Four.meme: How to Turn the BSC Chain into a DeFi Meme Wonderland Using AI Concept

By: blockbeats|2025/04/21 03:30:04
Share
copy
Original Title: "How Four.meme Turned BSC Chain into a Leek Magic Experimental Field with AI Concepts"
Original Author: Lawrence, Mars Finance

Foreword: An Art Performance That Can't Even Bother with "Surface Kung Fu"

Old leeks who have been in the crypto circle for many years are already accustomed to the classic three-piece suit used by project teams: drawing pies with PPT, spinning stories with a whitepaper, and giving buy signals through KOLs.

Four.meme: How to Turn the BSC Chain into a DeFi Meme Wonderland Using AI Concept

However, in the early morning of April 18, 2025, during the SKYAI presale project launched by the Four.meme platform, the posture of "writing perfunctorily on the face and engraving the harvest leek into DNA" refreshed the industry's lower limit. This magical drama, which combines "AI concept bombing," "rule black hole," "contract address typos," and "CZ's mystical retweet," can be described as the blockchain version of "The Emperor's New Clothes"—the project team parading naked, while the onlookers insist on praising the clothes as beautiful.

This article will dissect the new clothes of SKYAI from four dimensions: "technology hollowing," "rule opacity," "platform disqualification," and "community madness," and explore how Four.meme has fallen from a "Meme Launchpad" to a "Leek Shredder."

Chapter 1 Technology Section: When the "AI Protocol" Falls into the "Emperor's New Code"

1.1 MCP Protocol? Better Rename It to "Make Crypto Pretend"

SKYAI claims that its core is the MCP protocol (Machine-Contract Protocol), which is said to enable AI to achieve "smart contract audits," "cross-chain data tracking," and "real-time on-chain analysis." However, looking at the project's information, it's full of Internet jargon like "empowerment," "upgrade," "next generation," with specific technical details more mysterious than Satoshi Nakamoto's true identity. This is reminiscent of the classic tactic in e-commerce presales where "consumer is deceived with model photos, while actual delivery is flea market goods."

Even more absurdly, the project team forcefully "collided" OpenAI's Function Calling and Anthropic's Claude model, claiming to "integrate local tools into the BSC chain." However, upon closer inspection, the so-called "technical breakthrough" is nothing more than renaming the API interface of ChatGPT—similar to packaging "45-day presale delivery" as "artisan spirit slow living."

1.2 Roadmap: ETH/Base Chain Support? Why Not Just Say "Schrodinger's Multi-chain"?

SKYAI's roadmap is like a page from an e-commerce platform that "does not indicate shipping time on the pre-order page, only reveals it after payment, stating a one-month wait."

Despite primarily focusing on the BSC chain, mentioning ETH/Base support in the plan is akin to a restaurant selling "freshly stir-fried crayfish," then informing customers, "The crayfish are still growing in the lake; pay first, and it will be served in three years." This "harvesting current funds with future concepts" tactic is so audacious that even the Jiangsu Provincial Consumer Protection Commission would acknowledge its expertise.

Chapter 2 Rulebook: It's Not about Being Darker; It's about a Darker "Rug Pull Playbook"

2.1 No Presale Cap: Contemporary "Ponzi Scheme" Art Performance

SKYAI's presale rules can be considered the crypto version of a "Rule of the Ruthless": no upper limit on the amount, no token distribution details, and rules revealed only after it ends. This is like an online seller saying, "Dear, pay first, and we'll tell you what you bought when it arrives." With reference to the China Consumers Association's characterization of "ultra-long presales," this operation is suspected of leveraging its dominant position to shift risks onto investors—essentially engaging in "bullying through standard contract" towards investors.

2.2 Incorrect Contract Address: Not Even Bothering to Pretend to Be "Professional Fumbling"

If the project team can mistakenly type the CA address, it's akin to an e-commerce merchant "mistakenly listing a link for a down jacket as a short-sleeved shirt."

What's even more surreal is that some community members argue, "This is an anti-whale strategy!"—Following this logic, a bank's ATM dispensing counterfeit money could also be explained as an "anti-money laundering innovation." This kind of "packaging accidents as stories" rhetoric would even make Pinduoduo's "Slash the Price" algorithm bow in defeat.

Chapter 3 Platform Play: How Four.meme Shifted from a "Launchpad" to a "Rug Pull Incinerator"

3.1 Launch Platform Hosting IDOs? How about Switching to Selling "Air Coin Blind Boxes"?

As a Meme coin launchpad, Four.meme should have been the guardian of a "fair launch" but instead personally partook in promoting presales, akin to a Taobao customer service representative opening a store to sell counterfeit goods. Its actions completely contradict the decentralization spirit of Web3 and instead replicate the monopoly tactics of e-commerce platforms, playing both the judge and the player. Considering Four.meme's past of being hacked for $15,000 due to a contract flaw, endorsing SKYAI this time is more like a gambler's "desperate move in a crisis."

3.2 CZ Retweet Metaphysics: Modern "Shitcoin" Behavioral Economics

The community has developed a bizarre consensus that "CZ loves to retweet shit, just go all in," essentially alienating investment into a "retweet lottery."

Similar to the consumer psychology of "knowing it's a scam but still betting on the seller to deliver" in e-commerce pre-sales, rug pull victims have long been trapped in the "sunk cost fallacy delusion": since the BSC chain is the "chain of beasts," it's better to voluntarily become "feed" — this kind of magical realism is something even Marquez novels dare not write about.

Chapter 4 Ecology: Why BSC Chain Has Become a "Magical Realism Test Field"

4.1 From "Innovation Hub" to "Scam Breeding Ground": A Brief History of the BSC Chain's Downfall

Four.meme claimed that its four projects were selected for the BNB Chain's $100 million incentive plan, but the SKYAI incident exposed a deep crisis in the BSC ecosystem: heavy on marketing, light on technology; heavy on traffic, light on compliance; heavy on hype, light on value. This closely resembles the logic of e-commerce platforms that tolerate "super long pre-sales" — pleasing the capital market with GMV data at the expense of consumer trust. The characterization of "unfair clauses" by the Jiangsu Consumer Protection Commission seems perfectly fitting in the context of the BSC chain.

4.2 The Birth of the "Chain of Beasts": When Everyone Is Pretending to Play Games

The community's nickname for the BSC chain, the "chain of beasts," is essentially a collective catharsis of systemic disorder. Just as e-commerce platforms turn a blind eye to merchants "reselling returned goods," Four.meme's tolerance of SKYAI reflects the entire ecosystem's "race to the bottom": whoever can harvest rug pull victims faster is the "innovation pioneer." This distorted set of values has allowed blockchain technology to be completely reduced to a tool for "Ponzi magic."

Conclusion: Maintaining Sobriety in the "Clown Era" in N Ways

The SKYAI pre-sale farce is essentially a microcosm of the cryptocurrency world's "bad money drives out good money" scenario. When the technological narrative becomes a tool for rug pulls, community consensus devolves into retweet metaphysics, and platform credibility loses to traffic anxiety.

For the average investor, the author's advice is only threefold:

​​· Stay Away from "Three-No Pre-Sales": Projects with no technical whitepaper, no on-chain audit, and no clear rules are essentially P2P scams masquerading in Web3 clothing.

· Beware of "KOL Pyramid Schemes": Treating CZ's retweets as investment advice is akin to buying financial products based on Li Jiaqi's livestreams — the former may make you lose money, while the latter will at least get you a face mask.

· Understand the Nature of the Platform: When Four.meme started selling "Air Coin Blind Boxes," its business model had fallen from a "service fee model" to a "scam profit-sharing model."

You can temporarily deceive all the rug pull victims, or you can deceive some rug pull victims forever, but you cannot deceive all rug pull victims forever—unless the rug pull victims choose to play dead voluntarily.

Original Article Link

You may also like

a16z Leads $18M Seed Round for Catena Labs, Crypto Industry Bets on Stablecoin AI Payment

Traditional finance is still stuck in a "human-to-human" model, while Catena aims to achieve "AI-to-AI" interaction.

Pharos, deeply integrated with AntChain, is about to launch. How can we get involved?

What is the relationship between the $8 million funded NewChain and Ant, and how will they interact?

$COIN Joins S&P 500, but Coinbase Isn't Celebrating

On May 13, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced that Coinbase would officially replace Discover Financial Services in the S&P 500 on May 19. While other companies like Block and MicroStrategy, closely tied to Bitcoin, were already part of the S&P 500, Coinbase became the first cryptocurrency exchange whose primary business is in the index. This also signifies that cryptocurrency is gradually moving from the fringes to the mainstream in the U.S.



On the day of the announcement, Coinbase's stock price surged by 23%, surpassing the $250 mark. However, just 3 days later, Coinbase was hit by two consecutive events: a hack where employees were bribed to steal customer data and a demand for a $20 million ransom, and an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the authenticity of its claim of having over 100 million "verified users" in its securities filings and marketing materials. These two events acted as mini-bombs, and at the time of writing, Coinbase's stock had already dropped by over 7.3%.


Coincidentally, Discover Financial Services, being replaced by Coinbase, can also be considered the "Coinbase" of the previous payment era. Discover is a U.S.-based digital banking and payment services company headquartered in Illinois, founded in 1960. Its payment network, Discover Network, is the fourth largest payment network apart from Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.


In April, after the approval of the acquisition of Discover by the sixth-largest U.S. bank, Capital One, this well-established digital banking company of over 60 years smoothly handed over its S&P 500 "seat" to this emerging cryptocurrency "bank." This unexpected coincidence also portrayed the handover between the new and old eras in Coinbase's entry into the S&P 500, resembling a relay race scene. However, this relay baton also brought Coinbase's accumulated "external troubles and internal strife" to a tipping point.


Side Effects of ETFs


Over the past decade, cryptocurrency exchanges have been the most stable "profit machines." They play a role in providing liquidity to the entire industry and rely on trading fees to sustain their operations. However, with the comprehensive rollout of ETF products in the U.S. market, this profit model is facing unprecedented challenges. As the leader in the "American stack," with over 80% of its business coming from the U.S., Coinbase is most affected by this.



Starting from the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, traditional financial capital has significantly onboarded users and funds that originally belonged to exchanges in a more cost-effective, compliant, and transparent manner. The transaction fee revenue of cryptocurrency exchanges has started to decline, and this trend may further intensify in the coming months.


According to Coinbase's 2024 Q4 financial report, the platform's total trading revenue was $417 million, a 45% year-on-year decrease. The contribution of BTC and ETH's trading revenue dropped from 65% in the same period last year to less than 50%.


This decline is not a result of a decrease in market enthusiasm. In fact, since the approval of the Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the inflow of BTC into the U.S. market has continued to reach new highs, with asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity rapidly expanding their management scale. Data shows that BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) alone has surpassed $17 billion in assets under management. As of mid-May 2025, the cumulative net inflow of 11 major institutional Bitcoin spot ETFs on the market has exceeded $41.5 billion, with a total net asset value of $1214.69 billion, accounting for approximately 5.91% of the total Bitcoin market capitalization.


Chart showing the trend of net outflows for Grayscale among the 11 institutions


Institutional investors and some retail investors are shifting towards ETF products, partly due to compliance and tax considerations. On one hand, ETFs have much lower trading costs compared to cryptocurrency exchanges. While Coinbase's spot trading fee rate varies annually in a tiered manner but averages around 1.49%, for example, the management fee for IBIT ETF is only 0.25%, and the majority of ETF institution fees fluctuate around 0.15% to 0.25%.



In other words, the more rational users are, the more likely they are to move from exchanges to ETF products, especially for investors aiming for long-term holdings.


According to multiple sources, several institutions, including VanEck and Grayscale, have submitted applications to the SEC for a Solana (SOL) ETF, with some institutions also planning to submit an XRP ETF proposal. Once approved, this may trigger a new round of fund migration. According to a report submitted by Coinbase to the SEC, as of April, the platform's trading revenue from XRP and Solana accounted for 18% and 10%, nearly one-third of the platform's fee revenue.



However, the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs passed in 2024 also reduced the fees for these two tokens on Coinbase from 30% and 15% to 26% and 10%, respectively. If the SOL and XRP ETFs are approved, it will further undermine the core fee revenue of exchanges like Coinbase.


The expansion of ETF products is gradually weakening the financial intermediary status of cryptocurrency exchanges. From their original roles as matchmakers and clearers to now gradually becoming mere "on-ramps and off-ramps" for funds, exchanges are seeing their marginal value squeezed by ETFs.


Robinhood Takes a Stand, Traditional Brokerages Join the Fray


On May 12, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins gave a keynote speech at the Tokenization and Cryptocurrency Working Group roundtable. The theme of his speech revolved around "It is a new day at the SEC," where he indicated that the SEC would not approach enforcement and regulation the same way as before but would instead pave the way for cryptocurrency assets in the U.S. market.



With signs of cryptocurrency compliance such as the SEC's "NEW DAY" declaration, an increasing number of traditional brokerages are attempting to enter the cryptocurrency industry. One of the most representative cases is the well-known U.S. brokerage Robinhood, which began expanding its crypto business in 2018. By the time of its IPO in 2021, Robinhood's crypto business revenue accounted for over 50% of the company, with a significant boost from the Dogecoin "moonshot" promoted by Musk.


In Q1 2025 earnings report, Robinhood showcased strong growth, especially in revenue from cryptocurrency and options trading. Fueled by Trump's Memecoin, cryptocurrency-related revenue reached $250 million, nearly doubling year-over-year. Consequently, Robinhood Gold subscription users reached 3.5 million, a 90% increase from the previous year, with the rapid growth of Robinhood Gold providing the company with a stable source of income.



Meanwhile, RobinHood is actively pursuing acquisitions in the cryptocurrency space. In 2024, it announced a $2 billion acquisition of the long-standing European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp. Additionally, Canada's largest cryptocurrency CEX, WonderFi, which recently went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also announced its integration with RobinHood Crypto. After obtaining virtual asset licenses in the UK, Canada, Singapore, and other markets, RobinHood has taken a proactive approach in the compliant cryptocurrency trading market.



Furthermore, an increasing number of brokerage firms are exploring the same path. Futu Securities, Tiger Brokers, and others are also dipping their toes into cryptocurrency trading, with some having applied for or obtained the VA license from the Hong Kong SFC. Although their user bases are currently small, traditional brokerages have a natural advantage in user trust, regulatory licenses, and low fee structures. This could pose a threat to native cryptocurrency platforms in the future.



User Data Breach: Is Coinbase Still Secure?


In April 2025, security researchers discovered that some Coinbase user data was leaked on the dark web. While the platform initially responded by attributing it to a "technical misinformation," it still raised concerns among users regarding its security and privacy protection. Just two days before Dow Jones Indexes announced Coinbase's addition to the S&P 500 Index, on May 11, 2025, Coinbase received an email from an unknown threat actor claiming to have obtained customer account information and internal documents, demanding a $20 million ransom to keep the data private. Subsequent investigations confirmed the data breach.


Cybercriminals obtained the data by bribing overseas customer service agents and support staff, mainly in "non-U.S. regions such as India." These agents abused their access to Coinbase's internal customer support system and stole customer data. As early as February this year, blockchain detective ZachXBT revealed on X platform that between December 2024 and January 2025, Coinbase users lost over $65 million to social engineering scams, with the actual amount potentially higher.


Among the victims was a well-known figure, 67-year-old Ed Suman, an established artist in the art world for nearly two decades, having been involved in the creation of artworks such as Jeff Koons' "Balloon Dog" sculpture. Earlier this year, he fell victim to an impersonation scam involving fake Coinbase customer support, resulting in a loss of over $2 million in cryptocurrency. ZachXBT critiqued Coinbase for its inadequate handling of such scams, noting that other major exchanges have not faced similar issues and recommending Coinbase to enhance its security measures.


Amidst a series of ongoing social engineering incidents, although there has not been any impact on user assets at the technical level so far, it has raised concerns among many retail and institutional investors. Especially institutions holding massive assets on Coinbase. Just considering the U.S. BTC ETF institutions, as of mid-May 2025, they collectively hold nearly 840,000 BTC, and 75% of these are custodied by Coinbase. If we price BTC at $100,000, this amount reaches a staggering $63 billion, which is equivalent to the nominal GDP of two Iceland in the year 2024.


Visualization: ChatGPT, Source: Farside


In addition, Coinbase Custody also serves over 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, family offices, pension funds, and endowments. As of the Q1 2025 financial report, Coinbase's total assets under management (including institutional and retail clients) reached $404 billion. The specific amount of institutional custodied assets was not explicitly disclosed in the latest report, but it should still be over 50% based on the Q4 2024 report.


Visualization: ChatGPT


Once this security barrier is breached, not only could the rate of user attrition far exceed expectations, but more importantly, institutional trust in it would undermine the foundation of its business. Therefore, after a hacking event, Coinbase's stock price plummeted significantly.


CEXs are All in Self-Rescue Mode


Facing a decline in spot trading fee revenue, Coinbase is also accelerating its transformation, attempting to find growth opportunities in derivatives and emerging assets. Coinbase acquired a stake in the options platform Deribit at the end of 2024 and announced the official launch of perpetual contract products in 2025. This acquisition fills in Coinbase's gap in options trading and its relatively small global market share.



Deribit has a strong presence in non-U.S. markets, especially in Asia and Europe. The acquisition has enabled Coinbase to gain a dominant position in bitcoin and ethereum options trading on Deribit, accounting for approximately 80% of the global options trading volume, with daily trading volume remaining above $2 billion.


Meanwhile, 80-90% of Deribit's customer base consists of institutional investors, with their professionalism and liquidity in the Bitcoin and Ethereum options market highly favored by institutions. Coinbase's compliance advantage, coupled with its already robust institutional ecosystem, makes it even more suitable. By using institutions as an entry point, it can face the squeeze from giants like Binance and OKX in the derivatives market.



Facing a similar dilemma is Kraken, which is attempting to replicate Binance Futures' model in non-U.S. markets. Since the derivatives market relies more on professional users, fee rates are relatively higher and stickiness is stronger, making it a significant source of revenue for exchanges. In the first half of 2025, Kraken completed the acquisition of TradeStation Crypto and a futures exchange, aiming to build a complete derivatives trading ecosystem to hedge the risk of declining spot transaction fee income.


With the surge of Memecoin in 2024, Binance, OKX, and various CEX platforms began massively listing small-market-cap, highly volatile tokens to activate active trading users. Due to the wealth effect and trading activity of Memecoins, Coinbase was also forced to join the battle, successively listing popular tokens from the Solana ecosystem such as BOOK OF MEME and Dogwifhat. Although these coins are controversial, they are frequently traded, with fee rates several times higher than mainstream coins, serving as a "blood-boosting" method for spot trading.


However, due to its status as a publicly traded company, this practice is a riskier endeavor for Coinbase. Even in the current crypto-friendly environment, the SEC is still investigating whether tokens like SOL, ADA, and SAND constitute securities.


In addition to the forced transformation strategies carried out by the aforementioned CEXs, they are also starting to lay out RWAs and the most talked-about stablecoin payment fields, such as the PYUSD launched through a collaboration between Coinbase and Paypal, Coinbase's support for the Euro stablecoin EURC by Circle that complies with EU MiCA regulatory requirements, or the USD1 launched through a collaboration between Binance and WIFL. In the increasingly crowded trading field, many CEXs have shifted their focus from just the trading market to the application field.


The golden age of transaction fees has quietly ended, and the second half of the crypto exchange platform game has silently begun.


Arthur Hayes: Why I'm Betting on ETH While the Market Is Obsessed with SOL

"I personally have also allocated 20% to gold, expecting the price of gold to potentially rise to $10,000-20,000 by the end of this market cycle."

Key Market Insights for May 16th, how much did you miss out on?

1. On-chain Flows: $111.3M inflow to Ethereum this week; $237.6M outflow from Berachain 2. Largest Price Swings: $ETHFI, $NEIRO 3. Top News: Data: Solana Network's revenue reached $7.9M on the 13th, surpassing the sum of all other L1 and L2 chains

CryptoPunks Changes Hands Twice, Did the Originator of NFTs Finally Find Its "Forever Home" This Time?

The original NFT pioneer CryptoPunks has once again officially changed ownership after being sold to the Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) developer Yuga Labs.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more