IOSG In-Depth Report: Unveiling the Harsh Reality of Web3 Consumer App Survival Rate at Only 7%
Original Article Title: "IOSG Weekly Brief | Overview of Web3 Consumer Application Paradigm and Investment Theory #271"
Original Source: IOSG Ventures

During a recent period of time, Alliance DAO has gained significant influence due to its successful incubation of Pump.fun, Moonshot, and other Web3 consumer applications. This article first summarizes Alliance DAO's investment philosophy in the Web3 consumer track and presents its own observations on this track, outlining the current mainstream paradigms, challenges, and potential opportunities of Web3 consumer applications. Finally, it concludes with our thoughts on the investment theory of Web3 consumer applications.
Alliance DAO's Incubation of Web3 Consumer Track
Since its launch, the Alliance DAO Accelerator has co-incubated or externally invested in 28 Web3 consumer applications. They can be roughly divided into 7 major categories:
1. Lifestyle Category
Definition: Projects aimed at cultivating users' novel and healthy lifestyles through Web3;
Number: 3;
Specific Projects:
· StepN: A Web3 lifestyle application with the core innovation of Move to Earn, where users can purchase running shoe NFTs, track their exercise data, and receive token rewards.
· Sleepagotchi: A Web3 sleep monitoring and Sleep-to-Earn sleep aid game mobile application, a card gacha nurturing game where sleep earns tokens, and tokens are used for gacha draws.
· GM: Web3 AI Agent for health management, leveraging AI to enhance health and gain rewards.
2. Games Category:
Definition: Web3 games or GameFi;
Number: 10;
Specific Projects:
· Axie Infinity: Axie Infinity is a card game developed by Sky Mavis that allows players to breed, raise, battle, and trade Axie creatures.
· Genopets: Genopets is a Move-to-Earn NFT mobile game on Solana that makes adopting a positive lifestyle fun and rewarding. A Genopet is a player's digital pet, whose evolution and growth are closely tied to their own. As players explore, battle, and evolve, the steps they take each day power their journey in the Genoverse - earning cryptocurrency in the game.
· Nine Chronicles: Nine Chronicles is a decentralized card-based fighting RPG game.
· Chibi Clash: Chibi Clash is building a Web3 game world centered around its flagship auto-battler game. Inspired by gameplay from Hearthstone Battlegrounds and art style from MapleStory, Chibi Clash Auto Battler is an asynchronous PvP game where players can recruit, level up, and deploy troops to battle.
· Primodium: Primodium is building a fully on-chain, open-source, composable game where players aim to gain map control, research technology, and expand their factory.
· Starbots: Starbots is a robot combat NFT game where players can create fantasy robots to battle other opponents and collect NFT items and tokens.
· Legends of Venari: Legends of Venari is a blockchain game startup that has created an exploratory creature collection role-playing game. In Legends of Venari, players can trap, tame, and collect Venari creatures in a player-driven sandbox, vying for territory and rare resources.
· Force Prime: Force Prime is a full-chain strategy Web3 game platform that offers a multiplayer hero combat experience. Players can nurture and customize their own hero and battle against global players.
· Amihan: The first game from the game studio FARM FRENS, a TG casual farming mini-game.
· Wildcard: Wildcard is a Web3-based card collection game aimed at gamers, fans, and collectors.
3. Crypto Speculative Type:
Definition: A focus on products related to meeting users' Crypto speculation needs;
Quantity: 3;
Specific Projects:
· Pump Fun: Pump is a meme coin launch platform where users can release a token that can be traded immediately without providing liquidity.
· Moonshot: Moonshot is a platform for discovering, buying, and selling Meme coins, supporting users to make cash deposits using credit and debit cards, as well as cash out assets anytime via bank transfer.
· Candlestick: Candlestick is a crypto opportunity radar supported by actionable trading signals and predictions, providing abundant data on tokens with the highest price surges, biggest price drops, and highest trading volume.
4. SocialFi Category:
Definition: Tokenizing users' influence on social media platforms to create new speculative investment projects;
Quantity: 6
Specific Projects:
· fantasy.top: Fantasy is a SocialFi trading card game (TCG) where players can compete in an online game using trading cards of influencers in the crypto space on the Twitter platform, leveraging their social capital and research expertise for monetization.
· 0xPPL: A decentralized social network targeting native cryptocurrency users, aggregating users' content on Lens, Farcaster, and Twitter, and incorporating some Crypto functionalities.
· time.fun: time.fun is a time tokenization platform that allows time holders to connect with fans. As time holders provide more value to fans, their time value naturally increases due to market demand. Whenever someone trades their time, time holders can earn ETH from transaction fees and redemptions.
· fam.: Fam is a web3-native community hub for discovering, organizing, and enjoying activities of web3 families. fam. uses on-chain identity to allow users to easily find and connect with fellow holders no matter where they are.
· Tribe.run: Tribe is a Solana-based crypto social protocol. SocialFi, private groups, entry to groups requiring tokens, speculative, ability to host video or voice live streams, and more.
· EarlyFans: EarlyFans is a SocialFi product on the Blast L2, where creators can make a public commitment through EarlyFans and auction off that commitment. Fans can also actively initiate bribery and auction off bribery rights. If the creator refuses or expires, all funds are returned.
5. Creator Economy:
Definition: A Web3 content distribution platform that provides a new economic model for content creators (text, video, art, etc.);
Quantity: 2;
Specific Projects:
· Koop: Koop enables any creator, collector, or community to organize and fundraise through NFT art or collector passes. Funds from collector passes form a treasury (or bank) for each community to support their on-chain projects and tasks. The community can then directly manage their finances, leverage their members' unique skills, and manage their organization in an engaging and social way.
· CreatorDAO: CreatorDAO is a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) focused on accelerating creators' careers and giving them shared access to capital, technology, and community. CreatorDAO provides guidance to creators, develops the professional tools needed for branding, and creates a community for investing in each other's success.
6. Financial Products:
Definition: Products aimed at reducing user costs associated with using and managing Crypto, such as deposits and withdrawals;
Quantity: 3;
Specific Projects:
· Hana Network: Hana Network is a super casual financial system with social network effects and has launched the fiat on/off-ramp solution Hana Gateway. Hana Network aims to achieve user-driven distribution through existing open social networks.
· P2P.me: A decentralized India-based fiat on/off-ramp platform, where the off-chain part enhances security through a reputation system and improves privacy through ZK.
· Offramp: Offramp is a decentralized fiat off-ramp protocol that enables anyone in the world to quickly onboard/offboard cryptocurrency, fully self-custody funds, without KYC, and with low fees.
7. Tooling:
Definition: A product that solves a real-world user problem, such as a Web3 map;
Quantity: 1;
Specific Project:
· proto: An Indian version of Google Maps, Proto is a user-generated, token-incentivized mapping platform designed to disrupt the geospatial data industry. Through decentralized data collection, Proto is able to provide high-quality real-time map data at a fraction of the cost of traditional methods. Proto's unique approach allows it to easily penetrate dense, complex areas, providing businesses with accurate and up-to-date data tailored to their needs.
Looking at the development trend of investment preferences, Alliance DAO began investing in and incubating Consumer projects in 2021. From the first half of 2021 to the first half of 2023, its main investment and incubation focus was on Games and Creator Economy projects. Starting from the second half of 2023 until 2024, its preference shifted to Crypto Speculation, SocialFi, and Finance projects.

The author has tracked some of Alliance DAO's publicly released articles, podcasts, and other content, summarizing its investment philosophy regarding the Web3 consumer track as follows:
1. Firstly, it believes that the ecosystem's foundational tools are increasingly mature and that more application layer solutions are needed to bring genuine value capture to the ecosystem;
2. Founding teams should focus on Product-Market Fit (PMF). Usually, during the market validation process, teams face two main risks: product-side risk and market-side risk. Consumer projects have a higher market-side risk, so teams should consider avoiding premature token introduction to prevent distortion of PMF validation results.
3. The target users of Web3 consumer applications can be divided according to their acceptance of Web3. On the left are non-Web3 regular users, and on the right are Web3 Native users. For applications targeting left-side users, Web3 elements are mainly used to lower customer acquisition costs through "advertising tokens" to capture more market share. Right-side users need to focus on assetizing new targets, bringing additional investment and speculative demand, or addressing the unique needs of Web3-native users. Currently, the preference leans more towards the latter.
4. It's noted that the user profiles of the Solana ecosystem and EVM ecosystem are different, with the former being more conducive to the success of Consumer applications for four main reasons:
More vibrant community: Solana users are highly enthusiastic about participating in new projects, especially those with speculative potential, possibly due to the wealth effect; Stronger and more efficient ecosystem resource support: Solana ecosystem core members are more community-oriented, possess strong community mobilization capabilities, and respond more rapidly to new project support. Faster and lower-cost infrastructure: Aimed at creating an on-chain Nasdaq, with low transaction costs, high confirmation speeds, and due to the undiversified nature of core components and a focus on usability, the learning curve for new users is relatively low. Higher product competitive barriers: Due to the adoption of non-EVM technology stack choices, the cost of copying Solana DApps is higher.

What is a Web3 Consumer Application
A consumer application, also known in Chinese context as a To C (To Consumer) application, means that your target users are mostly ordinary consumers, not enterprise users. Open your App Store, and all the apps inside belong to this category. Web3 consumer applications refer to software applications with Web3 features aimed at consumers.
Generally, according to the categorization in most App Stores, we can roughly divide the entire consumer application field into the following 10 categories, each of which will have different subdivisions. Of course, as the market matures, many new products, in order to find their own unique selling points, will combine multiple features to some extent. However, we can still make a simple classification based on their core selling points.

Web3 Consumer Application Paradigms and Their Opportunities and Challenges
Based on an analysis of the investment concept of the Allinance DAO and his own observations, the author believes that there are three common paradigms of Web3 consumer applications:
1. Utilizing the technical characteristics of Web3 infrastructure to optimize certain issues existing in traditional consumer applications:
This is a common paradigm. We know that a large amount of investment in the Web3 industry revolves around infrastructure development. Application creators using this paradigm hope to leverage the technical features of Web3 infrastructure to enhance their product's competitive advantage or provide new services. The benefits brought by these technological innovation directions can usually be categorized into the following two types:
1. Ultimate Privacy Protection and Data Sovereignty:
· Opportunity: Privacy has always been the main theme of Web3 infrastructure innovation. From the initial asymmetric encryption algorithm for identity confirmation, it has gradually integrated numerous software and hardware technologies, such as ZK, FHE, to TEE, among others. Many tech bigwigs in Web3 seem to adhere to an extreme view, aiming to create a network environment that does not rely on third-party trust and provide users with the ability to interact with information or value.
This technological characteristic most directly benefits users by providing data sovereignty. Personal privacy information can be stored directly on locally trusted software and hardware devices, avoiding the leakage of privacy information. Many Web3 consumer applications optimized for this technological characteristic exist, and any project that claims to be a decentralized XX falls into this paradigm, such as decentralized social media platforms, decentralized AI large models, decentralized video websites, and so on.
· Challenge: After years of market validation, it can be said that using this as a core selling point has not shown a clear advantage in market competition. There are two reasons for this. Firstly, consumer users' emphasis on privacy is based on large-scale privacy breaches and infringement events. However, in most cases, such issues can be effectively mitigated through more comprehensive legislation and regulations. Therefore, if privacy protection is based on a more complex product experience or a higher cost of use, its competitiveness will be significantly inadequate.
Secondly, as we know, the business model of most current consumer applications is built on extracting value from big data, such as targeted marketing. Overemphasizing privacy protection will undermine the mainstream business model because user data will be scattered across a batch of data silos, posing a challenge for designing a sustainable business model. If the product ends up having to rely solely on so-called 'Tokenomics,' it will have to introduce unnecessary speculative attributes to the product. This, on the one hand, distracts the team's resources and energy to deal with the impact of these attributes on the product and, on the other hand, is detrimental to finding Product-Market Fit (PMF). This will be specifically analyzed in the following sections.
2. Low-Cost Global 24/7 Trusted Execution Environment:
Opportunity: The emergence of numerous L1 and L2 solutions has provided application developers with a new, globalized, 24/7 multi-party trusted program execution environment. Typically, traditional software service providers independently maintain their programs, such as running on their server clusters or in the cloud. This naturally incurs a trust cost in businesses involving multi-party collaboration, especially when the parties are evenly matched in strength or scale, or when the data involved is particularly sensitive and critical, resulting in a significant trust cost that usually translates into high development and user usage costs, such as in cross-border payment scenarios. The utilization of the execution environment brought by Web3 can effectively reduce the costs associated with these services. Stablecoins are a good example of such applications.
Challenge: From a cost reduction and efficiency improvement perspective, this is indeed a competitive advantage. However, exploring application scenarios for this is quite challenging. As mentioned earlier, the benefits of using this execution environment are only seen in a service involving multi-party collaboration, where relevant parties are independent and evenly matched in scale, and the data involved is particularly sensitive. This is a rather stringent condition. Currently, most of these application scenarios are concentrated in the financial services sector.
2. Utilizing Crypto Assets to Design New Marketing Strategies, User Loyalty Programs, or Business Models:
Similar to the first point, application developers adopting this paradigm also hope to introduce Web3 attributes to give their products a competitive advantage in a relatively mature, market-validated scenario. However, these application developers focus more on introducing crypto assets and leveraging the highly financial nature of crypto assets to design better marketing strategies, user loyalty programs, and business models.
We know that any investment target has two types of value, commodity value and financial value. The former is related to the target's use value in a particular real-world scenario, such as the livable attribute of real estate assets, while the latter is related to its trading value in the financial market. This trading value in the cryptocurrency field usually comes from the speculative scene brought about by high liquidity and volatility. Cryptocurrency is an asset class where the financial attribute far outweighs the commodity attribute.
And in the eyes of most such application developers, the introduction of cryptocurrency typically brings about three main benefits:
1. Reduce Customer Acquisition Costs through Token-based Marketing Activities like Airdrops:
· Opportunity: For most consumer applications, how to acquire customers at a low cost in the early stages of a project is a key issue. Tokens, with their high financial attribute and being assets created out of thin air, can significantly reduce the risk of early-stage projects. After all, compared to directly buying traffic with real money, gaining exposure, and using a zero-cost created Token for user acquisition is indeed a more cost-effective choice. From a certain perspective, these types of Tokens are similar to advertising Tokens. Many projects adopt this paradigm, such as most TON ecosystem projects and small games.
· Challenge: This customer acquisition method mainly faces two main issues. Firstly, the conversion cost of seed users acquired through this method is extremely high. We know that most users attracted by this method are mostly cryptocurrency speculators, so these users are not particularly focused on the project itself; they are more interested in the potential financial rewards and participate in it for that reason. Moreover, there are currently many professional airdrop hunters or airdrop farming studios, which poses a great challenge to converting them into actual product users later on. It might also lead to a misjudgment of Product-Market Fit (PMF), resulting in excessive investment in the wrong direction.
Secondly, with the widespread application of this type of model, the marginal benefits of acquiring customers through Airdrops are diminishing. This means that if you want to establish enough attractiveness among cryptocurrency speculators, the cost will gradually increase.
2. User Loyalty Programs Based on X to Earn:
· Opportunity: Retention and reactivation are another key concern for consumer applications. How to ensure that users continue to use your product requires a lot of effort and cost. Similar to marketing, using the financial attribute of Tokens to reduce the cost of retention and reactivation has also become the choice of most such projects. A representative model is X to Earn, where users are rewarded with Tokens based on pre-defined key user behaviors, thereby establishing a user loyalty program.
· Challenge: Relying on user motivation to earn rewards can shift the user's focus from the product's functionality to the yield, so if the potential yield decreases, user engagement will quickly diminish. This can be highly detrimental to consumer applications, especially those relying heavily on User-Generated Content (UGC). If the yield is based on the price of the project's issued token, it puts pressure on the project to manage its market value, especially during bear market phases, leading to high maintenance costs.
3. Leveraging Token's Financial Properties for Direct Liquidity:
· Opportunity: For traditional consumer applications, the most common business models are twofold: one is free of charge, leveraging the value of platform traffic after widespread adoption, and the other is paid usage, where users need to pay a fee to access certain Pro features. However, the former has a longer cycle, and the latter is more challenging. Therefore, Tokens bring forth a new business model, which is leveraging Token's financial properties for direct liquidity, meaning the project directly sells the token for cash-out.
· Challenge: It can be explicitly stated that this is an unsustainable business model. The reason being that once the project has passed the early-stage high-growth phase, due to the lack of incremental funding inflow, this zero-sum game model inevitably places the project's interests in opposition to user interests, accelerating user attrition. If not cashed out proactively, due to the lack of robust cash flow revenue, the project can only rely on fundraising to sustain team operations or business expansion, leading to a dependence on market conditions.
3. Fully Serving Web3-Native Users to Address this User Segment's Unique Pain Points:
The final paradigm refers to consumer applications that fully serve Web3-native users. These can generally be divided into two categories based on the innovation direction:
Creating new narratives around some of the untapped value elements for Web3-native users, engaging in monetization design and creating new asset categories:
· Opportunity: By providing new speculative targets for Web3-native users (e.g., the SocialFi track), the advantage lies in obtaining pricing power over a certain asset at the project's initial stage, thus gaining monopoly profits. In contrast, achieving this in traditional industries requires intense market competition and the establishment of strong competitive barriers.
· Challenge: Frankly speaking, this paradigm depends heavily on team resources, specifically on whether it is possible to obtain recognition and support from individuals or institutions within the Web3-native user base who possess strong influence or what is referred to as the "pricing power" of crypto assets. This brings about two main challenges: firstly, as the market evolves, the pricing power of crypto assets dynamically transfers between different groups, for example, from the original Crypto OGs to crypto VCs, then to CEX platforms, further to crypto Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs), and ultimately to traditional politicians, entrepreneurs, or celebrities.
Throughout this process, the ability to identify trends during each power transition, collaborate with the nouveau riche, and remain highly sensitive to team resources and market dynamics has become crucial. Secondly, in order to establish a partnership with these "price setters," it often requires significant costs and sacrifices because in this market, you are not competing against other rivals in a specific application track for a larger market share; instead, you are competing alongside all other crypto asset creators to win the favor of the "price setters," which is a fiercely competitive game.
By offering new tooling products that cater to the unmet needs of Web3-native users in the market participation process. Or, from a user experience perspective, providing better and more convenient products for this user segment:
· Opportunity: With the gradual adoption of cryptocurrencies, the overall user base of this segment will expand, creating opportunities for user segmentation. Furthermore, due to their focus on the genuine needs of a specific user group, these products often find it easier to achieve Product-Market Fit (PMF), thus establishing a more robust business model, such as some transaction-related data analysis platforms, Trading Bots, information platforms, etc.
· Challenge: As the focus returns to real user needs, although the development path of the product is more robust, the construction cycle is longer compared to other paradigm projects. Additionally, since such projects are demand-driven rather than narrative-driven, the PMF of the product is relatively easy to validate. In the early stages of the project, it is usually challenging to secure large amounts of funding. Therefore, maintaining patience and sticking to the original intentions amid the complexities of "coin issuance" or the wealth myth brought by overvalued financing is a very difficult task.

Reflections on the Investment Theory of Web3 Consumer Applications
Next, let's introduce our thoughts on the investment theory of Web3 consumer applications, which can be roughly divided into five core viewpoints:
1. How to surpass the speculative cycle is the primary consideration for Web3 consumer applications
As one of the most successful Web3 consumer applications in the previous cycle, the development path of Friend.Tech can provide us with great insights. According to Dune's data, Friend.Tech has currently accumulated a Protocol Fee of $24,313,188. The total number of users (Traders) has reached 918,888. For a Web3 application, this data performance is quite remarkable.

However, the development of this project has encountered significant challenges. The reasons behind this are multifaceted. First, in terms of product design, Friend.Tech introduced the Bonding Curve design, bringing a speculative element to the social application, which initially attracted a large number of users through a wealth effect. However, in the mid to long term, this approach also raised the barrier for user entry into the community, which contradicts the current practice of most Web3 projects or Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) relying on organic traffic to build influence.
Furthermore, Friend.Tech excessively tied the token to the product's utility, leading to an oversaturation of Web3 speculative users in their product. This caused users to lose focus on the product's utility, ultimately resulting in the current situation.
Therefore, for most Web3 consumer applications, after accumulating a large number of users, it is essential to carefully consider how to find Product-Market Fit (PMF), maintain user engagement, help the project move beyond the speculative cycle, and build a sustainable business model. By effectively addressing these issues, Web3 consumer applications can achieve true Mass Adoption.
2. During the investment process, how to evaluate Web3 consumer applications?
Overall, the investment evaluation of Web3 consumer applications mainly focuses on two aspects. The first aspect is to assess their market potential through the analysis of the product's operational data. This can be broadly divided into two dimensions:
· User Data: For most consumer applications, user data is always crucial as a substantial user base is a prerequisite for consumer applications to explore their business model. Similar to evaluating most traditional Web2 consumer applications, we can use metrics such as active users, user growth rate, user retention rate, etc., to determine whether they have found PMF.
In addition, for different categories and stages of Web3 consumer applications, the focus will also vary. For example, in Web3 Social applications, user retention rate will be more critical. Investors generally start from a niche market. When they find an application with a high retention rate within a user base with unique characteristics, it indicates its investment value. However, it's essential to carefully examine the data to avoid mistaking bot users for PMF during the evaluation process.
· Conversion Data: In addition to user data, it is also necessary to assess potential business value through conversion data, such as Assets Under Management (AUM) and User spend. If a project has many users but a small AUM, or if the average spend per user is low, it indicates limited commercial value. Not all revenue data is the same, and revenue quality can also vary significantly. If the revenue structure is based on actual income, it indicates that users are paying for the product provided to them, rather than mining their tokens. This type of business model is more sustainable.
The second aspect is the evaluation of the team, focusing mainly on three aspects. First is the team's technical strength, which allows them to build product moats, thus forming the core of their competitive advantage. Second, the team needs to have a strong market sense and openness to timely identify market opportunities, understand which users' needs are not being met, and promptly adjust their business direction. Lastly, team resources are also essential, such as partnerships with other applications, collaborations with Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs), etc., which determine the success rate of the project's launch.
3. How to Define a Successful Web3 Consumer Application
From an investor's perspective, defining a successful Web3 consumer application is an intriguing question. Is the success of a Web3 consumer application revenue-driven or token price-driven? Overall, these two aspects are interconnected. Assuming a project cannot generate sustainable revenue, in the end, its issued tokens will not have much of a future. However, this evaluation criterion mainly depends on your investment horizon. If the overall investment horizon is short, then the assessment of token price is more critical, focusing on the tokenomics. On the other hand, for long-term value investment, the performance of revenue data and the sustainability of the revenue structure are more crucial.
4. The "App Factory Model" may be a more deterministic business strategy for Web3 Consumer Applications
Referring to the development of China's Web2 industry, ByteDance has developed many successful consumer applications. Their business strategy involves continuous trial and error, developing numerous different types of products, and letting the market choose a few successful directions to continue investing resources and expanding their business. For them, the key to this successful strategy is the accumulation of a large user base, reducing their trial and error costs. This experience can be applied to the Web3 industry.
Therefore, from this perspective, projects like Friend.Tech still have opportunities in this cycle. At least in the short term, they have shown attractiveness, attracting a large number of users and having decent revenue-generating capabilities. These aspects will help them become Web3 app factories, making their subsequent development worth watching.
5. What Characteristics Will the Next Successful Web3 Consumer Application Possess?
We believe that in the next cycle, successful Web3 consumer applications will appear in the following three paradigms. First, by relying on the fun nature of the product, they will initially attract adoption by crypto Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) and then leverage the KOLs' influence to bring their fans onto the platform, helping the project achieve a cold start. A representative example of this paradigm is Kaito. The team, through their strong technical ability and innovative incentive mechanism, has gained significant mindshare in the crypto community, allowing them to have strong penetration in different communities. At the same time, they have precisely addressed how Web3 projects can effectively acquire users in the marketing process, accumulating a large number of B2C users and creating precise user profiles for each user through mindshare. This helps Web3 enterprises conduct precise marketing through the Kaito platform, making their business model more sustainable and breaking free from short-term speculative cycles.
The second paradigm is to start from the real needs of Web3 users, rely on product strength to win the market directly. By not introducing a Token too early, it will allow the project to escape the interference of speculative users during Product-Market Fit (PMF) process, building a higher user retention rate, as seen in projects like Polymarket, Chomp, etc.
The third paradigm is innovation in business models. At this point, Grass has given us great inspiration by utilizing users' idle computing resources to help them find sources of value capture in fields such as artificial intelligence and monetizing it through tokens. Although from a business model perspective, Grass leans more towards a B2B model, this "sharing economy" mindset can also be applied to the design of Web3 consumer applications.
6. Which categories of projects are more likely to become the first Web3 consumer applications to find PMF in the crypto industry
Currently, combining market trends and investor preferences, the next Web3 consumer applications most likely to find Product-Market Fit (PMF) may emerge from the following categories:
Firstly, Web3 social applications are still highly regarded by the market. We know that Web3 projects greatly value and rely on social media for marketing, and compared to traditional investors, cryptocurrency investors also prefer to use social media to gather information and form a value network. Therefore, the importance of Web3 social applications is self-evident. By exploring assetization or niche market demands, learning from friend.tech's experiences, introducing a more sustainable business model, and stronger user retention, will help Web3 social applications overcome excessive speculation, and find PMF.
Secondly, on-chain transaction tools applications also have great potential. With the continuous development of MEME, investors' attention to on-chain transactions is also increasing. The success of on-chain transaction tools such as OKX Wallet, GMGN proves the market's strong demand for this. As mainstream trading tools are widely adopted, the yield of homogenized trading strategies will decrease, thus, the customization needs of users will continue to rise. If these users can be provided with differentiated on-chain trading tools or investment strategies, the market potential for related products is also good.
Payment applications are also one of the categories worth looking forward to in the future. With the recent passage of legislation related to payment stablecoins, the regulatory pressure previously borne by payment applications has been relieved. Therefore, we have reason to believe that in the near future, Web3 payment applications will leverage the advantages brought by blockchain technology such as low cost and high settlement efficiency to build competitive barriers in cross-border payments, idle fund management, and other scenarios.
Lastly, the development of DeFi is also worth noting. Firstly, as one of the few scenarios that have currently found Product-Market Fit (PMF), DeFi has become an indispensable category within the Web3 industry. We can see from the success of Hyperliquid that users still have a demand for decentralization. With the continuous improvement of infrastructure, the performance limitations of previous decentralized applications will be overcome. In financial application scenarios that require high efficiency, such as high-frequency trading, DeFi will deliver performance comparable to CeFi products. Therefore, we have the opportunity to see more products similar to Hyperliquid that will challenge the existing CeFi system.
You may also like
a16z Leads $18M Seed Round for Catena Labs, Crypto Industry Bets on Stablecoin AI Payment
Pharos, deeply integrated with AntChain, is about to launch. How can we get involved?
$COIN Joins S&P 500, but Coinbase Isn't Celebrating
On May 13, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced that Coinbase would officially replace Discover Financial Services in the S&P 500 on May 19. While other companies like Block and MicroStrategy, closely tied to Bitcoin, were already part of the S&P 500, Coinbase became the first cryptocurrency exchange whose primary business is in the index. This also signifies that cryptocurrency is gradually moving from the fringes to the mainstream in the U.S.
On the day of the announcement, Coinbase's stock price surged by 23%, surpassing the $250 mark. However, just 3 days later, Coinbase was hit by two consecutive events: a hack where employees were bribed to steal customer data and a demand for a $20 million ransom, and an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the authenticity of its claim of having over 100 million "verified users" in its securities filings and marketing materials. These two events acted as mini-bombs, and at the time of writing, Coinbase's stock had already dropped by over 7.3%.
Coincidentally, Discover Financial Services, being replaced by Coinbase, can also be considered the "Coinbase" of the previous payment era. Discover is a U.S.-based digital banking and payment services company headquartered in Illinois, founded in 1960. Its payment network, Discover Network, is the fourth largest payment network apart from Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.
In April, after the approval of the acquisition of Discover by the sixth-largest U.S. bank, Capital One, this well-established digital banking company of over 60 years smoothly handed over its S&P 500 "seat" to this emerging cryptocurrency "bank." This unexpected coincidence also portrayed the handover between the new and old eras in Coinbase's entry into the S&P 500, resembling a relay race scene. However, this relay baton also brought Coinbase's accumulated "external troubles and internal strife" to a tipping point.
Over the past decade, cryptocurrency exchanges have been the most stable "profit machines." They play a role in providing liquidity to the entire industry and rely on trading fees to sustain their operations. However, with the comprehensive rollout of ETF products in the U.S. market, this profit model is facing unprecedented challenges. As the leader in the "American stack," with over 80% of its business coming from the U.S., Coinbase is most affected by this.
Starting from the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, traditional financial capital has significantly onboarded users and funds that originally belonged to exchanges in a more cost-effective, compliant, and transparent manner. The transaction fee revenue of cryptocurrency exchanges has started to decline, and this trend may further intensify in the coming months.
According to Coinbase's 2024 Q4 financial report, the platform's total trading revenue was $417 million, a 45% year-on-year decrease. The contribution of BTC and ETH's trading revenue dropped from 65% in the same period last year to less than 50%.
This decline is not a result of a decrease in market enthusiasm. In fact, since the approval of the Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the inflow of BTC into the U.S. market has continued to reach new highs, with asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity rapidly expanding their management scale. Data shows that BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) alone has surpassed $17 billion in assets under management. As of mid-May 2025, the cumulative net inflow of 11 major institutional Bitcoin spot ETFs on the market has exceeded $41.5 billion, with a total net asset value of $1214.69 billion, accounting for approximately 5.91% of the total Bitcoin market capitalization.
Institutional investors and some retail investors are shifting towards ETF products, partly due to compliance and tax considerations. On one hand, ETFs have much lower trading costs compared to cryptocurrency exchanges. While Coinbase's spot trading fee rate varies annually in a tiered manner but averages around 1.49%, for example, the management fee for IBIT ETF is only 0.25%, and the majority of ETF institution fees fluctuate around 0.15% to 0.25%.
In other words, the more rational users are, the more likely they are to move from exchanges to ETF products, especially for investors aiming for long-term holdings.
According to multiple sources, several institutions, including VanEck and Grayscale, have submitted applications to the SEC for a Solana (SOL) ETF, with some institutions also planning to submit an XRP ETF proposal. Once approved, this may trigger a new round of fund migration. According to a report submitted by Coinbase to the SEC, as of April, the platform's trading revenue from XRP and Solana accounted for 18% and 10%, nearly one-third of the platform's fee revenue.
However, the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs passed in 2024 also reduced the fees for these two tokens on Coinbase from 30% and 15% to 26% and 10%, respectively. If the SOL and XRP ETFs are approved, it will further undermine the core fee revenue of exchanges like Coinbase.
The expansion of ETF products is gradually weakening the financial intermediary status of cryptocurrency exchanges. From their original roles as matchmakers and clearers to now gradually becoming mere "on-ramps and off-ramps" for funds, exchanges are seeing their marginal value squeezed by ETFs.
On May 12, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins gave a keynote speech at the Tokenization and Cryptocurrency Working Group roundtable. The theme of his speech revolved around "It is a new day at the SEC," where he indicated that the SEC would not approach enforcement and regulation the same way as before but would instead pave the way for cryptocurrency assets in the U.S. market.
With signs of cryptocurrency compliance such as the SEC's "NEW DAY" declaration, an increasing number of traditional brokerages are attempting to enter the cryptocurrency industry. One of the most representative cases is the well-known U.S. brokerage Robinhood, which began expanding its crypto business in 2018. By the time of its IPO in 2021, Robinhood's crypto business revenue accounted for over 50% of the company, with a significant boost from the Dogecoin "moonshot" promoted by Musk.
In Q1 2025 earnings report, Robinhood showcased strong growth, especially in revenue from cryptocurrency and options trading. Fueled by Trump's Memecoin, cryptocurrency-related revenue reached $250 million, nearly doubling year-over-year. Consequently, Robinhood Gold subscription users reached 3.5 million, a 90% increase from the previous year, with the rapid growth of Robinhood Gold providing the company with a stable source of income.
Meanwhile, RobinHood is actively pursuing acquisitions in the cryptocurrency space. In 2024, it announced a $2 billion acquisition of the long-standing European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp. Additionally, Canada's largest cryptocurrency CEX, WonderFi, which recently went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also announced its integration with RobinHood Crypto. After obtaining virtual asset licenses in the UK, Canada, Singapore, and other markets, RobinHood has taken a proactive approach in the compliant cryptocurrency trading market.
Furthermore, an increasing number of brokerage firms are exploring the same path. Futu Securities, Tiger Brokers, and others are also dipping their toes into cryptocurrency trading, with some having applied for or obtained the VA license from the Hong Kong SFC. Although their user bases are currently small, traditional brokerages have a natural advantage in user trust, regulatory licenses, and low fee structures. This could pose a threat to native cryptocurrency platforms in the future.
In April 2025, security researchers discovered that some Coinbase user data was leaked on the dark web. While the platform initially responded by attributing it to a "technical misinformation," it still raised concerns among users regarding its security and privacy protection. Just two days before Dow Jones Indexes announced Coinbase's addition to the S&P 500 Index, on May 11, 2025, Coinbase received an email from an unknown threat actor claiming to have obtained customer account information and internal documents, demanding a $20 million ransom to keep the data private. Subsequent investigations confirmed the data breach.
Cybercriminals obtained the data by bribing overseas customer service agents and support staff, mainly in "non-U.S. regions such as India." These agents abused their access to Coinbase's internal customer support system and stole customer data. As early as February this year, blockchain detective ZachXBT revealed on X platform that between December 2024 and January 2025, Coinbase users lost over $65 million to social engineering scams, with the actual amount potentially higher.
Among the victims was a well-known figure, 67-year-old Ed Suman, an established artist in the art world for nearly two decades, having been involved in the creation of artworks such as Jeff Koons' "Balloon Dog" sculpture. Earlier this year, he fell victim to an impersonation scam involving fake Coinbase customer support, resulting in a loss of over $2 million in cryptocurrency. ZachXBT critiqued Coinbase for its inadequate handling of such scams, noting that other major exchanges have not faced similar issues and recommending Coinbase to enhance its security measures.
Amidst a series of ongoing social engineering incidents, although there has not been any impact on user assets at the technical level so far, it has raised concerns among many retail and institutional investors. Especially institutions holding massive assets on Coinbase. Just considering the U.S. BTC ETF institutions, as of mid-May 2025, they collectively hold nearly 840,000 BTC, and 75% of these are custodied by Coinbase. If we price BTC at $100,000, this amount reaches a staggering $63 billion, which is equivalent to the nominal GDP of two Iceland in the year 2024.
In addition, Coinbase Custody also serves over 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, family offices, pension funds, and endowments. As of the Q1 2025 financial report, Coinbase's total assets under management (including institutional and retail clients) reached $404 billion. The specific amount of institutional custodied assets was not explicitly disclosed in the latest report, but it should still be over 50% based on the Q4 2024 report.
Once this security barrier is breached, not only could the rate of user attrition far exceed expectations, but more importantly, institutional trust in it would undermine the foundation of its business. Therefore, after a hacking event, Coinbase's stock price plummeted significantly.
Facing a decline in spot trading fee revenue, Coinbase is also accelerating its transformation, attempting to find growth opportunities in derivatives and emerging assets. Coinbase acquired a stake in the options platform Deribit at the end of 2024 and announced the official launch of perpetual contract products in 2025. This acquisition fills in Coinbase's gap in options trading and its relatively small global market share.
Deribit has a strong presence in non-U.S. markets, especially in Asia and Europe. The acquisition has enabled Coinbase to gain a dominant position in bitcoin and ethereum options trading on Deribit, accounting for approximately 80% of the global options trading volume, with daily trading volume remaining above $2 billion.
Meanwhile, 80-90% of Deribit's customer base consists of institutional investors, with their professionalism and liquidity in the Bitcoin and Ethereum options market highly favored by institutions. Coinbase's compliance advantage, coupled with its already robust institutional ecosystem, makes it even more suitable. By using institutions as an entry point, it can face the squeeze from giants like Binance and OKX in the derivatives market.
Facing a similar dilemma is Kraken, which is attempting to replicate Binance Futures' model in non-U.S. markets. Since the derivatives market relies more on professional users, fee rates are relatively higher and stickiness is stronger, making it a significant source of revenue for exchanges. In the first half of 2025, Kraken completed the acquisition of TradeStation Crypto and a futures exchange, aiming to build a complete derivatives trading ecosystem to hedge the risk of declining spot transaction fee income.
With the surge of Memecoin in 2024, Binance, OKX, and various CEX platforms began massively listing small-market-cap, highly volatile tokens to activate active trading users. Due to the wealth effect and trading activity of Memecoins, Coinbase was also forced to join the battle, successively listing popular tokens from the Solana ecosystem such as BOOK OF MEME and Dogwifhat. Although these coins are controversial, they are frequently traded, with fee rates several times higher than mainstream coins, serving as a "blood-boosting" method for spot trading.
However, due to its status as a publicly traded company, this practice is a riskier endeavor for Coinbase. Even in the current crypto-friendly environment, the SEC is still investigating whether tokens like SOL, ADA, and SAND constitute securities.
In addition to the forced transformation strategies carried out by the aforementioned CEXs, they are also starting to lay out RWAs and the most talked-about stablecoin payment fields, such as the PYUSD launched through a collaboration between Coinbase and Paypal, Coinbase's support for the Euro stablecoin EURC by Circle that complies with EU MiCA regulatory requirements, or the USD1 launched through a collaboration between Binance and WIFL. In the increasingly crowded trading field, many CEXs have shifted their focus from just the trading market to the application field.
The golden age of transaction fees has quietly ended, and the second half of the crypto exchange platform game has silently begun.
Arthur Hayes: Why I'm Betting on ETH While the Market Is Obsessed with SOL
Key Market Insights for May 16th, how much did you miss out on?
CryptoPunks Changes Hands Twice, Did the Originator of NFTs Finally Find Its "Forever Home" This Time?
MOG Coin Skyrockets as Elon Musk and Garry Tan Embrace "mog/acc" Identity
The End and Rebirth of NFTs: How the Meme Coin Craze Ended the PFP Era?
STARTUP's Price Surges 40x in 30 Minutes: How did he become the Emotion King of Believe?
Key Market Intelligence on May 14th, how much did you miss out on?
1.Binance Alpha Launches HIPPO, BLUE, and Other Tokens
2.Believe Ecosystem Tokens See General Rise, LAUNCHCOIN Surges Over 250% in 24 Hours
3.Tiger Securities Introduces Cryptocurrency Deposit and Withdrawal Service, Supports Mainstream Cryptocurrencies such as BTC and ETH
4.Current Bitcoin Rally Possibly Driven by Institutions, Retail Traders Yet to Join
5.Binance Wallet's New TGE Privasea AI Participation Requires a 198 Point Threshold, with a Point Consumption of 15
Source: Overheard on CT (tg: @overheardonct), Kaito
PUMP: Today's discussions about PUMP focus on its new creator revenue-sharing model: the platform will allocate 50% of PumpSwap revenue to token creators, sparking varied reactions from users. Some criticize the move as insufficient or even misleading, while others view it as a positive step the platform is taking to reward creators. Meanwhile, PUMP faces market pressure from emerging competitors like LetsBONKfun and Raydium, which are rapidly gaining market share. Users also express concerns about PUMP's sustainability and potential regulatory risks in the U.S., with discussions extending to the platform's impact on the entire memecoin ecosystem.
COINBASE: Today, Coinbase became the first crypto company to join the S&P 500 Index, replacing Discover Financial Services, sparking widespread industry attention. The entire crypto community views this milestone as a significant development, signaling that crypto assets are further integrating into the mainstream financial system. The news has sparked lively discussions on Twitter, with many users pointing out that this may attract more institutional investors to enter the Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency markets.
XRP: XRP became the focal point of today's crypto discussion, with its significant market movements and strategic advances drawing attention. XRP has surpassed USDT to become the third-largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization, sparking market excitement and discussions about its future potential. The surge in market capitalization and price is believed to be related to increasing institutional interest, deepening strategic partnerships, and its role in the crypto ecosystem. Additionally, XRP's integration into multiple financial systems and its potential as a macro asset class are also seen as key factors driving the current market sentiment.
DYDX: Today's discussions about DYDX mainly focused on the dYdX Yapper Leaderboard launched by KaitoAI. The leaderboard aims to identify the most active community participants, with a total of $150,000 in rewards to be distributed over the first three seasons. This initiative has sparked broad community participation, with many users discussing the potential rewards and the incentive effect on the DYDX ecosystem. Meanwhile, progress on the ethDYDX to dYdX native chain migration and historical airdrop events have also been topics of discussion.
1. "What Is 'ICM'? Holding Up the $4 Billion Market Cap Solana's New Narrative"
Overnight, the hottest narrative in the crypto space has become "Internet Capital Markets," with a host of crypto projects and founders, led by the Solana ecosystem's new Launchpad platform Believe, releasing this phrase. Together with "Believe in something," it has become the new slogan heralding the onset of a bull market. What exactly is the so-called "Internet Capital Market," will it become a short-lived hype phrase like the Base ecosystem's previous Content Coin, and what related targets are available for selection?2.《LaunchCoin Surges 20x in One Day, How Did Believe Create a $200M Market Cap Shiba Inu After Going to Zero?|100x Retrospective》
LAUNCHCOIN broke through a $200 million market cap today, with the long-lost liquidity and such a high market cap "Memecoin" almost bringing half of the on-chain crypto community CT into the fray. The community is crazily discussing this token, with half of it being FOMO and the other half being FUD. This token, originally issued by Believe founder Ben Pasternak under his personal identity, transformed into a new platform token after a renaming. From once going to zero to a $200 million market cap, what happened in between?May 14 On-chain Fund Flow
Within 24 hours, GOONC's market cap soared to 70 million, could GOONC be the next billion-dollar dog on the Believe platform?
Bitcoin has broken $100,000, Ethereum has surpassed 2500, and is Solana's hot streak about to make a comeback?
The current market is in a state of macro euphoria, with GOONC riding the wave today, skyrocketing 10x in just a few hours, reaching a market cap of tens of millions of dollars, trading volume soaring past 50 million, and rumors swirling that the developer may be from OpenAI (unconfirmed but intriguing enough).
A ludicrous and absurd Solana meme that some actually buy into.
GOONC is a meme coin that has sprouted from the "gooning" subculture, offering no technological innovation or practical use, its sole function being speculation.
It takes inspiration from an NSFW term "gooning," which refers to a person being deeply immersed in certain content (you know what), eventually entering a nearly religious-like trance.
In Reddit (such as r/GOONED, r/GoonCaves) and some counterculture media outlets (such as MEL Magazine in 2020), "gooning" has gradually transitioned from an adult label to a meme-addicted, digital content and virtual self-indulgence synonym, arguably the epitome of Degen spirit.
GOONC is playing around with this concept, packaging the addictive nature, uselessness, and irony of gooning into a tradable financial product. The project team has made it clear: "We do not solve blockchain problems, we only trade absurdity." Blunt but oddly genuine.
GOONC launched on May 13, 2025, using the meme coin launch platform Believe App's LaunchCoin module on Solana. This tool is highly Degen: zero technical barriers, a few clicks to create a coin, perfect for projects like GOONC that can come up with ideas out of the blue.
The mastermind behind GOONC is also quite something and is the most talked-about, with KOL @basedalexandoor on X platform (alias "Pata van Goon") personally involved. His profile even caught the attention of Marc Andreessen, co-founder of a16z, making onlookers unable to resist speculating if GOONC has a hint of OpenAI lineage.
While this 'OpenAI Endorsement' is currently just community speculation, it is definitely a good card to play to fuel hype. Saying "we are pure speculation" on one hand, while tagging a few "AI + a16z" on the other.
GOONC took off as soon as it launched. After its launch on May 13, 2025, its market capitalization skyrocketed to $22 million within 4 hours, with a trading volume exceeding $25.6 million in 24 hours. According to platform data, the first day of trading saw an astonishing +41,100% surge, soaring from $0.0000001 to $0.02, becoming a "missed-the-boat" situation.
GOONC quickly formed an active trading community post-launch, with a lot of discussion and trading signals appearing on X platform (such as the 292x return signal provided by DeBot). Liquidity pools on exchanges like Raydium and Meteora grew rapidly, supporting high trading volumes and price increases.
The real climax occurred between May 13 and May 14, with the market cap rising to $5.5 million in the morning and directly surpassing $55 million in the afternoon. By the 14th, it briefly approached a $70 million market cap, with the trading volume soaring to $59 million. Some community members even posted screenshots claiming an increase of +85,000%, creating a new myth out of the ruins.
As of 1:30 pm on May 14, the price stabilized around $0.039, with a total market cap and FDV both around $39.6 million, and a 24-hour trading volume of $5.43 million. Active platforms include XT.COM, LBank, Meteora, and others.
Although there was a slight pullback from the peak ($0.07), the coin's popularity remains strong. For a coin that relies purely on "irony + community + X post" to thrive, this performance is already at a stellar level.
Currently, the background of the token's development team is not transparent, increasing the potential risk of a rug pull. Rugcheck.xyz warns that the creator of the GOONC contract may have permission to modify the contract (e.g., change fees or mint additional tokens), posing certain security risks.
Community members speculate that the meteoric rise of GOONC may be the "last hurrah".
Deconstructing Binance Alpha2.0's New "Asia-Led Liquidity Mining" Model
After Surging 40%, Has Ethereum Price Peaked Upon Exiting the Craze?
Whether you are an insider or an outsider, these days you must be familiar with the news about Ethereum. The reason is simple, causing Ethereum enthusiasts to sigh with emotion and almost throwing off-guard those who defend Ethereum, Ethereum, with a "3-day surge of 40%," climbed to the top of the Douyin Hot List.
As we all know, Ethereum launched the Pectra upgrade on May 7th. This most significant network upgrade since early 2024 integrates the Prague execution layer hard fork and the Electra consensus layer upgrade, significantly improving Ethereum's performance through 11 improvement proposals. The account abstraction feature (EIP-7702) allows users to flexibly manage wallets through social media accounts or multi-signature schemes, reducing the user threshold, attracting more users and developers. The staking mechanism optimization increases the validator ETH cap from 32ETH to 2048ETH and introduces a flexible withdrawal method, making it easier for institutions and individuals to participate in network security, enhancing the market's confidence in Ethereum's long-term value.
At the same time, Pectra optimized the interaction efficiency of Layer 2 networks such as Arbitrum and Optimism, making transactions faster and cheaper, leading to a surge in on-chain activity. As a crucial step for Ethereum's transition from "2G" to "5G," the Pectra upgrade not only enhances network vitality but also "recharges confidence" in the market, directly driving the price increase.
Related Reading: "Ethereum Skyrockets 22% in One Day, E Enthusiasts Rejoice"
It's not just Ethereum itself, as Wall Street also brought important bullish news.
The world's largest asset management company, BlackRock, proposed to the SEC allowing Ethereum ETFs for staking. This proposal is expected to elevate Ethereum ETFs from a mere investment tool to a bond-like "interest-bearing asset," bringing investors both capital appreciation and passive income, igniting market optimism about Ethereum's future potential.
Specifically, BlackRock has proposed to amend its S-1 filing to allow investors to create and redeem ETF shares directly with Ethereum instead of the U.S. dollar (i.e., in-kind redemption). This move, combined with its $2.9 billion BUIDL Fund launched in March 2024, aims to deepen the integration of traditional finance with blockchain. The BUIDL Fund is a tokenized fund operating on the Ethereum network, investing in traditional assets such as U.S. Treasury bonds. This setup is highly attractive to institutional investors, as they can not only benefit from Ethereum's price appreciation but also earn stable cash flow through staking.
Robert Mitchnick, BlackRock's Head of Digital Assets, stated in a CNBC interview in March 2025 that the addition of staking functionality will significantly enhance the appeal of the Ethereum ETF. He admitted that when the Ethereum spot ETF was launched in July 2024 without staking functionality, the market demand was lackluster, and staking could be the key to reversing this trend.
Meanwhile, the SEC's shifting stance on cryptocurrency regulation has also fueled this upward trend. During the tenure of the previous SEC chairman, the regulatory approach was tough, and staking was strictly viewed through the Howey test as a potential unregistered security. Therefore, when approving the Ethereum spot ETF in May 2024, staking functionality was explicitly prohibited.
However, with Trump back in the White House and Paul Atkins taking over the SEC, there has been a noticeable relaxation in crypto regulation. Apart from BlackRock, ETF issuers such as Invesco Galaxy, VanEck, WisdomTree, and 21Shares have also submitted applications for similar staking and in-kind redemption.
Related reading: "New Chairman Takes Office, SEC Transforms into 'Crypto Daddy' Within 48 Hours"
If staking ETFs are approved, the benefits are likely to go beyond price appreciation. The introduction of staking functionality could redefine the role of crypto assets, making them more similar to traditional financial products that provide returns and value appreciation, thereby driving Ethereum closer to mainstream finance.
Currently, the SEC still needs to address several decisions related to crypto ETFs, including whether to approve ETFs for Solana, XRP, Litecoin, and even Dogecoin. With the calls for an "altcoin season" growing louder, Ethereum's strong performance may just be the beginning of a larger crypto market frenzy.
In addition, the Trump family-related DeFi project WLFI is also bullish on this wave of rise, with frequent on-chain activities. According to on-chain data analyst @ai_9684xtpa's monitoring, a WLFI-related address is currently borrowing coins to go long on ETH, borrowing 4 million U from Aave to buy 1590 ETH at an average price of $2515 per ETH.
For this epic surge of Ethereum after half a year of silence, the community has indeed gained more confidence and hope, which has also led to a revival of the entire altcoin market. However, amidst the joy, there are also voices of pessimism. Below is a summary conducted by BlockBeats based on community discussions.
The optimists point out that the current market structure is similar to the eve of the bull markets in 2016 and 2020, predicting a life-changing surge in the next 3-6 months, where some altcoins may even achieve astonishing single-day gains of up to 40%.
@liuwei16602825 stated that this surge signifies the return of the bull market as a sure thing. There is no need to worry about a pullback. The driving force behind the surge uses a high-cost isolated operation, fearing a drop more than any retail investor and will definitely do everything to support the price.
Related Reading: "Ethereum Leads the Surge Triggering the 'Altcoin Season' Speculation, How Do Traders View the Future Market?"
The bears mainly believe that this surge is different from the bull market of 2021, as the current market lacks the confidence of large-scale retail investors entering and holding positions for the long term, with funds rotating too quickly.
@market_beggar observed that a Bitfinex E/B whale has started to close positions and believes that if this whale maintains its high-speed position-closing operation for the next few days, it can be inferred that the whale no longer sees the upside potential of ETH, preparing to take profits and exit. The closing time will be a key focus going forward.
@FLS_OTC stated that there are still many uncertainties at the macro level, and the liquidity cannot support a major bull market. At this stage, it is a "last hurrah," not a complete reversal, and will continue to remain in a short position.
@off_thetarget believes that after ETH transitioned from POW to POS, it lost the "gold standard" of mining machine power cost support. The staking economic model led to a breakdown in value anchoring. Additionally, the L2 ecosystem (such as Starknet, zkSync, etc.) suffered from liquidity fragmentation, failing to establish an effective capital inflow mechanism, causing the collapse of the split disc pattern. Furthermore, the ETH community's excessive pursuit of technical narratives divorced from real-world needs resulted in a weak ecosystem growth. Therefore, he believes that ETH's intrinsic value system has crumbled, and the price is bound to plummet to the 800-1200 range, with a decisive short position at 1800.
@Airdrop_Guard, based on the core logic of the "High Probability Trading Strategy," where three sets of underlying logic different trading systems (such as volume depletion, price supply-demand, long/short position funding rate, etc.) simultaneously issue a short signal at the same point (2580), creating a high-probability trading opportunity. He emphasizes that these systems must be based on different algorithms and logics (rather than mere technical indicator overlays). The current ETH trend aligns with the short conditions in multiple independent dimensions of his trading system, hence the decision to short.
Overall, Bitcoin still maintains over 54% market dominance, and institutional funds' continued preference for it may limit the altcoin's upward potential. The market's future direction will depend on multiple factors, such as Bitcoin's price trend, global macroeconomic conditions, and whether funds can effectively rotate from Bitcoin to the altcoin sector.
Although Ethereum's recent leadership in the market has brought about optimistic sentiment, investors still need to remain rational as different sectors of altcoins are likely to show divergence in trends. Whether this round of Ethereum's rise will usher in a true altcoin frenzy may require more time and conducive conditions.
How to Get Rich in Crypto Without Relying on Luck? Financial Veteran Raoul Pal's Macro Insights and Investment Path
Stablecoins Driving Global B2B Payment Innovation: How to Break Through Workflow Bottlenecks and Unlock Trillion-Dollar Market Potential?
These startups are building cutting-edge AI models without the need for a data center
After CEX and Wallet, OKX enters the payment game
Binance Sparks "Delist Concept": Can CEX Still Produce the Next ALPACA?
On April 24, Binance announced that it would delist four tokens, including Alpaca Finance ($ALPACA), on May 2, and cease trading of these pairs' perpetual futures contracts at 00:00 on May 1, 2025, Beijing time. Fast forward to the last day of perpetual futures trading delisting, ALPACA surged on the liquidation heat map. Over the past 24 hours, a total of $52.21 million evaporated in ALPACA's contract trading, exceeding the sum of the token's liquidation volume over the past two years.
Historically, when a token is listed on Binance, many traders would buy the news instantly ("Buy the News"). As the Binance listing effect gradually waned, traders found another path, which is to short sell the tokens set to be delisted from Binance ("Sell the News"). This strategy often has a very high success rate. However, as traders followed this path, they encountered the Alpaca on their short-selling journey.
Every thrilling market manipulation game requires careful preparation. Before Binance's official announcement, on April 10, $ALPACA was ranked 7th in the preliminary list of the second batch of "Vote for Delisting" on Binance, causing its price to plummet almost by half. However, in the five days leading up to Binance's official announcement, from April 19 to April 23, trading volume suddenly surged.
The story traces back to the start of Binance's second round of "Vote for Delisting," where ALPACA was included in the delisting candidates list, ranked 7th among 17 projects. After the completion of Binance's delisting vote count, $ALPACA was included in the projects to be delisted. The market did not react significantly, price fluctuations were not substantial, but trading volumes expanded abnormally, suggesting the entry of "manipulative funds" into the community.
On April 24, Binance officially announced the delisting of the $ALPACA spot trading pair on May 2 and the settlement of the futures contracts on April 30. Following the announcement, the spot price of $ALPACA dropped from $0.0329 to $0.029, with a market cap of only about $5 million. However, what followed were two price "rollercoaster" moments; within an hour, the price surged from $0.029 to $0.0857, an increase of about 195%, only to rapidly drop back to $0.04 within 3 hours. Shorts were caught off guard, and the open interest of contracts surged rapidly, initiating the "long and short grinder" mode.
On April 25, Alpaca Finance officially announced that the trading volume in the past 24 hours had exceeded 1 billion tokens. The liquidity provider had suggested a "minting for stability" to be returned to the treasury after a decrease in trading volume. However, as public opinion began to ferment, opposition filled the community. Alpaca Finance deleted the previous tweet and posted a new one at 9 p.m. on the same night, announcing the cancellation of the minting due to community opposition.
On April 26, Binance amended the contract funding rate rules, shortening the maximum rate cap settlement period to hourly and setting it at up to ±2%. Some high-leverage accounts continued to hold short positions against the high rate and were liquidated. Millions of dollars disappeared within a few hours, with $13 million in short positions vanishing on a token with a market cap of less than $30 million.
With the establishment of this short-selling trend, the price skyrocketed nearly 12 times from a low of $0.029 to $0.3477 within 3 days. The contract's open interest surged significantly, especially with a notable increase in short positions, resembling a microcosm of the Wall Street battle of GME's retail investors. However, this time, the retail investors' opponents could continue to mint additional chips.
From April 26 to April 29, these days were relatively calm, with the price fluctuating around $0.2 to $0.34. On April 29, Binance announced another increase in the rate cap to ±4%. Theoretically, such a high rate would severely impact short positions. If the rate remains at -4%, the bears will face a 96% "cost of ruin" after holding a short position for 24 hours. However, miraculously, the price plummeted from $0.27 to $0.067.
On April 30, with the contract delisting and liquidation scheduled in the final 24 hours, the price continued to experience intense fluctuations. ALPACA's attention peaked, with its highest price reaching $1.2 at one point. From a week before the delisting announcement to the eve of the contract delisting, ALPACA's price surged 40 times, creating an independent market for the token delisted by Binance. The total liquidation volume across the network also reached $50 million, with $42 million in "bearish fuel" beneath the price surge.
After the first surge of ALPACA, Heyi, the co-founder of Binance, replied to a netizen asking, "Can the teacher who buys the shell guarantee breakeven?" This has also triggered endless speculation among community members.
KOL Tunbtc believes that Heyi's reply to this matter was the starting point of ALPACA's surge. "The large holders of Alpaca's native token, by transferring spot chips, operating rights, and distribution rights, have pledged allegiance to Binance's deep-water core interest circle, allowing it to fully harvest market liquidity before delisting, slaughtering opposing positions." Through a triple path of fees, contract liquidations, and spot volatility, they converted user attention into profits.
He also called on Binance to thoroughly investigate this matter, clarify which market maker is manipulating the candlestick patterns, as ALPACA saw an 18x surge within 24 hours with users liquidated of tens of millions of dollars, while previously GPS's 500% surge was promptly halted, and expressed his sentiment: "All of this is thought-provoking."
Wenze, the founder of Beta Capital, believes that bypassing the regular listing process, buying shells, renaming, and restarting has crossed Binance's bottom line of maintaining listing credibility and brand compliance. Binance sometimes has a high tolerance for market fluctuations, and the OM issuance only adjusts the collateralization ratio, with many projects only allowed for leveraged trading. However, once the project, such as these "shell projects," is identified, it is easily labeled for observation, triggering a vote for delisting, ultimately leading to delisting rather than using mild measures.
Renowned KOL Rui, "YeruiZhang," likened the ALPACA incident to "crazy revenge on an ex" and shared a piece of insider information, claiming that the original whale behind ALPACA was a team that controlled BSC's MEV for a period of time and expressed dissatisfaction with Binance's current management for some reason. The comments section is rampant with speculation that it is BSC's whale 48CLUB, and 48CLUB's Ian even personally appeared to eat "his own melon."
With the recent buzz around VOXEL's surge and the wealth effect and discussion surrounding ALPACA, more and more "delisting concepts" have emerged. This concept does not necessarily refer to tokens that have already been delisted but rather shares some common characteristics of delisted tokens.
Famous KOL Chuanmo recently shared on Twitter his logic for choosing concept tokens and listed several tokens, all of which experienced varying degrees of price increase after his recommendation.
His "Concept Delisting" strategy involves selecting low-cap tokens from Bybit and Binance, arranging them by market cap from lowest to highest, with almost 100% price increase for the tokens with the highest holdings/circulating market cap. He buys three tokens daily following this order with a fixed amount, and based on the holdings/circulating supply ratio, he removes tokens that no longer meet the criteria daily and continues to buy the new top three tokens.
Many community members have tested this strategy, with some creating helpful tools. The dreamer Disney "discountifu" has created a dashboard, and Vivek10 early bird "vivekw_eth" has developed a monitoring and alert system that can be directly pushed to WeChat with a copyable link, although it is currently deployed locally and not yet entirely stable.
However, when using tools created for free by community members, please be cautious. While there are many enthusiastic contributors in the community, there are also many uncertain factors in this dark forest.
In an increasingly insular market, retail investors not only have to contend with whales and other retail investors but also must bear many unstable elements. The recent ALPACA incident serves as a warning to us. Whether it's a primary or secondary listing on a top-tier exchange or the "Concept Delisting" approach, we need to make rational asset allocations amidst FOMO to protect our principal and reach the other shore.
The mention of all tokens above does not constitute financial investment advice "NFA".
a16z Leads $18M Seed Round for Catena Labs, Crypto Industry Bets on Stablecoin AI Payment
Pharos, deeply integrated with AntChain, is about to launch. How can we get involved?
$COIN Joins S&P 500, but Coinbase Isn't Celebrating
On May 13, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced that Coinbase would officially replace Discover Financial Services in the S&P 500 on May 19. While other companies like Block and MicroStrategy, closely tied to Bitcoin, were already part of the S&P 500, Coinbase became the first cryptocurrency exchange whose primary business is in the index. This also signifies that cryptocurrency is gradually moving from the fringes to the mainstream in the U.S.
On the day of the announcement, Coinbase's stock price surged by 23%, surpassing the $250 mark. However, just 3 days later, Coinbase was hit by two consecutive events: a hack where employees were bribed to steal customer data and a demand for a $20 million ransom, and an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the authenticity of its claim of having over 100 million "verified users" in its securities filings and marketing materials. These two events acted as mini-bombs, and at the time of writing, Coinbase's stock had already dropped by over 7.3%.
Coincidentally, Discover Financial Services, being replaced by Coinbase, can also be considered the "Coinbase" of the previous payment era. Discover is a U.S.-based digital banking and payment services company headquartered in Illinois, founded in 1960. Its payment network, Discover Network, is the fourth largest payment network apart from Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.
In April, after the approval of the acquisition of Discover by the sixth-largest U.S. bank, Capital One, this well-established digital banking company of over 60 years smoothly handed over its S&P 500 "seat" to this emerging cryptocurrency "bank." This unexpected coincidence also portrayed the handover between the new and old eras in Coinbase's entry into the S&P 500, resembling a relay race scene. However, this relay baton also brought Coinbase's accumulated "external troubles and internal strife" to a tipping point.
Over the past decade, cryptocurrency exchanges have been the most stable "profit machines." They play a role in providing liquidity to the entire industry and rely on trading fees to sustain their operations. However, with the comprehensive rollout of ETF products in the U.S. market, this profit model is facing unprecedented challenges. As the leader in the "American stack," with over 80% of its business coming from the U.S., Coinbase is most affected by this.
Starting from the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, traditional financial capital has significantly onboarded users and funds that originally belonged to exchanges in a more cost-effective, compliant, and transparent manner. The transaction fee revenue of cryptocurrency exchanges has started to decline, and this trend may further intensify in the coming months.
According to Coinbase's 2024 Q4 financial report, the platform's total trading revenue was $417 million, a 45% year-on-year decrease. The contribution of BTC and ETH's trading revenue dropped from 65% in the same period last year to less than 50%.
This decline is not a result of a decrease in market enthusiasm. In fact, since the approval of the Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the inflow of BTC into the U.S. market has continued to reach new highs, with asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity rapidly expanding their management scale. Data shows that BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) alone has surpassed $17 billion in assets under management. As of mid-May 2025, the cumulative net inflow of 11 major institutional Bitcoin spot ETFs on the market has exceeded $41.5 billion, with a total net asset value of $1214.69 billion, accounting for approximately 5.91% of the total Bitcoin market capitalization.
Institutional investors and some retail investors are shifting towards ETF products, partly due to compliance and tax considerations. On one hand, ETFs have much lower trading costs compared to cryptocurrency exchanges. While Coinbase's spot trading fee rate varies annually in a tiered manner but averages around 1.49%, for example, the management fee for IBIT ETF is only 0.25%, and the majority of ETF institution fees fluctuate around 0.15% to 0.25%.
In other words, the more rational users are, the more likely they are to move from exchanges to ETF products, especially for investors aiming for long-term holdings.
According to multiple sources, several institutions, including VanEck and Grayscale, have submitted applications to the SEC for a Solana (SOL) ETF, with some institutions also planning to submit an XRP ETF proposal. Once approved, this may trigger a new round of fund migration. According to a report submitted by Coinbase to the SEC, as of April, the platform's trading revenue from XRP and Solana accounted for 18% and 10%, nearly one-third of the platform's fee revenue.
However, the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs passed in 2024 also reduced the fees for these two tokens on Coinbase from 30% and 15% to 26% and 10%, respectively. If the SOL and XRP ETFs are approved, it will further undermine the core fee revenue of exchanges like Coinbase.
The expansion of ETF products is gradually weakening the financial intermediary status of cryptocurrency exchanges. From their original roles as matchmakers and clearers to now gradually becoming mere "on-ramps and off-ramps" for funds, exchanges are seeing their marginal value squeezed by ETFs.
On May 12, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins gave a keynote speech at the Tokenization and Cryptocurrency Working Group roundtable. The theme of his speech revolved around "It is a new day at the SEC," where he indicated that the SEC would not approach enforcement and regulation the same way as before but would instead pave the way for cryptocurrency assets in the U.S. market.
With signs of cryptocurrency compliance such as the SEC's "NEW DAY" declaration, an increasing number of traditional brokerages are attempting to enter the cryptocurrency industry. One of the most representative cases is the well-known U.S. brokerage Robinhood, which began expanding its crypto business in 2018. By the time of its IPO in 2021, Robinhood's crypto business revenue accounted for over 50% of the company, with a significant boost from the Dogecoin "moonshot" promoted by Musk.
In Q1 2025 earnings report, Robinhood showcased strong growth, especially in revenue from cryptocurrency and options trading. Fueled by Trump's Memecoin, cryptocurrency-related revenue reached $250 million, nearly doubling year-over-year. Consequently, Robinhood Gold subscription users reached 3.5 million, a 90% increase from the previous year, with the rapid growth of Robinhood Gold providing the company with a stable source of income.
Meanwhile, RobinHood is actively pursuing acquisitions in the cryptocurrency space. In 2024, it announced a $2 billion acquisition of the long-standing European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp. Additionally, Canada's largest cryptocurrency CEX, WonderFi, which recently went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also announced its integration with RobinHood Crypto. After obtaining virtual asset licenses in the UK, Canada, Singapore, and other markets, RobinHood has taken a proactive approach in the compliant cryptocurrency trading market.
Furthermore, an increasing number of brokerage firms are exploring the same path. Futu Securities, Tiger Brokers, and others are also dipping their toes into cryptocurrency trading, with some having applied for or obtained the VA license from the Hong Kong SFC. Although their user bases are currently small, traditional brokerages have a natural advantage in user trust, regulatory licenses, and low fee structures. This could pose a threat to native cryptocurrency platforms in the future.
In April 2025, security researchers discovered that some Coinbase user data was leaked on the dark web. While the platform initially responded by attributing it to a "technical misinformation," it still raised concerns among users regarding its security and privacy protection. Just two days before Dow Jones Indexes announced Coinbase's addition to the S&P 500 Index, on May 11, 2025, Coinbase received an email from an unknown threat actor claiming to have obtained customer account information and internal documents, demanding a $20 million ransom to keep the data private. Subsequent investigations confirmed the data breach.
Cybercriminals obtained the data by bribing overseas customer service agents and support staff, mainly in "non-U.S. regions such as India." These agents abused their access to Coinbase's internal customer support system and stole customer data. As early as February this year, blockchain detective ZachXBT revealed on X platform that between December 2024 and January 2025, Coinbase users lost over $65 million to social engineering scams, with the actual amount potentially higher.
Among the victims was a well-known figure, 67-year-old Ed Suman, an established artist in the art world for nearly two decades, having been involved in the creation of artworks such as Jeff Koons' "Balloon Dog" sculpture. Earlier this year, he fell victim to an impersonation scam involving fake Coinbase customer support, resulting in a loss of over $2 million in cryptocurrency. ZachXBT critiqued Coinbase for its inadequate handling of such scams, noting that other major exchanges have not faced similar issues and recommending Coinbase to enhance its security measures.
Amidst a series of ongoing social engineering incidents, although there has not been any impact on user assets at the technical level so far, it has raised concerns among many retail and institutional investors. Especially institutions holding massive assets on Coinbase. Just considering the U.S. BTC ETF institutions, as of mid-May 2025, they collectively hold nearly 840,000 BTC, and 75% of these are custodied by Coinbase. If we price BTC at $100,000, this amount reaches a staggering $63 billion, which is equivalent to the nominal GDP of two Iceland in the year 2024.
In addition, Coinbase Custody also serves over 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, family offices, pension funds, and endowments. As of the Q1 2025 financial report, Coinbase's total assets under management (including institutional and retail clients) reached $404 billion. The specific amount of institutional custodied assets was not explicitly disclosed in the latest report, but it should still be over 50% based on the Q4 2024 report.
Once this security barrier is breached, not only could the rate of user attrition far exceed expectations, but more importantly, institutional trust in it would undermine the foundation of its business. Therefore, after a hacking event, Coinbase's stock price plummeted significantly.
Facing a decline in spot trading fee revenue, Coinbase is also accelerating its transformation, attempting to find growth opportunities in derivatives and emerging assets. Coinbase acquired a stake in the options platform Deribit at the end of 2024 and announced the official launch of perpetual contract products in 2025. This acquisition fills in Coinbase's gap in options trading and its relatively small global market share.
Deribit has a strong presence in non-U.S. markets, especially in Asia and Europe. The acquisition has enabled Coinbase to gain a dominant position in bitcoin and ethereum options trading on Deribit, accounting for approximately 80% of the global options trading volume, with daily trading volume remaining above $2 billion.
Meanwhile, 80-90% of Deribit's customer base consists of institutional investors, with their professionalism and liquidity in the Bitcoin and Ethereum options market highly favored by institutions. Coinbase's compliance advantage, coupled with its already robust institutional ecosystem, makes it even more suitable. By using institutions as an entry point, it can face the squeeze from giants like Binance and OKX in the derivatives market.
Facing a similar dilemma is Kraken, which is attempting to replicate Binance Futures' model in non-U.S. markets. Since the derivatives market relies more on professional users, fee rates are relatively higher and stickiness is stronger, making it a significant source of revenue for exchanges. In the first half of 2025, Kraken completed the acquisition of TradeStation Crypto and a futures exchange, aiming to build a complete derivatives trading ecosystem to hedge the risk of declining spot transaction fee income.
With the surge of Memecoin in 2024, Binance, OKX, and various CEX platforms began massively listing small-market-cap, highly volatile tokens to activate active trading users. Due to the wealth effect and trading activity of Memecoins, Coinbase was also forced to join the battle, successively listing popular tokens from the Solana ecosystem such as BOOK OF MEME and Dogwifhat. Although these coins are controversial, they are frequently traded, with fee rates several times higher than mainstream coins, serving as a "blood-boosting" method for spot trading.
However, due to its status as a publicly traded company, this practice is a riskier endeavor for Coinbase. Even in the current crypto-friendly environment, the SEC is still investigating whether tokens like SOL, ADA, and SAND constitute securities.
In addition to the forced transformation strategies carried out by the aforementioned CEXs, they are also starting to lay out RWAs and the most talked-about stablecoin payment fields, such as the PYUSD launched through a collaboration between Coinbase and Paypal, Coinbase's support for the Euro stablecoin EURC by Circle that complies with EU MiCA regulatory requirements, or the USD1 launched through a collaboration between Binance and WIFL. In the increasingly crowded trading field, many CEXs have shifted their focus from just the trading market to the application field.
The golden age of transaction fees has quietly ended, and the second half of the crypto exchange platform game has silently begun.
Arthur Hayes: Why I'm Betting on ETH While the Market Is Obsessed with SOL
Key Market Insights for May 16th, how much did you miss out on?
CryptoPunks Changes Hands Twice, Did the Originator of NFTs Finally Find Its "Forever Home" This Time?
Popular coins
Latest Crypto News
Customer Support:@weikecs
Business Cooperation:@weikecs
Quant Trading & MM:bd@weex.com
VIP Services:support@weex.com