The Dark Forest of MEME Coins: Retail Miner Difficulty in the Face of a 0.1% Survivability Rate

By: blockbeats|2025/02/17 11:15:04
0
Share
copy
Original Article Title: "The Dark Forest of MEME Coins: Industrialized Harvesting Pipeline with Million-Dollar Daily Revenue, Facing the Gold Rush Difficulty of Retail Investors with a Retention Rate of One in Ten Thousand"
Original Article Author: Frank, PANews

Issuing 11 tokens in 3 days, with a 100% success rate and $25,000 in profit. This may be the dream scenario for countless MEME players. However, the reality is that this is just one of the many addresses of an industrialized RUG team. While retail investors are still pursuing the "thousand-fold myth," professional teams have already transformed the MEME race track into a 24/7 harvesting machine using bots, multi-signature contracts, and sentiment engines. On-chain data shows that this type of industrialized RUG operation is not uncommon.

From fund tracing to exchanges from the initial address, to the hundreds of associated wallets derived from it, a "dark game" orchestrated by technology, capital, and human greed is devouring the wallets of speculators.

Single Address Earns $25,000 in 3 Days, RUG Pipeline Comprised of Hundreds of Addresses

PANews used on-chain data to dissect the entire harvesting process and attempted to reveal a harsh reality: when the issuance of MEME coins descends into a game of mathematical probability, when "community consensus" is mass-forged by industrialized shills, the endgame of this frenzy may have already been predetermined.

Using this address as an example, FrRqEYFfJ3VEHodfiZdrPnM3vAHTm2u9ewBN6HR9RxZE (hereinafter referred to as "FrRqE") issued 11 MEMEs in nearly 3 days, with a total profit of $25,000 and a 100% success rate.

How was this achieved? Looking at the holding time, each time FrRqE made a buy and sell, the time interval was only a few tens of seconds, with the longest not exceeding 1 minute. Firstly, FrRqE would buy a large amount of the token after the opening, usually around 48 SOL, making it appear to other users on the order book that a whale has entered the token, causing them to quickly follow suit. By this point, FrRqE's holding has exceeded 70%. Then, within a few tens of seconds, he would sell these tokens in one go. The average return rate per trade is about 20% to 30%, with each profit being around $2500.

Of course, as monitoring tools are now very sophisticated, many experienced players will not blindly buy when the developer's holdings are too large.

Therefore, after a single buy-in, FrRqE would quickly disperse these tokens to 400 wallet addresses to evade on-chain bot surveillance. And as more addresses buy in and the amount in the Pump internal pool is about to hit the limit, FrRqE would repeat the process, sending all tokens back to the same address, then sell them all at once, instantly reducing the token balance to zero.

The Dark Forest of MEME Coins: Retail Miner Difficulty in the Face of a 0.1% Survivability Rate

Interestingly, the source of funds for this address seems to want to intentionally conceal something. After conducting hundreds of on-chain penetrations, PANews finally discovered that the funds in this address originally came from the OKX exchange, with the initial receiving address being 3SrXcoKQ97xwFAwELnraHtpuycjGvmG82E9SBGs6UcQd.

From the operation timeline, it can be seen that this address has been engaged in such activities for over 2 months. Every time an address issues around 10 tokens, the funds are then transferred to a new address to continue the next round of RUG, resulting in hundreds of derivative RUG addresses at present.

Of course, besides these on-chain actions, there is much more that the DEV wanting to complete the RUG must do. For example, these tokens that are pumped internally usually have dozens or even hundreds of replies, and in the early stages, one can still clearly see traces of a large number of bot buys. Both the trading volume and level of discussion make users feel like this project is a typical MEME token.

What is even more frightening is that such tokens are not deliberately discovered by PANews through screening but are accidentally found on the board by randomly clicking on tokens on Pump.fun. For users who frequently invest in MEME, they should often encounter similar RUG schemes.

The operation process of these RUG schemes is not something that an ordinary user can achieve. First, professional address distribution tools and consolidation addresses are needed to complete flexible yet unified token transfer operations. Second, real-time monitoring tools for social media hotspots are needed to ensure that every token issuance is timed with the latest trends. Third, a large number of Pump.fun shills and social media shills are required, such as the X account @r999d999z, created in January 2025, which has promoted FrRqE's token many times, suggesting a complex web of connections between the two. Fourth, dedicated trading bots responsible for building momentum and sending batch transactions. To complete the above steps, perhaps a strong technical and operations team is truly needed.

One in a Thousand Retention Rate, MEME Forest No Longer Welcomes Retail Investors

According to dexscreener's data, in the past six months, among the tokens issued on Pump.fun, the current number of tokens with a market cap still above $50,000 is 1987, with 27 tokens remaining issued for over 1 month. There are 72 tokens issued for over 1 day, and the remaining 1915 were issued in the last 24 hours. Six tokens were issued yesterday. Based on this calculation, on February 13th, there were a total of 49,153 tokens issued on Pump.fun, with a graduation rate of 1.23%, totaling 606 graduating tokens. The proportion of tokens that can still maintain a market value above $50,000 within 1 day after graduation is 0.9%. Looking at the overall values, the probability of a token issued on pump.fun being able to maintain a market value above $50,000 one day after issuance is approximately one in a thousand.

We took the 6 tokens that remained after the February 13 issuance as a research sample to see what characteristics these surviving tokens possess (during the observation process, the data sample decreased from 6 to 4).

Looking at these four tokens, we can summarize several characteristics. First, all these tokens are backed by project tokens or have a clear endorser. Three of them are AI-related project teams, and 1 is a personal token issued by an internet celebrity. Among them, there is no trace of tokens randomly issued by ordinary players.

Second, the LP lockup ratio of these tokens is very high, mostly above 95%, and the lockup amount is above $100,000. Third, the number of followers on social media is all above 2,000, although several account creation times are not long, but due to KOL interaction, their social media scores are also not low.

Overall, the era of PVP seems to have passed, and personally issued tokens in this market are almost unlikely to stand out or achieve a high market value. Many players with issuance experience may have long been aware of this. Against this background, developers who still choose to release a large number of tokens daily obviously have their own unique business strategies. And this dark forest-style gameplay still exists in an unregulated environment.

Fishing in Muddy Waters, Many Players Are Painfully Exiting

The MEME coin race is transitioning from a nationwide angle-seeking casino to a hunting ground where technology and the mainstream target retail investors. Perhaps users sometimes find it difficult to see through the scammers' routines, but as the actual losses gradually increase, more and more users are reluctantly exiting this dark forest.

According to The Block, the trading volume of the Pump.fun token on Solana has recently cooled down, with the average daily trading volume over the past week being only $560 million, hitting a new low since Christmas 2024, a significant 82% drop from the peak of $3.13 billion three weeks ago.

Data on Solana's chain similarly shows a similar trend. In the past three months, on November 16, the number of active wallets on Solana's chain reached 7.22 million, dropping to 3.18 million on February 1, a decrease of more than half. The momentum also quickly declined for aggregators such as Meteora and Jupiter, which had previously surged in popularity due to the TRUMP token.

Even many KOLs whose main business is MEME have claimed that the current environment is no longer suitable for "meme farming." A blogger named Laughing said, "I have completely given up participating in the meme lottery PvP; those who buy lottery tickets can never outplay those who sell lottery tickets".

Arjun Balaji, a researcher at Paradigm, pointed out incisively, "Memecoins used to be fun and pure, but industrialized trenches have turned a harmless PvP game into a predatory game dominated by insider advantage."

Although the market is becoming increasingly harsh, we may still be able to gain some insights from the dual nature of blockchain. On the one hand, due to the unregulated nature of blockchain, it has allowed malicious devs to act recklessly. On the other hand, it is precisely because of the traceability of the blockchain that, no matter how opponents hide, we can always find some clues on the chain. For players who are dedicated to research, once they are familiar with these malicious schemes, they can also avoid similar scams.

In addition, although Pump.fun's token retention rate has dropped to one in ten thousand, players may also choose to bypass the early-stage frenzy and instead focus on tokens that have been issued for more than one day and are still "alive and kicking." Time seems to be the most practical filtering tool. For teams expecting to issue project tokens through MEME, because of this market environment, sincerity has become a simple and effective narrative; bad coins are destroying the market, while good coins will decisively defeat bad coins.

Original Article Link

You may also like

a16z Leads $18M Seed Round for Catena Labs, Crypto Industry Bets on Stablecoin AI Payment

Traditional finance is still stuck in a "human-to-human" model, while Catena aims to achieve "AI-to-AI" interaction.

Pharos, deeply integrated with AntChain, is about to launch. How can we get involved?

What is the relationship between the $8 million funded NewChain and Ant, and how will they interact?

$COIN Joins S&P 500, but Coinbase Isn't Celebrating

On May 13, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced that Coinbase would officially replace Discover Financial Services in the S&P 500 on May 19. While other companies like Block and MicroStrategy, closely tied to Bitcoin, were already part of the S&P 500, Coinbase became the first cryptocurrency exchange whose primary business is in the index. This also signifies that cryptocurrency is gradually moving from the fringes to the mainstream in the U.S.



On the day of the announcement, Coinbase's stock price surged by 23%, surpassing the $250 mark. However, just 3 days later, Coinbase was hit by two consecutive events: a hack where employees were bribed to steal customer data and a demand for a $20 million ransom, and an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the authenticity of its claim of having over 100 million "verified users" in its securities filings and marketing materials. These two events acted as mini-bombs, and at the time of writing, Coinbase's stock had already dropped by over 7.3%.


Coincidentally, Discover Financial Services, being replaced by Coinbase, can also be considered the "Coinbase" of the previous payment era. Discover is a U.S.-based digital banking and payment services company headquartered in Illinois, founded in 1960. Its payment network, Discover Network, is the fourth largest payment network apart from Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.


In April, after the approval of the acquisition of Discover by the sixth-largest U.S. bank, Capital One, this well-established digital banking company of over 60 years smoothly handed over its S&P 500 "seat" to this emerging cryptocurrency "bank." This unexpected coincidence also portrayed the handover between the new and old eras in Coinbase's entry into the S&P 500, resembling a relay race scene. However, this relay baton also brought Coinbase's accumulated "external troubles and internal strife" to a tipping point.


Side Effects of ETFs


Over the past decade, cryptocurrency exchanges have been the most stable "profit machines." They play a role in providing liquidity to the entire industry and rely on trading fees to sustain their operations. However, with the comprehensive rollout of ETF products in the U.S. market, this profit model is facing unprecedented challenges. As the leader in the "American stack," with over 80% of its business coming from the U.S., Coinbase is most affected by this.



Starting from the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, traditional financial capital has significantly onboarded users and funds that originally belonged to exchanges in a more cost-effective, compliant, and transparent manner. The transaction fee revenue of cryptocurrency exchanges has started to decline, and this trend may further intensify in the coming months.


According to Coinbase's 2024 Q4 financial report, the platform's total trading revenue was $417 million, a 45% year-on-year decrease. The contribution of BTC and ETH's trading revenue dropped from 65% in the same period last year to less than 50%.


This decline is not a result of a decrease in market enthusiasm. In fact, since the approval of the Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the inflow of BTC into the U.S. market has continued to reach new highs, with asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity rapidly expanding their management scale. Data shows that BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) alone has surpassed $17 billion in assets under management. As of mid-May 2025, the cumulative net inflow of 11 major institutional Bitcoin spot ETFs on the market has exceeded $41.5 billion, with a total net asset value of $1214.69 billion, accounting for approximately 5.91% of the total Bitcoin market capitalization.


Chart showing the trend of net outflows for Grayscale among the 11 institutions


Institutional investors and some retail investors are shifting towards ETF products, partly due to compliance and tax considerations. On one hand, ETFs have much lower trading costs compared to cryptocurrency exchanges. While Coinbase's spot trading fee rate varies annually in a tiered manner but averages around 1.49%, for example, the management fee for IBIT ETF is only 0.25%, and the majority of ETF institution fees fluctuate around 0.15% to 0.25%.



In other words, the more rational users are, the more likely they are to move from exchanges to ETF products, especially for investors aiming for long-term holdings.


According to multiple sources, several institutions, including VanEck and Grayscale, have submitted applications to the SEC for a Solana (SOL) ETF, with some institutions also planning to submit an XRP ETF proposal. Once approved, this may trigger a new round of fund migration. According to a report submitted by Coinbase to the SEC, as of April, the platform's trading revenue from XRP and Solana accounted for 18% and 10%, nearly one-third of the platform's fee revenue.



However, the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs passed in 2024 also reduced the fees for these two tokens on Coinbase from 30% and 15% to 26% and 10%, respectively. If the SOL and XRP ETFs are approved, it will further undermine the core fee revenue of exchanges like Coinbase.


The expansion of ETF products is gradually weakening the financial intermediary status of cryptocurrency exchanges. From their original roles as matchmakers and clearers to now gradually becoming mere "on-ramps and off-ramps" for funds, exchanges are seeing their marginal value squeezed by ETFs.


Robinhood Takes a Stand, Traditional Brokerages Join the Fray


On May 12, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins gave a keynote speech at the Tokenization and Cryptocurrency Working Group roundtable. The theme of his speech revolved around "It is a new day at the SEC," where he indicated that the SEC would not approach enforcement and regulation the same way as before but would instead pave the way for cryptocurrency assets in the U.S. market.



With signs of cryptocurrency compliance such as the SEC's "NEW DAY" declaration, an increasing number of traditional brokerages are attempting to enter the cryptocurrency industry. One of the most representative cases is the well-known U.S. brokerage Robinhood, which began expanding its crypto business in 2018. By the time of its IPO in 2021, Robinhood's crypto business revenue accounted for over 50% of the company, with a significant boost from the Dogecoin "moonshot" promoted by Musk.


In Q1 2025 earnings report, Robinhood showcased strong growth, especially in revenue from cryptocurrency and options trading. Fueled by Trump's Memecoin, cryptocurrency-related revenue reached $250 million, nearly doubling year-over-year. Consequently, Robinhood Gold subscription users reached 3.5 million, a 90% increase from the previous year, with the rapid growth of Robinhood Gold providing the company with a stable source of income.



Meanwhile, RobinHood is actively pursuing acquisitions in the cryptocurrency space. In 2024, it announced a $2 billion acquisition of the long-standing European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp. Additionally, Canada's largest cryptocurrency CEX, WonderFi, which recently went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also announced its integration with RobinHood Crypto. After obtaining virtual asset licenses in the UK, Canada, Singapore, and other markets, RobinHood has taken a proactive approach in the compliant cryptocurrency trading market.



Furthermore, an increasing number of brokerage firms are exploring the same path. Futu Securities, Tiger Brokers, and others are also dipping their toes into cryptocurrency trading, with some having applied for or obtained the VA license from the Hong Kong SFC. Although their user bases are currently small, traditional brokerages have a natural advantage in user trust, regulatory licenses, and low fee structures. This could pose a threat to native cryptocurrency platforms in the future.



User Data Breach: Is Coinbase Still Secure?


In April 2025, security researchers discovered that some Coinbase user data was leaked on the dark web. While the platform initially responded by attributing it to a "technical misinformation," it still raised concerns among users regarding its security and privacy protection. Just two days before Dow Jones Indexes announced Coinbase's addition to the S&P 500 Index, on May 11, 2025, Coinbase received an email from an unknown threat actor claiming to have obtained customer account information and internal documents, demanding a $20 million ransom to keep the data private. Subsequent investigations confirmed the data breach.


Cybercriminals obtained the data by bribing overseas customer service agents and support staff, mainly in "non-U.S. regions such as India." These agents abused their access to Coinbase's internal customer support system and stole customer data. As early as February this year, blockchain detective ZachXBT revealed on X platform that between December 2024 and January 2025, Coinbase users lost over $65 million to social engineering scams, with the actual amount potentially higher.


Among the victims was a well-known figure, 67-year-old Ed Suman, an established artist in the art world for nearly two decades, having been involved in the creation of artworks such as Jeff Koons' "Balloon Dog" sculpture. Earlier this year, he fell victim to an impersonation scam involving fake Coinbase customer support, resulting in a loss of over $2 million in cryptocurrency. ZachXBT critiqued Coinbase for its inadequate handling of such scams, noting that other major exchanges have not faced similar issues and recommending Coinbase to enhance its security measures.


Amidst a series of ongoing social engineering incidents, although there has not been any impact on user assets at the technical level so far, it has raised concerns among many retail and institutional investors. Especially institutions holding massive assets on Coinbase. Just considering the U.S. BTC ETF institutions, as of mid-May 2025, they collectively hold nearly 840,000 BTC, and 75% of these are custodied by Coinbase. If we price BTC at $100,000, this amount reaches a staggering $63 billion, which is equivalent to the nominal GDP of two Iceland in the year 2024.


Visualization: ChatGPT, Source: Farside


In addition, Coinbase Custody also serves over 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, family offices, pension funds, and endowments. As of the Q1 2025 financial report, Coinbase's total assets under management (including institutional and retail clients) reached $404 billion. The specific amount of institutional custodied assets was not explicitly disclosed in the latest report, but it should still be over 50% based on the Q4 2024 report.


Visualization: ChatGPT


Once this security barrier is breached, not only could the rate of user attrition far exceed expectations, but more importantly, institutional trust in it would undermine the foundation of its business. Therefore, after a hacking event, Coinbase's stock price plummeted significantly.


CEXs are All in Self-Rescue Mode


Facing a decline in spot trading fee revenue, Coinbase is also accelerating its transformation, attempting to find growth opportunities in derivatives and emerging assets. Coinbase acquired a stake in the options platform Deribit at the end of 2024 and announced the official launch of perpetual contract products in 2025. This acquisition fills in Coinbase's gap in options trading and its relatively small global market share.



Deribit has a strong presence in non-U.S. markets, especially in Asia and Europe. The acquisition has enabled Coinbase to gain a dominant position in bitcoin and ethereum options trading on Deribit, accounting for approximately 80% of the global options trading volume, with daily trading volume remaining above $2 billion.


Meanwhile, 80-90% of Deribit's customer base consists of institutional investors, with their professionalism and liquidity in the Bitcoin and Ethereum options market highly favored by institutions. Coinbase's compliance advantage, coupled with its already robust institutional ecosystem, makes it even more suitable. By using institutions as an entry point, it can face the squeeze from giants like Binance and OKX in the derivatives market.



Facing a similar dilemma is Kraken, which is attempting to replicate Binance Futures' model in non-U.S. markets. Since the derivatives market relies more on professional users, fee rates are relatively higher and stickiness is stronger, making it a significant source of revenue for exchanges. In the first half of 2025, Kraken completed the acquisition of TradeStation Crypto and a futures exchange, aiming to build a complete derivatives trading ecosystem to hedge the risk of declining spot transaction fee income.


With the surge of Memecoin in 2024, Binance, OKX, and various CEX platforms began massively listing small-market-cap, highly volatile tokens to activate active trading users. Due to the wealth effect and trading activity of Memecoins, Coinbase was also forced to join the battle, successively listing popular tokens from the Solana ecosystem such as BOOK OF MEME and Dogwifhat. Although these coins are controversial, they are frequently traded, with fee rates several times higher than mainstream coins, serving as a "blood-boosting" method for spot trading.


However, due to its status as a publicly traded company, this practice is a riskier endeavor for Coinbase. Even in the current crypto-friendly environment, the SEC is still investigating whether tokens like SOL, ADA, and SAND constitute securities.


In addition to the forced transformation strategies carried out by the aforementioned CEXs, they are also starting to lay out RWAs and the most talked-about stablecoin payment fields, such as the PYUSD launched through a collaboration between Coinbase and Paypal, Coinbase's support for the Euro stablecoin EURC by Circle that complies with EU MiCA regulatory requirements, or the USD1 launched through a collaboration between Binance and WIFL. In the increasingly crowded trading field, many CEXs have shifted their focus from just the trading market to the application field.


The golden age of transaction fees has quietly ended, and the second half of the crypto exchange platform game has silently begun.


Arthur Hayes: Why I'm Betting on ETH While the Market Is Obsessed with SOL

"I personally have also allocated 20% to gold, expecting the price of gold to potentially rise to $10,000-20,000 by the end of this market cycle."

Key Market Insights for May 16th, how much did you miss out on?

1. On-chain Flows: $111.3M inflow to Ethereum this week; $237.6M outflow from Berachain 2. Largest Price Swings: $ETHFI, $NEIRO 3. Top News: Data: Solana Network's revenue reached $7.9M on the 13th, surpassing the sum of all other L1 and L2 chains

MOG Coin Skyrockets as Elon Musk and Garry Tan Embrace "mog/acc" Identity

「mog/acc」 is rapidly sweeping through various figures, from Elon Musk to Garry Tan, boosting the project's visibility and ultimately driving up the price.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more