Interview with Independent Developer Haole: Working at a Tech Giant by Day, Building Dreams on the Blockchain by Night | Base Builder Talk

By: blockbeats|2025/03/31 10:30:03
Share
copy

The announcement that EOS has been rebranded as Vaulta and is transitioning to become a Web3 bank has stirred up many OGs in the crypto world. From ICOs, DeFi Summer, GameFi, NFTs, to meme coins, the narrative shift in the crypto world once again confirms its cruelty and romance.

In this issue of Base Builder Talk, our guest is haole, the developer of the Farcaster protocol client Recaster. He witnessed the rise and fall of Steemit, the first decentralized social platform, experienced the frenzy of DeFi Summer, and in the midst of the prophecy of AI devouring everything, he, as an independent developer, roamed outside the mainstream, dedicating himself to building the applications he needs and believes in.

This dedication not only stems from his pure love for technology but is deeply rooted in a philosophical speculation: whether to accept data fed in the comfortable centralized "matrix" or to choose the red pill leading to data sovereignty in the "real world." In the current wave of AI sweeping through and Web2 giants erecting high data barriers, Haole's persistence appears particularly valuable.

Building a product is not only about solving specific problems but also about practicing the ideal of an open network where "data belongs to users." For this increasingly monopolized and algorithm-defined digital world, he injects a rebellious undercurrent and a humanistic warmth. His story is that of a technological idealist's sobriety and persistence amidst the noisy crypto wave.

Below is the full interview:

BlockBeats: Please introduce yourself first. What was the trigger for you to enter the crypto world?

Haole: Currently, I work as a coder in a small factory in North America. Around 2016, I entered the crypto world when I needed to transfer money between China and the US. I found the traditional channels to be very troublesome, with layers of audits and slow transfer speeds. I realized that the hard-earned money was not truly mine. Because of this, I started to learn about Bitcoin, read related books, and got in touch with more and more crypto projects.

At that time, using Bitcoin for cross-border arbitrage between China and the US had a significant risk of fluctuation. There was a project called BitShares, which was considered a first-generation decentralized exchange platform. It had RMB gateways, which reduced the volatility, and the deposits and withdrawals were very convenient.

Due to this project, I became a fan of BitShares founder BM (Daniel Larimer) and delved deep into BitShares, Steemit, and EOS.

Related reading: "From Steemit to friend.tech: Tracing the 7-year Evolution of SocialFi"

In the following cycles, I have been involved in ICOs, DeFi, NFTs, Memes, and so on. However, it has always been a hobby for me, and I have never joined any blockchain company. Mainly because I feel that this industry has a strong speculative element, with too few long-term projects and companies dying too quickly.

BlockBeats: You didn't become a scientist after all?

Haole: I was somewhat of a scientist during the DeFi Summer period. I played around with some scripts and experiments, but later I found that the opportunity cost was high, and holding Bitcoin was more profitable. Through these cycles, I have come to realize that holding Bitcoin is the best strategy with the highest cost-effectiveness.

BlockBeats: Over the past year or two, from Recaster to Modbot, then to Newcaster, and also a payment product, which projects have you worked on part-time?

Haole: This year, I have mainly been working on Recaster, a client based on the Farcaster protocol. Modbot and Newcaster are both tools in the Farcaster ecosystem, and I have not invested too much time in them.

As for the payment product you mentioned, called Depal, it is a cryptocurrency-based payment platform that only I am currently using.

I developed this product to address a KYC + fee issue. Gateways like Coinbase in the crypto space charge a percentage of the payment amount, but the actual transaction cost is only a few cents. With large volumes, there is still a significant profit margin.

However, this product can only be considered a toy. To truly commercialize it, trust and a profitable business model need to be established.

BlockBeats: Apart from addressing your own needs, did you also aim to accumulate project experience by developing these products?

Haole: There are mainly two purposes. One is to address my own needs and create a product that satisfies me, and it would be even more fulfilling if it can help others. The second is to learn a new tech stack to use in my full-time work, which is essentially Web3 giving back to Web2.

BlockBeats: It's interesting to give back to Web2 using Web3. You mentioned in a statement that ordinary engineers entering the crypto industry can make money, and now everyone thinks AI is the way to go, that the crypto world is too chaotic and no one is optimistic. However, biases actually indicate opportunities. After this cycle, are you still satisfied with your initial judgment?

Interview with Independent Developer Haole: Working at a Tech Giant by Day, Building Dreams on the Blockchain by Night | Base Builder Talk

Haole: That tweet was actually posted in early 2024, just before the start of the bull market. At that time, everyone was chasing the AI trend, and the cryptocurrency circle was relatively quiet. The subsequent price surge from around $30,000 to $40,000 indeed validated this point, showing that bias can lead to opportunities and profits. However, the recent market reversal has proven that AI is the real hot trend now.

BlockBeats: Was that around the time when the Bitcoin ETF concept was starting to be hyped up?

Haole: Exactly, it was precisely at that time. The more people view the cryptocurrency industry with colored glasses, the more likely it is to identify value opportunities. When everyone is going crazy, it's actually time to consider pulling back.

BlockBeats: And in hindsight?

Haole: Speaking of this cycle, Bitcoin's performance is relatively satisfying, but during the meme season, there was a period of FOMO that led to significant losses. This cycle has once again proven that ordinary people are only suitable for holding Bitcoin. Meme coins are all zero-cost coins, and the final result of zero-cost coins is always going to zero.

Development Practice and Ecosystem Thinking of the Farcaster Client

BlockBeats: Why did you want to develop a Farcaster Protocol client?

Haole: Bitcoin solved the problem of private property rights, but when it comes to data ownership, there isn't a truly effective solution. Web2 social platforms are all leveraging user data for profit. Although they allow you to download your data, you cannot obtain all of the platform's data, while the platform can use global data to form data monopolies. In the AI era, platforms like Reddit, X, and Xiaohongshu are further restricting APIs to strengthen their data barriers.

Decentralized social platforms are attempts to address this issue. Due to network effects, everyone knows it’s challenging, but since there are teams actually working on it, I'm willing to participate and support the cause.

Currently, Farcaster should have the most abundant funding and the most practical technology team. They have been working for 3-4 years, and the founder enjoys engaging with the community. The team has weekly product iterations and is one of the rare teams in the cryptocurrency industry that takes a long-term view. That's why I prefer to do something persistent on Farcaster.

Recaster Custom Logo

BlockBeats: So when you were in a traditional tech company, working within that value system and rule set, and then you had a separate Open Network mindset where data belongs to everyone, didn't these two sets of values create a conflict in your mind?

Haole: It's precisely because I saw too much of Web2, where everyone makes money by monopolizing information, that I felt there should be another way to disrupt or restrict it. Just like how Bitcoin can hedge against the overissuance of fiat currency, decentralized social platforms also serve as a hedge against the information monopoly of large tech industry giants. Although progress is difficult, this is the right direction to invest in for the long term.

BlockBeats: Farcaster co-founder Varun once said in an interview that building applications and social networks is really, really difficult. It took a team of 20 people a year to build Warpcast. It's unrealistic to expect other teams to fully commit to building Farcaster from the start and invest 100% without any users. How much have you invested in this development process? Time, energy, funds?

Related Reading: "Exclusive Interview with Farcaster Co-founder: Exploring the Future of Decentralized Social Networks"

Haole: They needed to develop the protocol layer, front end, back end, and mobile end simultaneously, so the cost was relatively high. Now the community has Neynar providing backend APIs, and my development focus is mainly on the mobile end. I haven't invested much time, mainly utilizing weekends and evenings. In the initial stages, I spent about 20-30 hours per week, but now it's less, around 10 hours, and this has been ongoing for almost a year.

Funding-wise, I haven't hired anyone; I've been developing independently. The main expense is Neynar's service fee, $250 per month, plus miscellaneous server costs, keeping the overall monthly cost under $300, which is quite affordable.

BlockBeats: BlockBeats: Supercast (another front-end application of the Farcaster protocol) is now considered to have been acquired, and founder Woj has also joined the Farcaster protocol team. Where do you see Recaster heading in the future?

Haole: Currently, Farcaster's daily active users (DAU) are too few, making it challenging to sustain a full-time team of over 2 people without funding. The acquisition of Supercast is seen as a good outcome.

Recaster is quite unique, with very low costs as mentioned earlier. It does not require funding and has no commercialization needs. I am only responsible to myself, and I just want to polish it into a product that satisfies me. As long as the Farcaster protocol remains alive, Recaster will continue to exist.

If one day Recaster becomes popular among many people, with 10,000 to 20,000 daily active users, I may consider full-time development.

BlockBeats: How do you view the behavior of the Farcaster protocol developing its own client?

Haole: I think it's great, and I agree with it. Many people say the Farcaster team lacks the blockchain spirit and cannot build a protocol. But the fundamental issue currently is not about the protocol itself but about how to bring more people into the decentralized world. A pragmatic approach to decentralization is actually more effective in the early stages. However, the Farcaster protocol is open enough. For most core functions, I do not need official permission to develop.

BlockBeats: How do you see the competitive relationship between Warpcast and Tako, the other front-end applications of the Farcaster protocol?

Haole: It's hard to say there is competition; everyone is small and trying to find their product-market fit. Any team exploring decentralized social platforms should be supported and encouraged. Our real adversary is Web2 data monopolies. I also have a lot of exchanges with the Tako team, and we help each other.

BlockBeats: Throughout this process, you have persevered as a solo individual, which is truly remarkable.

Haole: Because my costs are low, and I am currently not focused on profitability, I just want to do something purely. If I were to truly build a team and consider making money, the pressure would be greater, making it harder to persist.

BlockBeats: Have you ever thought that Recaster would fail? What would be the reason for not being able to continue?

Haole: As long as the Farcaster protocol is alive, this product will also be alive because my costs are too low. The annual maintenance cost is less than $5,000, and the Farcaster Foundation has granted $10,000 to me. Even without spending the money, it's enough to sustain it for another two years. If I really can't continue, it can only mean that the Farcaster protocol is dead.

The Evolution of Developers in the AI Wave

BlockBeats: You have expressed on social media how AI has helped you. What is your greatest takeaway from this AI wave?

Haole: There will come a day when AI will replace programmers. Its development and execution capabilities are already stronger than most people. I can only say that I understand the constantly emerging new requirements in the real world better than it does?

BlockBeats: So, can we say that the role of a product manager will surpass that of an engineer who executes and delivers?

Haole: Perhaps in the future, AI can proactively discover needs and directly help people achieve them. Product managers and implementation engineers have the same fate.

But there is one thing that AI can never replace—relationships and communication between real people. However, the reality is that unless meeting offline, the online world cannot distinguish which accounts are real.

BlockBeats: How do you view the integration of AI agents and Crypto? Some say that in the future, AI on social media will have its own identity, combined with a Crypto payment system, making it indistinguishable from a real person. At that time, the virtual world will be very interesting, and some investors have mentioned that the metaverse will reignite.

Haole: I still prefer the real world. Just like in "The Matrix," choosing the red pill or the blue pill, I would choose the red pill. The path of reality is painful, imperfect, but genuine, allowing us to see the value of being alive.

BlockBeats: Having this kind of warmth is still very helpful for product development.

Haole: Yes, especially after you have children, after years of hard study, coming out not as good as AI, this is a very sad thing. What is the meaning of one's existence?

BlockBeats: So what is your answer to this question?

Haole: I haven't figured out the answer yet, I've just been thinking all the time. It might be a weakness of human nature, greed, fear, anger, sorrow, which can bring different brilliance to this world...

BlockBeats: Looking forward to you sharing your answer online in the future.

The Survival Philosophy of Indie Developers

BlockBeats: You've been in the U.S. for 10 years. Do you think there are any differences in developer culture between the U.S. and China?

Haole: Many students are starting their own businesses, and I often help them with their projects and provide oversight. Chinese engineers are indeed impressive, strong in technology and especially hardworking. Domestic teams use Feishu for remote collaboration, which is very efficient, much stronger than Slack. However, entrepreneurship in China is more realistic. Everyone gathers mainly to make money, and there are fewer idealistic people. Like the recently emerged Deepseek team, they are quite idealistic. Maybe after everyone has made enough money, they will pursue something else.

BlockBeats: After three cycles, what are the different aspects of the development ecosystem for you?

Haole: In 2016 and 2017, when I first entered the industry, my beliefs were not firm enough, so I entered and exited the industry several times, and my impression of the development ecosystem was not particularly deep. The DeFi Summer was the most exciting year, with many projects that were eye-catching, showing what blockchain can do (although in the end, they didn't solve any real problems). In this cycle, there is almost no excitement. The crypto world has become an extension of the dollar hegemony, becoming a laborer for the dollar.

BlockBeats: So now your faith in blockchain is only in Bitcoin.

Haole: Making data more open is also a belief.

BlockBeats: Are there any experiences from independent developers that can be shared with other developers in the blockchain industry?

Haole: Strictly speaking, I am not a true independent developer. Although I develop independently in form, true independent development should refer to a full-time and commercially viable model. Someone like me, who is currently not pursuing profit, is not suitable as an example. True independent developers must find PMF. Only when your product gains market recognition and users are willing to pay for it can you truly achieve independence.

However, from a realistic earnings perspective, aiming to make a big fortune through independent development may not be the optimal choice. Although there are success stories, when multiplied by probability, overall it is far less stable and reliable than joining a large company.

If you really want to do independent development, you must control costs, avoid blindly spending money, and recognize that the importance of marketing outweighs writing code. Truly good products require time to refine, whether it's one year, two years, or even five years. The value accumulated over time is the best moat.

You may also like

a16z Leads $18M Seed Round for Catena Labs, Crypto Industry Bets on Stablecoin AI Payment

Traditional finance is still stuck in a "human-to-human" model, while Catena aims to achieve "AI-to-AI" interaction.

Pharos, deeply integrated with AntChain, is about to launch. How can we get involved?

What is the relationship between the $8 million funded NewChain and Ant, and how will they interact?

$COIN Joins S&P 500, but Coinbase Isn't Celebrating

On May 13, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced that Coinbase would officially replace Discover Financial Services in the S&P 500 on May 19. While other companies like Block and MicroStrategy, closely tied to Bitcoin, were already part of the S&P 500, Coinbase became the first cryptocurrency exchange whose primary business is in the index. This also signifies that cryptocurrency is gradually moving from the fringes to the mainstream in the U.S.



On the day of the announcement, Coinbase's stock price surged by 23%, surpassing the $250 mark. However, just 3 days later, Coinbase was hit by two consecutive events: a hack where employees were bribed to steal customer data and a demand for a $20 million ransom, and an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the authenticity of its claim of having over 100 million "verified users" in its securities filings and marketing materials. These two events acted as mini-bombs, and at the time of writing, Coinbase's stock had already dropped by over 7.3%.


Coincidentally, Discover Financial Services, being replaced by Coinbase, can also be considered the "Coinbase" of the previous payment era. Discover is a U.S.-based digital banking and payment services company headquartered in Illinois, founded in 1960. Its payment network, Discover Network, is the fourth largest payment network apart from Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.


In April, after the approval of the acquisition of Discover by the sixth-largest U.S. bank, Capital One, this well-established digital banking company of over 60 years smoothly handed over its S&P 500 "seat" to this emerging cryptocurrency "bank." This unexpected coincidence also portrayed the handover between the new and old eras in Coinbase's entry into the S&P 500, resembling a relay race scene. However, this relay baton also brought Coinbase's accumulated "external troubles and internal strife" to a tipping point.


Side Effects of ETFs


Over the past decade, cryptocurrency exchanges have been the most stable "profit machines." They play a role in providing liquidity to the entire industry and rely on trading fees to sustain their operations. However, with the comprehensive rollout of ETF products in the U.S. market, this profit model is facing unprecedented challenges. As the leader in the "American stack," with over 80% of its business coming from the U.S., Coinbase is most affected by this.



Starting from the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, traditional financial capital has significantly onboarded users and funds that originally belonged to exchanges in a more cost-effective, compliant, and transparent manner. The transaction fee revenue of cryptocurrency exchanges has started to decline, and this trend may further intensify in the coming months.


According to Coinbase's 2024 Q4 financial report, the platform's total trading revenue was $417 million, a 45% year-on-year decrease. The contribution of BTC and ETH's trading revenue dropped from 65% in the same period last year to less than 50%.


This decline is not a result of a decrease in market enthusiasm. In fact, since the approval of the Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the inflow of BTC into the U.S. market has continued to reach new highs, with asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity rapidly expanding their management scale. Data shows that BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) alone has surpassed $17 billion in assets under management. As of mid-May 2025, the cumulative net inflow of 11 major institutional Bitcoin spot ETFs on the market has exceeded $41.5 billion, with a total net asset value of $1214.69 billion, accounting for approximately 5.91% of the total Bitcoin market capitalization.


Chart showing the trend of net outflows for Grayscale among the 11 institutions


Institutional investors and some retail investors are shifting towards ETF products, partly due to compliance and tax considerations. On one hand, ETFs have much lower trading costs compared to cryptocurrency exchanges. While Coinbase's spot trading fee rate varies annually in a tiered manner but averages around 1.49%, for example, the management fee for IBIT ETF is only 0.25%, and the majority of ETF institution fees fluctuate around 0.15% to 0.25%.



In other words, the more rational users are, the more likely they are to move from exchanges to ETF products, especially for investors aiming for long-term holdings.


According to multiple sources, several institutions, including VanEck and Grayscale, have submitted applications to the SEC for a Solana (SOL) ETF, with some institutions also planning to submit an XRP ETF proposal. Once approved, this may trigger a new round of fund migration. According to a report submitted by Coinbase to the SEC, as of April, the platform's trading revenue from XRP and Solana accounted for 18% and 10%, nearly one-third of the platform's fee revenue.



However, the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs passed in 2024 also reduced the fees for these two tokens on Coinbase from 30% and 15% to 26% and 10%, respectively. If the SOL and XRP ETFs are approved, it will further undermine the core fee revenue of exchanges like Coinbase.


The expansion of ETF products is gradually weakening the financial intermediary status of cryptocurrency exchanges. From their original roles as matchmakers and clearers to now gradually becoming mere "on-ramps and off-ramps" for funds, exchanges are seeing their marginal value squeezed by ETFs.


Robinhood Takes a Stand, Traditional Brokerages Join the Fray


On May 12, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins gave a keynote speech at the Tokenization and Cryptocurrency Working Group roundtable. The theme of his speech revolved around "It is a new day at the SEC," where he indicated that the SEC would not approach enforcement and regulation the same way as before but would instead pave the way for cryptocurrency assets in the U.S. market.



With signs of cryptocurrency compliance such as the SEC's "NEW DAY" declaration, an increasing number of traditional brokerages are attempting to enter the cryptocurrency industry. One of the most representative cases is the well-known U.S. brokerage Robinhood, which began expanding its crypto business in 2018. By the time of its IPO in 2021, Robinhood's crypto business revenue accounted for over 50% of the company, with a significant boost from the Dogecoin "moonshot" promoted by Musk.


In Q1 2025 earnings report, Robinhood showcased strong growth, especially in revenue from cryptocurrency and options trading. Fueled by Trump's Memecoin, cryptocurrency-related revenue reached $250 million, nearly doubling year-over-year. Consequently, Robinhood Gold subscription users reached 3.5 million, a 90% increase from the previous year, with the rapid growth of Robinhood Gold providing the company with a stable source of income.



Meanwhile, RobinHood is actively pursuing acquisitions in the cryptocurrency space. In 2024, it announced a $2 billion acquisition of the long-standing European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp. Additionally, Canada's largest cryptocurrency CEX, WonderFi, which recently went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also announced its integration with RobinHood Crypto. After obtaining virtual asset licenses in the UK, Canada, Singapore, and other markets, RobinHood has taken a proactive approach in the compliant cryptocurrency trading market.



Furthermore, an increasing number of brokerage firms are exploring the same path. Futu Securities, Tiger Brokers, and others are also dipping their toes into cryptocurrency trading, with some having applied for or obtained the VA license from the Hong Kong SFC. Although their user bases are currently small, traditional brokerages have a natural advantage in user trust, regulatory licenses, and low fee structures. This could pose a threat to native cryptocurrency platforms in the future.



User Data Breach: Is Coinbase Still Secure?


In April 2025, security researchers discovered that some Coinbase user data was leaked on the dark web. While the platform initially responded by attributing it to a "technical misinformation," it still raised concerns among users regarding its security and privacy protection. Just two days before Dow Jones Indexes announced Coinbase's addition to the S&P 500 Index, on May 11, 2025, Coinbase received an email from an unknown threat actor claiming to have obtained customer account information and internal documents, demanding a $20 million ransom to keep the data private. Subsequent investigations confirmed the data breach.


Cybercriminals obtained the data by bribing overseas customer service agents and support staff, mainly in "non-U.S. regions such as India." These agents abused their access to Coinbase's internal customer support system and stole customer data. As early as February this year, blockchain detective ZachXBT revealed on X platform that between December 2024 and January 2025, Coinbase users lost over $65 million to social engineering scams, with the actual amount potentially higher.


Among the victims was a well-known figure, 67-year-old Ed Suman, an established artist in the art world for nearly two decades, having been involved in the creation of artworks such as Jeff Koons' "Balloon Dog" sculpture. Earlier this year, he fell victim to an impersonation scam involving fake Coinbase customer support, resulting in a loss of over $2 million in cryptocurrency. ZachXBT critiqued Coinbase for its inadequate handling of such scams, noting that other major exchanges have not faced similar issues and recommending Coinbase to enhance its security measures.


Amidst a series of ongoing social engineering incidents, although there has not been any impact on user assets at the technical level so far, it has raised concerns among many retail and institutional investors. Especially institutions holding massive assets on Coinbase. Just considering the U.S. BTC ETF institutions, as of mid-May 2025, they collectively hold nearly 840,000 BTC, and 75% of these are custodied by Coinbase. If we price BTC at $100,000, this amount reaches a staggering $63 billion, which is equivalent to the nominal GDP of two Iceland in the year 2024.


Visualization: ChatGPT, Source: Farside


In addition, Coinbase Custody also serves over 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, family offices, pension funds, and endowments. As of the Q1 2025 financial report, Coinbase's total assets under management (including institutional and retail clients) reached $404 billion. The specific amount of institutional custodied assets was not explicitly disclosed in the latest report, but it should still be over 50% based on the Q4 2024 report.


Visualization: ChatGPT


Once this security barrier is breached, not only could the rate of user attrition far exceed expectations, but more importantly, institutional trust in it would undermine the foundation of its business. Therefore, after a hacking event, Coinbase's stock price plummeted significantly.


CEXs are All in Self-Rescue Mode


Facing a decline in spot trading fee revenue, Coinbase is also accelerating its transformation, attempting to find growth opportunities in derivatives and emerging assets. Coinbase acquired a stake in the options platform Deribit at the end of 2024 and announced the official launch of perpetual contract products in 2025. This acquisition fills in Coinbase's gap in options trading and its relatively small global market share.



Deribit has a strong presence in non-U.S. markets, especially in Asia and Europe. The acquisition has enabled Coinbase to gain a dominant position in bitcoin and ethereum options trading on Deribit, accounting for approximately 80% of the global options trading volume, with daily trading volume remaining above $2 billion.


Meanwhile, 80-90% of Deribit's customer base consists of institutional investors, with their professionalism and liquidity in the Bitcoin and Ethereum options market highly favored by institutions. Coinbase's compliance advantage, coupled with its already robust institutional ecosystem, makes it even more suitable. By using institutions as an entry point, it can face the squeeze from giants like Binance and OKX in the derivatives market.



Facing a similar dilemma is Kraken, which is attempting to replicate Binance Futures' model in non-U.S. markets. Since the derivatives market relies more on professional users, fee rates are relatively higher and stickiness is stronger, making it a significant source of revenue for exchanges. In the first half of 2025, Kraken completed the acquisition of TradeStation Crypto and a futures exchange, aiming to build a complete derivatives trading ecosystem to hedge the risk of declining spot transaction fee income.


With the surge of Memecoin in 2024, Binance, OKX, and various CEX platforms began massively listing small-market-cap, highly volatile tokens to activate active trading users. Due to the wealth effect and trading activity of Memecoins, Coinbase was also forced to join the battle, successively listing popular tokens from the Solana ecosystem such as BOOK OF MEME and Dogwifhat. Although these coins are controversial, they are frequently traded, with fee rates several times higher than mainstream coins, serving as a "blood-boosting" method for spot trading.


However, due to its status as a publicly traded company, this practice is a riskier endeavor for Coinbase. Even in the current crypto-friendly environment, the SEC is still investigating whether tokens like SOL, ADA, and SAND constitute securities.


In addition to the forced transformation strategies carried out by the aforementioned CEXs, they are also starting to lay out RWAs and the most talked-about stablecoin payment fields, such as the PYUSD launched through a collaboration between Coinbase and Paypal, Coinbase's support for the Euro stablecoin EURC by Circle that complies with EU MiCA regulatory requirements, or the USD1 launched through a collaboration between Binance and WIFL. In the increasingly crowded trading field, many CEXs have shifted their focus from just the trading market to the application field.


The golden age of transaction fees has quietly ended, and the second half of the crypto exchange platform game has silently begun.


Key Market Insights for May 16th, how much did you miss out on?

1. On-chain Flows: $111.3M inflow to Ethereum this week; $237.6M outflow from Berachain 2. Largest Price Swings: $ETHFI, $NEIRO 3. Top News: Data: Solana Network's revenue reached $7.9M on the 13th, surpassing the sum of all other L1 and L2 chains

MOG Coin Skyrockets as Elon Musk and Garry Tan Embrace "mog/acc" Identity

「mog/acc」 is rapidly sweeping through various figures, from Elon Musk to Garry Tan, boosting the project's visibility and ultimately driving up the price.

The End and Rebirth of NFTs: How the Meme Coin Craze Ended the PFP Era?

There must be another Labubu hidden beneath the ruins.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more