Binance Research Airdrop Report: How to Successfully Airdrop?

By: blockbeats|2025/03/25 04:00:04
Share
copy
Original Article Title: "Decoding Binance Research Institute's Airdrop Report: From Simple Distribution to Complex Game Theory, Where Is the Future of Airdrops?"
Original Source: DeepTech TechFlow

If there are still newcomers entering the industry, then airdrops are most likely still their first stop.

From simple airdrop farming to complex interactions between projects and users, airdrops have gradually become a mix of love and hate.

For users, the love comes from successful airdrops bringing significant rewards, but the hate stems from complex rules, tedious tasks, and even opaque distribution mechanisms;

For projects, the love is that airdrops can still bring short-term traffic and attention, but wash trading and declining community trust also give them a headache.

People change.

After experiencing multiple rounds of bull and bear markets, cryptocurrency market users still hold on to the expectation of a "free lunch," but their behavior has become more rational. Projects have gradually realized that simple airdrops can no longer meet the needs of community development, and they are now attempting more complex and transparent distribution mechanisms.

For example, Hyperliquid's airdrop was highly praised for rewarding early users, while Redstone's airdrop sparked strong community opposition due to a last-minute change in the distribution ratio.

It's already 2025, can airdrops still play their role?

Recently, Binance Research Institute released a report titled "Where Are Our Airdrops Going?" providing us with an in-depth view. By analyzing the current status, issues, and improvement directions of airdrops, perhaps both projects and users can find better solutions.

DeepTech TechFlow has organized and summarized the core content of this report, with key points as follows.

Key Points

Although the airdrop model still has many shortcomings, its position in the industry cannot be ignored. The two popular classifications of airdrops are:

· Retroactive Airdrops: Mainly reward existing users based on their historical behavior to distribute tokens, aiming to enhance community loyalty.

· Engagement Airdrops: By notifying users in advance and setting task incentives, they attract new users and increase project exposure. It is more suitable for early-stage projects to seize market share and build the initial user base.

· Areas for Improvement: Clear distribution rules and standards help reduce user dissatisfaction and misunderstanding. Project teams need to listen more to the community's voice. Avoid excessive biasing of resources towards internal teams or whales to avoid harming the interests of regular users. The introduction of on-chain monitoring tools and "human identity verification" technology is expected to reduce airdrop gaming behavior, making airdrops more fair and efficient.

Through these key points, the report provides us with a clear framework to help us understand the current state of airdrops and possible future directions.

From Simple Distribution to Complex Game

Since the first airdrop event in 2014, airdrops have a 10-year history in the industry.

The first notable airdrop was Auroracoin in 2014, which aimed to promote the national cryptocurrency to Icelandic residents. At that time, users only needed to enter their national identity number on the Auroracoin website to claim the tokens.

By comparison, the Hyperliquid HYPE airdrop (November 2024) may be one of the largest and most well-received airdrops to date, further solidifying airdrops as a powerful tool for user engagement. With a peak valuation exceeding $100 billion, the HYPE token airdrop surpassed Uniswap to become the largest airdrop calculated by peak price.

However, in response to increased front-running, the project team has also increased the complexity of qualifying for the airdrop.

Unlike early airdrops, today's airdrops usually require users to complete multiple tasks, such as using testnets, participating in social media activities, engaging in governance, downloading mobile applications, and cross-chain fund transfers. These necessary operations often directly benefit the project, such as increasing on-chain activity or enhancing social media exposure.

Current airdrops can be divided into the following two parts.

Type 1: Retroactive Airdrops

Some earlier airdrops, such as Auroracoin, Uniswap, and StarkNet airdrops, did not publicly disclose any relevant information before allocating the airdrop; the purpose was to reward existing community users and enhance their loyalty.

Characteristics:

More user-centric and usually implemented by protocols that already have a large user base and market share. They do not need airdrops to kickstart the initial user group.

Use Cases: Mature protocols used to reward existing users and strengthen community relationships.

Type 2: Engagement Airdrops

By informing users of an upcoming token generation event, incentivizing user participation in specific activities.

· Features:

More project-centric. Mainly used to attract new users and help the project gain initial market share. Often incentivizes user behavior through programs such as point systems.

· Typical Examples: Redstone, Kaito, and Hyperliquid.

· Use Cases:

Emerging projects that need to remain competitive through airdrops and competition protocols (may also use token incentive mechanisms).

Binance Research Airdrop Report: How to Successfully Airdrop?

Sentiment Analysis of Token Airdrops in the Past Year

To better understand the recent development of airdrops, this report also utilized Grok AI to conduct a brief sentiment analysis of some significant airdrops in the past year, providing ratings.

Source of sentiment analysis: Posts on X, including but not limited to community feedback, the ratio of positive to negative comments, interaction levels, and specific criticism or praise content.

Grok also reviewed official announcements in online articles, tokenomics, and airdrop eligibility criteria. Sentiment was categorized as positive, negative, or mixed based on the dominant reaction.

Below is the original table from the report, which was translated using AI. Some text may contain ambiguity; however, the scores in the original table reflect the community's varying opinions on different airdrops, with higher scores indicating a more positive sentiment.

Experiences and Lessons from Past Airdrops

Last-Minute Reduction in Allocation

Some crypto projects initially promised to allocate a certain percentage of tokens to the community, but later reduced this percentage, reallocating tokens to insiders or the project treasury. Recently, the Redstone airdrop sparked strong community backlash as the team reduced the community allocation from 9.5% to 5% just before the token distribution date. Many community members viewed this behavior as unfair.

Lesson Learned

· Clearly Define Token Allocation Early: Clearly communicate the token allocation plan before the Token Generation Event (TGE).

· Avoid Last-Minute Changes: Try to refrain from making last-minute adjustments to the allocation.

· Consult Stakeholders When Necessary: If a change to the allocation is indeed necessary, avoid unilateral decisions. Discuss with key stakeholders (such as investors, the community, exchanges) and ensure thorough communication.

Opaque Qualification Criteria and Mismatched Expectations

Some projects conveyed unclear standards for airdrop eligibility, leading to uneven reward distribution that failed to accurately reflect users' actual activities. The October 2024 airdrop of Scroll (distributing 7% of its total SCR token supply, i.e., 70 million tokens) faced criticism due to its arbitrary snapshot mechanism and hidden rules.

Lesson Learned

· Clearly Communicate Allocation Rules: Ensure transparent rules to avoid leaving users with too much guesswork, which often results in misaligned expectations and reality.

· Guard Against Sybil Attacks: Consider using on-chain monitoring tools or Proof-of-Humanity tools to reduce abusive behavior.

Excessive Allocation to Insiders and KOLs

Many projects allocate a larger proportion of tokens to the team, investors, and VCs, leaving a smaller share for the community. For instance, in the February 2025 airdrop of KAITO, 43.3% of tokens were allocated to the team and investors, with only 10% allocated to the community, sparking public debate on the X platform.

Some projects allocate a significant amount of tokens to influencers, who may choose to sell immediately, thereby diluting the token's value and harming the interests of genuine users. Reportedly, KAITO also faced controversy for distributing a large amount of tokens to influencers, who sold the tokens shortly after the Token Generation Event (TGE), impacting the token price and eroding community trust.

Lesson Learned

· Exercise Caution in Allocation Ratios: Learn from token allocation outcomes of projects of similar scale or nature, and pay attention to the market's response to the allocation scheme.

· Implement Vesting Period and Lockup Mechanism: Implementing a vesting period and token lockup for insiders and influencers can reduce early sell pressure post TGE and better align their interests with the project's long-term goals.

Technical Barriers in the Claiming Process

A complex or buggy claiming process can hinder users from claiming tokens, effectively reducing the distribution amount and significantly undermining the intended purpose of the airdrop claiming process.

For example, the December 2024 airdrop by Magic Eden, which aimed to promote its mobile wallet app through the airdrop, reportedly resulted in user frustration rather than anticipation due to feedback on platform-related bugs and unclear instructions.

Learnings

Airdrop claiming is a key first touchpoint for many potential users. Ensure a seamless and user-friendly process to increase the likelihood of user retention.

How to Improve Airdrops?

Enhance Transparency

Set clear objectives: The project team needs to establish clear objectives for the airdrop or token incentive program and ensure these goals align with the project's long-term vision. Clear communication of objectives: Through clear communication, align community actions with the project's goals and vision to reduce dissatisfaction stemming from inconsistent behavior weight allocation.

Boost Community Engagement

The community is a project's core strength: Technology and products can iterate quickly, but community building takes time and patience. The project's long-term success relies on a strong and loyal community. Balancing transparency with engagement: Transparency is foundational, but transparency alone is not enough. The project team needs to engage the community more deeply in project development through interaction and feedback mechanisms to enhance a sense of ownership and loyalty. Challenges of user fluidity: The open crypto industry has lowered user switching costs, so projects must retain users through stronger community stickiness and a sense of ownership.

Enhance Monitoring Mechanisms

Some projects (like LayerZero) have already partnered with on-chain analytics companies (such as Nansen) to identify and exclude airdrop eligibility for "whale attackers" through on-chain data analysis.

As technology advances, on-chain monitoring tools will become more sophisticated and widely applied, making it easier for project teams to detect and mitigate malicious behavior.

"Proof-of-Humanity" tools are expected to help prevent airdrop abuse in the future while protecting user anonymity and privacy. Such tools may become a key means to address the gamification of airdrops issue.

Original Article Link

You may also like

a16z Leads $18M Seed Round for Catena Labs, Crypto Industry Bets on Stablecoin AI Payment

Traditional finance is still stuck in a "human-to-human" model, while Catena aims to achieve "AI-to-AI" interaction.

Pharos, deeply integrated with AntChain, is about to launch. How can we get involved?

What is the relationship between the $8 million funded NewChain and Ant, and how will they interact?

$COIN Joins S&P 500, but Coinbase Isn't Celebrating

On May 13, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced that Coinbase would officially replace Discover Financial Services in the S&P 500 on May 19. While other companies like Block and MicroStrategy, closely tied to Bitcoin, were already part of the S&P 500, Coinbase became the first cryptocurrency exchange whose primary business is in the index. This also signifies that cryptocurrency is gradually moving from the fringes to the mainstream in the U.S.



On the day of the announcement, Coinbase's stock price surged by 23%, surpassing the $250 mark. However, just 3 days later, Coinbase was hit by two consecutive events: a hack where employees were bribed to steal customer data and a demand for a $20 million ransom, and an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the authenticity of its claim of having over 100 million "verified users" in its securities filings and marketing materials. These two events acted as mini-bombs, and at the time of writing, Coinbase's stock had already dropped by over 7.3%.


Coincidentally, Discover Financial Services, being replaced by Coinbase, can also be considered the "Coinbase" of the previous payment era. Discover is a U.S.-based digital banking and payment services company headquartered in Illinois, founded in 1960. Its payment network, Discover Network, is the fourth largest payment network apart from Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.


In April, after the approval of the acquisition of Discover by the sixth-largest U.S. bank, Capital One, this well-established digital banking company of over 60 years smoothly handed over its S&P 500 "seat" to this emerging cryptocurrency "bank." This unexpected coincidence also portrayed the handover between the new and old eras in Coinbase's entry into the S&P 500, resembling a relay race scene. However, this relay baton also brought Coinbase's accumulated "external troubles and internal strife" to a tipping point.


Side Effects of ETFs


Over the past decade, cryptocurrency exchanges have been the most stable "profit machines." They play a role in providing liquidity to the entire industry and rely on trading fees to sustain their operations. However, with the comprehensive rollout of ETF products in the U.S. market, this profit model is facing unprecedented challenges. As the leader in the "American stack," with over 80% of its business coming from the U.S., Coinbase is most affected by this.



Starting from the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, traditional financial capital has significantly onboarded users and funds that originally belonged to exchanges in a more cost-effective, compliant, and transparent manner. The transaction fee revenue of cryptocurrency exchanges has started to decline, and this trend may further intensify in the coming months.


According to Coinbase's 2024 Q4 financial report, the platform's total trading revenue was $417 million, a 45% year-on-year decrease. The contribution of BTC and ETH's trading revenue dropped from 65% in the same period last year to less than 50%.


This decline is not a result of a decrease in market enthusiasm. In fact, since the approval of the Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the inflow of BTC into the U.S. market has continued to reach new highs, with asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity rapidly expanding their management scale. Data shows that BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) alone has surpassed $17 billion in assets under management. As of mid-May 2025, the cumulative net inflow of 11 major institutional Bitcoin spot ETFs on the market has exceeded $41.5 billion, with a total net asset value of $1214.69 billion, accounting for approximately 5.91% of the total Bitcoin market capitalization.


Chart showing the trend of net outflows for Grayscale among the 11 institutions


Institutional investors and some retail investors are shifting towards ETF products, partly due to compliance and tax considerations. On one hand, ETFs have much lower trading costs compared to cryptocurrency exchanges. While Coinbase's spot trading fee rate varies annually in a tiered manner but averages around 1.49%, for example, the management fee for IBIT ETF is only 0.25%, and the majority of ETF institution fees fluctuate around 0.15% to 0.25%.



In other words, the more rational users are, the more likely they are to move from exchanges to ETF products, especially for investors aiming for long-term holdings.


According to multiple sources, several institutions, including VanEck and Grayscale, have submitted applications to the SEC for a Solana (SOL) ETF, with some institutions also planning to submit an XRP ETF proposal. Once approved, this may trigger a new round of fund migration. According to a report submitted by Coinbase to the SEC, as of April, the platform's trading revenue from XRP and Solana accounted for 18% and 10%, nearly one-third of the platform's fee revenue.



However, the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs passed in 2024 also reduced the fees for these two tokens on Coinbase from 30% and 15% to 26% and 10%, respectively. If the SOL and XRP ETFs are approved, it will further undermine the core fee revenue of exchanges like Coinbase.


The expansion of ETF products is gradually weakening the financial intermediary status of cryptocurrency exchanges. From their original roles as matchmakers and clearers to now gradually becoming mere "on-ramps and off-ramps" for funds, exchanges are seeing their marginal value squeezed by ETFs.


Robinhood Takes a Stand, Traditional Brokerages Join the Fray


On May 12, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins gave a keynote speech at the Tokenization and Cryptocurrency Working Group roundtable. The theme of his speech revolved around "It is a new day at the SEC," where he indicated that the SEC would not approach enforcement and regulation the same way as before but would instead pave the way for cryptocurrency assets in the U.S. market.



With signs of cryptocurrency compliance such as the SEC's "NEW DAY" declaration, an increasing number of traditional brokerages are attempting to enter the cryptocurrency industry. One of the most representative cases is the well-known U.S. brokerage Robinhood, which began expanding its crypto business in 2018. By the time of its IPO in 2021, Robinhood's crypto business revenue accounted for over 50% of the company, with a significant boost from the Dogecoin "moonshot" promoted by Musk.


In Q1 2025 earnings report, Robinhood showcased strong growth, especially in revenue from cryptocurrency and options trading. Fueled by Trump's Memecoin, cryptocurrency-related revenue reached $250 million, nearly doubling year-over-year. Consequently, Robinhood Gold subscription users reached 3.5 million, a 90% increase from the previous year, with the rapid growth of Robinhood Gold providing the company with a stable source of income.



Meanwhile, RobinHood is actively pursuing acquisitions in the cryptocurrency space. In 2024, it announced a $2 billion acquisition of the long-standing European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp. Additionally, Canada's largest cryptocurrency CEX, WonderFi, which recently went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also announced its integration with RobinHood Crypto. After obtaining virtual asset licenses in the UK, Canada, Singapore, and other markets, RobinHood has taken a proactive approach in the compliant cryptocurrency trading market.



Furthermore, an increasing number of brokerage firms are exploring the same path. Futu Securities, Tiger Brokers, and others are also dipping their toes into cryptocurrency trading, with some having applied for or obtained the VA license from the Hong Kong SFC. Although their user bases are currently small, traditional brokerages have a natural advantage in user trust, regulatory licenses, and low fee structures. This could pose a threat to native cryptocurrency platforms in the future.



User Data Breach: Is Coinbase Still Secure?


In April 2025, security researchers discovered that some Coinbase user data was leaked on the dark web. While the platform initially responded by attributing it to a "technical misinformation," it still raised concerns among users regarding its security and privacy protection. Just two days before Dow Jones Indexes announced Coinbase's addition to the S&P 500 Index, on May 11, 2025, Coinbase received an email from an unknown threat actor claiming to have obtained customer account information and internal documents, demanding a $20 million ransom to keep the data private. Subsequent investigations confirmed the data breach.


Cybercriminals obtained the data by bribing overseas customer service agents and support staff, mainly in "non-U.S. regions such as India." These agents abused their access to Coinbase's internal customer support system and stole customer data. As early as February this year, blockchain detective ZachXBT revealed on X platform that between December 2024 and January 2025, Coinbase users lost over $65 million to social engineering scams, with the actual amount potentially higher.


Among the victims was a well-known figure, 67-year-old Ed Suman, an established artist in the art world for nearly two decades, having been involved in the creation of artworks such as Jeff Koons' "Balloon Dog" sculpture. Earlier this year, he fell victim to an impersonation scam involving fake Coinbase customer support, resulting in a loss of over $2 million in cryptocurrency. ZachXBT critiqued Coinbase for its inadequate handling of such scams, noting that other major exchanges have not faced similar issues and recommending Coinbase to enhance its security measures.


Amidst a series of ongoing social engineering incidents, although there has not been any impact on user assets at the technical level so far, it has raised concerns among many retail and institutional investors. Especially institutions holding massive assets on Coinbase. Just considering the U.S. BTC ETF institutions, as of mid-May 2025, they collectively hold nearly 840,000 BTC, and 75% of these are custodied by Coinbase. If we price BTC at $100,000, this amount reaches a staggering $63 billion, which is equivalent to the nominal GDP of two Iceland in the year 2024.


Visualization: ChatGPT, Source: Farside


In addition, Coinbase Custody also serves over 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, family offices, pension funds, and endowments. As of the Q1 2025 financial report, Coinbase's total assets under management (including institutional and retail clients) reached $404 billion. The specific amount of institutional custodied assets was not explicitly disclosed in the latest report, but it should still be over 50% based on the Q4 2024 report.


Visualization: ChatGPT


Once this security barrier is breached, not only could the rate of user attrition far exceed expectations, but more importantly, institutional trust in it would undermine the foundation of its business. Therefore, after a hacking event, Coinbase's stock price plummeted significantly.


CEXs are All in Self-Rescue Mode


Facing a decline in spot trading fee revenue, Coinbase is also accelerating its transformation, attempting to find growth opportunities in derivatives and emerging assets. Coinbase acquired a stake in the options platform Deribit at the end of 2024 and announced the official launch of perpetual contract products in 2025. This acquisition fills in Coinbase's gap in options trading and its relatively small global market share.



Deribit has a strong presence in non-U.S. markets, especially in Asia and Europe. The acquisition has enabled Coinbase to gain a dominant position in bitcoin and ethereum options trading on Deribit, accounting for approximately 80% of the global options trading volume, with daily trading volume remaining above $2 billion.


Meanwhile, 80-90% of Deribit's customer base consists of institutional investors, with their professionalism and liquidity in the Bitcoin and Ethereum options market highly favored by institutions. Coinbase's compliance advantage, coupled with its already robust institutional ecosystem, makes it even more suitable. By using institutions as an entry point, it can face the squeeze from giants like Binance and OKX in the derivatives market.



Facing a similar dilemma is Kraken, which is attempting to replicate Binance Futures' model in non-U.S. markets. Since the derivatives market relies more on professional users, fee rates are relatively higher and stickiness is stronger, making it a significant source of revenue for exchanges. In the first half of 2025, Kraken completed the acquisition of TradeStation Crypto and a futures exchange, aiming to build a complete derivatives trading ecosystem to hedge the risk of declining spot transaction fee income.


With the surge of Memecoin in 2024, Binance, OKX, and various CEX platforms began massively listing small-market-cap, highly volatile tokens to activate active trading users. Due to the wealth effect and trading activity of Memecoins, Coinbase was also forced to join the battle, successively listing popular tokens from the Solana ecosystem such as BOOK OF MEME and Dogwifhat. Although these coins are controversial, they are frequently traded, with fee rates several times higher than mainstream coins, serving as a "blood-boosting" method for spot trading.


However, due to its status as a publicly traded company, this practice is a riskier endeavor for Coinbase. Even in the current crypto-friendly environment, the SEC is still investigating whether tokens like SOL, ADA, and SAND constitute securities.


In addition to the forced transformation strategies carried out by the aforementioned CEXs, they are also starting to lay out RWAs and the most talked-about stablecoin payment fields, such as the PYUSD launched through a collaboration between Coinbase and Paypal, Coinbase's support for the Euro stablecoin EURC by Circle that complies with EU MiCA regulatory requirements, or the USD1 launched through a collaboration between Binance and WIFL. In the increasingly crowded trading field, many CEXs have shifted their focus from just the trading market to the application field.


The golden age of transaction fees has quietly ended, and the second half of the crypto exchange platform game has silently begun.


Key Market Insights for May 16th, how much did you miss out on?

1. On-chain Flows: $111.3M inflow to Ethereum this week; $237.6M outflow from Berachain 2. Largest Price Swings: $ETHFI, $NEIRO 3. Top News: Data: Solana Network's revenue reached $7.9M on the 13th, surpassing the sum of all other L1 and L2 chains

MOG Coin Skyrockets as Elon Musk and Garry Tan Embrace "mog/acc" Identity

「mog/acc」 is rapidly sweeping through various figures, from Elon Musk to Garry Tan, boosting the project's visibility and ultimately driving up the price.

The End and Rebirth of NFTs: How the Meme Coin Craze Ended the PFP Era?

There must be another Labubu hidden beneath the ruins.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more