinbase is most affected by this.



Starting from the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, traditional financial capital has significantly onboarded users and funds that originally belonged to exchanges in a more cost-effective, compliant, and transparent manner. The transaction fee revenue of cryptocurrency exchanges has started to decline, and this trend may further intensify in the coming months.


According to Coinbase's 2024 Q4 financial report, the platform's total trading revenue was $417 million, a 45% year-on-year decrease. The contribution of BTC and ETH's trading revenue dropped from 65% in the same period last year to less than 50%.


This decline is not a result of a decrease in market enthusiasm. In fact, since the approval of the Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the inflow of BTC into the U.S. market has continued to reach new highs, with asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity rapidly expanding their management scale. Data shows that BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) alone has surpassed $17 billion in assets under management. As of mid-May 2025, the cumulative net inflow of 11 major institutional Bitcoin spot ETFs on the market has exceeded $41.5 billion, with a total net asset value of $1214.69 billion, accounting for approximately 5.91% of the total Bitcoin market capitalization.


Chart showing the trend of net outflows for Grayscale among the 11 institutions


Institutional investors and some retail investors are shifting towards ETF products, partly due to compliance and tax considerations. On one hand, ETFs have much lower trading costs compared to cryptocurrency exchanges. While Coinbase's spot trading fee rate varies annually in a tiered manner but averages around 1.49%, for example, the management fee for IBIT ETF is only 0.25%, and the majority of ETF institution fees fluctuate around 0.15% to 0.25%.



In other words, the more rational users are, the more likely they are to move from exchanges to ETF products, especially for investors aiming for long-term holdings.


According to multiple sources, several institutions, including VanEck and Grayscale, have submitted applications to the SEC for a Solana (SOL) ETF, with some institutions also planning to submit an XRP ETF proposal. Once approved, this may trigger a new round of fund migration. According to a report submitted by Coinbase to the SEC, as of April, the platform's trading revenue from XRP and Solana accounted for 18% and 10%, nearly one-third of the platform's fee revenue.



However, the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs passed in 2024 also reduced the fees for these two tokens on Coinbase from 30% and 15% to 26% and 10%, respectively. If the SOL and XRP ETFs are approved, it will further undermine the core fee revenue of exchanges like Coinbase.


The expansion of ETF products is gradually weakening the financial intermediary status of cryptocurrency exchanges. From their original roles as matchmakers and clearers to now gradually becoming mere "on-ramps and off-ramps" for funds, exchanges are seeing their marginal value squeezed by ETFs.


Robinhood Takes a Stand, Traditional Brokerages Join the Fray


On May 12, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins gave a keynote speech at the Tokenization and Cryptocurrency Working Group roundtable. The theme of his speech revolved around "It is a new day at the SEC," where he indicated that the SEC would not approach enforcement and regulation the same way as before but would instead pave the way for cryptocurrency assets in the U.S. market.



With signs of cryptocurrency compliance such as the SEC's "NEW DAY" declaration, an increasing number of traditional brokerages are attempting to enter the cryptocurrency industry. One of the most representative cases is the well-known U.S. brokerage Robinhood, which began expanding its crypto business in 2018. By the time of its IPO in 2021, Robinhood's crypto business revenue accounted for over 50% of the company, with a significant boost from the Dogecoin "moonshot" promoted by Musk.


In Q1 2025 earnings report, Robinhood showcased strong growth, especially in revenue from cryptocurrency and options trading. Fueled by Trump's Memecoin, cryptocurrency-related revenue reached $250 million, nearly doubling year-over-year. Consequently, Robinhood Gold subscription users reached 3.5 million, a 90% increase from the previous year, with the rapid growth of Robinhood Gold providing the company with a stable source of income.



Meanwhile, RobinHood is actively pursuing acquisitions in the cryptocurrency space. In 2024, it announced a $2 billion acquisition of the long-standing European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp. Additionally, Canada's largest cryptocurrency CEX, WonderFi, which recently went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also announced its integration with RobinHood Crypto. After obtaining virtual asset licenses in the UK, Canada, Singapore, and other markets, RobinHood has taken a proactive approach in the compliant cryptocurrency trading market.



Furthermore, an increasing number of brokerage firms are exploring the same path. Futu Securities, Tiger Brokers, and others are also dipping their toes into cryptocurrency trading, with some having applied for or obtained the VA license from the Hong Kong SFC. Although their user bases are currently small, traditional brokerages have a natural advantage in user trust, regulatory licenses, and low fee structures. This could pose a threat to native cryptocurrency platforms in the future.



User Data Breach: Is Coinbase Still Secure?


In April 2025, security researchers discovered that some Coinbase user data was leaked on the dark web. While the platform initially responded by attributing it to a "technical misinformation," it still raised concerns among users regarding its security and privacy protection. Just two days before Dow Jones Indexes announced Coinbase's addition to the S&P 500 Index, on May 11, 2025, Coinbase received an email from an unknown threat actor claiming to have obtained customer account information and internal documents, demanding a $20 million ransom to keep the data private. Subsequent investigations confirmed the data breach.


Cybercriminals obtained the data by bribing overseas customer service agents and support staff, mainly in "non-U.S. regions such as India." These agents abused their access to Coinbase's internal customer support system and stole customer data. As early as February this year, blockchain detective ZachXBT revealed on X platform that between December 2024 and January 2025, Coinbase users lost over $65 million to social engineering scams, with the actual amount potentially higher.


Among the victims was a well-known figure, 67-year-old Ed Suman, an established artist in the art world for nearly two decades, having been involved in the creation of artworks such as Jeff Koons' "Balloon Dog" sculpture. Earlier this year, he fell victim to an impersonation scam involving fake Coinbase customer support, resulting in a loss of over $2 million in cryptocurrency. ZachXBT critiqued Coinbase for its inadequate handling of such scams, noting that other major exchanges have not faced similar issues and recommending Coinbase to enhance its security measures.


Amidst a series of ongoing social engineering incidents, although there has not been any impact on user assets at the technical level so far, it has raised concerns among many retail and institutional investors. Especially institutions holding massive assets on Coinbase. Just considering the U.S. BTC ETF institutions, as of mid-May 2025, they collectively hold nearly 840,000 BTC, and 75% of these are custodied by Coinbase. If we price BTC at $100,000, this amount reaches a staggering $63 billion, which is equivalent to the nominal GDP of two Iceland in the year 2024.


Visualization: ChatGPT, Source: Farside


In addition, Coinbase Custody also serves over 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, family offices, pension funds, and endowments. As of the Q1 2025 financial report, Coinbase's total assets under management (including institutional and retail clients) reached $404 billion. The specific amount of institutional custodied assets was not explicitly disclosed in the latest report, but it should still be over 50% based on the Q4 2024 report.


Visualization: ChatGPT


Once this security barrier is breached, not only could the rate of user attrition far exceed expectations, but more importantly, institutional trust in it would undermine the foundation of its business. Therefore, after a hacking event, Coinbase's stock price plummeted significantly.


CEXs are All in Self-Rescue Mode


Facing a decline in spot trading fee revenue, Coinbase is also accelerating its transformation, attempting to find growth opportunities in derivatives and emerging assets. Coinbase acquired a stake in the options platform Deribit at the end of 2024 and announced the official launch of perpetual contract products in 2025. This acquisition fills in Coinbase's gap in options trading and its relatively small global market share.



Deribit has a strong presence in non-U.S. markets, especially in Asia and Europe. The acquisition has enabled Coinbase to gain a dominant position in bitcoin and ethereum options trading on Deribit, accounting for approximately 80% of the global options trading volume, with daily trading volume remaining above $2 billion.


Meanwhile, 80-90% of Deribit's customer base consists of institutional investors, with their professionalism and liquidity in the Bitcoin and Ethereum options market highly favored by institutions. Coinbase's compliance advantage, coupled with its already robust institutional ecosystem, makes it even more suitable. By using institutions as an entry point, it can face the squeeze from giants like Binance and OKX in the derivatives market.



Facing a similar dilemma is Kraken, which is attempting to replicate Binance Futures' model in non-U.S. markets. Since the derivatives market relies more on professional users, fee rates are relatively higher and stickiness is stronger, making it a significant source of revenue for exchanges. In the first half of 2025, Kraken completed the acquisition of TradeStation Crypto and a futures exchange, aiming to build a complete derivatives trading ecosystem to hedge the risk of declining spot transaction fee income.


With the surge of Memecoin in 2024, Binance, OKX, and various CEX platforms began massively listing small-market-cap, highly volatile tokens to activate active trading users. Due to the wealth effect and trading activity of Memecoins, Coinbase was also forced to join the battle, successively listing popular tokens from the Solana ecosystem such as BOOK OF MEME and Dogwifhat. Although these coins are controversial, they are frequently traded, with fee rates several times higher than mainstream coins, serving as a "blood-boosting" method for spot trading.


However, due to its status as a publicly traded company, this practice is a riskier endeavor for Coinbase. Even in the current crypto-friendly environment, the SEC is still investigating whether tokens like SOL, ADA, and SAND constitute securities.


In addition to the forced transformation strategies carried out by the aforementioned CEXs, they are also starting to lay out RWAs and the most talked-about stablecoin payment fields, such as the PYUSD launched through a collaboration between Coinbase and Paypal, Coinbase's support for the Euro stablecoin EURC by Circle that complies with EU MiCA regulatory requirements, or the USD1 launched through a collaboration between Binance and WIFL. In the increasingly crowded trading field, many CEXs have shifted their focus from just the trading market to the application field.


The golden age of transaction fees has quietly ended, and the second half of the crypto exchange platform game has silently begun.


Arthur Hayes: Why I'm Betting on ETH While the Market Is Obsessed with SOL

"I personally have also allocated 20% to gold, expecting the price of gold to potentially rise to $10,000-20,000 by the end of this market cycle."

Deconstructing Binance Alpha2.0's New "Asia-Led Liquidity Mining" Model

Deep Dive into the Failure of Binance Alpha 1.0 and the Strategic Pivot of Alpha 2.0

How to Get Rich in Crypto Without Relying on Luck? Financial Veteran Raoul Pal's Macro Insights and Investment Path

2008 Financial Crisis "Oracle" Raoul Pal on Cryptocurrency, Resilient Wealth, and Macro Insights.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more