Tokenomics Report: Nearly $70 Billion in Tokens Set to Unlock in 2025, with an Average Meme Lifespan of Only One Year

By: blockbeats|2025/02/07 03:45:03
Share
copy
Original Title: Tokenomist Annual Report 2024
Original Source: Tokenomist
Original Translation: Nancy, PANews

In late January, Tokenomist released the "Tokenomist Annual Report 2024," covering key trends such as token unlocks, low circulating supply high FDV tokens, Memecoins, and AI proxies, revealing their impact on market liquidity, investor sentiment, and long-term value capture.

The report highlighted that 2024 began with the issuance of some significant projects with low circulating supply and high FDV (Fully Diluted Value), setting the tone for the industry's development trajectory. However, there was a shift in market sentiment mid-year. From short-term, low-cap tokens with vesting schedules to fully unlocked, community-driven meme coins, reflecting a divergence in investor preferences. By year-end, the "super MEME cycle" emerged as the dominant narrative, attracting widespread attention.

Key Highlights:

· It is expected that over $150 billion in tokens will unlock from 2024 to 2025, with approximately $82 billion absorbed in 2024 alone.

· By the end of 2024, the average circulating supply/FDV ratio at token issuance had risen to 35%;

· The 2024 MEME track had a return rate of up to 536%, far exceeding the performance of Bitcoin and Ethereum.

· The long-term success rate of Memecoins is very low, with 97% eventually "dying," and an average lifespan of about 1 year, with many tokens disappearing much sooner;

· A new crypto trend emerged combining MEME, AI, and social media, with self-sovereign entities, such as Virtuals and ai16z frameworks, leading innovation.

Top 5 Unlocking Events Before 2024

Token unlocking events are key milestones in the crypto market. Releasing locked tokens into circulation according to a preset vesting schedule can affect price and funding rates, especially in the short term. Therefore, this section analyzes the five largest unlocking events in 2024, focusing on the price impact and funding rate trends within a 60-day window (-30 to +30 days). By analyzing the relationship between funding rates and price changes, we can assess whether the market's expectations (as reflected in derivative positions) align with actual price trends. This provides valuable insights into market sentiment, particularly in critical events like token unlocks.

1. Arbitrum (ARB): $22.2 Billion Token Unlocking

Tokenomics Report: Nearly $70 Billion in Tokens Set to Unlock in 2025, with an Average Meme Lifespan of Only One Year

In March 2024, when Bitcoin hit a new all-time high of $74,000, Arbitrum (ARB) conducted the largest token unlocking event of the month, unlocking tokens worth $22.2 billion. This was the first unlocking for Arbitrum's private investors and founders/ team, introducing a significant amount of new token supply to the market.

In terms of price impact, leading up to the unlocking date, ARB's price impact steadily declined, possibly reflecting cautious trading behavior anticipating the supply increase. In the 30 days post-unlocking, ARB's price impact continued to decrease by 33.8%, possibly due to more supply entering the market.

Regarding the funding rate, ARB's funding rate closely tracked Bitcoin's funding rate over a 60-day period but remained higher than Bitcoin, indicating relatively high demand for leveraged positions during that time.

2. Sui (SUI): $12.1 Billion Token Unlocking

In May 2024, Sui (SUI) witnessed the second-largest unlocking event of the year, unlocking tokens worth $12.1 billion. This unlocking released a significant token supply, with the majority allocated to private investors.

Analyzing the price impact, SUI's price surged by 39.6% in the 30 days before the unlocking but dropped by 20.3% in the 30 days post-unlocking.

Regarding the funding rate, in the 20 days leading up to the unlocking, SUI's funding rate turned negative, reaching -34.1% on the unlocking day, displaying a pessimistic sentiment ahead of the unlocking event. Around 20 days after the unlocking, SUI's funding rate recovered and aligned with Bitcoin's funding rate (approximately 11.0%).

3. Celestia (TIA): $9.7744 Billion Token Unlocking

In October 2024, Celestia (TIA) kicked off a significant unlocking event worth $9.7744 billion. This marked the first major unlocking for TIA post its TGE event, becoming one of the largest token unlockings of the year, with the vast majority distributed to private investors and founders/ team. The dominance of private investors and founders/ team in the unlocking ensured continued incentives for long-term contributors and early supporters.

Regarding price impact, prior to unlocking, TIA's price continued to drop and fell by 25% within 20 days after unlocking. However, it quickly rebounded, surpassing BTC by 19.2% after 30 days of unlocking.

TIA's funding rate chart is more volatile compared to other tokens. On the unlocking day, TIA's funding rate remained in the negative territory (-61.1%); however, a few days after unlocking, it returned to a positive value, quickly aligning with BTC's funding rate.

4. Jito (JTO): Unlocking Value $5.6391 Billion

In December 2024, JTO concluded the year with a significant unlocking event valued at $5.6391 billion, releasing 151,909,981 JTO into circulation. The unlocking was led by the founding team, holding 57.3%, followed by private investors at 37.9%. This was not surprising.

Due to significant market volatility at that time, when observing price impact, we saw JTO's price impact shift from negative to positive twice before unlocking. Post unlocking, the price impact continued to rise, then sharply dropped to around -15%. By the end of 30 days, it shifted back from positive to negative.

The funding rate trend also reflected this volatility. In the 30 days before unlocking, JTO's funding rate roughly matched that of BTC, sometimes surpassing it and sometimes falling below. However, in the 30 days after unlocking, we observed continuous fluctuation in JTO's funding rate while BTC remained relatively stable.

5. Aptos (APT): Unlocking Value $4.236 Billion

The fifth-largest unlocking event of the year occurred in April 2024, where Aptos (APT) underwent a $4.236 billion unlocking event. The largest share in the unlocking was held by the founders/teams and private investors, with approximately 13% allocated to the community.

APT's price impact surged by approximately 51.7% in the 5 days before unlocking (from day 20 to day 15 before unlocking), driven by increased trading activity and speculation. However, starting from 15 days before unlocking, the price impact began to steadily decline. During the post-unlocking period, the price impact turned negative and remained in that state for the next 30 days. During this time, the entire crypto market also experienced a downward trend.

The funding rate trend of APT is very similar to BTC, similar to the funding rate trend of ARB. This indicates that price impact may be more due to macro factors affecting the overall market.

Analysis

By analyzing these token unlock events, it is evident that the market sentiment before and after unlocking can vary due to factors such as unlock size, market expectations, macroeconomic conditions, and other factors. Predicting outcomes based on these factors is inherently complex, but they can provide some observations to help us understand how key driving factors influence market behavior during unlock events.

As these unlock events approach, analyzing market expectations is crucial, which can be observed through price impact and funding rates. A price drop before unlock may reflect market concerns about increased supply, while a price increase may indicate market optimism or speculative behavior. Prior to the unlock in May 2024 for SUI and the unlock in October 2024 for TIA, we observed that their price impact and funding rates both showed a fairly pessimistic sentiment. This aligns with the view that unlock events are generally bearish as they dilute the supply and increase selling pressure. However, sometimes the opposite can occur; an unlock may be a bullish signal, releasing more supply into the market for buyers to snap up. As seen in the case of ARB, the funding rate before unlocking reached a high of +115.8%, indicating increased leverage demand for long positions and optimistic market sentiment.

Although these factors provide valuable insights, we must also consider the overall market conditions. During a market downturn, there may be larger factors driving the price action of a specific token, as seen in the cases of JITO and APT. The funding rates of these two tokens are closely linked to BTC's movement, or experience significant fluctuations when BTC's funding rate remains relatively stable.

Low Circulating Supply High FDV Token

Circulating supply is defined as the ratio of circulating supply to maximum supply, and has become an increasingly important metric when considering supply data. Low circulating supply high FDV (Fully Diluted Valuation) tokens, characterized by a low circulating supply at issuance but a high overall valuation, have become increasingly prominent in recent years. This pattern leads to rapid price appreciation due to limited liquidity at issuance, but often faces long-term sustainability criticism due to subsequent token unlocks putting downward pressure on the market. This section aims to examine the historical background, trends, and impacts of this token economic model, providing a data-driven perspective to assess its viability.

Despite the recent surge in popularity of low circulating supply high FDV tokens, this pattern is not a new phenomenon. It first gained significant attention during the 2020-2021 bull market. A notable example is Curve (CRV), which was issued in August 2020, and prominent crypto investor Jason Choi used CRV to highlight the risks of this pattern. Within seven hours of trading, CRV's market cap increased from $2 million to $6 million. However, the FDV of the token at issuance was almost half of Bitcoin's market cap, demonstrating that this valuation was unsustainable. Early investors faced significant losses as the price dropped by 50% shortly after issuance, attributed to inflation and early sellers exiting their positions leading to dilution.

The CRV case study reveals a key issue: the initial price trend of low circulating supply, high Fully Diluted Value (FDV) tokens may mislead investors who overlook the long-term dilution impact. Despite CRV's exaggerated inflation mechanism, it laid the foundation for a broader trend that would unfold later.

An analysis of token issuance from 2020 to 2024 shows a clear pattern in the adoption of the low circulating supply, high FDV model. These tokens were particularly prevalent at the end of 2020 and the beginning of 2024, coinciding with Bitcoin's halving and the subsequent bull market.

Over time, the crypto community has become increasingly aware of the risks posed by this pattern, prompting recent projects to make adaptive adjustments in tokenomics. One notable trend is the change in the circulating supply/FDV ratio at issuance. By the end of 2024, the average ratio had increased to around 35%, reflecting investors' greater caution. For example, Binance introduced listing criteria that consider the circulating supply at Token Generation Events (TGEs), encouraging projects to prioritize sustainable tokenomics.

To further understand the impact of the low circulating supply, high FDV model, we analyzed the performance of 2024's altcoins at issuance. We aggregated key metrics, including FDV, market cap, circulating supply at TGE, price performance, and price change, for the top 25 FDV-ranked altcoins at TGE dates.

Excluding outliers like Hyperliquid and Ondo Finance, the data shows that there is not a strong correlation between the circulating supply at TGE and this year's price performance, as visualized in the scatter plot below. There are several reasons that could account for this. Most notably, the increase in demand and liquidity, along with a greater focus on hype-driven/emotion-driven narratives in the recent bull market cycle, may have reduced the correlation between circulating supply and price performance. On the other hand, for some tokens, the evolution of tokenomics has introduced new dimensions, such as inflationary or deflationary tokenomics and staking mechanisms, which may have diluted the impact of circulating supply at TGE.

Scatter plot of 90-day price performance versus circulating supply/FDV ratio at initial pricing date. Excluding outliers like HYPE, ONDO, etc.

As mentioned above, there are also exceptions. Hyperliquid conducted a distribution of 33% of its token supply through a community airdrop at issuance, without any VC unlocks. This approach promoted decentralization and community participation, setting a benchmark for fair token distribution.

The following chart shows the total token unlock value from 2020 to 2030, revealing some significant patterns during the past two bull market cycles. The total unlock value peaked in 2021 at $136.7 billion, over eight times the value in 2020 ($16.9 billion). While not as significant, the total unlock value in 2024 ($82 billion) is roughly double that of the previous year ($47 billion). This peak aligns with the peak of the previous bull market when many projects issued large amounts of locked token allocations for future release.

Looking ahead, the market will face significant unlock pressure. From 2024 to 2025, over $150 billion in tokens are expected to unlock, with 2024 alone accounting for approximately $82 billion. This poses a short-term risk to market stability. However, as lock-up plans are completed, the reduction in unlock pressure may contribute to long-term market stability.

The low circulating supply, high FDV (Fully Diluted Valuation) token model has proven to be a double-edged sword. While it can drive rapid price appreciation, it also brings significant risks due to future dilution and unsustainable valuations. As the crypto market matures, investors and projects must carefully assess tokenomics to ensure alignment with long-term goals. Evolutions in token distribution mechanisms like Hyperliquid offer promising alternatives that focus on fairness and sustainability.

It is important to note that these forecasts are based on data from 378 tokens tracked by Tokenomist, representing a portion of the market. New token issuances and changes in existing tokenomics, such as relocking or burning mechanisms, could alter these dynamics.

MEME and AI Agents

Throughout 2024, Bitcoin maintained its dominance in the cryptocurrency market, attracting increasing investment from the traditional financial sector. However, sentiment regarding altcoins underperforming was also growing. Despite a surge in growth towards the end of the year, many altcoins failed to keep pace with Bitcoin.

Source: Glassnode x Fasanara_Digital Assets Report Q4 2024

Analysis data shows that among the top 250 market cap-ranked altcoins, only 28.1% outperformed Bitcoin, while 45.5% outperformed Ethereum.

Comparing to the broader altcoin market, one sector has significantly outperformed its peers: Memecoin. This sector showcased extraordinary growth in 2024, achieving a year-to-date return of 536%—a performance that surpasses Bitcoin and Ethereum by 177% and 300%, respectively. Notably, among the top 54 tokens by market cap launched this year, 19 were Memecoins.

Appeal of Memecoin

The remarkable success of Memecoin has raised vital questions about the reasons behind its appeal and ongoing popularity. This section explores the data and motivations behind this unique phenomenon.

· Fair Launch Model

One of the key drivers of Memecoin's appeal is its fair launch model, which allocated its entire token supply to the community from day one. This approach ensured 100% circulation, aligning with the core tenets of cryptocurrency: fairness, transparency, and decentralization. In contrast to many other projects, Memecoin avoided excessive team allocations or early investor privileges, promoting equitable participation.

This fair launch model resonated strongly with investors, especially as sentiments grew against projects with heavy venture capital backing. These projects are sometimes criticized for having convoluted tokenomics and distribution structures that may seem skewed towards early insiders.

Furthermore, Memecoin offers a simpler and more straightforward narrative compared to other altcoins, which often require significant technical expertise to assess. Memecoin focuses on community engagement and cultural relevance, making it an effective tool for attracting new cryptocurrency users.

· Community Long-Term Incentive Alignment

The traditional approach to Web3 community building heavily relies on token airdrops to incentivize early contributors. These rewards typically target individuals creating content, participating in Discord, or engaging in protocol-specific activities. While this model effectively sparks initial interest, our analysis revealed significant shortcomings in long-term community retention. Studies show that airdrop hunters often immediately sell the received tokens, especially when the distribution does not meet expectations, leading to decreased community engagement and potential negative sentiment towards the protocol.

Our research indicates that Memecoin projects have shown significant success in building sustainable communities through an innovative incentive alignment approach. These projects effectively merge the interests of the team and the community, creating a situation described by market participants as "the best marketing is price appreciation." Drawing on Murad's framework, successful crypto communities often exhibit characteristics akin to fervent followers, possessing loyal supporters and a unique common belief. This phenomenon fosters intense shared enthusiasm among participants, enhancing retention, and driving organic growth through community-driven initiatives. This approach creates a gamified environment where users feel directly tied to the project's success, motivating them to maintain long-term engagement.

· Community Takeover: A New Paradigm

A emerging trend in protocol governance is Community Takeover (CTO). When a project's original developers abandon the project, community users and token holders take over the project's future direction and management, leading to a community takeover. As the project transitions to community ownership, token holders become both owners and operators. This dual role fundamentally changes their relationship with the project. Community members must actively participate in governance, development, and marketing to maintain and enhance the value of their held tokens.

· Growth Catalyst

In 2024, a major catalyst for the Memecoin phenomenon was pump.fun, aimed at enabling more people to easily create and trade their own tokens, greatly reducing the entry barrier. Since its launch in January 2024, as of January 6, 2025, over 5,581,665 tokens have been created on pump.fun. As shown in the graph below, most Solana-based tokens are now issued through pump.fun rather than traditional methods. The success of pump.fun has also spurred competition, with other blockchain ecosystems exploring similar platforms to capitalize on the growing interest in fairly launched tokens.

· Risks and Limitations

Despite Memecoins' popularity in 2024, they still come with inherent risks. Like any newly issued token, Memecoins are essentially a trend and often experience rapid popularity and an equally fast decline. Similarly, repeated Memecoin oversaturation can weaken their impact, as illustrated by Murad's "Memecoin Pyramid," where the proportion of successful Memecoins is small compared to those that gradually fade away.

Murad's Memecoin Pyramid Source: The Meme Coin Supercycle - TOKEN2049

The long-term success rate of Memecoins is significantly lower. According to Chainplay's "2024 Memecoin Status" report, the average lifespan of Memecoins is one year, with 97% of Memecoins eventually considered "dead" (defined as having a 24-hour trading volume below $1,000, liquidity below $50,000, and no updates on Twitter within three months). Currently, only one Memecoin on pump.fun has a market capitalization exceeding $1 billion, with eight exceeding $100 million.

Another key risk is the potential for malicious activities. Despite a fair launch, insiders or developers may still control a majority of the tokens, undermining the principle of decentralization and allowing for pump and dumps. Although pump.fun combats this scenario through its bonding curve mechanism and token "graduation" to Raydium, scams may still go undetected. Even with a fair launch Memecoin, there have been cases where teams or insiders use virtual wallets to sniper meme coins. It is worth referring to websites like gmgn.ai for risk analysis indicators such as top 10 token holders, blacklist, developer activity, and a bubble chart.

AI Agents

Another prominent area in 2024 is AI agents. AI agents are essentially autonomous entities capable of performing tasks and interacting with other users/agents, leveraging blockchain technology for on-chain operations. They are likened to an enhanced version of Memecoin because they combine memes, AI, and social media elements to create autonomous entities that can interact with users and self-propagate. In 2024, we saw the emergence of key players like Virtuals and ai16z, providing frameworks for developing and deploying AI agents.

In an article about 2025 crypto predictions, Dragonfly Capital Managing Partner Haseeb Qureshi predicted that tokens related to AI agents will surpass Memecoins in the upcoming year. He believes that unlike Key Opinion Leaders (KOL) and influencers, AI agents never rest, conform to majority opinions, and are less driven by self-interest. They also excel in real-time information aggregation and amplification. Current agents like aixbt, by curating social media data to create alpha information feeds, demonstrate potential incremental improvements in the next year or two.

However, Qureshi predicts that over time, the novelty of these agents may fade. An abundance of AI agents may lead to an emotional backlash, and the crypto community may revert to supporting human preferences. Of course, this is also a natural evolution of trends. Nevertheless, Qureshi suggests that the truly transformative impact in this space will come from software engineering agents, with the potential to fundamentally change the development and security of blockchain projects.

Broader Impact

Furthermore, noteworthy is the continuous innovation in the DeFi space over the past year. OG projects like Aave maintained a strong performance, reaching record highs in deposits this year. Meanwhile, new projects like Ethena have attracted increasing attention from the traditional finance sector. RWA projects like Ondo Finance have also exceeded expectations this year, possibly driven by the increasing demand for the tokenization of financial products.

The success of Memecoins and their community-driven tokenomics has inspired other areas to adopt similar fair launch practices. For example, the DeSci token. Another noticeable trend is that, during token issuance, an increasing number of projects are allocating a larger proportion to the community.

Another anticipated potential trend is the fusion of Memecoins and utility. User @hmalivya9 proposed the concept of "Community Clusters" on X. The model suggests a staking system that would collaborate Memecoin projects with utility token projects, where Memecoin holders can stake tokens to earn rewards from multiple utility token projects. This system would be enhanced through requiring active social media participation, essentially gamifying the branding of utility tokens. hmalivya9 envisions this symbiotic relationship as a blueprint for the future structure of the crypto community, intertwining entertainment with utility, a concept not entirely new. For example, in Hyperliquid, holders of its native spot token $PURR can receive airdrops of other spot tokens within the Hyperliquid ecosystem and earn Hyperliquid Points. $PURR can only be traded within Hyperliquid, significantly expanding its user base.

In the coming year, AI agents will also see continued development. ai16z has put forward a tokenomics model where token staking serves as a validation system, granting platform access, enabling governance participation, and establishing accountability through possible penalty conditions. In this evolved staking model, stakeholders' economic incentives are directly linked to their contributions to the ecosystem's quality and growth.

Undoubtedly, 2025 will be an exciting year, whether through the evolution of existing trends or the emergence of new ones.

Original Article Link

You may also like

a16z Leads $18M Seed Round for Catena Labs, Crypto Industry Bets on Stablecoin AI Payment

Traditional finance is still stuck in a "human-to-human" model, while Catena aims to achieve "AI-to-AI" interaction.

Pharos, deeply integrated with AntChain, is about to launch. How can we get involved?

What is the relationship between the $8 million funded NewChain and Ant, and how will they interact?

$COIN Joins S&P 500, but Coinbase Isn't Celebrating

On May 13, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced that Coinbase would officially replace Discover Financial Services in the S&P 500 on May 19. While other companies like Block and MicroStrategy, closely tied to Bitcoin, were already part of the S&P 500, Coinbase became the first cryptocurrency exchange whose primary business is in the index. This also signifies that cryptocurrency is gradually moving from the fringes to the mainstream in the U.S.



On the day of the announcement, Coinbase's stock price surged by 23%, surpassing the $250 mark. However, just 3 days later, Coinbase was hit by two consecutive events: a hack where employees were bribed to steal customer data and a demand for a $20 million ransom, and an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the authenticity of its claim of having over 100 million "verified users" in its securities filings and marketing materials. These two events acted as mini-bombs, and at the time of writing, Coinbase's stock had already dropped by over 7.3%.


Coincidentally, Discover Financial Services, being replaced by Coinbase, can also be considered the "Coinbase" of the previous payment era. Discover is a U.S.-based digital banking and payment services company headquartered in Illinois, founded in 1960. Its payment network, Discover Network, is the fourth largest payment network apart from Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.


In April, after the approval of the acquisition of Discover by the sixth-largest U.S. bank, Capital One, this well-established digital banking company of over 60 years smoothly handed over its S&P 500 "seat" to this emerging cryptocurrency "bank." This unexpected coincidence also portrayed the handover between the new and old eras in Coinbase's entry into the S&P 500, resembling a relay race scene. However, this relay baton also brought Coinbase's accumulated "external troubles and internal strife" to a tipping point.


Side Effects of ETFs


Over the past decade, cryptocurrency exchanges have been the most stable "profit machines." They play a role in providing liquidity to the entire industry and rely on trading fees to sustain their operations. However, with the comprehensive rollout of ETF products in the U.S. market, this profit model is facing unprecedented challenges. As the leader in the "American stack," with over 80% of its business coming from the U.S., Coinbase is most affected by this.



Starting from the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, traditional financial capital has significantly onboarded users and funds that originally belonged to exchanges in a more cost-effective, compliant, and transparent manner. The transaction fee revenue of cryptocurrency exchanges has started to decline, and this trend may further intensify in the coming months.


According to Coinbase's 2024 Q4 financial report, the platform's total trading revenue was $417 million, a 45% year-on-year decrease. The contribution of BTC and ETH's trading revenue dropped from 65% in the same period last year to less than 50%.


This decline is not a result of a decrease in market enthusiasm. In fact, since the approval of the Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the inflow of BTC into the U.S. market has continued to reach new highs, with asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity rapidly expanding their management scale. Data shows that BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) alone has surpassed $17 billion in assets under management. As of mid-May 2025, the cumulative net inflow of 11 major institutional Bitcoin spot ETFs on the market has exceeded $41.5 billion, with a total net asset value of $1214.69 billion, accounting for approximately 5.91% of the total Bitcoin market capitalization.


Chart showing the trend of net outflows for Grayscale among the 11 institutions


Institutional investors and some retail investors are shifting towards ETF products, partly due to compliance and tax considerations. On one hand, ETFs have much lower trading costs compared to cryptocurrency exchanges. While Coinbase's spot trading fee rate varies annually in a tiered manner but averages around 1.49%, for example, the management fee for IBIT ETF is only 0.25%, and the majority of ETF institution fees fluctuate around 0.15% to 0.25%.



In other words, the more rational users are, the more likely they are to move from exchanges to ETF products, especially for investors aiming for long-term holdings.


According to multiple sources, several institutions, including VanEck and Grayscale, have submitted applications to the SEC for a Solana (SOL) ETF, with some institutions also planning to submit an XRP ETF proposal. Once approved, this may trigger a new round of fund migration. According to a report submitted by Coinbase to the SEC, as of April, the platform's trading revenue from XRP and Solana accounted for 18% and 10%, nearly one-third of the platform's fee revenue.



However, the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs passed in 2024 also reduced the fees for these two tokens on Coinbase from 30% and 15% to 26% and 10%, respectively. If the SOL and XRP ETFs are approved, it will further undermine the core fee revenue of exchanges like Coinbase.


The expansion of ETF products is gradually weakening the financial intermediary status of cryptocurrency exchanges. From their original roles as matchmakers and clearers to now gradually becoming mere "on-ramps and off-ramps" for funds, exchanges are seeing their marginal value squeezed by ETFs.


Robinhood Takes a Stand, Traditional Brokerages Join the Fray


On May 12, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins gave a keynote speech at the Tokenization and Cryptocurrency Working Group roundtable. The theme of his speech revolved around "It is a new day at the SEC," where he indicated that the SEC would not approach enforcement and regulation the same way as before but would instead pave the way for cryptocurrency assets in the U.S. market.



With signs of cryptocurrency compliance such as the SEC's "NEW DAY" declaration, an increasing number of traditional brokerages are attempting to enter the cryptocurrency industry. One of the most representative cases is the well-known U.S. brokerage Robinhood, which began expanding its crypto business in 2018. By the time of its IPO in 2021, Robinhood's crypto business revenue accounted for over 50% of the company, with a significant boost from the Dogecoin "moonshot" promoted by Musk.


In Q1 2025 earnings report, Robinhood showcased strong growth, especially in revenue from cryptocurrency and options trading. Fueled by Trump's Memecoin, cryptocurrency-related revenue reached $250 million, nearly doubling year-over-year. Consequently, Robinhood Gold subscription users reached 3.5 million, a 90% increase from the previous year, with the rapid growth of Robinhood Gold providing the company with a stable source of income.



Meanwhile, RobinHood is actively pursuing acquisitions in the cryptocurrency space. In 2024, it announced a $2 billion acquisition of the long-standing European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp. Additionally, Canada's largest cryptocurrency CEX, WonderFi, which recently went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also announced its integration with RobinHood Crypto. After obtaining virtual asset licenses in the UK, Canada, Singapore, and other markets, RobinHood has taken a proactive approach in the compliant cryptocurrency trading market.



Furthermore, an increasing number of brokerage firms are exploring the same path. Futu Securities, Tiger Brokers, and others are also dipping their toes into cryptocurrency trading, with some having applied for or obtained the VA license from the Hong Kong SFC. Although their user bases are currently small, traditional brokerages have a natural advantage in user trust, regulatory licenses, and low fee structures. This could pose a threat to native cryptocurrency platforms in the future.



User Data Breach: Is Coinbase Still Secure?


In April 2025, security researchers discovered that some Coinbase user data was leaked on the dark web. While the platform initially responded by attributing it to a "technical misinformation," it still raised concerns among users regarding its security and privacy protection. Just two days before Dow Jones Indexes announced Coinbase's addition to the S&P 500 Index, on May 11, 2025, Coinbase received an email from an unknown threat actor claiming to have obtained customer account information and internal documents, demanding a $20 million ransom to keep the data private. Subsequent investigations confirmed the data breach.


Cybercriminals obtained the data by bribing overseas customer service agents and support staff, mainly in "non-U.S. regions such as India." These agents abused their access to Coinbase's internal customer support system and stole customer data. As early as February this year, blockchain detective ZachXBT revealed on X platform that between December 2024 and January 2025, Coinbase users lost over $65 million to social engineering scams, with the actual amount potentially higher.


Among the victims was a well-known figure, 67-year-old Ed Suman, an established artist in the art world for nearly two decades, having been involved in the creation of artworks such as Jeff Koons' "Balloon Dog" sculpture. Earlier this year, he fell victim to an impersonation scam involving fake Coinbase customer support, resulting in a loss of over $2 million in cryptocurrency. ZachXBT critiqued Coinbase for its inadequate handling of such scams, noting that other major exchanges have not faced similar issues and recommending Coinbase to enhance its security measures.


Amidst a series of ongoing social engineering incidents, although there has not been any impact on user assets at the technical level so far, it has raised concerns among many retail and institutional investors. Especially institutions holding massive assets on Coinbase. Just considering the U.S. BTC ETF institutions, as of mid-May 2025, they collectively hold nearly 840,000 BTC, and 75% of these are custodied by Coinbase. If we price BTC at $100,000, this amount reaches a staggering $63 billion, which is equivalent to the nominal GDP of two Iceland in the year 2024.


Visualization: ChatGPT, Source: Farside


In addition, Coinbase Custody also serves over 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, family offices, pension funds, and endowments. As of the Q1 2025 financial report, Coinbase's total assets under management (including institutional and retail clients) reached $404 billion. The specific amount of institutional custodied assets was not explicitly disclosed in the latest report, but it should still be over 50% based on the Q4 2024 report.


Visualization: ChatGPT


Once this security barrier is breached, not only could the rate of user attrition far exceed expectations, but more importantly, institutional trust in it would undermine the foundation of its business. Therefore, after a hacking event, Coinbase's stock price plummeted significantly.


CEXs are All in Self-Rescue Mode


Facing a decline in spot trading fee revenue, Coinbase is also accelerating its transformation, attempting to find growth opportunities in derivatives and emerging assets. Coinbase acquired a stake in the options platform Deribit at the end of 2024 and announced the official launch of perpetual contract products in 2025. This acquisition fills in Coinbase's gap in options trading and its relatively small global market share.



Deribit has a strong presence in non-U.S. markets, especially in Asia and Europe. The acquisition has enabled Coinbase to gain a dominant position in bitcoin and ethereum options trading on Deribit, accounting for approximately 80% of the global options trading volume, with daily trading volume remaining above $2 billion.


Meanwhile, 80-90% of Deribit's customer base consists of institutional investors, with their professionalism and liquidity in the Bitcoin and Ethereum options market highly favored by institutions. Coinbase's compliance advantage, coupled with its already robust institutional ecosystem, makes it even more suitable. By using institutions as an entry point, it can face the squeeze from giants like Binance and OKX in the derivatives market.



Facing a similar dilemma is Kraken, which is attempting to replicate Binance Futures' model in non-U.S. markets. Since the derivatives market relies more on professional users, fee rates are relatively higher and stickiness is stronger, making it a significant source of revenue for exchanges. In the first half of 2025, Kraken completed the acquisition of TradeStation Crypto and a futures exchange, aiming to build a complete derivatives trading ecosystem to hedge the risk of declining spot transaction fee income.


With the surge of Memecoin in 2024, Binance, OKX, and various CEX platforms began massively listing small-market-cap, highly volatile tokens to activate active trading users. Due to the wealth effect and trading activity of Memecoins, Coinbase was also forced to join the battle, successively listing popular tokens from the Solana ecosystem such as BOOK OF MEME and Dogwifhat. Although these coins are controversial, they are frequently traded, with fee rates several times higher than mainstream coins, serving as a "blood-boosting" method for spot trading.


However, due to its status as a publicly traded company, this practice is a riskier endeavor for Coinbase. Even in the current crypto-friendly environment, the SEC is still investigating whether tokens like SOL, ADA, and SAND constitute securities.


In addition to the forced transformation strategies carried out by the aforementioned CEXs, they are also starting to lay out RWAs and the most talked-about stablecoin payment fields, such as the PYUSD launched through a collaboration between Coinbase and Paypal, Coinbase's support for the Euro stablecoin EURC by Circle that complies with EU MiCA regulatory requirements, or the USD1 launched through a collaboration between Binance and WIFL. In the increasingly crowded trading field, many CEXs have shifted their focus from just the trading market to the application field.


The golden age of transaction fees has quietly ended, and the second half of the crypto exchange platform game has silently begun.


Arthur Hayes: Why I'm Betting on ETH While the Market Is Obsessed with SOL

"I personally have also allocated 20% to gold, expecting the price of gold to potentially rise to $10,000-20,000 by the end of this market cycle."

Key Market Insights for May 16th, how much did you miss out on?

1. On-chain Flows: $111.3M inflow to Ethereum this week; $237.6M outflow from Berachain 2. Largest Price Swings: $ETHFI, $NEIRO 3. Top News: Data: Solana Network's revenue reached $7.9M on the 13th, surpassing the sum of all other L1 and L2 chains

May 16 Key Market Information Gap, A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report

1. Top News: Coinbase Faces Double Blow with 'SEC Investigation' and 'User Data Breach,' Stock Price Drops by 7.2% 2. Token Unlocking: $ARB, $AVAX, $PRIME, $ASTR, $1INCH

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more