The Trump Family Project WLFI Sells Off ETH at a Loss of Millions, How Many Chips Does It Still Hold?

By: blockbeats|2025/04/09 07:00:03
Share
copy
Original Article Title: "The Behind-the-Scenes of WLFI's ETH Dump: Stop Loss or Another Scheme?"
Original Article Author: Luke, Mars Finance

On April 9, 2025, a wallet allegedly linked to World Liberty Financial (WLFI) dumped 5,471 ETH at an average price of $1,465, cashing out approximately $8.01 million. This was no small matter—this wallet had previously splurged $210 million to accumulate 67,498 ETH at an average price of $3,259, now facing an unrealized loss of $125 million. As a DeFi star project endorsed by the Trump family, WLFI's move is puzzling: why liquidate at this critical moment? How much more ETH can be sold? Will there be more dumps in the future?

The Trump Family Project WLFI Sells Off ETH at a Loss of Millions, How Many Chips Does It Still Hold?

A Tough Decision in the Chilling Market

Currently, the crypto market seems to be shrouded in cold air, with ETH price fluctuating between $1,465 and $1,503, more than halving from WLFI's purchase price. Looking back to the beginning of 2025, the optimism brought by Trump's inauguration had prompted WLFI to significantly increase its ETH holdings, seemingly attempting to soar with the policy tailwind. Unfortunately, the good times did not last long, and the continued slump of ETH turned this enthusiasm into a massive $125 million unrealized loss. From $89 million in March to $125 million now, the snowball of losses keeps growing.

The timing of the sell-off is intriguing. On the same day, a whale scooped up 4,677 ETH at $1,481, intensifying the market's long vs. short game. WLFI's decision to act at this moment may indicate a sense of a short-term bottom or a fear of further price decline. Regardless, this $8.01 million cash-out is like selling an old coat in the winter—it's reluctant but inevitable.

Why Sell: Stop Loss or Another Plan?

Why did WLFI cut losses at this point? The answer may not be simple.

Firstly, the logic of stop-loss is obvious. With each ETH dropping by $1,794, selling 5,471 ETH may incur a near-million-dollar loss, but it's better than watching the remaining 62,027 ETH continue to depreciate. It's like cutting off a "deadbeat stock" in the stock market, securing cash first. After all, if fully liquidated at the current price, the loss would almost hit $111 million—who can bear that?

Furthermore, the pressure on cash flow cannot be ignored. WLFI basked in the glory of a $590 million token sale for a while, but expenses for operations, partnerships, and new projects will not stop. While $8.01 million may not be a lot, it can provide relief in a market downturn. Just think, a project backed by the Trump family surely cannot let its wallet run dry, right?

Moreover, this may be an attempt at a strategic pivot. WLFI's asset pool contains not only ETH but also "veterans" like WBTC, TRX, and "rising stars" in the RWA space. By reducing ETH holdings, freeing up funds to invest in partners like Ondo Finance or betting on the potential of Layer 2 could be a way to prepare for the future. After all, the stage of DeFi is large, and ETH is just one of the players.

Lastly, don't forget about external perception. As the "favorite son" of the Trump family, WLFI shines with prestige but also carries controversy. With 75% of profits in the whitepaper going to the family while risks are shifted to token holders, this model has long raised suspicions. Could this sell-off be due to investor pressure to prove that they are not solely relying on the "celebrity effect" to thrive? It's unlikely, but not entirely unreasonable.

Overall, stop-losses and liquidity are the most immediate driving forces, while strategic adjustments may hint at what's to come. As for external pressures, perhaps they are just the background music of this drama.

How Much More Can Be Sold: Trump Card and Bottom Line

After selling 5,471 tokens, WLFI still holds 62,027 ETH, which is worth approximately $90.9 million at the current price. How much more can this trump card reveal?

From a funding perspective, if each sale targets around $8 million in cash flow, selling another approximately 5,000 tokens would suffice, leaving a "safety net" of $56 million in holdings. However, if there is a larger funding gap, such as for a new project launch or debt maturity, selling a few tens of thousands of tokens is not out of the question. However, doing this would undoubtedly raise doubts about ETH's core position.

The market's ability to handle this is also crucial. The recent $8.01 million sale did not cause much of a stir, and the daily trading volume of ETH at $5 billion seems able to absorb it. But if WLFI were to dump tens of millions of dollars' worth of assets in one go, panic could further drive down prices. For precaution, selling in small batches appears to be their style.

Much more crucial is the strategic bottom line. WLFI views ETH as a "strategic reserve," and if holdings drop below half (around 33.74 million tokens), its image as a DeFi leader may be at risk. Unless absolutely necessary, they are unlikely to easily deplete this reserve. In the short term, selling another 5,000 to 10,000 tokens (approximately $7.3 million to $14.65 million) is a reasonable estimate, both quenching thirst and avoiding harm.

Will the Sell-off Continue?

In the future, will WLFI continue to sell off? The answer lies within three key clues.

First, watch the market sentiment. If ETH drops below $1,400 and the unrealized losses increase by another one or two hundred million, the urge to sell off may be unstoppable. However, if the price rebounds to $1,800, and unrealized losses shrink to $90 million, they might hold onto their assets tightly, even regaining confidence to buy back. Currently, the $1,450 support level and $1,600 resistance level serve as indicators.

Second, internal calculations are also crucial. If WLFI still aims to play a leading role in the DeFi space, they cannot afford to see ETH's position heavily impacted. In this case, the sell-off may gradually slow down. However, if they set their sights on other trends, such as RWA or emerging tokens, ETH may become a "cash machine," accelerating the sell-off pace.

Third, external factors matter. The pro-crypto stance of the Trump administration acts as a shield for WLFI. If a significant move is made in the second quarter leading to market recovery, they might sit comfortably on the sidelines. Yet, if the family is caught up in political turmoil or investors demand transparency, the pressure to cash out will be inevitable.

In the short term (one to two months), there is a possibility of small-scale sell-offs, with the total amount ranging from $10 to $20 million. If the market continues to slump, a mid-term sell-off could account for 30% to 50% of the remaining holdings, totaling $27 to $45 million. Looking ahead, unless ETH stages a complete turnaround, WLFI may gradually fade from this field, moving their chips to a new battleground.

Ethereum Fundamental Transition: Why Are Whales Turning Bearish?

In recent years, Ethereum's fundamentals seem to be undergoing a quiet transition, which may be a crucial reason why whales are becoming pessimistic about ETH's future. Glassnode data shows that over the past four years, Ethereum's active address count has remained almost stagnant, hovering around the same level, failing to significantly grow alongside market trends. This is not the "efficiency range" of technical optimization but rather resembles a depletion of growth momentum, indicating Ethereum's fatigue in attracting new users and developers.

Meanwhile, the emergence of Layer 2 (L2) solutions was supposed to bring new vitality to Ethereum but unexpectedly weakened its value capture ability. L2 significantly reduced mainnet Gas fees by diverting transaction volume (Gas fees dropped over 70% in March 2025). While this is user-friendly, it allows L2 to intercept the value that was supposed to be fed back to ETH holders through the EIP-1559 burning mechanism, further squeezing Ethereum's "profit space." Some analyses suggest that unless the mainnet can revitalize its demand for block space through large-scale tokenization, Ethereum's long-term competitiveness may be at risk.

The perspective of institutions also reflects this concern. In a report, CoinShares pointed out that the frequent adjustments to the Ethereum protocol (such as the Dencun hard fork) have brought about uncertainty, hindering institutional investors from building reliable valuation models, thereby diminishing its attractiveness. In March 2025, Standard Chartered lowered its price target for Ethereum in 2025 to $4,000, citing structural decay as the reason.

Jon Charbonneau, Co-Founder of the crypto investment firm DBA, also stated that Ethereum's issuance model under the Proof of Stake (PoS) mechanism faces fundamental trade-off issues, with adjustment being difficult to resolve the core contradiction. On the X platform, some users even bluntly said that Ethereum has "barely changed since 2016," with upgrades being slow and missing the window for rapid transformation, seemingly becoming a "victim" of its own success.

Meanwhile, EigenLayer's Stakedrop event also left the market disappointed, as the narrative of enhancing ETH holding rewards through Restaking was shattered due to unfair distribution, further undermining the confidence of large holders. These signals collectively point to a reality: Ethereum's fundamentals are being eroded by internal and external factors, with its once growth engine now showing signs of fatigue, and the pessimism of large holders may indeed be a direct response to this trend.

Summary

This sell-off event not only revealed WLFI's struggle in the market downturn but also highlighted Ethereum's deeper predicament. The stagnant growth of active addresses, L2 value diversion, signals of institutional pessimism, all contribute to casting a shadow over Ethereum's fundamentals, with the confidence of large holders wavering. WLFI's next move, whether to continue selling or strategically pivot, will unfold in the dual game of markets and policies.

For investors, while chasing the hype may be enticing, a more composed judgment is needed: Can Ethereum's future be revitalized? Where will WLFI's bold gamble lead? The answer, perhaps, can only be revealed with time.

Original Article Link

You may also like

$COIN Joins S&P 500, but Coinbase Isn't Celebrating

On May 13, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced that Coinbase would officially replace Discover Financial Services in the S&P 500 on May 19. While other companies like Block and MicroStrategy, closely tied to Bitcoin, were already part of the S&P 500, Coinbase became the first cryptocurrency exchange whose primary business is in the index. This also signifies that cryptocurrency is gradually moving from the fringes to the mainstream in the U.S.



On the day of the announcement, Coinbase's stock price surged by 23%, surpassing the $250 mark. However, just 3 days later, Coinbase was hit by two consecutive events: a hack where employees were bribed to steal customer data and a demand for a $20 million ransom, and an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the authenticity of its claim of having over 100 million "verified users" in its securities filings and marketing materials. These two events acted as mini-bombs, and at the time of writing, Coinbase's stock had already dropped by over 7.3%.


Coincidentally, Discover Financial Services, being replaced by Coinbase, can also be considered the "Coinbase" of the previous payment era. Discover is a U.S.-based digital banking and payment services company headquartered in Illinois, founded in 1960. Its payment network, Discover Network, is the fourth largest payment network apart from Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.


In April, after the approval of the acquisition of Discover by the sixth-largest U.S. bank, Capital One, this well-established digital banking company of over 60 years smoothly handed over its S&P 500 "seat" to this emerging cryptocurrency "bank." This unexpected coincidence also portrayed the handover between the new and old eras in Coinbase's entry into the S&P 500, resembling a relay race scene. However, this relay baton also brought Coinbase's accumulated "external troubles and internal strife" to a tipping point.


Side Effects of ETFs


Over the past decade, cryptocurrency exchanges have been the most stable "profit machines." They play a role in providing liquidity to the entire industry and rely on trading fees to sustain their operations. However, with the comprehensive rollout of ETF products in the U.S. market, this profit model is facing unprecedented challenges. As the leader in the "American stack," with over 80% of its business coming from the U.S., Coinbase is most affected by this.



Starting from the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, traditional financial capital has significantly onboarded users and funds that originally belonged to exchanges in a more cost-effective, compliant, and transparent manner. The transaction fee revenue of cryptocurrency exchanges has started to decline, and this trend may further intensify in the coming months.


According to Coinbase's 2024 Q4 financial report, the platform's total trading revenue was $417 million, a 45% year-on-year decrease. The contribution of BTC and ETH's trading revenue dropped from 65% in the same period last year to less than 50%.


This decline is not a result of a decrease in market enthusiasm. In fact, since the approval of the Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the inflow of BTC into the U.S. market has continued to reach new highs, with asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity rapidly expanding their management scale. Data shows that BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) alone has surpassed $17 billion in assets under management. As of mid-May 2025, the cumulative net inflow of 11 major institutional Bitcoin spot ETFs on the market has exceeded $41.5 billion, with a total net asset value of $1214.69 billion, accounting for approximately 5.91% of the total Bitcoin market capitalization.


Chart showing the trend of net outflows for Grayscale among the 11 institutions


Institutional investors and some retail investors are shifting towards ETF products, partly due to compliance and tax considerations. On one hand, ETFs have much lower trading costs compared to cryptocurrency exchanges. While Coinbase's spot trading fee rate varies annually in a tiered manner but averages around 1.49%, for example, the management fee for IBIT ETF is only 0.25%, and the majority of ETF institution fees fluctuate around 0.15% to 0.25%.



In other words, the more rational users are, the more likely they are to move from exchanges to ETF products, especially for investors aiming for long-term holdings.


According to multiple sources, several institutions, including VanEck and Grayscale, have submitted applications to the SEC for a Solana (SOL) ETF, with some institutions also planning to submit an XRP ETF proposal. Once approved, this may trigger a new round of fund migration. According to a report submitted by Coinbase to the SEC, as of April, the platform's trading revenue from XRP and Solana accounted for 18% and 10%, nearly one-third of the platform's fee revenue.



However, the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs passed in 2024 also reduced the fees for these two tokens on Coinbase from 30% and 15% to 26% and 10%, respectively. If the SOL and XRP ETFs are approved, it will further undermine the core fee revenue of exchanges like Coinbase.


The expansion of ETF products is gradually weakening the financial intermediary status of cryptocurrency exchanges. From their original roles as matchmakers and clearers to now gradually becoming mere "on-ramps and off-ramps" for funds, exchanges are seeing their marginal value squeezed by ETFs.


Robinhood Takes a Stand, Traditional Brokerages Join the Fray


On May 12, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins gave a keynote speech at the Tokenization and Cryptocurrency Working Group roundtable. The theme of his speech revolved around "It is a new day at the SEC," where he indicated that the SEC would not approach enforcement and regulation the same way as before but would instead pave the way for cryptocurrency assets in the U.S. market.



With signs of cryptocurrency compliance such as the SEC's "NEW DAY" declaration, an increasing number of traditional brokerages are attempting to enter the cryptocurrency industry. One of the most representative cases is the well-known U.S. brokerage Robinhood, which began expanding its crypto business in 2018. By the time of its IPO in 2021, Robinhood's crypto business revenue accounted for over 50% of the company, with a significant boost from the Dogecoin "moonshot" promoted by Musk.


In Q1 2025 earnings report, Robinhood showcased strong growth, especially in revenue from cryptocurrency and options trading. Fueled by Trump's Memecoin, cryptocurrency-related revenue reached $250 million, nearly doubling year-over-year. Consequently, Robinhood Gold subscription users reached 3.5 million, a 90% increase from the previous year, with the rapid growth of Robinhood Gold providing the company with a stable source of income.



Meanwhile, RobinHood is actively pursuing acquisitions in the cryptocurrency space. In 2024, it announced a $2 billion acquisition of the long-standing European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp. Additionally, Canada's largest cryptocurrency CEX, WonderFi, which recently went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also announced its integration with RobinHood Crypto. After obtaining virtual asset licenses in the UK, Canada, Singapore, and other markets, RobinHood has taken a proactive approach in the compliant cryptocurrency trading market.



Furthermore, an increasing number of brokerage firms are exploring the same path. Futu Securities, Tiger Brokers, and others are also dipping their toes into cryptocurrency trading, with some having applied for or obtained the VA license from the Hong Kong SFC. Although their user bases are currently small, traditional brokerages have a natural advantage in user trust, regulatory licenses, and low fee structures. This could pose a threat to native cryptocurrency platforms in the future.



User Data Breach: Is Coinbase Still Secure?


In April 2025, security researchers discovered that some Coinbase user data was leaked on the dark web. While the platform initially responded by attributing it to a "technical misinformation," it still raised concerns among users regarding its security and privacy protection. Just two days before Dow Jones Indexes announced Coinbase's addition to the S&P 500 Index, on May 11, 2025, Coinbase received an email from an unknown threat actor claiming to have obtained customer account information and internal documents, demanding a $20 million ransom to keep the data private. Subsequent investigations confirmed the data breach.


Cybercriminals obtained the data by bribing overseas customer service agents and support staff, mainly in "non-U.S. regions such as India." These agents abused their access to Coinbase's internal customer support system and stole customer data. As early as February this year, blockchain detective ZachXBT revealed on X platform that between December 2024 and January 2025, Coinbase users lost over $65 million to social engineering scams, with the actual amount potentially higher.


Among the victims was a well-known figure, 67-year-old Ed Suman, an established artist in the art world for nearly two decades, having been involved in the creation of artworks such as Jeff Koons' "Balloon Dog" sculpture. Earlier this year, he fell victim to an impersonation scam involving fake Coinbase customer support, resulting in a loss of over $2 million in cryptocurrency. ZachXBT critiqued Coinbase for its inadequate handling of such scams, noting that other major exchanges have not faced similar issues and recommending Coinbase to enhance its security measures.


Amidst a series of ongoing social engineering incidents, although there has not been any impact on user assets at the technical level so far, it has raised concerns among many retail and institutional investors. Especially institutions holding massive assets on Coinbase. Just considering the U.S. BTC ETF institutions, as of mid-May 2025, they collectively hold nearly 840,000 BTC, and 75% of these are custodied by Coinbase. If we price BTC at $100,000, this amount reaches a staggering $63 billion, which is equivalent to the nominal GDP of two Iceland in the year 2024.


Visualization: ChatGPT, Source: Farside


In addition, Coinbase Custody also serves over 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, family offices, pension funds, and endowments. As of the Q1 2025 financial report, Coinbase's total assets under management (including institutional and retail clients) reached $404 billion. The specific amount of institutional custodied assets was not explicitly disclosed in the latest report, but it should still be over 50% based on the Q4 2024 report.


Visualization: ChatGPT


Once this security barrier is breached, not only could the rate of user attrition far exceed expectations, but more importantly, institutional trust in it would undermine the foundation of its business. Therefore, after a hacking event, Coinbase's stock price plummeted significantly.


CEXs are All in Self-Rescue Mode


Facing a decline in spot trading fee revenue, Coinbase is also accelerating its transformation, attempting to find growth opportunities in derivatives and emerging assets. Coinbase acquired a stake in the options platform Deribit at the end of 2024 and announced the official launch of perpetual contract products in 2025. This acquisition fills in Coinbase's gap in options trading and its relatively small global market share.



Deribit has a strong presence in non-U.S. markets, especially in Asia and Europe. The acquisition has enabled Coinbase to gain a dominant position in bitcoin and ethereum options trading on Deribit, accounting for approximately 80% of the global options trading volume, with daily trading volume remaining above $2 billion.


Meanwhile, 80-90% of Deribit's customer base consists of institutional investors, with their professionalism and liquidity in the Bitcoin and Ethereum options market highly favored by institutions. Coinbase's compliance advantage, coupled with its already robust institutional ecosystem, makes it even more suitable. By using institutions as an entry point, it can face the squeeze from giants like Binance and OKX in the derivatives market.



Facing a similar dilemma is Kraken, which is attempting to replicate Binance Futures' model in non-U.S. markets. Since the derivatives market relies more on professional users, fee rates are relatively higher and stickiness is stronger, making it a significant source of revenue for exchanges. In the first half of 2025, Kraken completed the acquisition of TradeStation Crypto and a futures exchange, aiming to build a complete derivatives trading ecosystem to hedge the risk of declining spot transaction fee income.


With the surge of Memecoin in 2024, Binance, OKX, and various CEX platforms began massively listing small-market-cap, highly volatile tokens to activate active trading users. Due to the wealth effect and trading activity of Memecoins, Coinbase was also forced to join the battle, successively listing popular tokens from the Solana ecosystem such as BOOK OF MEME and Dogwifhat. Although these coins are controversial, they are frequently traded, with fee rates several times higher than mainstream coins, serving as a "blood-boosting" method for spot trading.


However, due to its status as a publicly traded company, this practice is a riskier endeavor for Coinbase. Even in the current crypto-friendly environment, the SEC is still investigating whether tokens like SOL, ADA, and SAND constitute securities.


In addition to the forced transformation strategies carried out by the aforementioned CEXs, they are also starting to lay out RWAs and the most talked-about stablecoin payment fields, such as the PYUSD launched through a collaboration between Coinbase and Paypal, Coinbase's support for the Euro stablecoin EURC by Circle that complies with EU MiCA regulatory requirements, or the USD1 launched through a collaboration between Binance and WIFL. In the increasingly crowded trading field, many CEXs have shifted their focus from just the trading market to the application field.


The golden age of transaction fees has quietly ended, and the second half of the crypto exchange platform game has silently begun.


Arthur Hayes: Why I'm Betting on ETH While the Market Is Obsessed with SOL

"I personally have also allocated 20% to gold, expecting the price of gold to potentially rise to $10,000-20,000 by the end of this market cycle."

Key Market Insights for May 16th, how much did you miss out on?

1. On-chain Flows: $111.3M inflow to Ethereum this week; $237.6M outflow from Berachain 2. Largest Price Swings: $ETHFI, $NEIRO 3. Top News: Data: Solana Network's revenue reached $7.9M on the 13th, surpassing the sum of all other L1 and L2 chains

CryptoPunks Changes Hands Twice, Did the Originator of NFTs Finally Find Its "Forever Home" This Time?

The original NFT pioneer CryptoPunks has once again officially changed ownership after being sold to the Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) developer Yuga Labs.

MOG Coin Skyrockets as Elon Musk and Garry Tan Embrace "mog/acc" Identity

「mog/acc」 is rapidly sweeping through various figures, from Elon Musk to Garry Tan, boosting the project's visibility and ultimately driving up the price.

STARTUP's Price Surges 40x in 30 Minutes: How did he become the Emotion King of Believe?

He is both a KOL and understands the market script, playing a game where attention is the currency.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more