- Buy Crypto
- Markets
- Futures
- Spot
- Copy Trade
WE-Launch
Learn from Traditional Companies: How Do Crypto Projects Distribute Profits?
Original Article Title: When Tokens Burn
Original Article Author: Saurabh Deshpande
Original Article Translation: Luffy, Foresight News
Lately, I have taken stablecoin supply as a metric for measuring liquidity, considering the number of tokens in the market to calculate the liquidity of each asset. As expected, liquidity eventually approaches zero, and the chart drawn based on the analysis results can be considered a piece of "art."
In March 2021, each cryptocurrency enjoyed approximately $1.8 million worth of stablecoin liquidity, but by March 2025, this number had dropped to only $5,500.
As a project, you are competing for the attention of users and investors with over 40 million other tokens, a number that was only 5 million three years ago. So, how do you retain token holders? You can try to build a community, where members say "GM" on Discord and conduct some airdrop events.
But then what? Once they get the token, they will move on to the next Discord group to say "GM."
Community members won't stay for no reason; you have to give them a reason. In my view, a high-quality product with actual cash flow is a reason, or making the project's data look good.
Russ Hanneman Syndrome
In the TV show "Silicon Valley," Russ Hanneman once boasted about becoming a billionaire by "putting the radio on the Internet." In the crypto space, everyone wants to be Russ, chasing overnight riches but not caring about the business fundamentals, building moats, and acquiring sustainable income—these "boring" yet practical issues.
Joel's recent articles "Death to Stagnation" and "Make Revenue Great Again" emphasize the urgent need for crypto projects to focus on sustainable value creation. Similar to the memorable scene in the show, Russ Hanneman dismisses Richard Hendricks' concerns about building a sustainable revenue model, many crypto projects similarly rely on speculative narratives and investor enthusiasm. Now, it appears that this strategy is clearly unsustainable.
However, unlike Russ, founders cannot rely solely on shouting "Tres Comas" (a wealth-flaunting term used by Russ in the show) to make a project successful. Most projects require sustainable revenue, and to achieve this, we first need to understand how existing revenue-generating projects operate.
https://youtu.be/BzAdXyPYKQo
The Zero-Sum Game of Attention
In the traditional market, regulatory bodies maintain stock liquidity for publicly traded companies by setting high barriers to entry. Globally, there are 359 million companies, with only about 55,000 publicly listed, accounting for only about 0.01%. The benefit of this approach is that most available capital is concentrated within a limited range. However, it also means that early-stage investors in companies and opportunities for high returns are scarce.
The dispersion of attention and liquidity is the price at which every token can be easily publicly traded. I am not here to judge which model is better, but simply to illustrate the differences between the two worlds.
The question then is, how to stand out in the seemingly endless ocean of tokens? One way is to demonstrate that the project you are building is in demand and to engage token holders in the project's growth. Do not misunderstand; not every project needs to be equally focused on revenue and profit maximization.
Revenue is not the end goal but a means to achieve long-term sustainability.
For example, an L1 that hosts a sufficient number of applications only needs to earn enough fees to offset token inflation. Ethereum's validator return rate is about 3.5%, which means its annual token supply will increase by 3.5%. Holders staking ETH to earn rewards will see their token holdings diluted. However, if Ethereum were to implement a fee burn mechanism to destroy an equivalent amount of tokens, then regular ETH holders would not be diluted.
As a project, Ethereum does not actually need to be profitable because it already has a thriving ecosystem. As long as validators can earn enough revenue to maintain node operation, Ethereum does not need additional income. However, for projects with a circulating supply ratio (circulating token percentage) of around 20%, these projects are more like traditional companies and may take time to reach a point where there are enough volunteers to sustain the project.
Founders must face the reality that Russ Hanneman overlooks: generating tangible, sustainable revenue is crucial. It should be noted that in this article, whenever "revenue" is mentioned, I am actually referring to Free Cash Flow (FCF) because obtaining the data behind revenue for most crypto projects is challenging.
Understanding how to allocate Free Cash Flow (FCF), such as when to use it for reinvestment to drive growth, when to share it with token holders, and the optimal allocation method (e.g., buybacks or dividends), these decisions are likely to determine the success or failure of founders aiming to create lasting value.
Reference to the equity market is very helpful in making these decisions effectively. Traditional companies often distribute FCF through dividends and buybacks. Factors such as company maturity, industry position, profitability, growth potential, market conditions, and shareholder expectations will all impact these decisions.
Different crypto projects naturally have different opportunities and limitations in value redistribution based on their lifecycle stage. Below, I will describe this in detail.
Crypto Project Lifecycle
(1) Explorer Stage
Early crypto projects are usually in the experimental stage, focusing on attracting users and refining the core product, rather than aggressively pursuing profits. The product-market fit is still unclear, and ideally, these projects prioritize reinvestment for long-term growth maximization rather than profit-sharing schemes.
The governance of these projects is usually more centralized, controlled by the founding team for upgrades and strategic decisions. The ecosystem is still nascent, network effects are weak, and user retention is a major challenge. Many of these projects rely on token incentives, venture capital, or grants to sustain initial user adoption, rather than arising from natural demand.
While some projects may find early success in a niche market, they still need to prove whether their model is sustainable. Most crypto startup projects fall into this category, and only a small fraction can break through and move forward.
These projects are still seeking the product-market fit, and their revenue models highlight the dilemma of sustaining growth. Projects like Synthetix and Balancer show a pattern of revenue skyrocketing and then significantly declining, indicating a speculative phase rather than steady market acceptance.
(2) Climber Stage
Projects that have passed the early stages but have not yet established dominance belong to the growth category. These protocols can generate substantial revenue, ranging from $10 million to $50 million annually. However, they are still in the growth phase, with governance structures evolving continuously, and reinvestment remains a top priority. While some projects consider profit-sharing mechanisms, they must strike a balance between profit distribution and continued expansion.
The above chart records the weekly revenue of projects in the Climber phase in the cryptocurrency space. These protocols have gained some traction but are still in the process of solidifying their long-term position. Unlike the early Explorer phase, these projects have visible revenue, but the growth trajectory remains unstable.
Projects like Curve and Arbitrum One show relatively stable revenue flows with noticeable peaks and troughs, indicating fluctuations influenced by market cycles and incentive measures. OP Mainnet also exhibits a similar trend where surges suggest periods of high demand followed by slowdowns. Meanwhile, Usual's revenue shows exponential growth, indicating rapid adoption, but the lack of historical data to confirm whether this growth is sustainable. Pendle and Layer3 experience a significant surge in activity, indicating a high level of user engagement currently, but also revealing the challenge of maintaining momentum in the long term.
Many Layer 2 scaling solutions (such as Optimism, Arbitrum), decentralized finance platforms (such as GMX, Lido), and emerging Layer 1 solutions (such as Avalanche, Sui) fall into this category. According to Token Terminal data, currently only 29 projects have annual revenues exceeding $10 million, though the actual number may be slightly higher. These projects are at a turning point, where those consolidating network effects and user retention will move to the next stage, while others may stagnate or decline.
For Climbers, the path forward involves reducing reliance on incentive measures, strengthening network effects, and proving that revenue growth can be sustained without sudden reversals.
（III）Titan Stage
Mature protocols like Uniswap, Aave, and Hyperliquid are in the growth and maturity stage, having achieved product-market fit and generating significant cash flow. These projects are able to implement structured buybacks or dividends, enhancing token holder trust and ensuring long-term sustainability. Their governance is more decentralized, with the community actively participating in upgrades and treasury decisions.
Network effects form a competitive moat, making them hard to replace. Currently, only a few dozen projects can reach this revenue level, meaning very few protocols have truly matured. Unlike projects in the early or growth stages, these protocols do not rely on inflationary token incentives but earn sustainable revenue through transaction fees, lending interest, or staking rewards. Their ability to withstand market cycles further sets them apart from speculative projects.
Differing from early-stage projects or projects in the growth phase, these protocols demonstrate strong network effects, a solid user base, and a deeper market presence.
Ethereum leads in decentralized revenue generation, showing periodic peaks in revenue that align with high network activity. The revenue situation of the two stablecoin giants, Tether and Circle, is different, with a more stable and structured income flow rather than significant fluctuations. While Solana and Ethena have substantial revenue, they still experience noticeable growth and fall-back cycles, reflecting their ever-changing adoption status.
Meanwhile, Sky's revenue is relatively unstable, indicating significant demand volatility rather than sustained dominance.
Although giants stand out in scale, they are not immune to fluctuations. The difference lies in their ability to weather downturns and maintain revenue in the long term.
(4) Seasonal Projects
Some projects undergo rapid but unsustainable growth due to hype, incentive measures, or social trends. Projects like FriendTech and memecoins may generate substantial revenue during peak periods but struggle to retain users long term. Premature revenue-sharing schemes may exacerbate volatility as speculative capital quickly exits once incentives dry up. Their governance is often weak or centralized, the ecosystem is fragile, decentralized application adoption is limited, or long-term viability is lacking.
While these projects may temporarily achieve high valuations, they are prone to collapse when market sentiment shifts, leaving investors disappointed. Many speculative platforms rely on unsustainable token issuance, false trading, or inflated yields to create artificial demand. Although some projects can move past this stage, most fail to establish a sustainable business model and are inherently high-risk investments.
Profit-Sharing Models of Publicly Traded Companies
Observing how publicly traded companies handle profit sharing can teach us more.
This chart illustrates how the profit-sharing behavior of traditional companies evolves as their maturity increases. Young companies face significant financial losses (66%) and tend to retain profits for reinvestment rather than distributing dividends (18%) or engaging in stock buybacks (28%). As companies mature, profitability typically stabilizes, and dividend payments and buybacks increase accordingly. Mature companies often distribute profits, with dividends (78%) and buybacks (82%) becoming common.
These trends parallel the lifecycle of crypto projects. Like young traditional companies, early-stage crypto "explorers" typically focus on reinvestment to find the product-market fit. Conversely, mature crypto "giants," like established stable traditional companies, have the capacity to distribute income through token buybacks or dividends, enhancing investor confidence and project long-term viability.
The relationship between company age and profit-sharing strategy naturally extends to the practices of specific industries. While young companies typically prioritize reinvestment, mature companies adjust their strategies based on the characteristics of the industry they operate in. Cash-rich industries tend to favor predictable dividends, while industries characterized by innovation and volatility prefer the flexibility offered by stock buybacks. Understanding these subtle differences helps cryptocurrency project founders effectively adjust their revenue distribution strategies to align with the project's lifecycle stage and industry characteristics, meeting investor expectations.
The following chart highlights the unique profit distribution strategies of different industries. Traditional and stable industries like Utilities (80% of companies pay dividends, 21% engage in buybacks) and Consumer Staples (72% of companies pay dividends, 22% engage in buybacks) strongly favor dividends due to their predictable revenue streams. In contrast, technology-focused industries such as Information Technology (27% engage in buybacks, with the highest cash return through buybacks at 58%) lean towards buybacks to provide flexibility during revenue fluctuations.
These considerations directly impact cryptocurrency projects. Protocols with stable, predictable income, such as stablecoin providers or mature DeFi platforms, may be best suited for a dividend-like continuous payment approach. Conversely, high-growth, innovation-focused cryptocurrency projects, especially those in DeFi and infrastructure layers, can adopt a flexible token buyback approach, mimicking strategies seen in the traditional tech industry to adapt to volatile and rapidly changing market conditions.
Dividends vs. Buybacks
Each method has its pros and cons, but buybacks have recently been favored over dividends. Buybacks offer more flexibility, while dividends have stickiness. Once you announce a X% dividend, investors expect you to do so every quarter. Therefore, buybacks provide strategic leeway to companies, not just in how much profit is returned but also when, allowing them to adapt to market cycles without being confined to a rigid dividend payment schedule. Buybacks do not set fixed expectations like dividends, being viewed as one-time endeavors.
However, buybacks are a wealth transfer mechanism and a zero-sum game. Dividends create value for each shareholder, so both have their place.
Recent trends show that buybacks are increasingly favored due to the reasons mentioned above.
In the early 1990s, only about 20% of profits were distributed through buybacks. By 2024, approximately 60% of profit distribution is done through buybacks. In dollar terms, buybacks surpassed dividends in 1999 and have since maintained the lead.
From a governance perspective, share buybacks require careful valuation assessment to avoid inadvertently transferring wealth from long-term shareholders to those who sold the stock at inflated prices. When a company buys back its stock, it (ideally) believes the stock is undervalued. Conversely, investors choosing to sell the stock believe it is overvalued. These two views cannot both be correct simultaneously. It is generally believed that the company knows its plans better than shareholders, so those selling their stock during buybacks may miss out on higher potential profits.
According to a paper from Harvard Law School, current disclosure practices often lack timeliness, making it difficult for shareholders to assess the progress of buybacks and maintain their ownership percentage. Additionally, when compensation is tied to metrics such as earnings per share, buybacks can impact executive pay, potentially incentivizing executives to prioritize short-term stock performance over the company's long-term growth.
Despite these governance challenges, buybacks remain attractive to many companies, especially U.S. tech firms, due to the flexibility of buyback operations, autonomy in investment decisions, and lower future expectations compared to dividends.
Cryptocurrency Revenue Generation and Distribution
According to Token Terminal data, there are 27 projects in the crypto space that can generate $1 million in revenue monthly. This is not comprehensive as it excludes projects like PumpFun, BullX, etc., but I think it's not far off. I researched 10 of these projects to observe how they handle revenue. The key point is that most crypto projects should not even consider distributing revenue or profits to token holders. In this regard, I admire Jupiter. They explicitly stated at the token announcement stage their lack of intent to share direct revenue (e.g., dividends). Only after user growth exceeds tenfold does Jupiter initiate a mechanism similar to a buyback to distribute value to token holders.
Revenue Sharing in Crypto Projects
Crypto projects must rethink how they share value with token holders, drawing inspiration from traditional corporate practices while employing unique approaches to navigate regulatory scrutiny. Unlike stocks, tokens offer an innovative opportunity to directly integrate into the product ecosystem. Projects are not merely distributing revenue to token holders but actively incentivizing key ecosystem activities.
For example, even before initiating buybacks, Aave rewarded token stakers providing critical liquidity. Similarly, Hyperliquid strategically shares 46% of its revenue with liquidity providers, akin to traditional consumer loyalty models in established enterprises.
In addition to these token integration strategies, some projects adopt a more direct revenue-sharing approach, reminiscent of traditional public equity practices. However, even in a direct revenue-sharing model, caution must be exercised to avoid being classified as securities, striking a balance between rewarding token holders and complying with regulations. Projects like Hyperliquid, based outside the United States, often have more operational flexibility when implementing a revenue-sharing approach.
Jupiter presents a more creative value-sharing example. They do not engage in traditional buybacks but instead leverage a third-party entity called the Litterbox Trust, which receives JUP tokens programmatically, equivalent to half of the Jupiter Protocol's revenue. As of March 26, it has accumulated approximately 18 million JUP, valued at around $9.7 million. This mechanism directly aligns token holders with the project's success while circumventing regulatory issues associated with traditional buybacks.
It is essential to remember that Jupiter embarked on the path of rewarding token holders with value only after establishing a robust stablecoin treasury sufficient to sustain the project's operations for several years.
The reason for distributing 50% of the revenue to this accumulation plan is straightforward. Jupiter follows a guiding principle of balancing ownership between the team and the community, fostering clear alignment and shared incentives. This approach also encourages token holders to actively promote the protocol, linking their financial interests directly to the product's growth and success.
Aave recently launched a token buyback following a structured governance process. The protocol boasts a healthy treasury of over $95 million (excluding its token holdings) and initiated the buyback plan in early 2025 after detailed governance proposals. The plan named "Purchase and Distribute" allocates $1 million weekly for buybacks, following extensive community discussions around tokenomics, treasury management, and token price stability. Aave's treasury growth and financial strength have enabled this initiative without compromising operational capabilities.
Hyperliquid uses 54% of its revenue to buy back HYPE tokens, with the remaining 46% allocated to incentivize the liquidity of the trading platform. Buybacks are facilitated through the Hyperliquid Support Fund. Since the inception of this plan, the Support Fund has purchased over 18 million HYPE tokens. As of March 26, its value exceeds $250 million.
Hyperliquid stands out as a unique case where the team avoided venture capital and most likely self-funded development, now allocating 100% of its revenue to reward liquidity providers or repurchase tokens. Replicating this for other teams may not be easy. However, Jupiter and Aave both exemplify a crucial aspect: their financial position is robust enough to initiate token buybacks without impacting core operations, reflecting prudent financial management and strategic foresight. This is a model that every project can emulate. Sufficient reserves should be in place before initiating buybacks or dividends.
Token as a Product
Kyle made a great point that cryptocurrency projects need to establish Investor Relations (IR) roles. In an industry built on transparency, cryptocurrency projects ironically fall short when it comes to operational transparency. Most external communications are done through sporadic Discord announcements or Twitter posts, financial metrics are selectively shared, and expense allocations are largely opaque.
When the token price continues to fall, users quickly lose interest in the underlying product unless it has already built a strong moat. This sets up a vicious cycle: price drop leads to waning interest, further depressing the price. Projects need to give token holders ample reasons to hold and non-holders reasons to buy in.
Clear and consistent communication about development progress and fund utilization can itself confer a competitive advantage in today's market.
In traditional markets, the Investor Relations (IR) department bridges the communication gap between the company and investors by regularly releasing financial reports, conducting analyst earnings calls, and providing performance guidance. The cryptocurrency industry can adopt this model while leveraging its unique technological advantages. Quarterly reporting of revenue, operating costs, and development milestones, coupled with on-chain validation of treasury fund flows and buybacks, will greatly enhance stakeholders' confidence.
The biggest transparency gap lies in expenses. Publicly disclosing team salaries, expense breakdowns, and grant allocations can preemptively address questions that only arise when a project collapses: "Where did the ICO money go?" and "How much does the founder pay themselves?"
The strategic advantages from robust IR practices go beyond transparency. They reduce volatility by minimizing information asymmetry, expand the investor base by making it easier for institutional capital to enter, nurture long-term holders who are well-versed in operations and can withstand market cycles, and build community trust that can help the project weather storms.
Forward-thinking projects like Kaito, Uniswap Labs, and Sky (formerly MakerDAO) have already moved in this direction by regularly publishing transparent reports. As Joel pointed out in his article, the cryptocurrency industry must break free from speculative cycles. By adopting professional IR practices, projects can shed the "casino" reputation and become, as envisioned by Kyle, "compounding assets" that can continuously create long-term value.
In an increasingly discerning market, transparent communication will become a survival imperative.
You may also like
$COIN Joins S&P 500, but Coinbase Isn't Celebrating
On May 13, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced that Coinbase would officially replace Discover Financial Services in the S&P 500 on May 19. While other companies like Block and MicroStrategy, closely tied to Bitcoin, were already part of the S&P 500, Coinbase became the first cryptocurrency exchange whose primary business is in the index. This also signifies that cryptocurrency is gradually moving from the fringes to the mainstream in the U.S.
On the day of the announcement, Coinbase's stock price surged by 23%, surpassing the $250 mark. However, just 3 days later, Coinbase was hit by two consecutive events: a hack where employees were bribed to steal customer data and a demand for a $20 million ransom, and an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the authenticity of its claim of having over 100 million "verified users" in its securities filings and marketing materials. These two events acted as mini-bombs, and at the time of writing, Coinbase's stock had already dropped by over 7.3%.
Coincidentally, Discover Financial Services, being replaced by Coinbase, can also be considered the "Coinbase" of the previous payment era. Discover is a U.S.-based digital banking and payment services company headquartered in Illinois, founded in 1960. Its payment network, Discover Network, is the fourth largest payment network apart from Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.
In April, after the approval of the acquisition of Discover by the sixth-largest U.S. bank, Capital One, this well-established digital banking company of over 60 years smoothly handed over its S&P 500 "seat" to this emerging cryptocurrency "bank." This unexpected coincidence also portrayed the handover between the new and old eras in Coinbase's entry into the S&P 500, resembling a relay race scene. However, this relay baton also brought Coinbase's accumulated "external troubles and internal strife" to a tipping point.
Over the past decade, cryptocurrency exchanges have been the most stable "profit machines." They play a role in providing liquidity to the entire industry and rely on trading fees to sustain their operations. However, with the comprehensive rollout of ETF products in the U.S. market, this profit model is facing unprecedented challenges. As the leader in the "American stack," with over 80% of its business coming from the U.S., Coinbase is most affected by this.
Starting from the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, traditional financial capital has significantly onboarded users and funds that originally belonged to exchanges in a more cost-effective, compliant, and transparent manner. The transaction fee revenue of cryptocurrency exchanges has started to decline, and this trend may further intensify in the coming months.
According to Coinbase's 2024 Q4 financial report, the platform's total trading revenue was $417 million, a 45% year-on-year decrease. The contribution of BTC and ETH's trading revenue dropped from 65% in the same period last year to less than 50%.
This decline is not a result of a decrease in market enthusiasm. In fact, since the approval of the Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the inflow of BTC into the U.S. market has continued to reach new highs, with asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity rapidly expanding their management scale. Data shows that BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) alone has surpassed $17 billion in assets under management. As of mid-May 2025, the cumulative net inflow of 11 major institutional Bitcoin spot ETFs on the market has exceeded $41.5 billion, with a total net asset value of $1214.69 billion, accounting for approximately 5.91% of the total Bitcoin market capitalization.
Institutional investors and some retail investors are shifting towards ETF products, partly due to compliance and tax considerations. On one hand, ETFs have much lower trading costs compared to cryptocurrency exchanges. While Coinbase's spot trading fee rate varies annually in a tiered manner but averages around 1.49%, for example, the management fee for IBIT ETF is only 0.25%, and the majority of ETF institution fees fluctuate around 0.15% to 0.25%.
In other words, the more rational users are, the more likely they are to move from exchanges to ETF products, especially for investors aiming for long-term holdings.
According to multiple sources, several institutions, including VanEck and Grayscale, have submitted applications to the SEC for a Solana (SOL) ETF, with some institutions also planning to submit an XRP ETF proposal. Once approved, this may trigger a new round of fund migration. According to a report submitted by Coinbase to the SEC, as of April, the platform's trading revenue from XRP and Solana accounted for 18% and 10%, nearly one-third of the platform's fee revenue.
However, the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs passed in 2024 also reduced the fees for these two tokens on Coinbase from 30% and 15% to 26% and 10%, respectively. If the SOL and XRP ETFs are approved, it will further undermine the core fee revenue of exchanges like Coinbase.
The expansion of ETF products is gradually weakening the financial intermediary status of cryptocurrency exchanges. From their original roles as matchmakers and clearers to now gradually becoming mere "on-ramps and off-ramps" for funds, exchanges are seeing their marginal value squeezed by ETFs.
On May 12, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins gave a keynote speech at the Tokenization and Cryptocurrency Working Group roundtable. The theme of his speech revolved around "It is a new day at the SEC," where he indicated that the SEC would not approach enforcement and regulation the same way as before but would instead pave the way for cryptocurrency assets in the U.S. market.
With signs of cryptocurrency compliance such as the SEC's "NEW DAY" declaration, an increasing number of traditional brokerages are attempting to enter the cryptocurrency industry. One of the most representative cases is the well-known U.S. brokerage Robinhood, which began expanding its crypto business in 2018. By the time of its IPO in 2021, Robinhood's crypto business revenue accounted for over 50% of the company, with a significant boost from the Dogecoin "moonshot" promoted by Musk.
In Q1 2025 earnings report, Robinhood showcased strong growth, especially in revenue from cryptocurrency and options trading. Fueled by Trump's Memecoin, cryptocurrency-related revenue reached $250 million, nearly doubling year-over-year. Consequently, Robinhood Gold subscription users reached 3.5 million, a 90% increase from the previous year, with the rapid growth of Robinhood Gold providing the company with a stable source of income.
Meanwhile, RobinHood is actively pursuing acquisitions in the cryptocurrency space. In 2024, it announced a $2 billion acquisition of the long-standing European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp. Additionally, Canada's largest cryptocurrency CEX, WonderFi, which recently went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also announced its integration with RobinHood Crypto. After obtaining virtual asset licenses in the UK, Canada, Singapore, and other markets, RobinHood has taken a proactive approach in the compliant cryptocurrency trading market.
Furthermore, an increasing number of brokerage firms are exploring the same path. Futu Securities, Tiger Brokers, and others are also dipping their toes into cryptocurrency trading, with some having applied for or obtained the VA license from the Hong Kong SFC. Although their user bases are currently small, traditional brokerages have a natural advantage in user trust, regulatory licenses, and low fee structures. This could pose a threat to native cryptocurrency platforms in the future.
In April 2025, security researchers discovered that some Coinbase user data was leaked on the dark web. While the platform initially responded by attributing it to a "technical misinformation," it still raised concerns among users regarding its security and privacy protection. Just two days before Dow Jones Indexes announced Coinbase's addition to the S&P 500 Index, on May 11, 2025, Coinbase received an email from an unknown threat actor claiming to have obtained customer account information and internal documents, demanding a $20 million ransom to keep the data private. Subsequent investigations confirmed the data breach.
Cybercriminals obtained the data by bribing overseas customer service agents and support staff, mainly in "non-U.S. regions such as India." These agents abused their access to Coinbase's internal customer support system and stole customer data. As early as February this year, blockchain detective ZachXBT revealed on X platform that between December 2024 and January 2025, Coinbase users lost over $65 million to social engineering scams, with the actual amount potentially higher.
Among the victims was a well-known figure, 67-year-old Ed Suman, an established artist in the art world for nearly two decades, having been involved in the creation of artworks such as Jeff Koons' "Balloon Dog" sculpture. Earlier this year, he fell victim to an impersonation scam involving fake Coinbase customer support, resulting in a loss of over $2 million in cryptocurrency. ZachXBT critiqued Coinbase for its inadequate handling of such scams, noting that other major exchanges have not faced similar issues and recommending Coinbase to enhance its security measures.
Amidst a series of ongoing social engineering incidents, although there has not been any impact on user assets at the technical level so far, it has raised concerns among many retail and institutional investors. Especially institutions holding massive assets on Coinbase. Just considering the U.S. BTC ETF institutions, as of mid-May 2025, they collectively hold nearly 840,000 BTC, and 75% of these are custodied by Coinbase. If we price BTC at $100,000, this amount reaches a staggering $63 billion, which is equivalent to the nominal GDP of two Iceland in the year 2024.
In addition, Coinbase Custody also serves over 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, family offices, pension funds, and endowments. As of the Q1 2025 financial report, Coinbase's total assets under management (including institutional and retail clients) reached $404 billion. The specific amount of institutional custodied assets was not explicitly disclosed in the latest report, but it should still be over 50% based on the Q4 2024 report.
Once this security barrier is breached, not only could the rate of user attrition far exceed expectations, but more importantly, institutional trust in it would undermine the foundation of its business. Therefore, after a hacking event, Coinbase's stock price plummeted significantly.
Facing a decline in spot trading fee revenue, Coinbase is also accelerating its transformation, attempting to find growth opportunities in derivatives and emerging assets. Coinbase acquired a stake in the options platform Deribit at the end of 2024 and announced the official launch of perpetual contract products in 2025. This acquisition fills in Coinbase's gap in options trading and its relatively small global market share.
Deribit has a strong presence in non-U.S. markets, especially in Asia and Europe. The acquisition has enabled Coinbase to gain a dominant position in bitcoin and ethereum options trading on Deribit, accounting for approximately 80% of the global options trading volume, with daily trading volume remaining above $2 billion.
Meanwhile, 80-90% of Deribit's customer base consists of institutional investors, with their professionalism and liquidity in the Bitcoin and Ethereum options market highly favored by institutions. Coinbase's compliance advantage, coupled with its already robust institutional ecosystem, makes it even more suitable. By using institutions as an entry point, it can face the squeeze from giants like Binance and OKX in the derivatives market.
Facing a similar dilemma is Kraken, which is attempting to replicate Binance Futures' model in non-U.S. markets. Since the derivatives market relies more on professional users, fee rates are relatively higher and stickiness is stronger, making it a significant source of revenue for exchanges. In the first half of 2025, Kraken completed the acquisition of TradeStation Crypto and a futures exchange, aiming to build a complete derivatives trading ecosystem to hedge the risk of declining spot transaction fee income.
With the surge of Memecoin in 2024, Binance, OKX, and various CEX platforms began massively listing small-market-cap, highly volatile tokens to activate active trading users. Due to the wealth effect and trading activity of Memecoins, Coinbase was also forced to join the battle, successively listing popular tokens from the Solana ecosystem such as BOOK OF MEME and Dogwifhat. Although these coins are controversial, they are frequently traded, with fee rates several times higher than mainstream coins, serving as a "blood-boosting" method for spot trading.
However, due to its status as a publicly traded company, this practice is a riskier endeavor for Coinbase. Even in the current crypto-friendly environment, the SEC is still investigating whether tokens like SOL, ADA, and SAND constitute securities.
In addition to the forced transformation strategies carried out by the aforementioned CEXs, they are also starting to lay out RWAs and the most talked-about stablecoin payment fields, such as the PYUSD launched through a collaboration between Coinbase and Paypal, Coinbase's support for the Euro stablecoin EURC by Circle that complies with EU MiCA regulatory requirements, or the USD1 launched through a collaboration between Binance and WIFL. In the increasingly crowded trading field, many CEXs have shifted their focus from just the trading market to the application field.
The golden age of transaction fees has quietly ended, and the second half of the crypto exchange platform game has silently begun.
Arthur Hayes: Why I'm Betting on ETH While the Market Is Obsessed with SOL
Key Market Insights for May 16th, how much did you miss out on?
CryptoPunks Changes Hands Twice, Did the Originator of NFTs Finally Find Its "Forever Home" This Time?
MOG Coin Skyrockets as Elon Musk and Garry Tan Embrace "mog/acc" Identity
STARTUP's Price Surges 40x in 30 Minutes: How did he become the Emotion King of Believe?
Key Market Intelligence on May 14th, how much did you miss out on?
1.Binance Alpha Launches HIPPO, BLUE, and Other Tokens
2.Believe Ecosystem Tokens See General Rise, LAUNCHCOIN Surges Over 250% in 24 Hours
3.Tiger Securities Introduces Cryptocurrency Deposit and Withdrawal Service, Supports Mainstream Cryptocurrencies such as BTC and ETH
4.Current Bitcoin Rally Possibly Driven by Institutions, Retail Traders Yet to Join
5.Binance Wallet's New TGE Privasea AI Participation Requires a 198 Point Threshold, with a Point Consumption of 15
Source: Overheard on CT (tg: @overheardonct), Kaito
PUMP: Today's discussions about PUMP focus on its new creator revenue-sharing model: the platform will allocate 50% of PumpSwap revenue to token creators, sparking varied reactions from users. Some criticize the move as insufficient or even misleading, while others view it as a positive step the platform is taking to reward creators. Meanwhile, PUMP faces market pressure from emerging competitors like LetsBONKfun and Raydium, which are rapidly gaining market share. Users also express concerns about PUMP's sustainability and potential regulatory risks in the U.S., with discussions extending to the platform's impact on the entire memecoin ecosystem.
COINBASE: Today, Coinbase became the first crypto company to join the S&P 500 Index, replacing Discover Financial Services, sparking widespread industry attention. The entire crypto community views this milestone as a significant development, signaling that crypto assets are further integrating into the mainstream financial system. The news has sparked lively discussions on Twitter, with many users pointing out that this may attract more institutional investors to enter the Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency markets.
XRP: XRP became the focal point of today's crypto discussion, with its significant market movements and strategic advances drawing attention. XRP has surpassed USDT to become the third-largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization, sparking market excitement and discussions about its future potential. The surge in market capitalization and price is believed to be related to increasing institutional interest, deepening strategic partnerships, and its role in the crypto ecosystem. Additionally, XRP's integration into multiple financial systems and its potential as a macro asset class are also seen as key factors driving the current market sentiment.
DYDX: Today's discussions about DYDX mainly focused on the dYdX Yapper Leaderboard launched by KaitoAI. The leaderboard aims to identify the most active community participants, with a total of $150,000 in rewards to be distributed over the first three seasons. This initiative has sparked broad community participation, with many users discussing the potential rewards and the incentive effect on the DYDX ecosystem. Meanwhile, progress on the ethDYDX to dYdX native chain migration and historical airdrop events have also been topics of discussion.
1. "What Is 'ICM'? Holding Up the $4 Billion Market Cap Solana's New Narrative"
Overnight, the hottest narrative in the crypto space has become "Internet Capital Markets," with a host of crypto projects and founders, led by the Solana ecosystem's new Launchpad platform Believe, releasing this phrase. Together with "Believe in something," it has become the new slogan heralding the onset of a bull market. What exactly is the so-called "Internet Capital Market," will it become a short-lived hype phrase like the Base ecosystem's previous Content Coin, and what related targets are available for selection?2.《LaunchCoin Surges 20x in One Day, How Did Believe Create a $200M Market Cap Shiba Inu After Going to Zero?｜100x Retrospective》
LAUNCHCOIN broke through a $200 million market cap today, with the long-lost liquidity and such a high market cap "Memecoin" almost bringing half of the on-chain crypto community CT into the fray. The community is crazily discussing this token, with half of it being FOMO and the other half being FUD. This token, originally issued by Believe founder Ben Pasternak under his personal identity, transformed into a new platform token after a renaming. From once going to zero to a $200 million market cap, what happened in between?May 14 On-chain Fund Flow
Within 24 hours, GOONC's market cap soared to 70 million, could GOONC be the next billion-dollar dog on the Believe platform?
Bitcoin has broken $100,000, Ethereum has surpassed 2500, and is Solana's hot streak about to make a comeback?
The current market is in a state of macro euphoria, with GOONC riding the wave today, skyrocketing 10x in just a few hours, reaching a market cap of tens of millions of dollars, trading volume soaring past 50 million, and rumors swirling that the developer may be from OpenAI (unconfirmed but intriguing enough).
A ludicrous and absurd Solana meme that some actually buy into.
GOONC is a meme coin that has sprouted from the "gooning" subculture, offering no technological innovation or practical use, its sole function being speculation.
It takes inspiration from an NSFW term "gooning," which refers to a person being deeply immersed in certain content (you know what), eventually entering a nearly religious-like trance.
In Reddit (such as r/GOONED, r/GoonCaves) and some counterculture media outlets (such as MEL Magazine in 2020), "gooning" has gradually transitioned from an adult label to a meme-addicted, digital content and virtual self-indulgence synonym, arguably the epitome of Degen spirit.
GOONC is playing around with this concept, packaging the addictive nature, uselessness, and irony of gooning into a tradable financial product. The project team has made it clear: "We do not solve blockchain problems, we only trade absurdity." Blunt but oddly genuine.
GOONC launched on May 13, 2025, using the meme coin launch platform Believe App's LaunchCoin module on Solana. This tool is highly Degen: zero technical barriers, a few clicks to create a coin, perfect for projects like GOONC that can come up with ideas out of the blue.
The mastermind behind GOONC is also quite something and is the most talked-about, with KOL @basedalexandoor on X platform (alias "Pata van Goon") personally involved. His profile even caught the attention of Marc Andreessen, co-founder of a16z, making onlookers unable to resist speculating if GOONC has a hint of OpenAI lineage.
While this 'OpenAI Endorsement' is currently just community speculation, it is definitely a good card to play to fuel hype. Saying "we are pure speculation" on one hand, while tagging a few "AI + a16z" on the other.
GOONC took off as soon as it launched. After its launch on May 13, 2025, its market capitalization skyrocketed to $22 million within 4 hours, with a trading volume exceeding $25.6 million in 24 hours. According to platform data, the first day of trading saw an astonishing +41,100% surge, soaring from $0.0000001 to $0.02, becoming a "missed-the-boat" situation.
GOONC quickly formed an active trading community post-launch, with a lot of discussion and trading signals appearing on X platform (such as the 292x return signal provided by DeBot). Liquidity pools on exchanges like Raydium and Meteora grew rapidly, supporting high trading volumes and price increases.
The real climax occurred between May 13 and May 14, with the market cap rising to $5.5 million in the morning and directly surpassing $55 million in the afternoon. By the 14th, it briefly approached a $70 million market cap, with the trading volume soaring to $59 million. Some community members even posted screenshots claiming an increase of +85,000%, creating a new myth out of the ruins.
As of 1:30 pm on May 14, the price stabilized around $0.039, with a total market cap and FDV both around $39.6 million, and a 24-hour trading volume of $5.43 million. Active platforms include XT.COM, LBank, Meteora, and others.
Although there was a slight pullback from the peak ($0.07), the coin's popularity remains strong. For a coin that relies purely on "irony + community + X post" to thrive, this performance is already at a stellar level.
Currently, the background of the token's development team is not transparent, increasing the potential risk of a rug pull. Rugcheck.xyz warns that the creator of the GOONC contract may have permission to modify the contract (e.g., change fees or mint additional tokens), posing certain security risks.
Community members speculate that the meteoric rise of GOONC may be the "last hurrah".
After Surging 40%, Has Ethereum Price Peaked Upon Exiting the Craze?
Whether you are an insider or an outsider, these days you must be familiar with the news about Ethereum. The reason is simple, causing Ethereum enthusiasts to sigh with emotion and almost throwing off-guard those who defend Ethereum, Ethereum, with a "3-day surge of 40%," climbed to the top of the Douyin Hot List.
As we all know, Ethereum launched the Pectra upgrade on May 7th. This most significant network upgrade since early 2024 integrates the Prague execution layer hard fork and the Electra consensus layer upgrade, significantly improving Ethereum's performance through 11 improvement proposals. The account abstraction feature (EIP-7702) allows users to flexibly manage wallets through social media accounts or multi-signature schemes, reducing the user threshold, attracting more users and developers. The staking mechanism optimization increases the validator ETH cap from 32ETH to 2048ETH and introduces a flexible withdrawal method, making it easier for institutions and individuals to participate in network security, enhancing the market's confidence in Ethereum's long-term value.
At the same time, Pectra optimized the interaction efficiency of Layer 2 networks such as Arbitrum and Optimism, making transactions faster and cheaper, leading to a surge in on-chain activity. As a crucial step for Ethereum's transition from "2G" to "5G," the Pectra upgrade not only enhances network vitality but also "recharges confidence" in the market, directly driving the price increase.
Related Reading: "Ethereum Skyrockets 22% in One Day, E Enthusiasts Rejoice"
It's not just Ethereum itself, as Wall Street also brought important bullish news.
The world's largest asset management company, BlackRock, proposed to the SEC allowing Ethereum ETFs for staking. This proposal is expected to elevate Ethereum ETFs from a mere investment tool to a bond-like "interest-bearing asset," bringing investors both capital appreciation and passive income, igniting market optimism about Ethereum's future potential.
Specifically, BlackRock has proposed to amend its S-1 filing to allow investors to create and redeem ETF shares directly with Ethereum instead of the U.S. dollar (i.e., in-kind redemption). This move, combined with its $2.9 billion BUIDL Fund launched in March 2024, aims to deepen the integration of traditional finance with blockchain. The BUIDL Fund is a tokenized fund operating on the Ethereum network, investing in traditional assets such as U.S. Treasury bonds. This setup is highly attractive to institutional investors, as they can not only benefit from Ethereum's price appreciation but also earn stable cash flow through staking.
Robert Mitchnick, BlackRock's Head of Digital Assets, stated in a CNBC interview in March 2025 that the addition of staking functionality will significantly enhance the appeal of the Ethereum ETF. He admitted that when the Ethereum spot ETF was launched in July 2024 without staking functionality, the market demand was lackluster, and staking could be the key to reversing this trend.
Meanwhile, the SEC's shifting stance on cryptocurrency regulation has also fueled this upward trend. During the tenure of the previous SEC chairman, the regulatory approach was tough, and staking was strictly viewed through the Howey test as a potential unregistered security. Therefore, when approving the Ethereum spot ETF in May 2024, staking functionality was explicitly prohibited.
However, with Trump back in the White House and Paul Atkins taking over the SEC, there has been a noticeable relaxation in crypto regulation. Apart from BlackRock, ETF issuers such as Invesco Galaxy, VanEck, WisdomTree, and 21Shares have also submitted applications for similar staking and in-kind redemption.
Related reading: "New Chairman Takes Office, SEC Transforms into 'Crypto Daddy' Within 48 Hours"
If staking ETFs are approved, the benefits are likely to go beyond price appreciation. The introduction of staking functionality could redefine the role of crypto assets, making them more similar to traditional financial products that provide returns and value appreciation, thereby driving Ethereum closer to mainstream finance.
Currently, the SEC still needs to address several decisions related to crypto ETFs, including whether to approve ETFs for Solana, XRP, Litecoin, and even Dogecoin. With the calls for an "altcoin season" growing louder, Ethereum's strong performance may just be the beginning of a larger crypto market frenzy.
In addition, the Trump family-related DeFi project WLFI is also bullish on this wave of rise, with frequent on-chain activities. According to on-chain data analyst @ai_9684xtpa's monitoring, a WLFI-related address is currently borrowing coins to go long on ETH, borrowing 4 million U from Aave to buy 1590 ETH at an average price of $2515 per ETH.
For this epic surge of Ethereum after half a year of silence, the community has indeed gained more confidence and hope, which has also led to a revival of the entire altcoin market. However, amidst the joy, there are also voices of pessimism. Below is a summary conducted by BlockBeats based on community discussions.
The optimists point out that the current market structure is similar to the eve of the bull markets in 2016 and 2020, predicting a life-changing surge in the next 3-6 months, where some altcoins may even achieve astonishing single-day gains of up to 40%.
@liuwei16602825 stated that this surge signifies the return of the bull market as a sure thing. There is no need to worry about a pullback. The driving force behind the surge uses a high-cost isolated operation, fearing a drop more than any retail investor and will definitely do everything to support the price.
Related Reading: "Ethereum Leads the Surge Triggering the 'Altcoin Season' Speculation, How Do Traders View the Future Market?"
The bears mainly believe that this surge is different from the bull market of 2021, as the current market lacks the confidence of large-scale retail investors entering and holding positions for the long term, with funds rotating too quickly.
@market_beggar observed that a Bitfinex E/B whale has started to close positions and believes that if this whale maintains its high-speed position-closing operation for the next few days, it can be inferred that the whale no longer sees the upside potential of ETH, preparing to take profits and exit. The closing time will be a key focus going forward.
@FLS_OTC stated that there are still many uncertainties at the macro level, and the liquidity cannot support a major bull market. At this stage, it is a "last hurrah," not a complete reversal, and will continue to remain in a short position.
@off_thetarget believes that after ETH transitioned from POW to POS, it lost the "gold standard" of mining machine power cost support. The staking economic model led to a breakdown in value anchoring. Additionally, the L2 ecosystem (such as Starknet, zkSync, etc.) suffered from liquidity fragmentation, failing to establish an effective capital inflow mechanism, causing the collapse of the split disc pattern. Furthermore, the ETH community's excessive pursuit of technical narratives divorced from real-world needs resulted in a weak ecosystem growth. Therefore, he believes that ETH's intrinsic value system has crumbled, and the price is bound to plummet to the 800-1200 range, with a decisive short position at 1800.
@Airdrop_Guard, based on the core logic of the "High Probability Trading Strategy," where three sets of underlying logic different trading systems (such as volume depletion, price supply-demand, long/short position funding rate, etc.) simultaneously issue a short signal at the same point (2580), creating a high-probability trading opportunity. He emphasizes that these systems must be based on different algorithms and logics (rather than mere technical indicator overlays). The current ETH trend aligns with the short conditions in multiple independent dimensions of his trading system, hence the decision to short.
Overall, Bitcoin still maintains over 54% market dominance, and institutional funds' continued preference for it may limit the altcoin's upward potential. The market's future direction will depend on multiple factors, such as Bitcoin's price trend, global macroeconomic conditions, and whether funds can effectively rotate from Bitcoin to the altcoin sector.
Although Ethereum's recent leadership in the market has brought about optimistic sentiment, investors still need to remain rational as different sectors of altcoins are likely to show divergence in trends. Whether this round of Ethereum's rise will usher in a true altcoin frenzy may require more time and conducive conditions.
How to Get Rich in Crypto Without Relying on Luck? Financial Veteran Raoul Pal's Macro Insights and Investment Path
These startups are building cutting-edge AI models without the need for a data center
After CEX and Wallet, OKX enters the payment game
Binance Sparks "Delist Concept": Can CEX Still Produce the Next ALPACA?
On April 24, Binance announced that it would delist four tokens, including Alpaca Finance ($ALPACA), on May 2, and cease trading of these pairs' perpetual futures contracts at 00:00 on May 1, 2025, Beijing time. Fast forward to the last day of perpetual futures trading delisting, ALPACA surged on the liquidation heat map. Over the past 24 hours, a total of $52.21 million evaporated in ALPACA's contract trading, exceeding the sum of the token's liquidation volume over the past two years.
Historically, when a token is listed on Binance, many traders would buy the news instantly ("Buy the News"). As the Binance listing effect gradually waned, traders found another path, which is to short sell the tokens set to be delisted from Binance ("Sell the News"). This strategy often has a very high success rate. However, as traders followed this path, they encountered the Alpaca on their short-selling journey.
Every thrilling market manipulation game requires careful preparation. Before Binance's official announcement, on April 10, $ALPACA was ranked 7th in the preliminary list of the second batch of "Vote for Delisting" on Binance, causing its price to plummet almost by half. However, in the five days leading up to Binance's official announcement, from April 19 to April 23, trading volume suddenly surged.
The story traces back to the start of Binance's second round of "Vote for Delisting," where ALPACA was included in the delisting candidates list, ranked 7th among 17 projects. After the completion of Binance's delisting vote count, $ALPACA was included in the projects to be delisted. The market did not react significantly, price fluctuations were not substantial, but trading volumes expanded abnormally, suggesting the entry of "manipulative funds" into the community.
On April 24, Binance officially announced the delisting of the $ALPACA spot trading pair on May 2 and the settlement of the futures contracts on April 30. Following the announcement, the spot price of $ALPACA dropped from $0.0329 to $0.029, with a market cap of only about $5 million. However, what followed were two price "rollercoaster" moments; within an hour, the price surged from $0.029 to $0.0857, an increase of about 195%, only to rapidly drop back to $0.04 within 3 hours. Shorts were caught off guard, and the open interest of contracts surged rapidly, initiating the "long and short grinder" mode.
On April 25, Alpaca Finance officially announced that the trading volume in the past 24 hours had exceeded 1 billion tokens. The liquidity provider had suggested a "minting for stability" to be returned to the treasury after a decrease in trading volume. However, as public opinion began to ferment, opposition filled the community. Alpaca Finance deleted the previous tweet and posted a new one at 9 p.m. on the same night, announcing the cancellation of the minting due to community opposition.
On April 26, Binance amended the contract funding rate rules, shortening the maximum rate cap settlement period to hourly and setting it at up to ±2%. Some high-leverage accounts continued to hold short positions against the high rate and were liquidated. Millions of dollars disappeared within a few hours, with $13 million in short positions vanishing on a token with a market cap of less than $30 million.
With the establishment of this short-selling trend, the price skyrocketed nearly 12 times from a low of $0.029 to $0.3477 within 3 days. The contract's open interest surged significantly, especially with a notable increase in short positions, resembling a microcosm of the Wall Street battle of GME's retail investors. However, this time, the retail investors' opponents could continue to mint additional chips.
From April 26 to April 29, these days were relatively calm, with the price fluctuating around $0.2 to $0.34. On April 29, Binance announced another increase in the rate cap to ±4%. Theoretically, such a high rate would severely impact short positions. If the rate remains at -4%, the bears will face a 96% "cost of ruin" after holding a short position for 24 hours. However, miraculously, the price plummeted from $0.27 to $0.067.
On April 30, with the contract delisting and liquidation scheduled in the final 24 hours, the price continued to experience intense fluctuations. ALPACA's attention peaked, with its highest price reaching $1.2 at one point. From a week before the delisting announcement to the eve of the contract delisting, ALPACA's price surged 40 times, creating an independent market for the token delisted by Binance. The total liquidation volume across the network also reached $50 million, with $42 million in "bearish fuel" beneath the price surge.
After the first surge of ALPACA, Heyi, the co-founder of Binance, replied to a netizen asking, "Can the teacher who buys the shell guarantee breakeven?" This has also triggered endless speculation among community members.
KOL Tunbtc believes that Heyi's reply to this matter was the starting point of ALPACA's surge. "The large holders of Alpaca's native token, by transferring spot chips, operating rights, and distribution rights, have pledged allegiance to Binance's deep-water core interest circle, allowing it to fully harvest market liquidity before delisting, slaughtering opposing positions." Through a triple path of fees, contract liquidations, and spot volatility, they converted user attention into profits.
He also called on Binance to thoroughly investigate this matter, clarify which market maker is manipulating the candlestick patterns, as ALPACA saw an 18x surge within 24 hours with users liquidated of tens of millions of dollars, while previously GPS's 500% surge was promptly halted, and expressed his sentiment: "All of this is thought-provoking."
Wenze, the founder of Beta Capital, believes that bypassing the regular listing process, buying shells, renaming, and restarting has crossed Binance's bottom line of maintaining listing credibility and brand compliance. Binance sometimes has a high tolerance for market fluctuations, and the OM issuance only adjusts the collateralization ratio, with many projects only allowed for leveraged trading. However, once the project, such as these "shell projects," is identified, it is easily labeled for observation, triggering a vote for delisting, ultimately leading to delisting rather than using mild measures.
Renowned KOL Rui, "YeruiZhang," likened the ALPACA incident to "crazy revenge on an ex" and shared a piece of insider information, claiming that the original whale behind ALPACA was a team that controlled BSC's MEV for a period of time and expressed dissatisfaction with Binance's current management for some reason. The comments section is rampant with speculation that it is BSC's whale 48CLUB, and 48CLUB's Ian even personally appeared to eat "his own melon."
With the recent buzz around VOXEL's surge and the wealth effect and discussion surrounding ALPACA, more and more "delisting concepts" have emerged. This concept does not necessarily refer to tokens that have already been delisted but rather shares some common characteristics of delisted tokens.
Famous KOL Chuanmo recently shared on Twitter his logic for choosing concept tokens and listed several tokens, all of which experienced varying degrees of price increase after his recommendation.
His "Concept Delisting" strategy involves selecting low-cap tokens from Bybit and Binance, arranging them by market cap from lowest to highest, with almost 100% price increase for the tokens with the highest holdings/circulating market cap. He buys three tokens daily following this order with a fixed amount, and based on the holdings/circulating supply ratio, he removes tokens that no longer meet the criteria daily and continues to buy the new top three tokens.
Many community members have tested this strategy, with some creating helpful tools. The dreamer Disney "discountifu" has created a dashboard, and Vivek10 early bird "vivekw_eth" has developed a monitoring and alert system that can be directly pushed to WeChat with a copyable link, although it is currently deployed locally and not yet entirely stable.
However, when using tools created for free by community members, please be cautious. While there are many enthusiastic contributors in the community, there are also many uncertain factors in this dark forest.
In an increasingly insular market, retail investors not only have to contend with whales and other retail investors but also must bear many unstable elements. The recent ALPACA incident serves as a warning to us. Whether it's a primary or secondary listing on a top-tier exchange or the "Concept Delisting" approach, we need to make rational asset allocations amidst FOMO to protect our principal and reach the other shore.
The mention of all tokens above does not constitute financial investment advice "NFA".
RWA Evergreen Product Crisis: Why is the GLP Model Doomed to Collapse Under RWA Evergreen?
Sentient In-Depth Research Report: Secures $85 Million in Funding to Build a Decentralized AGI New Paradigm
Interview with Virtuals Co-Founder empty: AI Startups Don't Need a Lot of Funding, Crypto is One of the Answers
Week 16 On-Chain Data: Intensifying Structural Supply-Demand Imbalance, Data Reveals Solid Blueprint for Next Bull Run?
Sui Q1 Advanced Report: The Rise of BTCfi Infrastructure, the Boom of Lending Protocols, and the Future of Rollup-Based Scalability
$COIN Joins S&P 500, but Coinbase Isn't Celebrating
On May 13, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced that Coinbase would officially replace Discover Financial Services in the S&P 500 on May 19. While other companies like Block and MicroStrategy, closely tied to Bitcoin, were already part of the S&P 500, Coinbase became the first cryptocurrency exchange whose primary business is in the index. This also signifies that cryptocurrency is gradually moving from the fringes to the mainstream in the U.S.
On the day of the announcement, Coinbase's stock price surged by 23%, surpassing the $250 mark. However, just 3 days later, Coinbase was hit by two consecutive events: a hack where employees were bribed to steal customer data and a demand for a $20 million ransom, and an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the authenticity of its claim of having over 100 million "verified users" in its securities filings and marketing materials. These two events acted as mini-bombs, and at the time of writing, Coinbase's stock had already dropped by over 7.3%.
Coincidentally, Discover Financial Services, being replaced by Coinbase, can also be considered the "Coinbase" of the previous payment era. Discover is a U.S.-based digital banking and payment services company headquartered in Illinois, founded in 1960. Its payment network, Discover Network, is the fourth largest payment network apart from Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.
In April, after the approval of the acquisition of Discover by the sixth-largest U.S. bank, Capital One, this well-established digital banking company of over 60 years smoothly handed over its S&P 500 "seat" to this emerging cryptocurrency "bank." This unexpected coincidence also portrayed the handover between the new and old eras in Coinbase's entry into the S&P 500, resembling a relay race scene. However, this relay baton also brought Coinbase's accumulated "external troubles and internal strife" to a tipping point.
Over the past decade, cryptocurrency exchanges have been the most stable "profit machines." They play a role in providing liquidity to the entire industry and rely on trading fees to sustain their operations. However, with the comprehensive rollout of ETF products in the U.S. market, this profit model is facing unprecedented challenges. As the leader in the "American stack," with over 80% of its business coming from the U.S., Coinbase is most affected by this.
Starting from the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, traditional financial capital has significantly onboarded users and funds that originally belonged to exchanges in a more cost-effective, compliant, and transparent manner. The transaction fee revenue of cryptocurrency exchanges has started to decline, and this trend may further intensify in the coming months.
According to Coinbase's 2024 Q4 financial report, the platform's total trading revenue was $417 million, a 45% year-on-year decrease. The contribution of BTC and ETH's trading revenue dropped from 65% in the same period last year to less than 50%.
This decline is not a result of a decrease in market enthusiasm. In fact, since the approval of the Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the inflow of BTC into the U.S. market has continued to reach new highs, with asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity rapidly expanding their management scale. Data shows that BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) alone has surpassed $17 billion in assets under management. As of mid-May 2025, the cumulative net inflow of 11 major institutional Bitcoin spot ETFs on the market has exceeded $41.5 billion, with a total net asset value of $1214.69 billion, accounting for approximately 5.91% of the total Bitcoin market capitalization.
Institutional investors and some retail investors are shifting towards ETF products, partly due to compliance and tax considerations. On one hand, ETFs have much lower trading costs compared to cryptocurrency exchanges. While Coinbase's spot trading fee rate varies annually in a tiered manner but averages around 1.49%, for example, the management fee for IBIT ETF is only 0.25%, and the majority of ETF institution fees fluctuate around 0.15% to 0.25%.
In other words, the more rational users are, the more likely they are to move from exchanges to ETF products, especially for investors aiming for long-term holdings.
According to multiple sources, several institutions, including VanEck and Grayscale, have submitted applications to the SEC for a Solana (SOL) ETF, with some institutions also planning to submit an XRP ETF proposal. Once approved, this may trigger a new round of fund migration. According to a report submitted by Coinbase to the SEC, as of April, the platform's trading revenue from XRP and Solana accounted for 18% and 10%, nearly one-third of the platform's fee revenue.
However, the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs passed in 2024 also reduced the fees for these two tokens on Coinbase from 30% and 15% to 26% and 10%, respectively. If the SOL and XRP ETFs are approved, it will further undermine the core fee revenue of exchanges like Coinbase.
The expansion of ETF products is gradually weakening the financial intermediary status of cryptocurrency exchanges. From their original roles as matchmakers and clearers to now gradually becoming mere "on-ramps and off-ramps" for funds, exchanges are seeing their marginal value squeezed by ETFs.
On May 12, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins gave a keynote speech at the Tokenization and Cryptocurrency Working Group roundtable. The theme of his speech revolved around "It is a new day at the SEC," where he indicated that the SEC would not approach enforcement and regulation the same way as before but would instead pave the way for cryptocurrency assets in the U.S. market.
With signs of cryptocurrency compliance such as the SEC's "NEW DAY" declaration, an increasing number of traditional brokerages are attempting to enter the cryptocurrency industry. One of the most representative cases is the well-known U.S. brokerage Robinhood, which began expanding its crypto business in 2018. By the time of its IPO in 2021, Robinhood's crypto business revenue accounted for over 50% of the company, with a significant boost from the Dogecoin "moonshot" promoted by Musk.
In Q1 2025 earnings report, Robinhood showcased strong growth, especially in revenue from cryptocurrency and options trading. Fueled by Trump's Memecoin, cryptocurrency-related revenue reached $250 million, nearly doubling year-over-year. Consequently, Robinhood Gold subscription users reached 3.5 million, a 90% increase from the previous year, with the rapid growth of Robinhood Gold providing the company with a stable source of income.
Meanwhile, RobinHood is actively pursuing acquisitions in the cryptocurrency space. In 2024, it announced a $2 billion acquisition of the long-standing European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp. Additionally, Canada's largest cryptocurrency CEX, WonderFi, which recently went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also announced its integration with RobinHood Crypto. After obtaining virtual asset licenses in the UK, Canada, Singapore, and other markets, RobinHood has taken a proactive approach in the compliant cryptocurrency trading market.
Furthermore, an increasing number of brokerage firms are exploring the same path. Futu Securities, Tiger Brokers, and others are also dipping their toes into cryptocurrency trading, with some having applied for or obtained the VA license from the Hong Kong SFC. Although their user bases are currently small, traditional brokerages have a natural advantage in user trust, regulatory licenses, and low fee structures. This could pose a threat to native cryptocurrency platforms in the future.
In April 2025, security researchers discovered that some Coinbase user data was leaked on the dark web. While the platform initially responded by attributing it to a "technical misinformation," it still raised concerns among users regarding its security and privacy protection. Just two days before Dow Jones Indexes announced Coinbase's addition to the S&P 500 Index, on May 11, 2025, Coinbase received an email from an unknown threat actor claiming to have obtained customer account information and internal documents, demanding a $20 million ransom to keep the data private. Subsequent investigations confirmed the data breach.
Cybercriminals obtained the data by bribing overseas customer service agents and support staff, mainly in "non-U.S. regions such as India." These agents abused their access to Coinbase's internal customer support system and stole customer data. As early as February this year, blockchain detective ZachXBT revealed on X platform that between December 2024 and January 2025, Coinbase users lost over $65 million to social engineering scams, with the actual amount potentially higher.
Among the victims was a well-known figure, 67-year-old Ed Suman, an established artist in the art world for nearly two decades, having been involved in the creation of artworks such as Jeff Koons' "Balloon Dog" sculpture. Earlier this year, he fell victim to an impersonation scam involving fake Coinbase customer support, resulting in a loss of over $2 million in cryptocurrency. ZachXBT critiqued Coinbase for its inadequate handling of such scams, noting that other major exchanges have not faced similar issues and recommending Coinbase to enhance its security measures.
Amidst a series of ongoing social engineering incidents, although there has not been any impact on user assets at the technical level so far, it has raised concerns among many retail and institutional investors. Especially institutions holding massive assets on Coinbase. Just considering the U.S. BTC ETF institutions, as of mid-May 2025, they collectively hold nearly 840,000 BTC, and 75% of these are custodied by Coinbase. If we price BTC at $100,000, this amount reaches a staggering $63 billion, which is equivalent to the nominal GDP of two Iceland in the year 2024.
In addition, Coinbase Custody also serves over 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, family offices, pension funds, and endowments. As of the Q1 2025 financial report, Coinbase's total assets under management (including institutional and retail clients) reached $404 billion. The specific amount of institutional custodied assets was not explicitly disclosed in the latest report, but it should still be over 50% based on the Q4 2024 report.
Once this security barrier is breached, not only could the rate of user attrition far exceed expectations, but more importantly, institutional trust in it would undermine the foundation of its business. Therefore, after a hacking event, Coinbase's stock price plummeted significantly.
Facing a decline in spot trading fee revenue, Coinbase is also accelerating its transformation, attempting to find growth opportunities in derivatives and emerging assets. Coinbase acquired a stake in the options platform Deribit at the end of 2024 and announced the official launch of perpetual contract products in 2025. This acquisition fills in Coinbase's gap in options trading and its relatively small global market share.
Deribit has a strong presence in non-U.S. markets, especially in Asia and Europe. The acquisition has enabled Coinbase to gain a dominant position in bitcoin and ethereum options trading on Deribit, accounting for approximately 80% of the global options trading volume, with daily trading volume remaining above $2 billion.
Meanwhile, 80-90% of Deribit's customer base consists of institutional investors, with their professionalism and liquidity in the Bitcoin and Ethereum options market highly favored by institutions. Coinbase's compliance advantage, coupled with its already robust institutional ecosystem, makes it even more suitable. By using institutions as an entry point, it can face the squeeze from giants like Binance and OKX in the derivatives market.
Facing a similar dilemma is Kraken, which is attempting to replicate Binance Futures' model in non-U.S. markets. Since the derivatives market relies more on professional users, fee rates are relatively higher and stickiness is stronger, making it a significant source of revenue for exchanges. In the first half of 2025, Kraken completed the acquisition of TradeStation Crypto and a futures exchange, aiming to build a complete derivatives trading ecosystem to hedge the risk of declining spot transaction fee income.
With the surge of Memecoin in 2024, Binance, OKX, and various CEX platforms began massively listing small-market-cap, highly volatile tokens to activate active trading users. Due to the wealth effect and trading activity of Memecoins, Coinbase was also forced to join the battle, successively listing popular tokens from the Solana ecosystem such as BOOK OF MEME and Dogwifhat. Although these coins are controversial, they are frequently traded, with fee rates several times higher than mainstream coins, serving as a "blood-boosting" method for spot trading.
However, due to its status as a publicly traded company, this practice is a riskier endeavor for Coinbase. Even in the current crypto-friendly environment, the SEC is still investigating whether tokens like SOL, ADA, and SAND constitute securities.
In addition to the forced transformation strategies carried out by the aforementioned CEXs, they are also starting to lay out RWAs and the most talked-about stablecoin payment fields, such as the PYUSD launched through a collaboration between Coinbase and Paypal, Coinbase's support for the Euro stablecoin EURC by Circle that complies with EU MiCA regulatory requirements, or the USD1 launched through a collaboration between Binance and WIFL. In the increasingly crowded trading field, many CEXs have shifted their focus from just the trading market to the application field.
The golden age of transaction fees has quietly ended, and the second half of the crypto exchange platform game has silently begun.
Arthur Hayes: Why I'm Betting on ETH While the Market Is Obsessed with SOL
Key Market Insights for May 16th, how much did you miss out on?
CryptoPunks Changes Hands Twice, Did the Originator of NFTs Finally Find Its "Forever Home" This Time?
MOG Coin Skyrockets as Elon Musk and Garry Tan Embrace "mog/acc" Identity
STARTUP's Price Surges 40x in 30 Minutes: How did he become the Emotion King of Believe?
Popular coins
Latest Crypto News
Customer Support：@weikecs
Business Cooperation：@weikecs
Quant Trading & MM：bd@weex.com
VIP Services：support@weex.com
App